Loading…

LTE and WiMAX: performance and complexity comparison for possible channel estimation techniques

SUMMARYThe similarities between the physical layer of LTE and WiMAX systems trigger the design of a unified hardware platform. As a consequence, there exists a great need to design common blocks that can be adapted to support both of them. In this paper, the choice of the channel estimator is studie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of communication systems 2013-06, Vol.26 (6), p.792-805
Main Authors: Hafez, H., Fahmy, Y.A., Khairy, M.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4300-2e0c7c1ce2ff807de02267787f77dbe85fccb38f0856bc9460c2be958f3a9fc83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4300-2e0c7c1ce2ff807de02267787f77dbe85fccb38f0856bc9460c2be958f3a9fc83
container_end_page 805
container_issue 6
container_start_page 792
container_title International journal of communication systems
container_volume 26
creator Hafez, H.
Fahmy, Y.A.
Khairy, M.M.
description SUMMARYThe similarities between the physical layer of LTE and WiMAX systems trigger the design of a unified hardware platform. As a consequence, there exists a great need to design common blocks that can be adapted to support both of them. In this paper, the choice of the channel estimator is studied where the performance and complexity trade‐off is investigated to seek a unified channel estimation design that can suit both systems under different channel conditions. The performance of different channel estimation techniques when applied to LTE and WiMAX systems is assessed and compared. Two channel profiles with different delay spreads are considered for urban macrocell and bad urban macrocell channels. Three different Doppler frequencies are assumed to illustrate the effect of users’ mobility. The estimators’ computational complexity is also thoroughly studied.Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. The similarities between the physical layer of LTE and WiMAX systems trigger the design of a unified hardware platform. In this paper, the choice of the channel estimator is studied where the performance and complexity trade‐off is investigated to seek a unified channel estimation design that can suit both systems. The performance of different channel estimation techniques when applied to LTE and WiMAX systems, with different channel delay profile and Doppler frequencies, is assessed and compared.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/dac.1370
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671595379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1671595379</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4300-2e0c7c1ce2ff807de02267787f77dbe85fccb38f0856bc9460c2be958f3a9fc83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxRdRsP4BP8KCFy9bJ5tmk_VWaq1KqwiVipeQTScY3e6uyRbbb2-qoih4msfMj5l5L4qOCHQJQHo6V7pLKIetqEMgzxNCKNneaN5LGGVkN9rz_hkARJqxTiTH02Gsqnk8s5P-w1ncoDO1W6hK40db14umxJVt1x9SOevrKg5I3NTe26LEWD-pqsIyRt_ahWptmLeonyr7ukR_EO0YVXo8_Kr70f3FcDq4TMa3o6tBf5zoHgVIUgTNNdGYGiOAzxHSNONccMP5vEDBjNYFFQYEywqd9zLQaYE5E4aq3GhB96OTz72Nqzd3W7mwXmNZqgrrpZck44TljPI8oMd_0Od66arwnSQ0E6zHQo4_C7ULRh0a2bhgz60lAblJWoak5SbpgCaf6Jstcf0vJ8_7g9-89S2uvnnlXmTGKWdydjOS5HF2J64ZyAl9B0LYjiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1368545002</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>LTE and WiMAX: performance and complexity comparison for possible channel estimation techniques</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Hafez, H. ; Fahmy, Y.A. ; Khairy, M.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hafez, H. ; Fahmy, Y.A. ; Khairy, M.M.</creatorcontrib><description>SUMMARYThe similarities between the physical layer of LTE and WiMAX systems trigger the design of a unified hardware platform. As a consequence, there exists a great need to design common blocks that can be adapted to support both of them. In this paper, the choice of the channel estimator is studied where the performance and complexity trade‐off is investigated to seek a unified channel estimation design that can suit both systems under different channel conditions. The performance of different channel estimation techniques when applied to LTE and WiMAX systems is assessed and compared. Two channel profiles with different delay spreads are considered for urban macrocell and bad urban macrocell channels. Three different Doppler frequencies are assumed to illustrate the effect of users’ mobility. The estimators’ computational complexity is also thoroughly studied.Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. The similarities between the physical layer of LTE and WiMAX systems trigger the design of a unified hardware platform. In this paper, the choice of the channel estimator is studied where the performance and complexity trade‐off is investigated to seek a unified channel estimation design that can suit both systems. The performance of different channel estimation techniques when applied to LTE and WiMAX systems, with different channel delay profile and Doppler frequencies, is assessed and compared.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1074-5351</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1131</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/dac.1370</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>channel estimation ; Channels ; Complexity ; computational complexity ; Delay ; Design engineering ; Doppler effect ; Estimators ; Interoperability ; LTE ; WiMAX ; Wireless communication</subject><ispartof>International journal of communication systems, 2013-06, Vol.26 (6), p.792-805</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4300-2e0c7c1ce2ff807de02267787f77dbe85fccb38f0856bc9460c2be958f3a9fc83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4300-2e0c7c1ce2ff807de02267787f77dbe85fccb38f0856bc9460c2be958f3a9fc83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hafez, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fahmy, Y.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khairy, M.M.</creatorcontrib><title>LTE and WiMAX: performance and complexity comparison for possible channel estimation techniques</title><title>International journal of communication systems</title><addtitle>Int. J. Commun. Syst</addtitle><description>SUMMARYThe similarities between the physical layer of LTE and WiMAX systems trigger the design of a unified hardware platform. As a consequence, there exists a great need to design common blocks that can be adapted to support both of them. In this paper, the choice of the channel estimator is studied where the performance and complexity trade‐off is investigated to seek a unified channel estimation design that can suit both systems under different channel conditions. The performance of different channel estimation techniques when applied to LTE and WiMAX systems is assessed and compared. Two channel profiles with different delay spreads are considered for urban macrocell and bad urban macrocell channels. Three different Doppler frequencies are assumed to illustrate the effect of users’ mobility. The estimators’ computational complexity is also thoroughly studied.Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. The similarities between the physical layer of LTE and WiMAX systems trigger the design of a unified hardware platform. In this paper, the choice of the channel estimator is studied where the performance and complexity trade‐off is investigated to seek a unified channel estimation design that can suit both systems. The performance of different channel estimation techniques when applied to LTE and WiMAX systems, with different channel delay profile and Doppler frequencies, is assessed and compared.</description><subject>channel estimation</subject><subject>Channels</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>computational complexity</subject><subject>Delay</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Doppler effect</subject><subject>Estimators</subject><subject>Interoperability</subject><subject>LTE</subject><subject>WiMAX</subject><subject>Wireless communication</subject><issn>1074-5351</issn><issn>1099-1131</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxRdRsP4BP8KCFy9bJ5tmk_VWaq1KqwiVipeQTScY3e6uyRbbb2-qoih4msfMj5l5L4qOCHQJQHo6V7pLKIetqEMgzxNCKNneaN5LGGVkN9rz_hkARJqxTiTH02Gsqnk8s5P-w1ncoDO1W6hK40db14umxJVt1x9SOevrKg5I3NTe26LEWD-pqsIyRt_ahWptmLeonyr7ukR_EO0YVXo8_Kr70f3FcDq4TMa3o6tBf5zoHgVIUgTNNdGYGiOAzxHSNONccMP5vEDBjNYFFQYEywqd9zLQaYE5E4aq3GhB96OTz72Nqzd3W7mwXmNZqgrrpZck44TljPI8oMd_0Od66arwnSQ0E6zHQo4_C7ULRh0a2bhgz60lAblJWoak5SbpgCaf6Jstcf0vJ8_7g9-89S2uvnnlXmTGKWdydjOS5HF2J64ZyAl9B0LYjiQ</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Hafez, H.</creator><creator>Fahmy, Y.A.</creator><creator>Khairy, M.M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>LTE and WiMAX: performance and complexity comparison for possible channel estimation techniques</title><author>Hafez, H. ; Fahmy, Y.A. ; Khairy, M.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4300-2e0c7c1ce2ff807de02267787f77dbe85fccb38f0856bc9460c2be958f3a9fc83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>channel estimation</topic><topic>Channels</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>computational complexity</topic><topic>Delay</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Doppler effect</topic><topic>Estimators</topic><topic>Interoperability</topic><topic>LTE</topic><topic>WiMAX</topic><topic>Wireless communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hafez, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fahmy, Y.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khairy, M.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>International journal of communication systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hafez, H.</au><au>Fahmy, Y.A.</au><au>Khairy, M.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>LTE and WiMAX: performance and complexity comparison for possible channel estimation techniques</atitle><jtitle>International journal of communication systems</jtitle><addtitle>Int. J. Commun. Syst</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>792</spage><epage>805</epage><pages>792-805</pages><issn>1074-5351</issn><eissn>1099-1131</eissn><abstract>SUMMARYThe similarities between the physical layer of LTE and WiMAX systems trigger the design of a unified hardware platform. As a consequence, there exists a great need to design common blocks that can be adapted to support both of them. In this paper, the choice of the channel estimator is studied where the performance and complexity trade‐off is investigated to seek a unified channel estimation design that can suit both systems under different channel conditions. The performance of different channel estimation techniques when applied to LTE and WiMAX systems is assessed and compared. Two channel profiles with different delay spreads are considered for urban macrocell and bad urban macrocell channels. Three different Doppler frequencies are assumed to illustrate the effect of users’ mobility. The estimators’ computational complexity is also thoroughly studied.Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. The similarities between the physical layer of LTE and WiMAX systems trigger the design of a unified hardware platform. In this paper, the choice of the channel estimator is studied where the performance and complexity trade‐off is investigated to seek a unified channel estimation design that can suit both systems. The performance of different channel estimation techniques when applied to LTE and WiMAX systems, with different channel delay profile and Doppler frequencies, is assessed and compared.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/dac.1370</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1074-5351
ispartof International journal of communication systems, 2013-06, Vol.26 (6), p.792-805
issn 1074-5351
1099-1131
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671595379
source Wiley
subjects channel estimation
Channels
Complexity
computational complexity
Delay
Design engineering
Doppler effect
Estimators
Interoperability
LTE
WiMAX
Wireless communication
title LTE and WiMAX: performance and complexity comparison for possible channel estimation techniques
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T01%3A58%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=LTE%20and%20WiMAX:%20performance%20and%20complexity%20comparison%20for%20possible%20channel%20estimation%20techniques&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20communication%20systems&rft.au=Hafez,%20H.&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=792&rft.epage=805&rft.pages=792-805&rft.issn=1074-5351&rft.eissn=1099-1131&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/dac.1370&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671595379%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4300-2e0c7c1ce2ff807de02267787f77dbe85fccb38f0856bc9460c2be958f3a9fc83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1368545002&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true