Comparison of rate-dependent constitutive models with experimental data

Applicability of constitutive models of Cowper–Symonds (CS), Modified Cowper–Symonds (Modified CS), Johnson–Cook (JC), Zerilli–Armstrong (ZA) and Tanimura–Mimura 2009 (TM2009) is discussed by comparing the properties of these models with experimental data. It is shown that the stress–strain curves a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of impact engineering 2014-07, Vol.69, p.104-113
Main Authors: Tanimura, S., Tsuda, T., Abe, A., Hayashi, H., Jones, N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Constitutive equation
Constitutive relationships
Cowper–Symonds
Dynamic
Estimates
Fracture
Fracture mechanics
Johnson–Cook
Material
Mathematical models
Rate sensitivity
Strain
Strain rate
Stress strain curves
Stress-strain relationships
Tanimura–Mimura
Zerilli–Armstrong
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Applicability of constitutive models of Cowper–Symonds (CS), Modified Cowper–Symonds (Modified CS), Johnson–Cook (JC), Zerilli–Armstrong (ZA) and Tanimura–Mimura 2009 (TM2009) is discussed by comparing the properties of these models with experimental data. It is shown that the stress–strain curves at each strain rate, which are predicted by using the values of parameters published in the literature for the CS, MCS, JC and ZA models, can sometimes diverge from the experimental curves, not only for the large strain region near the true fracture strain, but also for the homogenous deformation region. It is only necessary to know the quasi-static stress–strain curve in advance for the TM 2009 model, because the set of parameters is given for each material group, and can be used for any material belonging to the group. Simple methods to estimate the quasi-static curve are discussed.
ISSN:0734-743X
1879-3509
DOI:10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.01.006