Loading…
Soil N2O emissions under N2-fixing legumes and N-fertilised canola: A reappraisal of emissions factor calculations
•We measured soil nitrous oxide emissions from a Vertosol in sub-tropical Australia.•Nitrous oxide emitted from N-fertilised canola exceeded those from N-fixing legumes.•Legumes can mitigate soil nitrous oxide emissions from cropping systems.•Legume N-fixation provided 37–64% of total plant biomass...
Saved in:
Published in: | Agriculture, ecosystems & environment ecosystems & environment, 2015-04, Vol.202, p.232-242 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-667f942166e5429f6a96580afd7dd0a2fdce699b320e3016d5f3fd7c143bf8b83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-667f942166e5429f6a96580afd7dd0a2fdce699b320e3016d5f3fd7c143bf8b83 |
container_end_page | 242 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 232 |
container_title | Agriculture, ecosystems & environment |
container_volume | 202 |
creator | Schwenke, Graeme D. Herridge, David F. Scheer, Clemens Rowlings, David W. Haigh, Bruce M. McMullen, K. Guy |
description | •We measured soil nitrous oxide emissions from a Vertosol in sub-tropical Australia.•Nitrous oxide emitted from N-fertilised canola exceeded those from N-fixing legumes.•Legumes can mitigate soil nitrous oxide emissions from cropping systems.•Legume N-fixation provided 37–64% of total plant biomass N, not 100%.•Emission factor guidelines need to account for actual legume-N fixed from air.
Introducing nitrogen (N)-fixing legumes into cereal-based crop rotations reduces synthetic fertiliser-N use and may mitigate soil emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O). Current IPCC calculations assume 100% of legume biomass N as the anthropogenic N input and use 1% of this as an emission factor (EF)—the percentage of input N emitted as N2O. However, legumes also utilise soil inorganic N, so legume-fixed N is typically less than 100% of legume biomass N.
In two field experiments, we measured soil N2O emissions from a black Vertosol in sub-tropical Australia for 12 months after sowing of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), canola (Brassica napus L.), faba bean (Vicia faba L.), and field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Cumulative N2O emissions from N-fertilised canola (624gN2O-Nha−1) greatly exceeded those from chickpea (127gN2O-Nha−1) in Experiment 1. Similarly, N2O emitted from canola (385gN2O-Nha−1) in Experiment 2 was significantly greater than chickpea (166gN2O-Nha−1), faba bean (166gN2O-Nha−1) or field pea (135gN2O-Nha−1). Highest losses from canola were recorded during the growing season, whereas 75% of the annual N2O losses from the legumes occurred post-harvest.
Legume N2-fixation provided 37–43% (chickpea), 54% (field pea) and 64% (faba bean) of total plant biomass N. Using only fixed-N inputs, we calculated EFs for chickpea (0.13–0.31%), field pea (0.18%) and faba bean (0.04%) that were significantly less than N-fertilised canola (0.48–0.78%) (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.agee.2015.01.017 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677998055</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167880915000183</els_id><sourcerecordid>1677998055</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-667f942166e5429f6a96580afd7dd0a2fdce699b320e3016d5f3fd7c143bf8b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctKQzEQhoMoWC8v4CpLN6fmci6JuCnFGxRdqOuQJpOSkp7U5BzRtzelLlyJw8DA5PuHmfwIXVAypYS2V-upXgFMGaHNlNCS3QGaUNHxinHSHKJJgbpKCCKP0UnOa1KCcTFB6SX6gJ_YM4aNz9nHPuOxt5BKr3L-0_crHGA1biBj3Vv8VDlIgw8-g8VG9zHoazzDCfR2m7TPOuDofs1y2gwxFTKYMehh1ztDR06HDOc_9RS93d2-zh-qxfP943y2qAwTdKjatnOyZrRtoamZdK2WbSOIdrazlmjmrIFWyiVnBHg5zzaOlzdDa750Yin4Kbrcz92m-D5CHlTZykAIuoc4ZlV-pJNSkKb5D8q5kHUtC8r2qEkx5wRObZPf6PSlKFE7L9Ra7bxQOy8UoSW7IrrZi6Dc--EhqWw89AasT2AGZaP_S_4NTL2StQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1673389449</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Soil N2O emissions under N2-fixing legumes and N-fertilised canola: A reappraisal of emissions factor calculations</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Schwenke, Graeme D. ; Herridge, David F. ; Scheer, Clemens ; Rowlings, David W. ; Haigh, Bruce M. ; McMullen, K. Guy</creator><creatorcontrib>Schwenke, Graeme D. ; Herridge, David F. ; Scheer, Clemens ; Rowlings, David W. ; Haigh, Bruce M. ; McMullen, K. Guy</creatorcontrib><description>•We measured soil nitrous oxide emissions from a Vertosol in sub-tropical Australia.•Nitrous oxide emitted from N-fertilised canola exceeded those from N-fixing legumes.•Legumes can mitigate soil nitrous oxide emissions from cropping systems.•Legume N-fixation provided 37–64% of total plant biomass N, not 100%.•Emission factor guidelines need to account for actual legume-N fixed from air.
Introducing nitrogen (N)-fixing legumes into cereal-based crop rotations reduces synthetic fertiliser-N use and may mitigate soil emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O). Current IPCC calculations assume 100% of legume biomass N as the anthropogenic N input and use 1% of this as an emission factor (EF)—the percentage of input N emitted as N2O. However, legumes also utilise soil inorganic N, so legume-fixed N is typically less than 100% of legume biomass N.
In two field experiments, we measured soil N2O emissions from a black Vertosol in sub-tropical Australia for 12 months after sowing of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), canola (Brassica napus L.), faba bean (Vicia faba L.), and field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Cumulative N2O emissions from N-fertilised canola (624gN2O-Nha−1) greatly exceeded those from chickpea (127gN2O-Nha−1) in Experiment 1. Similarly, N2O emitted from canola (385gN2O-Nha−1) in Experiment 2 was significantly greater than chickpea (166gN2O-Nha−1), faba bean (166gN2O-Nha−1) or field pea (135gN2O-Nha−1). Highest losses from canola were recorded during the growing season, whereas 75% of the annual N2O losses from the legumes occurred post-harvest.
Legume N2-fixation provided 37–43% (chickpea), 54% (field pea) and 64% (faba bean) of total plant biomass N. Using only fixed-N inputs, we calculated EFs for chickpea (0.13–0.31%), field pea (0.18%) and faba bean (0.04%) that were significantly less than N-fertilised canola (0.48–0.78%) (P<0.05), suggesting legume-fixed N is a less emissive form of N input to the soil than fertiliser N.
Inputs of legume-fixed N should be more accurately quantified to properly gauge the potential for legumes to mitigate soil N2O emissions. EF’s from legume crops need to be revised and should include a factor for the proportion of the legume’s N derived from the atmosphere.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-8809</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2305</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.01.017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Biomass ; Brassica napus ; Chickpeas ; Cicer arietinum ; Crops ; Emission factor ; Emittance ; Faba beans ; Legumes ; Mathematical analysis ; N2O ; Nitrous oxides ; Pisum sativum ; Soil (material) ; Vicia faba</subject><ispartof>Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 2015-04, Vol.202, p.232-242</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-667f942166e5429f6a96580afd7dd0a2fdce699b320e3016d5f3fd7c143bf8b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-667f942166e5429f6a96580afd7dd0a2fdce699b320e3016d5f3fd7c143bf8b83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0423-2517</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schwenke, Graeme D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herridge, David F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheer, Clemens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowlings, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haigh, Bruce M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMullen, K. Guy</creatorcontrib><title>Soil N2O emissions under N2-fixing legumes and N-fertilised canola: A reappraisal of emissions factor calculations</title><title>Agriculture, ecosystems & environment</title><description>•We measured soil nitrous oxide emissions from a Vertosol in sub-tropical Australia.•Nitrous oxide emitted from N-fertilised canola exceeded those from N-fixing legumes.•Legumes can mitigate soil nitrous oxide emissions from cropping systems.•Legume N-fixation provided 37–64% of total plant biomass N, not 100%.•Emission factor guidelines need to account for actual legume-N fixed from air.
Introducing nitrogen (N)-fixing legumes into cereal-based crop rotations reduces synthetic fertiliser-N use and may mitigate soil emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O). Current IPCC calculations assume 100% of legume biomass N as the anthropogenic N input and use 1% of this as an emission factor (EF)—the percentage of input N emitted as N2O. However, legumes also utilise soil inorganic N, so legume-fixed N is typically less than 100% of legume biomass N.
In two field experiments, we measured soil N2O emissions from a black Vertosol in sub-tropical Australia for 12 months after sowing of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), canola (Brassica napus L.), faba bean (Vicia faba L.), and field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Cumulative N2O emissions from N-fertilised canola (624gN2O-Nha−1) greatly exceeded those from chickpea (127gN2O-Nha−1) in Experiment 1. Similarly, N2O emitted from canola (385gN2O-Nha−1) in Experiment 2 was significantly greater than chickpea (166gN2O-Nha−1), faba bean (166gN2O-Nha−1) or field pea (135gN2O-Nha−1). Highest losses from canola were recorded during the growing season, whereas 75% of the annual N2O losses from the legumes occurred post-harvest.
Legume N2-fixation provided 37–43% (chickpea), 54% (field pea) and 64% (faba bean) of total plant biomass N. Using only fixed-N inputs, we calculated EFs for chickpea (0.13–0.31%), field pea (0.18%) and faba bean (0.04%) that were significantly less than N-fertilised canola (0.48–0.78%) (P<0.05), suggesting legume-fixed N is a less emissive form of N input to the soil than fertiliser N.
Inputs of legume-fixed N should be more accurately quantified to properly gauge the potential for legumes to mitigate soil N2O emissions. EF’s from legume crops need to be revised and should include a factor for the proportion of the legume’s N derived from the atmosphere.</description><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Brassica napus</subject><subject>Chickpeas</subject><subject>Cicer arietinum</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Emission factor</subject><subject>Emittance</subject><subject>Faba beans</subject><subject>Legumes</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>N2O</subject><subject>Nitrous oxides</subject><subject>Pisum sativum</subject><subject>Soil (material)</subject><subject>Vicia faba</subject><issn>0167-8809</issn><issn>1873-2305</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkctKQzEQhoMoWC8v4CpLN6fmci6JuCnFGxRdqOuQJpOSkp7U5BzRtzelLlyJw8DA5PuHmfwIXVAypYS2V-upXgFMGaHNlNCS3QGaUNHxinHSHKJJgbpKCCKP0UnOa1KCcTFB6SX6gJ_YM4aNz9nHPuOxt5BKr3L-0_crHGA1biBj3Vv8VDlIgw8-g8VG9zHoazzDCfR2m7TPOuDofs1y2gwxFTKYMehh1ztDR06HDOc_9RS93d2-zh-qxfP943y2qAwTdKjatnOyZrRtoamZdK2WbSOIdrazlmjmrIFWyiVnBHg5zzaOlzdDa750Yin4Kbrcz92m-D5CHlTZykAIuoc4ZlV-pJNSkKb5D8q5kHUtC8r2qEkx5wRObZPf6PSlKFE7L9Ra7bxQOy8UoSW7IrrZi6Dc--EhqWw89AasT2AGZaP_S_4NTL2StQ</recordid><startdate>20150401</startdate><enddate>20150401</enddate><creator>Schwenke, Graeme D.</creator><creator>Herridge, David F.</creator><creator>Scheer, Clemens</creator><creator>Rowlings, David W.</creator><creator>Haigh, Bruce M.</creator><creator>McMullen, K. Guy</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0423-2517</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150401</creationdate><title>Soil N2O emissions under N2-fixing legumes and N-fertilised canola: A reappraisal of emissions factor calculations</title><author>Schwenke, Graeme D. ; Herridge, David F. ; Scheer, Clemens ; Rowlings, David W. ; Haigh, Bruce M. ; McMullen, K. Guy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-667f942166e5429f6a96580afd7dd0a2fdce699b320e3016d5f3fd7c143bf8b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Brassica napus</topic><topic>Chickpeas</topic><topic>Cicer arietinum</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Emission factor</topic><topic>Emittance</topic><topic>Faba beans</topic><topic>Legumes</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>N2O</topic><topic>Nitrous oxides</topic><topic>Pisum sativum</topic><topic>Soil (material)</topic><topic>Vicia faba</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schwenke, Graeme D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herridge, David F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheer, Clemens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowlings, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haigh, Bruce M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMullen, K. Guy</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agriculture, ecosystems & environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schwenke, Graeme D.</au><au>Herridge, David F.</au><au>Scheer, Clemens</au><au>Rowlings, David W.</au><au>Haigh, Bruce M.</au><au>McMullen, K. Guy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Soil N2O emissions under N2-fixing legumes and N-fertilised canola: A reappraisal of emissions factor calculations</atitle><jtitle>Agriculture, ecosystems & environment</jtitle><date>2015-04-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>202</volume><spage>232</spage><epage>242</epage><pages>232-242</pages><issn>0167-8809</issn><eissn>1873-2305</eissn><abstract>•We measured soil nitrous oxide emissions from a Vertosol in sub-tropical Australia.•Nitrous oxide emitted from N-fertilised canola exceeded those from N-fixing legumes.•Legumes can mitigate soil nitrous oxide emissions from cropping systems.•Legume N-fixation provided 37–64% of total plant biomass N, not 100%.•Emission factor guidelines need to account for actual legume-N fixed from air.
Introducing nitrogen (N)-fixing legumes into cereal-based crop rotations reduces synthetic fertiliser-N use and may mitigate soil emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O). Current IPCC calculations assume 100% of legume biomass N as the anthropogenic N input and use 1% of this as an emission factor (EF)—the percentage of input N emitted as N2O. However, legumes also utilise soil inorganic N, so legume-fixed N is typically less than 100% of legume biomass N.
In two field experiments, we measured soil N2O emissions from a black Vertosol in sub-tropical Australia for 12 months after sowing of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), canola (Brassica napus L.), faba bean (Vicia faba L.), and field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Cumulative N2O emissions from N-fertilised canola (624gN2O-Nha−1) greatly exceeded those from chickpea (127gN2O-Nha−1) in Experiment 1. Similarly, N2O emitted from canola (385gN2O-Nha−1) in Experiment 2 was significantly greater than chickpea (166gN2O-Nha−1), faba bean (166gN2O-Nha−1) or field pea (135gN2O-Nha−1). Highest losses from canola were recorded during the growing season, whereas 75% of the annual N2O losses from the legumes occurred post-harvest.
Legume N2-fixation provided 37–43% (chickpea), 54% (field pea) and 64% (faba bean) of total plant biomass N. Using only fixed-N inputs, we calculated EFs for chickpea (0.13–0.31%), field pea (0.18%) and faba bean (0.04%) that were significantly less than N-fertilised canola (0.48–0.78%) (P<0.05), suggesting legume-fixed N is a less emissive form of N input to the soil than fertiliser N.
Inputs of legume-fixed N should be more accurately quantified to properly gauge the potential for legumes to mitigate soil N2O emissions. EF’s from legume crops need to be revised and should include a factor for the proportion of the legume’s N derived from the atmosphere.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.agee.2015.01.017</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0423-2517</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-8809 |
ispartof | Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 2015-04, Vol.202, p.232-242 |
issn | 0167-8809 1873-2305 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1677998055 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Biomass Brassica napus Chickpeas Cicer arietinum Crops Emission factor Emittance Faba beans Legumes Mathematical analysis N2O Nitrous oxides Pisum sativum Soil (material) Vicia faba |
title | Soil N2O emissions under N2-fixing legumes and N-fertilised canola: A reappraisal of emissions factor calculations |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T17%3A15%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Soil%20N2O%20emissions%20under%20N2-fixing%20legumes%20and%20N-fertilised%20canola:%20A%20reappraisal%20of%20emissions%20factor%20calculations&rft.jtitle=Agriculture,%20ecosystems%20&%20environment&rft.au=Schwenke,%20Graeme%20D.&rft.date=2015-04-01&rft.volume=202&rft.spage=232&rft.epage=242&rft.pages=232-242&rft.issn=0167-8809&rft.eissn=1873-2305&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.agee.2015.01.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1677998055%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-667f942166e5429f6a96580afd7dd0a2fdce699b320e3016d5f3fd7c143bf8b83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1673389449&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |