Carbon stocks and carbon fluxes from a 10‐year prescribed burning chronosequence on a UK blanket peat

Prescribed burning is a common land management technique in many areas of the UK uplands. However, concern has been expressed at the impact of this management practice on carbon stocks and fluxes found in the carbon‐rich peat soils that underlie many of these areas. This study measured both carbon s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Soil use and management 2015-03, Vol.31 (1), p.39-51
Main Authors: Clay, G. D, Worrall, F, Aebischer, N. J, Goss, Michael
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
aboveground biomass
Carbon
Carbon budgets
Carbon dioxide
Carbon sinks
chronosequences
CO2 exchange
Combustion
ecosystem respiration
Ecosystems
Fluxes
Forest & brush fires
highlands
Land management
landscapes
Management
net ecosystem exchange
organic carbon
Particulate organic carbon
Peat
Peat soils
peatland
Photosynthesis
prescribed burning
Prescribed fire
Raw materials
Sampling
Scars
upland
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Prescribed burning is a common land management technique in many areas of the UK uplands. However, concern has been expressed at the impact of this management practice on carbon stocks and fluxes found in the carbon‐rich peat soils that underlie many of these areas. This study measured both carbon stocks and carbon fluxes from a chronosequence of prescribed burn sites in northern England. A range of carbon parameters were measured including above ground biomass and carbon stocks; net ecosystem exchange (NEE), net ecosystem respiration (Rₑcₒ) and photosynthesis (Pg) from closed chamber methods; and particulate organic carbon (POC). Analysis of the CO₂data showed that burning was a significant factor in measured CO₂readings but that other factors such as month of sampling explained a greater proportion of the variation in the data. Carbon budget results showed that whereas all the plots were net sources of carbon, the most recent burn scars were smaller sources of carbon compared with the older burn scars, suggesting that burning of Calluna‐dominated landscapes leads to an ‘avoided loss’ of carbon. However, this management intervention did not lead to a transition to a carbon sink and that for carbon purposes, active peat‐forming conditions are desirable.
ISSN:0266-0032
1475-2743
DOI:10.1111/sum.12164