Loading…
Predator Interference across Trophic Chains
Conflict between ratio-dependent views of trophic interactions finds its simplest resolution in the comparison of steady-state responses of trophic chain to increases in primary productivity. We analyze data on trophic abundances of lake ecosystems with a general trophic-chain model that is intermed...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecology (Durham) 1995-06, Vol.76 (4), p.1310-1319 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5150-f43a980ae8000370ff83bfa174aeb30c79cfe9163d8c939fa28cf58dbb03fc53 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 1319 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1310 |
container_title | Ecology (Durham) |
container_volume | 76 |
creator | McCarthy, Michael A. Ginzburg, Lev R. Akçakaya, H. Resit |
description | Conflict between ratio-dependent views of trophic interactions finds its simplest resolution in the comparison of steady-state responses of trophic chain to increases in primary productivity. We analyze data on trophic abundances of lake ecosystems with a general trophic-chain model that is intermediate between prey dependence and ratio dependence, and can describe either of the two extremes, depending on parameter values. We estimate, for all trophic levels, the set of interference coefficients that predicts the observed statistical relationship between biomasses of adjacent trophic levels. This constitutes a test of two competing theories, since the model we use is a prey-dependent model if all interference coefficients are ≈ 0, and a ratio-dependent model if they are ≈ 1. The results show that the observed relationships among trophic levels in lake ecosystems are compatible with a ratio-dependent parameterization of this model, with interference distributed relatively evenly across trophic chains, and are incompatible with a pure prey dependent parameterization. We suggest that approximate ratio dependence applied uniformly across trophic chains is a more plausible description of lake ecosystems than either pure prey dependence (non-interference) or "concentrated interference" (prey dependence at some trophic levels and partial interference in others). |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/1940937 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16764472</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A17087686</galeid><jstor_id>1940937</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A17087686</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5150-f43a980ae8000370ff83bfa174aeb30c79cfe9163d8c939fa28cf58dbb03fc53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10U1rGzEQBmBRGqiblP4F04bkkGw7s9rVxzGYfEEgOfjSkxjLo2TNWutINiH_vkptWiixdBCIh5mXGSG-IvyoJeifaBuwUn8QI7TSVhY1fBQjAKwrq1rzSXzOeQHlYGNG4uwh8ZzWQxrfxjWnwImj5zH5NOQ8nqZh9dT58eSJupiPxEGgPvOX3XsopleX08lNdXd_fTu5uKt8iy1UoZFkDRCb0kRqCMHIWSDUDfFMgtfWB7ao5Nz4kjBQbXxozXw2Axl8Kw_FybbsKg3PG85rt-yy576nyMMmO1RaNY2uC_z2H1wMmxRLNFejBUQwsqDv-xDWVjV1Y-Ct5_lWPVLProthWCfyjxw5UT9EDl35viijNFoZVXj1Di93zsvOv-dPt_7PWBMHt0rdktKrQ3BvW3O7rRV5vItL2VMfEkXf5b9cKqVbaQqTW_ZSGr3uq-YuJ7_Q2rbMCyXCv-KLXDa-N8Nviv-saw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219011083</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predator Interference across Trophic Chains</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley Online (Archive)</source><creator>McCarthy, Michael A. ; Ginzburg, Lev R. ; Akçakaya, H. Resit</creator><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Michael A. ; Ginzburg, Lev R. ; Akçakaya, H. Resit</creatorcontrib><description>Conflict between ratio-dependent views of trophic interactions finds its simplest resolution in the comparison of steady-state responses of trophic chain to increases in primary productivity. We analyze data on trophic abundances of lake ecosystems with a general trophic-chain model that is intermediate between prey dependence and ratio dependence, and can describe either of the two extremes, depending on parameter values. We estimate, for all trophic levels, the set of interference coefficients that predicts the observed statistical relationship between biomasses of adjacent trophic levels. This constitutes a test of two competing theories, since the model we use is a prey-dependent model if all interference coefficients are ≈ 0, and a ratio-dependent model if they are ≈ 1. The results show that the observed relationships among trophic levels in lake ecosystems are compatible with a ratio-dependent parameterization of this model, with interference distributed relatively evenly across trophic chains, and are incompatible with a pure prey dependent parameterization. We suggest that approximate ratio dependence applied uniformly across trophic chains is a more plausible description of lake ecosystems than either pure prey dependence (non-interference) or "concentrated interference" (prey dependence at some trophic levels and partial interference in others).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1940937</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECGYAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: The Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Behavior ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Biotic communities ; Ecosystem models ; Food chains (Ecology) ; Fresh water ecosystems ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Lake ecology ; Lentic systems ; Modeling ; Phytoplankton ; Predation ; Predators ; Predatory animals ; Regression analysis ; Synecology ; Trophic levels ; Zooplankton</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 1995-06, Vol.76 (4), p.1310-1319</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1995 The Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1995 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1995 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Jun 1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5150-f43a980ae8000370ff83bfa174aeb30c79cfe9163d8c939fa28cf58dbb03fc53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1940937$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1940937$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1410,27901,27902,46024,46448,58213,58446</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3667538$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginzburg, Lev R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akçakaya, H. Resit</creatorcontrib><title>Predator Interference across Trophic Chains</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><description>Conflict between ratio-dependent views of trophic interactions finds its simplest resolution in the comparison of steady-state responses of trophic chain to increases in primary productivity. We analyze data on trophic abundances of lake ecosystems with a general trophic-chain model that is intermediate between prey dependence and ratio dependence, and can describe either of the two extremes, depending on parameter values. We estimate, for all trophic levels, the set of interference coefficients that predicts the observed statistical relationship between biomasses of adjacent trophic levels. This constitutes a test of two competing theories, since the model we use is a prey-dependent model if all interference coefficients are ≈ 0, and a ratio-dependent model if they are ≈ 1. The results show that the observed relationships among trophic levels in lake ecosystems are compatible with a ratio-dependent parameterization of this model, with interference distributed relatively evenly across trophic chains, and are incompatible with a pure prey dependent parameterization. We suggest that approximate ratio dependence applied uniformly across trophic chains is a more plausible description of lake ecosystems than either pure prey dependence (non-interference) or "concentrated interference" (prey dependence at some trophic levels and partial interference in others).</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biotic communities</subject><subject>Ecosystem models</subject><subject>Food chains (Ecology)</subject><subject>Fresh water ecosystems</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Lake ecology</subject><subject>Lentic systems</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Predatory animals</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Trophic levels</subject><subject>Zooplankton</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10U1rGzEQBmBRGqiblP4F04bkkGw7s9rVxzGYfEEgOfjSkxjLo2TNWutINiH_vkptWiixdBCIh5mXGSG-IvyoJeifaBuwUn8QI7TSVhY1fBQjAKwrq1rzSXzOeQHlYGNG4uwh8ZzWQxrfxjWnwImj5zH5NOQ8nqZh9dT58eSJupiPxEGgPvOX3XsopleX08lNdXd_fTu5uKt8iy1UoZFkDRCb0kRqCMHIWSDUDfFMgtfWB7ao5Nz4kjBQbXxozXw2Axl8Kw_FybbsKg3PG85rt-yy576nyMMmO1RaNY2uC_z2H1wMmxRLNFejBUQwsqDv-xDWVjV1Y-Ct5_lWPVLProthWCfyjxw5UT9EDl35viijNFoZVXj1Di93zsvOv-dPt_7PWBMHt0rdktKrQ3BvW3O7rRV5vItL2VMfEkXf5b9cKqVbaQqTW_ZSGr3uq-YuJ7_Q2rbMCyXCv-KLXDa-N8Nviv-saw</recordid><startdate>199506</startdate><enddate>199506</enddate><creator>McCarthy, Michael A.</creator><creator>Ginzburg, Lev R.</creator><creator>Akçakaya, H. Resit</creator><general>The Ecological Society of America</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><general>Brooklyn Botanic Garden, etc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199506</creationdate><title>Predator Interference across Trophic Chains</title><author>McCarthy, Michael A. ; Ginzburg, Lev R. ; Akçakaya, H. Resit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5150-f43a980ae8000370ff83bfa174aeb30c79cfe9163d8c939fa28cf58dbb03fc53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biotic communities</topic><topic>Ecosystem models</topic><topic>Food chains (Ecology)</topic><topic>Fresh water ecosystems</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Lake ecology</topic><topic>Lentic systems</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Predatory animals</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Trophic levels</topic><topic>Zooplankton</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginzburg, Lev R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akçakaya, H. Resit</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCarthy, Michael A.</au><au>Ginzburg, Lev R.</au><au>Akçakaya, H. Resit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predator Interference across Trophic Chains</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><date>1995-06</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1310</spage><epage>1319</epage><pages>1310-1319</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><coden>ECGYAQ</coden><abstract>Conflict between ratio-dependent views of trophic interactions finds its simplest resolution in the comparison of steady-state responses of trophic chain to increases in primary productivity. We analyze data on trophic abundances of lake ecosystems with a general trophic-chain model that is intermediate between prey dependence and ratio dependence, and can describe either of the two extremes, depending on parameter values. We estimate, for all trophic levels, the set of interference coefficients that predicts the observed statistical relationship between biomasses of adjacent trophic levels. This constitutes a test of two competing theories, since the model we use is a prey-dependent model if all interference coefficients are ≈ 0, and a ratio-dependent model if they are ≈ 1. The results show that the observed relationships among trophic levels in lake ecosystems are compatible with a ratio-dependent parameterization of this model, with interference distributed relatively evenly across trophic chains, and are incompatible with a pure prey dependent parameterization. We suggest that approximate ratio dependence applied uniformly across trophic chains is a more plausible description of lake ecosystems than either pure prey dependence (non-interference) or "concentrated interference" (prey dependence at some trophic levels and partial interference in others).</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>The Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.2307/1940937</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-9658 |
ispartof | Ecology (Durham), 1995-06, Vol.76 (4), p.1310-1319 |
issn | 0012-9658 1939-9170 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16764472 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley Online (Archive) |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Behavior Biological and medical sciences Biomass Biotic communities Ecosystem models Food chains (Ecology) Fresh water ecosystems Freshwater Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Lake ecology Lentic systems Modeling Phytoplankton Predation Predators Predatory animals Regression analysis Synecology Trophic levels Zooplankton |
title | Predator Interference across Trophic Chains |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T03%3A09%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predator%20Interference%20across%20Trophic%20Chains&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=McCarthy,%20Michael%20A.&rft.date=1995-06&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1310&rft.epage=1319&rft.pages=1310-1319&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.coden=ECGYAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1940937&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA17087686%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5150-f43a980ae8000370ff83bfa174aeb30c79cfe9163d8c939fa28cf58dbb03fc53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219011083&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A17087686&rft_jstor_id=1940937&rfr_iscdi=true |