Loading…
LTE and WiMAX: performance and complexity comparison for possible channel estimation techniques
SUMMARYThe similarities between the physical layer of LTE and WiMAX systems trigger the design of a unified hardware platform. As a consequence, there exists a great need to design common blocks that can be adapted to support both of them. In this paper, the choice of the channel estimator is studie...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of communication systems 2013-06, Vol.26 (6), p.792-805 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4300-2e0c7c1ce2ff807de02267787f77dbe85fccb38f0856bc9460c2be958f3a9fc83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4300-2e0c7c1ce2ff807de02267787f77dbe85fccb38f0856bc9460c2be958f3a9fc83 |
container_end_page | 805 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 792 |
container_title | International journal of communication systems |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Hafez, H. Fahmy, Y.A. Khairy, M.M. |
description | SUMMARYThe similarities between the physical layer of LTE and WiMAX systems trigger the design of a unified hardware platform. As a consequence, there exists a great need to design common blocks that can be adapted to support both of them. In this paper, the choice of the channel estimator is studied where the performance and complexity trade‐off is investigated to seek a unified channel estimation design that can suit both systems under different channel conditions. The performance of different channel estimation techniques when applied to LTE and WiMAX systems is assessed and compared. Two channel profiles with different delay spreads are considered for urban macrocell and bad urban macrocell channels. Three different Doppler frequencies are assumed to illustrate the effect of users’ mobility. The estimators’ computational complexity is also thoroughly studied.Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
The similarities between the physical layer of LTE and WiMAX systems trigger the design of a unified hardware platform. In this paper, the choice of the channel estimator is studied where the performance and complexity trade‐off is investigated to seek a unified channel estimation design that can suit both systems. The performance of different channel estimation techniques when applied to LTE and WiMAX systems, with different channel delay profile and Doppler frequencies, is assessed and compared. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/dac.1370 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671595379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1671595379</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4300-2e0c7c1ce2ff807de02267787f77dbe85fccb38f0856bc9460c2be958f3a9fc83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxRdRsP4BP8KCFy9bJ5tmk_VWaq1KqwiVipeQTScY3e6uyRbbb2-qoih4msfMj5l5L4qOCHQJQHo6V7pLKIetqEMgzxNCKNneaN5LGGVkN9rz_hkARJqxTiTH02Gsqnk8s5P-w1ncoDO1W6hK40db14umxJVt1x9SOevrKg5I3NTe26LEWD-pqsIyRt_ahWptmLeonyr7ukR_EO0YVXo8_Kr70f3FcDq4TMa3o6tBf5zoHgVIUgTNNdGYGiOAzxHSNONccMP5vEDBjNYFFQYEywqd9zLQaYE5E4aq3GhB96OTz72Nqzd3W7mwXmNZqgrrpZck44TljPI8oMd_0Od66arwnSQ0E6zHQo4_C7ULRh0a2bhgz60lAblJWoak5SbpgCaf6Jstcf0vJ8_7g9-89S2uvnnlXmTGKWdydjOS5HF2J64ZyAl9B0LYjiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1368545002</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>LTE and WiMAX: performance and complexity comparison for possible channel estimation techniques</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Hafez, H. ; Fahmy, Y.A. ; Khairy, M.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hafez, H. ; Fahmy, Y.A. ; Khairy, M.M.</creatorcontrib><description>SUMMARYThe similarities between the physical layer of LTE and WiMAX systems trigger the design of a unified hardware platform. As a consequence, there exists a great need to design common blocks that can be adapted to support both of them. In this paper, the choice of the channel estimator is studied where the performance and complexity trade‐off is investigated to seek a unified channel estimation design that can suit both systems under different channel conditions. The performance of different channel estimation techniques when applied to LTE and WiMAX systems is assessed and compared. Two channel profiles with different delay spreads are considered for urban macrocell and bad urban macrocell channels. Three different Doppler frequencies are assumed to illustrate the effect of users’ mobility. The estimators’ computational complexity is also thoroughly studied.Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
The similarities between the physical layer of LTE and WiMAX systems trigger the design of a unified hardware platform. In this paper, the choice of the channel estimator is studied where the performance and complexity trade‐off is investigated to seek a unified channel estimation design that can suit both systems. The performance of different channel estimation techniques when applied to LTE and WiMAX systems, with different channel delay profile and Doppler frequencies, is assessed and compared.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1074-5351</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1131</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/dac.1370</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>channel estimation ; Channels ; Complexity ; computational complexity ; Delay ; Design engineering ; Doppler effect ; Estimators ; Interoperability ; LTE ; WiMAX ; Wireless communication</subject><ispartof>International journal of communication systems, 2013-06, Vol.26 (6), p.792-805</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4300-2e0c7c1ce2ff807de02267787f77dbe85fccb38f0856bc9460c2be958f3a9fc83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4300-2e0c7c1ce2ff807de02267787f77dbe85fccb38f0856bc9460c2be958f3a9fc83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hafez, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fahmy, Y.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khairy, M.M.</creatorcontrib><title>LTE and WiMAX: performance and complexity comparison for possible channel estimation techniques</title><title>International journal of communication systems</title><addtitle>Int. J. Commun. Syst</addtitle><description>SUMMARYThe similarities between the physical layer of LTE and WiMAX systems trigger the design of a unified hardware platform. As a consequence, there exists a great need to design common blocks that can be adapted to support both of them. In this paper, the choice of the channel estimator is studied where the performance and complexity trade‐off is investigated to seek a unified channel estimation design that can suit both systems under different channel conditions. The performance of different channel estimation techniques when applied to LTE and WiMAX systems is assessed and compared. Two channel profiles with different delay spreads are considered for urban macrocell and bad urban macrocell channels. Three different Doppler frequencies are assumed to illustrate the effect of users’ mobility. The estimators’ computational complexity is also thoroughly studied.Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
The similarities between the physical layer of LTE and WiMAX systems trigger the design of a unified hardware platform. In this paper, the choice of the channel estimator is studied where the performance and complexity trade‐off is investigated to seek a unified channel estimation design that can suit both systems. The performance of different channel estimation techniques when applied to LTE and WiMAX systems, with different channel delay profile and Doppler frequencies, is assessed and compared.</description><subject>channel estimation</subject><subject>Channels</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>computational complexity</subject><subject>Delay</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Doppler effect</subject><subject>Estimators</subject><subject>Interoperability</subject><subject>LTE</subject><subject>WiMAX</subject><subject>Wireless communication</subject><issn>1074-5351</issn><issn>1099-1131</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxRdRsP4BP8KCFy9bJ5tmk_VWaq1KqwiVipeQTScY3e6uyRbbb2-qoih4msfMj5l5L4qOCHQJQHo6V7pLKIetqEMgzxNCKNneaN5LGGVkN9rz_hkARJqxTiTH02Gsqnk8s5P-w1ncoDO1W6hK40db14umxJVt1x9SOevrKg5I3NTe26LEWD-pqsIyRt_ahWptmLeonyr7ukR_EO0YVXo8_Kr70f3FcDq4TMa3o6tBf5zoHgVIUgTNNdGYGiOAzxHSNONccMP5vEDBjNYFFQYEywqd9zLQaYE5E4aq3GhB96OTz72Nqzd3W7mwXmNZqgrrpZck44TljPI8oMd_0Od66arwnSQ0E6zHQo4_C7ULRh0a2bhgz60lAblJWoak5SbpgCaf6Jstcf0vJ8_7g9-89S2uvnnlXmTGKWdydjOS5HF2J64ZyAl9B0LYjiQ</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Hafez, H.</creator><creator>Fahmy, Y.A.</creator><creator>Khairy, M.M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>LTE and WiMAX: performance and complexity comparison for possible channel estimation techniques</title><author>Hafez, H. ; Fahmy, Y.A. ; Khairy, M.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4300-2e0c7c1ce2ff807de02267787f77dbe85fccb38f0856bc9460c2be958f3a9fc83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>channel estimation</topic><topic>Channels</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>computational complexity</topic><topic>Delay</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Doppler effect</topic><topic>Estimators</topic><topic>Interoperability</topic><topic>LTE</topic><topic>WiMAX</topic><topic>Wireless communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hafez, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fahmy, Y.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khairy, M.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>International journal of communication systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hafez, H.</au><au>Fahmy, Y.A.</au><au>Khairy, M.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>LTE and WiMAX: performance and complexity comparison for possible channel estimation techniques</atitle><jtitle>International journal of communication systems</jtitle><addtitle>Int. J. Commun. Syst</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>792</spage><epage>805</epage><pages>792-805</pages><issn>1074-5351</issn><eissn>1099-1131</eissn><abstract>SUMMARYThe similarities between the physical layer of LTE and WiMAX systems trigger the design of a unified hardware platform. As a consequence, there exists a great need to design common blocks that can be adapted to support both of them. In this paper, the choice of the channel estimator is studied where the performance and complexity trade‐off is investigated to seek a unified channel estimation design that can suit both systems under different channel conditions. The performance of different channel estimation techniques when applied to LTE and WiMAX systems is assessed and compared. Two channel profiles with different delay spreads are considered for urban macrocell and bad urban macrocell channels. Three different Doppler frequencies are assumed to illustrate the effect of users’ mobility. The estimators’ computational complexity is also thoroughly studied.Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
The similarities between the physical layer of LTE and WiMAX systems trigger the design of a unified hardware platform. In this paper, the choice of the channel estimator is studied where the performance and complexity trade‐off is investigated to seek a unified channel estimation design that can suit both systems. The performance of different channel estimation techniques when applied to LTE and WiMAX systems, with different channel delay profile and Doppler frequencies, is assessed and compared.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/dac.1370</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1074-5351 |
ispartof | International journal of communication systems, 2013-06, Vol.26 (6), p.792-805 |
issn | 1074-5351 1099-1131 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1671595379 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | channel estimation Channels Complexity computational complexity Delay Design engineering Doppler effect Estimators Interoperability LTE WiMAX Wireless communication |
title | LTE and WiMAX: performance and complexity comparison for possible channel estimation techniques |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T01%3A58%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=LTE%20and%20WiMAX:%20performance%20and%20complexity%20comparison%20for%20possible%20channel%20estimation%20techniques&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20communication%20systems&rft.au=Hafez,%20H.&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=792&rft.epage=805&rft.pages=792-805&rft.issn=1074-5351&rft.eissn=1099-1131&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/dac.1370&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671595379%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4300-2e0c7c1ce2ff807de02267787f77dbe85fccb38f0856bc9460c2be958f3a9fc83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1368545002&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |