Loading…
Quality of life after mild to moderate trauma
Abstract Introduction To evaluate potential reduction in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after a mild to moderate trauma. Materials and methods Follow-up study of a cohort of 153 trauma patients admitted to the High Dependency Unit of the Emergency Department of the University-Hospital of Flo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Injury 2015-05, Vol.46 (5), p.902-908 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract Introduction To evaluate potential reduction in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after a mild to moderate trauma. Materials and methods Follow-up study of a cohort of 153 trauma patients admitted to the High Dependency Unit of the Emergency Department of the University-Hospital of Florence from July 2008 to February 2012. After 6 months from the event, a telephone interview using the Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Health Composite Score (SF12) was conducted. Patients reported their HRQOL both at present and before trauma. Scores ≥50 represent no disability; 40–49, mild disability; 30–39, moderate disability; and below 30, severe disability. Results Before the event 143 (93%) subjects reported a normal PCS and MCS. After the events, a significantly lower proportion of patients maintained a normal PCS and MCS values (52 and 68%, all p < 0.01). One, two, three and four PCS items worsened in 14%, 15%, 18% and 38% of the study population, while one, two, three or four MCS dimensions worsened in 12%, 19%, 19% and 24%. We identified 109 subjects (N+), which showed normal PCS and MCS values before trauma, in the absence of any pre-existing medical condition. After the event, we observed a significant PCS (before: 54, standard deviation, SD 6; after 43, SD 11, p < 0.0001) and MCS (before: 55, SD 7; after 47, SD 11, p < 0.0001) worsening among N+ subjects. Distribution across the four disability categories was 52, 24, 17 and 6% for MCS score and 38, 25, 27 and 11% for PCS score: overall 8 (7%) patients reported a moderate disability and 5 (5%) reported a severe disability in both dimensions. Compared with subjects with preserved values, patients with an abnormal ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0020-1383 1879-0267 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.injury.2014.11.033 |