The Reliability and Adaptive Responses of Gross Efficiency in Hot Ambient Conditions

• Published in: International journal of sports medicine 2014-09, Vol.35 (10), p.817-821
• Main Author: Waldron, M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acclimatization; Adult; Athletic Performance - physiology; Bicycling - physiology; Biological and medical sciences; Body Temperature Regulation; Energy Metabolism - physiology; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Heart Rate; Hot Temperature; Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology; Humans; Lactic Acid - blood; Medical sciences; Oxygen Consumption; Physiology & Biochemistry; Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports
• ISSN: 0172-4622; 1439-3964
• DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1367013

Abstract This study evaluated the reliability and adaptive responses of cycling gross efficiency (GE) performed at different intensities, across 3 trials in simulated hot (~30°C) temperatures. Twelve cyclists performed 3 hot (30±0.7ºC and RH of 50±2.9%) GE sessions, comprising 3 sub-maximal work rates of 150 W, 200 W and 250 W (5-min each), separated by 24-h. Paired t -tests revealed no changes ( P >0.05) in GE between trials. 95% limits of agreement demonstrated random error in GE ranging from 1.71% (250 W; trials 1–2) to 2.32% (200 W; trials 1–2), leading to a total error of -2.45%. The coefficient of variation (CV%) ranged from 3.1±0.4% (250 W; trials 1–2) to 4.0±0.5% (200 W; trials 1–2). Among non-acclimated, well-trained cyclists, GE did not change between consecutive submaximal cycling bouts performed in the heat. The reliability of GE when cycling in the heat (CV=3.1–4.0%) is similar to that reported among cyclists in thermoneutral environments. Whilst the interpretation of GE reliability was dependent on the adopted statistical technique, it can be small enough to detect typical changes owing to heat exposure.