Loading…
Inferring changes in ENSO amplitude from the variance of proxy records
One common approach to investigating past changes in El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) amplitude is through quantifying the variance of ENSO‐influenced proxy records. However, a component of the variance of all such proxies will reflect influences that are unrelated to the instrumental climatic in...
Saved in:
Published in: | Geophysical research letters 2015-02, Vol.42 (4), p.1197-1204 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | One common approach to investigating past changes in El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) amplitude is through quantifying the variance of ENSO‐influenced proxy records. However, a component of the variance of all such proxies will reflect influences that are unrelated to the instrumental climatic indices from which modern ENSO amplitudes are defined. The unrelated component of proxy variance introduces a fundamental source of uncertainty to all such constraints on past ENSO amplitudes. Based on a simple parametric approach to modeling this uncertainty, we present guidelines for the magnitudes of proxy variance change required to robustly infer the following: (i) any change at all in ENSO amplitude and (ii) a change in ENSO amplitude that exceeds the plausible range of unforced variability. It is noted that more extreme changes in proxy variance are required to robustly infer decreases, as opposed to increases, in past ENSO amplitude from modern levels.
Key Points
Constraints on ENSO amplitude derived from proxy variance are uncertain
Estimates of these uncertainties may be made from a simple statistical framework
Defines proxy variance changes needed to robustly infer ENSO amplitude changes |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0094-8276 1944-8007 |
DOI: | 10.1002/2014GL062331 |