Loading…

Durability of English oak (Quercus robur L.) – Comparison of decay progress and resistance under various laboratory and field conditions

Various procedures are used for testing the durability of wood and wood based materials for decades. Generally they can be divided in field and laboratory tests, whereby lab tests allow more defined and reproducible conditions and benefit from shorter test durations. However, while laboratory test r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International biodeterioration & biodegradation 2014-01, Vol.86 (Part B), p.79-85
Main Authors: Meyer, L., Brischke, C., Melcher, E., Brandt, K., Lenz, M.-T., Soetbeer, A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-bf5b81e1633daac7ccb4214f2a9f589f6380c4e02fd92f0abeb0fd13570ca913
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-bf5b81e1633daac7ccb4214f2a9f589f6380c4e02fd92f0abeb0fd13570ca913
container_end_page 85
container_issue Part B
container_start_page 79
container_title International biodeterioration & biodegradation
container_volume 86
creator Meyer, L.
Brischke, C.
Melcher, E.
Brandt, K.
Lenz, M.-T.
Soetbeer, A.
description Various procedures are used for testing the durability of wood and wood based materials for decades. Generally they can be divided in field and laboratory tests, whereby lab tests allow more defined and reproducible conditions and benefit from shorter test durations. However, while laboratory test results are hardly transferable to real life situations, field tests ensure more realistic conditions. For instance natural weathering and detoxification of biocidal compounds through so called “non-target-organisms” is assured only under outdoor field exposure. Due to these dissimilarities a diverse and in some cases also unrealistic classification of wood durability can be obtained when testing a material exclusively under laboratory conditions. This study will exemplarily focus on English oak (Quercus robur L.), which is classified as ‘durable’ according to the European Standard EN 350-2 (1994). Results from several laboratory and field test studies showed an enormously high variation of its durability between ‘very durable’ (Durability class (DC) 1, EN 350-1 (1994)) to ‘not durable’ (DC 5). Therefore this study aimed on a comparative evaluation of the durability of English oak in laboratory and field tests using standard specimens, but also full-size components under in-service conditions. The test results showed only little variation in durability of different oak origins. However it was indicated that a transferability of results determined in laboratory decay tests with pure cultures to the performance of a certain material in outdoor exposure is possible only to a limited extend. •Durability of 3 oak assortments tested in laboratory, semi-laboratory, field tests.•Only little variation in durability of the different oak origins was found.•Differences were superposed by the effect of different test methods.•Transferability of lab results to outdoor performance limited.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.06.025
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677997831</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0964830513002503</els_id><sourcerecordid>1560117748</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-bf5b81e1633daac7ccb4214f2a9f589f6380c4e02fd92f0abeb0fd13570ca913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkb1uFDEUhS0EEkvCE9C4DMVMrscz_iko0BKSSCshpPSWf4OX2fFiz0TaLjUtb8iTxJulRqnuLb5zdHQOQh8ItAQIu9y20cTk2g4IbYG10A2v0IoILhvoQLxGK5CsbwSF4S16V8oWAMggyAr9_rJkbeIY5wNOAV9N92MsP3DSP_HF98VnuxSck1ky3rQf8d_HP3iddnudY0nTUeC81Qe8z-k--1KwnhyuTyyznqzHy-R8xg8VT9Vn1CZlPad8eOZC9KPDNk0uzjFN5Ry9CXos_v2_e4buvl7drW-azbfr2_XnTWN7KufGhMEI4gmj1GltubWm70gfOi3DIGRgVIDtPXTByS6ANt5AcIQOHKyWhJ6hi5NtDf1r8WVWu1isH0c9-ZpSEca5lFzQF6ADA0I478ULUADOuBRDRekJtTmVkn1Q-xx3Oh8UAXWcU23V85zqOKcCpuqcVfXppPK1mofosyo2-lqyi9nbWbkU_6t_ApzSrFY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1500767985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Durability of English oak (Quercus robur L.) – Comparison of decay progress and resistance under various laboratory and field conditions</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Meyer, L. ; Brischke, C. ; Melcher, E. ; Brandt, K. ; Lenz, M.-T. ; Soetbeer, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Meyer, L. ; Brischke, C. ; Melcher, E. ; Brandt, K. ; Lenz, M.-T. ; Soetbeer, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Various procedures are used for testing the durability of wood and wood based materials for decades. Generally they can be divided in field and laboratory tests, whereby lab tests allow more defined and reproducible conditions and benefit from shorter test durations. However, while laboratory test results are hardly transferable to real life situations, field tests ensure more realistic conditions. For instance natural weathering and detoxification of biocidal compounds through so called “non-target-organisms” is assured only under outdoor field exposure. Due to these dissimilarities a diverse and in some cases also unrealistic classification of wood durability can be obtained when testing a material exclusively under laboratory conditions. This study will exemplarily focus on English oak (Quercus robur L.), which is classified as ‘durable’ according to the European Standard EN 350-2 (1994). Results from several laboratory and field test studies showed an enormously high variation of its durability between ‘very durable’ (Durability class (DC) 1, EN 350-1 (1994)) to ‘not durable’ (DC 5). Therefore this study aimed on a comparative evaluation of the durability of English oak in laboratory and field tests using standard specimens, but also full-size components under in-service conditions. The test results showed only little variation in durability of different oak origins. However it was indicated that a transferability of results determined in laboratory decay tests with pure cultures to the performance of a certain material in outdoor exposure is possible only to a limited extend. •Durability of 3 oak assortments tested in laboratory, semi-laboratory, field tests.•Only little variation in durability of the different oak origins was found.•Differences were superposed by the effect of different test methods.•Transferability of lab results to outdoor performance limited.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-8305</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0208</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.06.025</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Decay ; Decay fungi ; Direct current ; Durability ; European oak ; Field tests ; Oak ; Outdoor ; Premature failure ; Quercus robur ; Wood ; Wood resistance</subject><ispartof>International biodeterioration &amp; biodegradation, 2014-01, Vol.86 (Part B), p.79-85</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-bf5b81e1633daac7ccb4214f2a9f589f6380c4e02fd92f0abeb0fd13570ca913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-bf5b81e1633daac7ccb4214f2a9f589f6380c4e02fd92f0abeb0fd13570ca913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meyer, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brischke, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melcher, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandt, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenz, M.-T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soetbeer, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Durability of English oak (Quercus robur L.) – Comparison of decay progress and resistance under various laboratory and field conditions</title><title>International biodeterioration &amp; biodegradation</title><description>Various procedures are used for testing the durability of wood and wood based materials for decades. Generally they can be divided in field and laboratory tests, whereby lab tests allow more defined and reproducible conditions and benefit from shorter test durations. However, while laboratory test results are hardly transferable to real life situations, field tests ensure more realistic conditions. For instance natural weathering and detoxification of biocidal compounds through so called “non-target-organisms” is assured only under outdoor field exposure. Due to these dissimilarities a diverse and in some cases also unrealistic classification of wood durability can be obtained when testing a material exclusively under laboratory conditions. This study will exemplarily focus on English oak (Quercus robur L.), which is classified as ‘durable’ according to the European Standard EN 350-2 (1994). Results from several laboratory and field test studies showed an enormously high variation of its durability between ‘very durable’ (Durability class (DC) 1, EN 350-1 (1994)) to ‘not durable’ (DC 5). Therefore this study aimed on a comparative evaluation of the durability of English oak in laboratory and field tests using standard specimens, but also full-size components under in-service conditions. The test results showed only little variation in durability of different oak origins. However it was indicated that a transferability of results determined in laboratory decay tests with pure cultures to the performance of a certain material in outdoor exposure is possible only to a limited extend. •Durability of 3 oak assortments tested in laboratory, semi-laboratory, field tests.•Only little variation in durability of the different oak origins was found.•Differences were superposed by the effect of different test methods.•Transferability of lab results to outdoor performance limited.</description><subject>Decay</subject><subject>Decay fungi</subject><subject>Direct current</subject><subject>Durability</subject><subject>European oak</subject><subject>Field tests</subject><subject>Oak</subject><subject>Outdoor</subject><subject>Premature failure</subject><subject>Quercus robur</subject><subject>Wood</subject><subject>Wood resistance</subject><issn>0964-8305</issn><issn>1879-0208</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkb1uFDEUhS0EEkvCE9C4DMVMrscz_iko0BKSSCshpPSWf4OX2fFiz0TaLjUtb8iTxJulRqnuLb5zdHQOQh8ItAQIu9y20cTk2g4IbYG10A2v0IoILhvoQLxGK5CsbwSF4S16V8oWAMggyAr9_rJkbeIY5wNOAV9N92MsP3DSP_HF98VnuxSck1ky3rQf8d_HP3iddnudY0nTUeC81Qe8z-k--1KwnhyuTyyznqzHy-R8xg8VT9Vn1CZlPad8eOZC9KPDNk0uzjFN5Ry9CXos_v2_e4buvl7drW-azbfr2_XnTWN7KufGhMEI4gmj1GltubWm70gfOi3DIGRgVIDtPXTByS6ANt5AcIQOHKyWhJ6hi5NtDf1r8WVWu1isH0c9-ZpSEca5lFzQF6ADA0I478ULUADOuBRDRekJtTmVkn1Q-xx3Oh8UAXWcU23V85zqOKcCpuqcVfXppPK1mofosyo2-lqyi9nbWbkU_6t_ApzSrFY</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Meyer, L.</creator><creator>Brischke, C.</creator><creator>Melcher, E.</creator><creator>Brandt, K.</creator><creator>Lenz, M.-T.</creator><creator>Soetbeer, A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Durability of English oak (Quercus robur L.) – Comparison of decay progress and resistance under various laboratory and field conditions</title><author>Meyer, L. ; Brischke, C. ; Melcher, E. ; Brandt, K. ; Lenz, M.-T. ; Soetbeer, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-bf5b81e1633daac7ccb4214f2a9f589f6380c4e02fd92f0abeb0fd13570ca913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Decay</topic><topic>Decay fungi</topic><topic>Direct current</topic><topic>Durability</topic><topic>European oak</topic><topic>Field tests</topic><topic>Oak</topic><topic>Outdoor</topic><topic>Premature failure</topic><topic>Quercus robur</topic><topic>Wood</topic><topic>Wood resistance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meyer, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brischke, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melcher, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandt, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenz, M.-T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soetbeer, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>International biodeterioration &amp; biodegradation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meyer, L.</au><au>Brischke, C.</au><au>Melcher, E.</au><au>Brandt, K.</au><au>Lenz, M.-T.</au><au>Soetbeer, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Durability of English oak (Quercus robur L.) – Comparison of decay progress and resistance under various laboratory and field conditions</atitle><jtitle>International biodeterioration &amp; biodegradation</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>Part B</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>85</epage><pages>79-85</pages><issn>0964-8305</issn><eissn>1879-0208</eissn><abstract>Various procedures are used for testing the durability of wood and wood based materials for decades. Generally they can be divided in field and laboratory tests, whereby lab tests allow more defined and reproducible conditions and benefit from shorter test durations. However, while laboratory test results are hardly transferable to real life situations, field tests ensure more realistic conditions. For instance natural weathering and detoxification of biocidal compounds through so called “non-target-organisms” is assured only under outdoor field exposure. Due to these dissimilarities a diverse and in some cases also unrealistic classification of wood durability can be obtained when testing a material exclusively under laboratory conditions. This study will exemplarily focus on English oak (Quercus robur L.), which is classified as ‘durable’ according to the European Standard EN 350-2 (1994). Results from several laboratory and field test studies showed an enormously high variation of its durability between ‘very durable’ (Durability class (DC) 1, EN 350-1 (1994)) to ‘not durable’ (DC 5). Therefore this study aimed on a comparative evaluation of the durability of English oak in laboratory and field tests using standard specimens, but also full-size components under in-service conditions. The test results showed only little variation in durability of different oak origins. However it was indicated that a transferability of results determined in laboratory decay tests with pure cultures to the performance of a certain material in outdoor exposure is possible only to a limited extend. •Durability of 3 oak assortments tested in laboratory, semi-laboratory, field tests.•Only little variation in durability of the different oak origins was found.•Differences were superposed by the effect of different test methods.•Transferability of lab results to outdoor performance limited.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.06.025</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0964-8305
ispartof International biodeterioration & biodegradation, 2014-01, Vol.86 (Part B), p.79-85
issn 0964-8305
1879-0208
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677997831
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Decay
Decay fungi
Direct current
Durability
European oak
Field tests
Oak
Outdoor
Premature failure
Quercus robur
Wood
Wood resistance
title Durability of English oak (Quercus robur L.) – Comparison of decay progress and resistance under various laboratory and field conditions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T22%3A26%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Durability%20of%20English%20oak%20(Quercus%20robur%20L.)%20%E2%80%93%20Comparison%20of%20decay%20progress%20and%20resistance%20under%20various%20laboratory%20and%20field%20conditions&rft.jtitle=International%20biodeterioration%20&%20biodegradation&rft.au=Meyer,%20L.&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=Part%20B&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=85&rft.pages=79-85&rft.issn=0964-8305&rft.eissn=1879-0208&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.06.025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1560117748%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-bf5b81e1633daac7ccb4214f2a9f589f6380c4e02fd92f0abeb0fd13570ca913%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1500767985&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true