Loading…
Relationship between Neurocardiogenic Syncope and Ventricular Repolarization
Background We aimed to analyze ventricular repolarization in neurocardiogenic syncope (NCS) patients by using T‐peak‐T‐end interval, T‐peak‐T‐end/QT ratio, T‐peak‐T‐end/QTc ratio and corrected QT interval (QTc), QT dispersion (QTd), QT index (QTI) and corrected QT interval index (QTcI) comparing wit...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 2015-05, Vol.38 (5), p.625-629 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3679-696fccd878bf91c50773d7ed76fcb894cde3a37ab785abe5404a7f0f148440b93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3679-696fccd878bf91c50773d7ed76fcb894cde3a37ab785abe5404a7f0f148440b93 |
container_end_page | 629 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 625 |
container_title | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | SUCU, MURAT OZER, ORHAN DAVUTOGLU, VEDAT ERCAN, SULEYMAN YUCE, MURAT COSKUN, FATMA YILMAZ |
description | Background
We aimed to analyze ventricular repolarization in neurocardiogenic syncope (NCS) patients by using T‐peak‐T‐end interval, T‐peak‐T‐end/QT ratio, T‐peak‐T‐end/QTc ratio and corrected QT interval (QTc), QT dispersion (QTd), QT index (QTI) and corrected QT interval index (QTcI) comparing with the corrected JT dispersion (JTcd), and corrected JT (JTc) and the corrected JT interval index (JTcI), by inspecting ventricular activation until termination of repolarization. These parameters are used as an index of potential ventricular arrhythmogenesis.
Methods
We have studied patients with head‐up tilt table test (HUTT) (+) (33 patients; mean age: 28 ± 11 years) and HUTT (–) as control group (33 patients; mean age: 30 ± 11 years). In all patients, T‐peak‐T‐end interval, T‐peak‐T‐end/QT ratio, T‐peak‐T‐end/QTc ratio, QT, QTd, QTI, QTc, QTcI, JTd, JTc, and JTcI were measured on electrocardiogram.
Results
The following parameters were statistically significant between groups: QTd (22.72 ± 17.54 msn; 11.21 ± 13.40 msn; P = 0.004), QTc (424.27 ± 33.75 msn; 403.66 ± 38.08 msn; P = 0.023), QTcI (114.09 ± 14, 29%; 106.71 ± 15.33%, P = 0.047), and QTI (100.72 ± 7.19%; 97.14 ± 7.13%, P = 0.046). Furthermore, T‐peak‐T‐end interval was significantly prolonged in the study group (93.78 ± 20.27 msn; 81.21 ± 11.66 msn; P = 0.003). T‐peak‐T‐end/QT ratio was significantly higher in the study group (0.24 ± 0.04 msn; 0.22 ± 0.04 msn; P = 0.030). T‐peak‐T‐end/QTc ratio was significantly higher in the study group (0.22 ± 0.04 msn; 0.20 ± 0.03 msn; P = 0.015). The JTc and JTd were also significantly higher in the study group ([103.00 ± 9, 72%; 95.44 ± 10.26%, P = 0.003], [27.57 ± 16.01 msn; 10.45 ± 16.08 msn; P < 0.001], respectively).
Conclusions
Electrocardiographic ventricular repolarization parameters including T‐peak‐T‐end interval, T‐peak‐T‐end/QT ratio, T‐peak‐T‐end/QTc ratio, QTc, QTd, QTI, QTcI, JTc, JTd, and JTI are prolonged in NCS. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/pace.12599 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1676591928</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1676591928</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3679-696fccd878bf91c50773d7ed76fcb894cde3a37ab785abe5404a7f0f148440b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EgvLY8AEoS4SUYjd2bC-rqrSIUlB5dGk5zgQMaRLsRKV8PaEtLJnNSKNzjzQXoVOCu6Sdy0ob6JIek3IHdQijOBSEyV3UwYTyUERCHqBD798wxjGmbB8d9FhMGZG9DprMINe1LQv_aqsggXoJUARTaFxptEtt-QKFNcHDqjBlBYEu0uAZitpZ0-TaBTOoynbbr7XjGO1lOvdwst1H6Olq-DgYh5O70fWgPwlNFHMZxjLOjEkFF0kmiWGY8yjlkPL2nAhJTQqRjrhOuGA6gfYhqnmGM0IFpTiR0RE633grV3404Gu1sN5AnusCysYrEvOYyfY_0aIXG9S40nsHmaqcXWi3UgSrn_bUT3tq3V4Ln229TbKA9A_9rasFyAZY2hxW_6jUfX8w_JWGm4z1NXz-ZbR7VzGPOFPz6UiNxze38_G0p26jb6Txiqo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1676591928</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relationship between Neurocardiogenic Syncope and Ventricular Repolarization</title><source>SPORTDiscus database</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>SUCU, MURAT ; OZER, ORHAN ; DAVUTOGLU, VEDAT ; ERCAN, SULEYMAN ; YUCE, MURAT ; COSKUN, FATMA YILMAZ</creator><creatorcontrib>SUCU, MURAT ; OZER, ORHAN ; DAVUTOGLU, VEDAT ; ERCAN, SULEYMAN ; YUCE, MURAT ; COSKUN, FATMA YILMAZ</creatorcontrib><description>Background
We aimed to analyze ventricular repolarization in neurocardiogenic syncope (NCS) patients by using T‐peak‐T‐end interval, T‐peak‐T‐end/QT ratio, T‐peak‐T‐end/QTc ratio and corrected QT interval (QTc), QT dispersion (QTd), QT index (QTI) and corrected QT interval index (QTcI) comparing with the corrected JT dispersion (JTcd), and corrected JT (JTc) and the corrected JT interval index (JTcI), by inspecting ventricular activation until termination of repolarization. These parameters are used as an index of potential ventricular arrhythmogenesis.
Methods
We have studied patients with head‐up tilt table test (HUTT) (+) (33 patients; mean age: 28 ± 11 years) and HUTT (–) as control group (33 patients; mean age: 30 ± 11 years). In all patients, T‐peak‐T‐end interval, T‐peak‐T‐end/QT ratio, T‐peak‐T‐end/QTc ratio, QT, QTd, QTI, QTc, QTcI, JTd, JTc, and JTcI were measured on electrocardiogram.
Results
The following parameters were statistically significant between groups: QTd (22.72 ± 17.54 msn; 11.21 ± 13.40 msn; P = 0.004), QTc (424.27 ± 33.75 msn; 403.66 ± 38.08 msn; P = 0.023), QTcI (114.09 ± 14, 29%; 106.71 ± 15.33%, P = 0.047), and QTI (100.72 ± 7.19%; 97.14 ± 7.13%, P = 0.046). Furthermore, T‐peak‐T‐end interval was significantly prolonged in the study group (93.78 ± 20.27 msn; 81.21 ± 11.66 msn; P = 0.003). T‐peak‐T‐end/QT ratio was significantly higher in the study group (0.24 ± 0.04 msn; 0.22 ± 0.04 msn; P = 0.030). T‐peak‐T‐end/QTc ratio was significantly higher in the study group (0.22 ± 0.04 msn; 0.20 ± 0.03 msn; P = 0.015). The JTc and JTd were also significantly higher in the study group ([103.00 ± 9, 72%; 95.44 ± 10.26%, P = 0.003], [27.57 ± 16.01 msn; 10.45 ± 16.08 msn; P < 0.001], respectively).
Conclusions
Electrocardiographic ventricular repolarization parameters including T‐peak‐T‐end interval, T‐peak‐T‐end/QT ratio, T‐peak‐T‐end/QTc ratio, QTc, QTd, QTI, QTcI, JTc, JTd, and JTI are prolonged in NCS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-8389</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/pace.12599</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25645192</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; electrocardiogram ; Electrocardiography ; Female ; Heart Ventricles - physiopathology ; Humans ; Male ; neurocardiogenic syncope ; repolarization ; Syncope, Vasovagal - physiopathology ; Tilt-Table Test</subject><ispartof>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 2015-05, Vol.38 (5), p.625-629</ispartof><rights>2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3679-696fccd878bf91c50773d7ed76fcb894cde3a37ab785abe5404a7f0f148440b93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3679-696fccd878bf91c50773d7ed76fcb894cde3a37ab785abe5404a7f0f148440b93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25645192$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SUCU, MURAT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OZER, ORHAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAVUTOGLU, VEDAT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ERCAN, SULEYMAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YUCE, MURAT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COSKUN, FATMA YILMAZ</creatorcontrib><title>Relationship between Neurocardiogenic Syncope and Ventricular Repolarization</title><title>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</title><addtitle>Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology</addtitle><description>Background
We aimed to analyze ventricular repolarization in neurocardiogenic syncope (NCS) patients by using T‐peak‐T‐end interval, T‐peak‐T‐end/QT ratio, T‐peak‐T‐end/QTc ratio and corrected QT interval (QTc), QT dispersion (QTd), QT index (QTI) and corrected QT interval index (QTcI) comparing with the corrected JT dispersion (JTcd), and corrected JT (JTc) and the corrected JT interval index (JTcI), by inspecting ventricular activation until termination of repolarization. These parameters are used as an index of potential ventricular arrhythmogenesis.
Methods
We have studied patients with head‐up tilt table test (HUTT) (+) (33 patients; mean age: 28 ± 11 years) and HUTT (–) as control group (33 patients; mean age: 30 ± 11 years). In all patients, T‐peak‐T‐end interval, T‐peak‐T‐end/QT ratio, T‐peak‐T‐end/QTc ratio, QT, QTd, QTI, QTc, QTcI, JTd, JTc, and JTcI were measured on electrocardiogram.
Results
The following parameters were statistically significant between groups: QTd (22.72 ± 17.54 msn; 11.21 ± 13.40 msn; P = 0.004), QTc (424.27 ± 33.75 msn; 403.66 ± 38.08 msn; P = 0.023), QTcI (114.09 ± 14, 29%; 106.71 ± 15.33%, P = 0.047), and QTI (100.72 ± 7.19%; 97.14 ± 7.13%, P = 0.046). Furthermore, T‐peak‐T‐end interval was significantly prolonged in the study group (93.78 ± 20.27 msn; 81.21 ± 11.66 msn; P = 0.003). T‐peak‐T‐end/QT ratio was significantly higher in the study group (0.24 ± 0.04 msn; 0.22 ± 0.04 msn; P = 0.030). T‐peak‐T‐end/QTc ratio was significantly higher in the study group (0.22 ± 0.04 msn; 0.20 ± 0.03 msn; P = 0.015). The JTc and JTd were also significantly higher in the study group ([103.00 ± 9, 72%; 95.44 ± 10.26%, P = 0.003], [27.57 ± 16.01 msn; 10.45 ± 16.08 msn; P < 0.001], respectively).
Conclusions
Electrocardiographic ventricular repolarization parameters including T‐peak‐T‐end interval, T‐peak‐T‐end/QT ratio, T‐peak‐T‐end/QTc ratio, QTc, QTd, QTI, QTcI, JTc, JTd, and JTI are prolonged in NCS.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>electrocardiogram</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Ventricles - physiopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>neurocardiogenic syncope</subject><subject>repolarization</subject><subject>Syncope, Vasovagal - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tilt-Table Test</subject><issn>0147-8389</issn><issn>1540-8159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EgvLY8AEoS4SUYjd2bC-rqrSIUlB5dGk5zgQMaRLsRKV8PaEtLJnNSKNzjzQXoVOCu6Sdy0ob6JIek3IHdQijOBSEyV3UwYTyUERCHqBD798wxjGmbB8d9FhMGZG9DprMINe1LQv_aqsggXoJUARTaFxptEtt-QKFNcHDqjBlBYEu0uAZitpZ0-TaBTOoynbbr7XjGO1lOvdwst1H6Olq-DgYh5O70fWgPwlNFHMZxjLOjEkFF0kmiWGY8yjlkPL2nAhJTQqRjrhOuGA6gfYhqnmGM0IFpTiR0RE633grV3404Gu1sN5AnusCysYrEvOYyfY_0aIXG9S40nsHmaqcXWi3UgSrn_bUT3tq3V4Ln229TbKA9A_9rasFyAZY2hxW_6jUfX8w_JWGm4z1NXz-ZbR7VzGPOFPz6UiNxze38_G0p26jb6Txiqo</recordid><startdate>201505</startdate><enddate>201505</enddate><creator>SUCU, MURAT</creator><creator>OZER, ORHAN</creator><creator>DAVUTOGLU, VEDAT</creator><creator>ERCAN, SULEYMAN</creator><creator>YUCE, MURAT</creator><creator>COSKUN, FATMA YILMAZ</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201505</creationdate><title>Relationship between Neurocardiogenic Syncope and Ventricular Repolarization</title><author>SUCU, MURAT ; OZER, ORHAN ; DAVUTOGLU, VEDAT ; ERCAN, SULEYMAN ; YUCE, MURAT ; COSKUN, FATMA YILMAZ</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3679-696fccd878bf91c50773d7ed76fcb894cde3a37ab785abe5404a7f0f148440b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>electrocardiogram</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Ventricles - physiopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>neurocardiogenic syncope</topic><topic>repolarization</topic><topic>Syncope, Vasovagal - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tilt-Table Test</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SUCU, MURAT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OZER, ORHAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAVUTOGLU, VEDAT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ERCAN, SULEYMAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YUCE, MURAT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COSKUN, FATMA YILMAZ</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SUCU, MURAT</au><au>OZER, ORHAN</au><au>DAVUTOGLU, VEDAT</au><au>ERCAN, SULEYMAN</au><au>YUCE, MURAT</au><au>COSKUN, FATMA YILMAZ</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relationship between Neurocardiogenic Syncope and Ventricular Repolarization</atitle><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology</addtitle><date>2015-05</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>625</spage><epage>629</epage><pages>625-629</pages><issn>0147-8389</issn><eissn>1540-8159</eissn><abstract>Background
We aimed to analyze ventricular repolarization in neurocardiogenic syncope (NCS) patients by using T‐peak‐T‐end interval, T‐peak‐T‐end/QT ratio, T‐peak‐T‐end/QTc ratio and corrected QT interval (QTc), QT dispersion (QTd), QT index (QTI) and corrected QT interval index (QTcI) comparing with the corrected JT dispersion (JTcd), and corrected JT (JTc) and the corrected JT interval index (JTcI), by inspecting ventricular activation until termination of repolarization. These parameters are used as an index of potential ventricular arrhythmogenesis.
Methods
We have studied patients with head‐up tilt table test (HUTT) (+) (33 patients; mean age: 28 ± 11 years) and HUTT (–) as control group (33 patients; mean age: 30 ± 11 years). In all patients, T‐peak‐T‐end interval, T‐peak‐T‐end/QT ratio, T‐peak‐T‐end/QTc ratio, QT, QTd, QTI, QTc, QTcI, JTd, JTc, and JTcI were measured on electrocardiogram.
Results
The following parameters were statistically significant between groups: QTd (22.72 ± 17.54 msn; 11.21 ± 13.40 msn; P = 0.004), QTc (424.27 ± 33.75 msn; 403.66 ± 38.08 msn; P = 0.023), QTcI (114.09 ± 14, 29%; 106.71 ± 15.33%, P = 0.047), and QTI (100.72 ± 7.19%; 97.14 ± 7.13%, P = 0.046). Furthermore, T‐peak‐T‐end interval was significantly prolonged in the study group (93.78 ± 20.27 msn; 81.21 ± 11.66 msn; P = 0.003). T‐peak‐T‐end/QT ratio was significantly higher in the study group (0.24 ± 0.04 msn; 0.22 ± 0.04 msn; P = 0.030). T‐peak‐T‐end/QTc ratio was significantly higher in the study group (0.22 ± 0.04 msn; 0.20 ± 0.03 msn; P = 0.015). The JTc and JTd were also significantly higher in the study group ([103.00 ± 9, 72%; 95.44 ± 10.26%, P = 0.003], [27.57 ± 16.01 msn; 10.45 ± 16.08 msn; P < 0.001], respectively).
Conclusions
Electrocardiographic ventricular repolarization parameters including T‐peak‐T‐end interval, T‐peak‐T‐end/QT ratio, T‐peak‐T‐end/QTc ratio, QTc, QTd, QTI, QTcI, JTc, JTd, and JTI are prolonged in NCS.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25645192</pmid><doi>10.1111/pace.12599</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0147-8389 |
ispartof | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 2015-05, Vol.38 (5), p.625-629 |
issn | 0147-8389 1540-8159 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1676591928 |
source | SPORTDiscus database; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Adult electrocardiogram Electrocardiography Female Heart Ventricles - physiopathology Humans Male neurocardiogenic syncope repolarization Syncope, Vasovagal - physiopathology Tilt-Table Test |
title | Relationship between Neurocardiogenic Syncope and Ventricular Repolarization |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T14%3A39%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relationship%20between%20Neurocardiogenic%20Syncope%20and%20Ventricular%20Repolarization&rft.jtitle=Pacing%20and%20clinical%20electrophysiology&rft.au=SUCU,%20MURAT&rft.date=2015-05&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=625&rft.epage=629&rft.pages=625-629&rft.issn=0147-8389&rft.eissn=1540-8159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/pace.12599&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1676591928%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3679-696fccd878bf91c50773d7ed76fcb894cde3a37ab785abe5404a7f0f148440b93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1676591928&rft_id=info:pmid/25645192&rfr_iscdi=true |