Loading…
Students' mental models with respect to flood risk in the Netherlands
Until now various quantitative studies have shown that adults and students in the Netherlands have low flood risk perceptions. In this study we interviewed fifty 15-year-old students in two different flood prone areas. In order to find out how they think and reason about the risk of flooding, the me...
Saved in:
Published in: | International research in geographical and environmental education 2015-04, Vol.24 (2), p.131-147 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-a890c256394e870d691c33de9388b357f225f2770ee11283cbb88187213ffd713 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-a890c256394e870d691c33de9388b357f225f2770ee11283cbb88187213ffd713 |
container_end_page | 147 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 131 |
container_title | International research in geographical and environmental education |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Bosschaart, Adwin Kuiper, Wilmad van der Schee, Joop |
description | Until now various quantitative studies have shown that adults and students in the Netherlands have low flood risk perceptions. In this study we interviewed fifty 15-year-old students in two different flood prone areas. In order to find out how they think and reason about the risk of flooding, the mental model approach was used. Flood risk turned out to be not very salient and the mental models had a piecemeal character with fundamental misconceptions. Furthermore, the mental models consisted largely of descriptive concepts instead of concepts about underlying processes with respect to explaining and predicting flooding. Concepts with respect to hazard adjustments and disaster response were lacking most. Conclusions about how to use the results of this study in geography education were discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10382046.2014.993171 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_rmit_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1676350171</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1056782</ericid><informt_id>10.3316/aeipt.206433</informt_id><sourcerecordid>1676350171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-a890c256394e870d691c33de9388b357f225f2770ee11283cbb88187213ffd713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtP3DAUhaOqSKXAP2gl79pNBl_fxHZWVYuGlxAsoGvL40fHbRKntkeIf0-G0C7Z-Fo63zn36lTVJ6AroJKeAkXJaMNXjEKz6joEAe-qQxCNqAUHeD__Z6TeMx-qjzn_ppQil3BYre_Lzrqx5C9kmIfuyRCt6zN5DGVLksuTM4WUSHwfoyUp5D8kjKRsHbl185t6Pdp8XB143Wd38jqPqp_n64ezy_rm7uLq7PtNbRoGpdayo4a1HLvGSUEt78AgWtehlBtshWes9UwI6hwAk2g2GylBCgbovRWAR9XXJXdK8e_O5aKGkI3r5yNc3GUFXHBsKbygzYKaFHNOzqsphUGnJwVU7VtT_1pT-9bU0tps-7zYXArmv2V9DbTlQrJZ_7HoaQhFaRemoralTFlZXbQKo48vSky_lI1hvwwR-CvJKG8Q55BvS8iC68eYequKfupj8kmPJmSFb575DCxtktk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1676350171</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Students' mental models with respect to flood risk in the Netherlands</title><source>Taylor & Francis</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Bosschaart, Adwin ; Kuiper, Wilmad ; van der Schee, Joop</creator><creatorcontrib>Bosschaart, Adwin ; Kuiper, Wilmad ; van der Schee, Joop</creatorcontrib><description>Until now various quantitative studies have shown that adults and students in the Netherlands have low flood risk perceptions. In this study we interviewed fifty 15-year-old students in two different flood prone areas. In order to find out how they think and reason about the risk of flooding, the mental model approach was used. Flood risk turned out to be not very salient and the mental models had a piecemeal character with fundamental misconceptions. Furthermore, the mental models consisted largely of descriptive concepts instead of concepts about underlying processes with respect to explaining and predicting flooding. Concepts with respect to hazard adjustments and disaster response were lacking most. Conclusions about how to use the results of this study in geography education were discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1038-2046</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-7611</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10382046.2014.993171</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>15-year-old students ; Environmental awareness ; flood risk ; Foreign Countries ; Geography ; geography education ; Geography Instruction ; Geography teaching ; Interviews ; Mental models ; Misconceptions ; Natural Disasters ; Netherlands ; Prediction ; Qualitative Research ; Risk ; Risk management ; Schemata (Cognition) ; Secondary education ; Secondary School Students ; Semi Structured Interviews ; Student Attitudes ; Teaching Methods ; the Netherlands</subject><ispartof>International research in geographical and environmental education, 2015-04, Vol.24 (2), p.131-147</ispartof><rights>2014 Taylor & Francis 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-a890c256394e870d691c33de9388b357f225f2770ee11283cbb88187213ffd713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-a890c256394e870d691c33de9388b357f225f2770ee11283cbb88187213ffd713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1056782$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bosschaart, Adwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuiper, Wilmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Schee, Joop</creatorcontrib><title>Students' mental models with respect to flood risk in the Netherlands</title><title>International research in geographical and environmental education</title><description>Until now various quantitative studies have shown that adults and students in the Netherlands have low flood risk perceptions. In this study we interviewed fifty 15-year-old students in two different flood prone areas. In order to find out how they think and reason about the risk of flooding, the mental model approach was used. Flood risk turned out to be not very salient and the mental models had a piecemeal character with fundamental misconceptions. Furthermore, the mental models consisted largely of descriptive concepts instead of concepts about underlying processes with respect to explaining and predicting flooding. Concepts with respect to hazard adjustments and disaster response were lacking most. Conclusions about how to use the results of this study in geography education were discussed.</description><subject>15-year-old students</subject><subject>Environmental awareness</subject><subject>flood risk</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>geography education</subject><subject>Geography Instruction</subject><subject>Geography teaching</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Mental models</subject><subject>Misconceptions</subject><subject>Natural Disasters</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Schemata (Cognition)</subject><subject>Secondary education</subject><subject>Secondary School Students</subject><subject>Semi Structured Interviews</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>the Netherlands</subject><issn>1038-2046</issn><issn>1747-7611</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtP3DAUhaOqSKXAP2gl79pNBl_fxHZWVYuGlxAsoGvL40fHbRKntkeIf0-G0C7Z-Fo63zn36lTVJ6AroJKeAkXJaMNXjEKz6joEAe-qQxCNqAUHeD__Z6TeMx-qjzn_ppQil3BYre_Lzrqx5C9kmIfuyRCt6zN5DGVLksuTM4WUSHwfoyUp5D8kjKRsHbl185t6Pdp8XB143Wd38jqPqp_n64ezy_rm7uLq7PtNbRoGpdayo4a1HLvGSUEt78AgWtehlBtshWes9UwI6hwAk2g2GylBCgbovRWAR9XXJXdK8e_O5aKGkI3r5yNc3GUFXHBsKbygzYKaFHNOzqsphUGnJwVU7VtT_1pT-9bU0tps-7zYXArmv2V9DbTlQrJZ_7HoaQhFaRemoralTFlZXbQKo48vSky_lI1hvwwR-CvJKG8Q55BvS8iC68eYequKfupj8kmPJmSFb575DCxtktk</recordid><startdate>20150403</startdate><enddate>20150403</enddate><creator>Bosschaart, Adwin</creator><creator>Kuiper, Wilmad</creator><creator>van der Schee, Joop</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150403</creationdate><title>Students' mental models with respect to flood risk in the Netherlands</title><author>Bosschaart, Adwin ; Kuiper, Wilmad ; van der Schee, Joop</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-a890c256394e870d691c33de9388b357f225f2770ee11283cbb88187213ffd713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>15-year-old students</topic><topic>Environmental awareness</topic><topic>flood risk</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>geography education</topic><topic>Geography Instruction</topic><topic>Geography teaching</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Mental models</topic><topic>Misconceptions</topic><topic>Natural Disasters</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Schemata (Cognition)</topic><topic>Secondary education</topic><topic>Secondary School Students</topic><topic>Semi Structured Interviews</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>the Netherlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bosschaart, Adwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuiper, Wilmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Schee, Joop</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International research in geographical and environmental education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bosschaart, Adwin</au><au>Kuiper, Wilmad</au><au>van der Schee, Joop</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1056782</ericid><atitle>Students' mental models with respect to flood risk in the Netherlands</atitle><jtitle>International research in geographical and environmental education</jtitle><date>2015-04-03</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>147</epage><pages>131-147</pages><issn>1038-2046</issn><eissn>1747-7611</eissn><abstract>Until now various quantitative studies have shown that adults and students in the Netherlands have low flood risk perceptions. In this study we interviewed fifty 15-year-old students in two different flood prone areas. In order to find out how they think and reason about the risk of flooding, the mental model approach was used. Flood risk turned out to be not very salient and the mental models had a piecemeal character with fundamental misconceptions. Furthermore, the mental models consisted largely of descriptive concepts instead of concepts about underlying processes with respect to explaining and predicting flooding. Concepts with respect to hazard adjustments and disaster response were lacking most. Conclusions about how to use the results of this study in geography education were discussed.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/10382046.2014.993171</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1038-2046 |
ispartof | International research in geographical and environmental education, 2015-04, Vol.24 (2), p.131-147 |
issn | 1038-2046 1747-7611 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1676350171 |
source | Taylor & Francis; ERIC |
subjects | 15-year-old students Environmental awareness flood risk Foreign Countries Geography geography education Geography Instruction Geography teaching Interviews Mental models Misconceptions Natural Disasters Netherlands Prediction Qualitative Research Risk Risk management Schemata (Cognition) Secondary education Secondary School Students Semi Structured Interviews Student Attitudes Teaching Methods the Netherlands |
title | Students' mental models with respect to flood risk in the Netherlands |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T16%3A32%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_rmit_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Students'%20mental%20models%20with%20respect%20to%20flood%20risk%20in%20the%20Netherlands&rft.jtitle=International%20research%20in%20geographical%20and%20environmental%20education&rft.au=Bosschaart,%20Adwin&rft.date=2015-04-03&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=147&rft.pages=131-147&rft.issn=1038-2046&rft.eissn=1747-7611&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10382046.2014.993171&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_rmit_%3E1676350171%3C/proquest_rmit_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-a890c256394e870d691c33de9388b357f225f2770ee11283cbb88187213ffd713%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1676350171&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1056782&rft_informt_id=10.3316/aeipt.206433&rfr_iscdi=true |