Geometric design consideration for controlled fragmentation of metallic shells

• Published in: Finite elements in analysis and design 2014-11, Vol.91, p.59-67
• Main Authors: Pike, A.W., Zuo, Q.H.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Controlled fragmentation; CTH simulations; Cylindrical shells; Design engineering; Explosions; Explosive loading; Fragmentation; Geometric consideration; Grooves; High strength steels; Johnson–Cook failure model; Mathematical analysis; Natural fragmentation; Nickel chromium molybdenum steels; Notches; Shells
• ISSN: 0168-874X; 1872-6925
• DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2014.07.012

Geometric designs for the controlled fragmentation of metal cylindrical shells have been considered via CTH hydrocode simulations. Fragmentation is controlled by engineering notches on the interior of the shells. Design parameters considered include the shell radius, thickness, and the depth and spacing of interior notches. A large number of shell designs were analyzed and their effectiveness on the controlled fragmentation categorized. The best overall controlled fragmentation designs exhibit full and complete fragment breakup as prescribed along the system of interior notches without any of the individual fragments naturally fragmenting throughout their thicknesses. For the combination of the Composition C-4 explosive and the 4340 steel, the best performing designs were shown to commonly possess the following characteristics: (1) they each have notch or groove depths greater than half of the shell thickness, (2) they each have notch or groove spacing within a range that is approximately the same as the shell thickness, and (3) they each have shell thicknesses many times smaller than the shell radius. •We consider designs for the controlled fragmentation of metal cylindrical shells.•The best performing designs were shown to commonly possess the following features:•They each have notch or groove depths greater than half of the shell thickness.•They each have notch spacing within a range approximately the shell thickness.•They each have shell thicknesses many times smaller than the shell radius.