Loading…

Evaluation of microelectrode array data using Bayesian modeling as an approach to screening and prioritization for neurotoxicity testing

► MEA data from cortical cultures treated with 30 chemicals were analyzed using a Bayesian approach. ► The probability of chemical effect on firing rate distributions across electrodes was determined. ► These probabilities can be used to determine chemical “hits” and prioritize chemicals for testing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neurotoxicology (Park Forest South) 2013-05, Vol.36, p.34-41
Main Authors: LeFew, William R., McConnell, Emma R., Crooks, James L., Shafer, Timothy J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-fc2db60c867a92a589f978c1f6eb4a790529cc1e099e6e019a3a696437a20563
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-fc2db60c867a92a589f978c1f6eb4a790529cc1e099e6e019a3a696437a20563
container_end_page 41
container_issue
container_start_page 34
container_title Neurotoxicology (Park Forest South)
container_volume 36
creator LeFew, William R.
McConnell, Emma R.
Crooks, James L.
Shafer, Timothy J.
description ► MEA data from cortical cultures treated with 30 chemicals were analyzed using a Bayesian approach. ► The probability of chemical effect on firing rate distributions across electrodes was determined. ► These probabilities can be used to determine chemical “hits” and prioritize chemicals for testing. ► The Bayesian approach was less robust at detecting hits than the weighted mean firing rate. ► The weighted mean firing rate and Bayesian combined correctly classified >95% of chemicals. The need to assess large numbers of chemicals for their potential toxicities has resulted in increased emphasis on medium- and high-throughput in vitro screening approaches. For such approaches to be useful, efficient and reliable data analysis and hit detection methods are also required. Assessment of chemical effects on neuronal network activity using microelectrode arrays (MEAs) has been proposed as a screening tool for neurotoxicity. The current study examined a Bayesian data analysis approach for assessing effects of a 30 chemical training set on activity of primary cortical neurons grown in multi-well MEA plates. Each well of the MEA plate contained 64 microelectrodes and the data set contains the number of electrical spikes registered by each electrode over the course of each experiment. A Bayesian data analysis approach was developed and then applied to several different parsings of the data set to produce probability determinations for hit selection and ranking. This methodology results in an approach that is approximately 74% sensitive in detecting chemicals in the training set known to alter neuronal function (23 expected positives) while being 100% specific in detecting chemicals expected to have no effect (7 expected negatives). Additionally, this manuscript demonstrates that the Bayesian approach may be combined with a previously published weighted mean firing rate approach in order to produce a more robust hit detection method. In particular, when combined with the weighted mean firing rate approach, the joint analysis produces a sensitivity of approximately 96% and a specificity of 100%. These results demonstrate the utility of a novel approach to analysis of MEA data and support the use of neuronal networks grown on MEAs as a for neurotoxicity screening approach.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neuro.2013.02.006
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1676356724</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0161813X13000260</els_id><sourcerecordid>1676356724</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-fc2db60c867a92a589f978c1f6eb4a790529cc1e099e6e019a3a696437a20563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcuO1DAQRS0EYnoavgAJeYPEJsGPxI4XLGA0A0gjsZkFO6vaqYBbSdzYzmiaL-CzcT-AHawsu065bt1LyAvOas64erOtZ1xiqAXjsmaiZkw9IiveaVEZzfljsioUrzouv1yQy5S2jPFWK_OUXAjZtI1SfEV-Xt_DuED2YaZhoJN3MeCILsfQI4UYYU97yECX5Oev9D3sMXmY6VTK4-EFEi1X2O1iAPeN5kCTi4jzsTb3dBd9iD77H6cZQ4j0KDuHB-983tOMKRf4GXkywJjw-flck7ub67urj9Xt5w-frt7dVq4RIleDE_1GMdcpDUZA25nB6M7xQeGmAW1YK4xzHJkxqJBxAxKUUY3UIFir5Jq8Pn1b9H5fymg7-eRwHGHGsCTLlVayVVo0_0dlqxtj2mL_msgTWtxLKeJgy9oTxL3lzB7Cslt73NoewrJM2BJW6Xp5HrBsJuz_9PxOpwCvzgAkB-MQYXY-_eV0I03HdOHenjgsxt17jDY5j7PD3scSpe2D_6eQXxcgtj8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1357499501</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of microelectrode array data using Bayesian modeling as an approach to screening and prioritization for neurotoxicity testing</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>LeFew, William R. ; McConnell, Emma R. ; Crooks, James L. ; Shafer, Timothy J.</creator><creatorcontrib>LeFew, William R. ; McConnell, Emma R. ; Crooks, James L. ; Shafer, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><description>► MEA data from cortical cultures treated with 30 chemicals were analyzed using a Bayesian approach. ► The probability of chemical effect on firing rate distributions across electrodes was determined. ► These probabilities can be used to determine chemical “hits” and prioritize chemicals for testing. ► The Bayesian approach was less robust at detecting hits than the weighted mean firing rate. ► The weighted mean firing rate and Bayesian combined correctly classified &gt;95% of chemicals. The need to assess large numbers of chemicals for their potential toxicities has resulted in increased emphasis on medium- and high-throughput in vitro screening approaches. For such approaches to be useful, efficient and reliable data analysis and hit detection methods are also required. Assessment of chemical effects on neuronal network activity using microelectrode arrays (MEAs) has been proposed as a screening tool for neurotoxicity. The current study examined a Bayesian data analysis approach for assessing effects of a 30 chemical training set on activity of primary cortical neurons grown in multi-well MEA plates. Each well of the MEA plate contained 64 microelectrodes and the data set contains the number of electrical spikes registered by each electrode over the course of each experiment. A Bayesian data analysis approach was developed and then applied to several different parsings of the data set to produce probability determinations for hit selection and ranking. This methodology results in an approach that is approximately 74% sensitive in detecting chemicals in the training set known to alter neuronal function (23 expected positives) while being 100% specific in detecting chemicals expected to have no effect (7 expected negatives). Additionally, this manuscript demonstrates that the Bayesian approach may be combined with a previously published weighted mean firing rate approach in order to produce a more robust hit detection method. In particular, when combined with the weighted mean firing rate approach, the joint analysis produces a sensitivity of approximately 96% and a specificity of 100%. These results demonstrate the utility of a novel approach to analysis of MEA data and support the use of neuronal networks grown on MEAs as a for neurotoxicity screening approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-813X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2013.02.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23454661</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Action Potentials - physiology ; Animals ; Bayes Theorem ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical screening ; Data analysis ; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Microelectrode array ; Microelectrodes ; Models, Neurological ; Neurons - physiology ; Neurotoxicity ; Neurotoxicity Syndromes - diagnosis ; Prevention and actions ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>Neurotoxicology (Park Forest South), 2013-05, Vol.36, p.34-41</ispartof><rights>2013</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-fc2db60c867a92a589f978c1f6eb4a790529cc1e099e6e019a3a696437a20563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-fc2db60c867a92a589f978c1f6eb4a790529cc1e099e6e019a3a696437a20563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27439807$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23454661$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LeFew, William R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McConnell, Emma R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crooks, James L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shafer, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of microelectrode array data using Bayesian modeling as an approach to screening and prioritization for neurotoxicity testing</title><title>Neurotoxicology (Park Forest South)</title><addtitle>Neurotoxicology</addtitle><description>► MEA data from cortical cultures treated with 30 chemicals were analyzed using a Bayesian approach. ► The probability of chemical effect on firing rate distributions across electrodes was determined. ► These probabilities can be used to determine chemical “hits” and prioritize chemicals for testing. ► The Bayesian approach was less robust at detecting hits than the weighted mean firing rate. ► The weighted mean firing rate and Bayesian combined correctly classified &gt;95% of chemicals. The need to assess large numbers of chemicals for their potential toxicities has resulted in increased emphasis on medium- and high-throughput in vitro screening approaches. For such approaches to be useful, efficient and reliable data analysis and hit detection methods are also required. Assessment of chemical effects on neuronal network activity using microelectrode arrays (MEAs) has been proposed as a screening tool for neurotoxicity. The current study examined a Bayesian data analysis approach for assessing effects of a 30 chemical training set on activity of primary cortical neurons grown in multi-well MEA plates. Each well of the MEA plate contained 64 microelectrodes and the data set contains the number of electrical spikes registered by each electrode over the course of each experiment. A Bayesian data analysis approach was developed and then applied to several different parsings of the data set to produce probability determinations for hit selection and ranking. This methodology results in an approach that is approximately 74% sensitive in detecting chemicals in the training set known to alter neuronal function (23 expected positives) while being 100% specific in detecting chemicals expected to have no effect (7 expected negatives). Additionally, this manuscript demonstrates that the Bayesian approach may be combined with a previously published weighted mean firing rate approach in order to produce a more robust hit detection method. In particular, when combined with the weighted mean firing rate approach, the joint analysis produces a sensitivity of approximately 96% and a specificity of 100%. These results demonstrate the utility of a novel approach to analysis of MEA data and support the use of neuronal networks grown on MEAs as a for neurotoxicity screening approach.</description><subject>Action Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical screening</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microelectrode array</subject><subject>Microelectrodes</subject><subject>Models, Neurological</subject><subject>Neurons - physiology</subject><subject>Neurotoxicity</subject><subject>Neurotoxicity Syndromes - diagnosis</subject><subject>Prevention and actions</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>0161-813X</issn><issn>1872-9711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkcuO1DAQRS0EYnoavgAJeYPEJsGPxI4XLGA0A0gjsZkFO6vaqYBbSdzYzmiaL-CzcT-AHawsu065bt1LyAvOas64erOtZ1xiqAXjsmaiZkw9IiveaVEZzfljsioUrzouv1yQy5S2jPFWK_OUXAjZtI1SfEV-Xt_DuED2YaZhoJN3MeCILsfQI4UYYU97yECX5Oev9D3sMXmY6VTK4-EFEi1X2O1iAPeN5kCTi4jzsTb3dBd9iD77H6cZQ4j0KDuHB-983tOMKRf4GXkywJjw-flck7ub67urj9Xt5w-frt7dVq4RIleDE_1GMdcpDUZA25nB6M7xQeGmAW1YK4xzHJkxqJBxAxKUUY3UIFir5Jq8Pn1b9H5fymg7-eRwHGHGsCTLlVayVVo0_0dlqxtj2mL_msgTWtxLKeJgy9oTxL3lzB7Cslt73NoewrJM2BJW6Xp5HrBsJuz_9PxOpwCvzgAkB-MQYXY-_eV0I03HdOHenjgsxt17jDY5j7PD3scSpe2D_6eQXxcgtj8</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>LeFew, William R.</creator><creator>McConnell, Emma R.</creator><creator>Crooks, James L.</creator><creator>Shafer, Timothy J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>Evaluation of microelectrode array data using Bayesian modeling as an approach to screening and prioritization for neurotoxicity testing</title><author>LeFew, William R. ; McConnell, Emma R. ; Crooks, James L. ; Shafer, Timothy J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-fc2db60c867a92a589f978c1f6eb4a790529cc1e099e6e019a3a696437a20563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Action Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical screening</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microelectrode array</topic><topic>Microelectrodes</topic><topic>Models, Neurological</topic><topic>Neurons - physiology</topic><topic>Neurotoxicity</topic><topic>Neurotoxicity Syndromes - diagnosis</topic><topic>Prevention and actions</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LeFew, William R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McConnell, Emma R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crooks, James L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shafer, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Neurotoxicology (Park Forest South)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LeFew, William R.</au><au>McConnell, Emma R.</au><au>Crooks, James L.</au><au>Shafer, Timothy J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of microelectrode array data using Bayesian modeling as an approach to screening and prioritization for neurotoxicity testing</atitle><jtitle>Neurotoxicology (Park Forest South)</jtitle><addtitle>Neurotoxicology</addtitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>36</volume><spage>34</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>34-41</pages><issn>0161-813X</issn><eissn>1872-9711</eissn><abstract>► MEA data from cortical cultures treated with 30 chemicals were analyzed using a Bayesian approach. ► The probability of chemical effect on firing rate distributions across electrodes was determined. ► These probabilities can be used to determine chemical “hits” and prioritize chemicals for testing. ► The Bayesian approach was less robust at detecting hits than the weighted mean firing rate. ► The weighted mean firing rate and Bayesian combined correctly classified &gt;95% of chemicals. The need to assess large numbers of chemicals for their potential toxicities has resulted in increased emphasis on medium- and high-throughput in vitro screening approaches. For such approaches to be useful, efficient and reliable data analysis and hit detection methods are also required. Assessment of chemical effects on neuronal network activity using microelectrode arrays (MEAs) has been proposed as a screening tool for neurotoxicity. The current study examined a Bayesian data analysis approach for assessing effects of a 30 chemical training set on activity of primary cortical neurons grown in multi-well MEA plates. Each well of the MEA plate contained 64 microelectrodes and the data set contains the number of electrical spikes registered by each electrode over the course of each experiment. A Bayesian data analysis approach was developed and then applied to several different parsings of the data set to produce probability determinations for hit selection and ranking. This methodology results in an approach that is approximately 74% sensitive in detecting chemicals in the training set known to alter neuronal function (23 expected positives) while being 100% specific in detecting chemicals expected to have no effect (7 expected negatives). Additionally, this manuscript demonstrates that the Bayesian approach may be combined with a previously published weighted mean firing rate approach in order to produce a more robust hit detection method. In particular, when combined with the weighted mean firing rate approach, the joint analysis produces a sensitivity of approximately 96% and a specificity of 100%. These results demonstrate the utility of a novel approach to analysis of MEA data and support the use of neuronal networks grown on MEAs as a for neurotoxicity screening approach.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>23454661</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuro.2013.02.006</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-813X
ispartof Neurotoxicology (Park Forest South), 2013-05, Vol.36, p.34-41
issn 0161-813X
1872-9711
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1676356724
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Action Potentials - physiology
Animals
Bayes Theorem
Biological and medical sciences
Chemical screening
Data analysis
Drug Evaluation, Preclinical
Humans
Medical sciences
Microelectrode array
Microelectrodes
Models, Neurological
Neurons - physiology
Neurotoxicity
Neurotoxicity Syndromes - diagnosis
Prevention and actions
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Toxicology
title Evaluation of microelectrode array data using Bayesian modeling as an approach to screening and prioritization for neurotoxicity testing
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T00%3A15%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20microelectrode%20array%20data%20using%20Bayesian%20modeling%20as%20an%20approach%20to%20screening%20and%20prioritization%20for%20neurotoxicity%20testing&rft.jtitle=Neurotoxicology%20(Park%20Forest%20South)&rft.au=LeFew,%20William%20R.&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=36&rft.spage=34&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=34-41&rft.issn=0161-813X&rft.eissn=1872-9711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuro.2013.02.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1676356724%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-fc2db60c867a92a589f978c1f6eb4a790529cc1e099e6e019a3a696437a20563%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1357499501&rft_id=info:pmid/23454661&rfr_iscdi=true