Loading…

Comparison between Methods of Biological Crust Removal on Granite

This paper presents the evaluation of the efficacy of the removal of biological crust from ornamental granites. The removal was made applying different procedures and the efficiency was evaluated by means of optic and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier Transformed Infrared spectrometry (FTI...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Key engineering materials 2013-04, Vol.548, p.317-325
Main Authors: Montojo, Cristina, Pozo, Santiago, López de Silanes, María Eugenia, Rivas, Teresa, López-Díaz, Ana Jesús, Fiorucci, Maria Paula
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-908ea684b4226773eaf7ade3027e0edc3832c7e47b96d070de34624ea1acc4b43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-908ea684b4226773eaf7ade3027e0edc3832c7e47b96d070de34624ea1acc4b43
container_end_page 325
container_issue
container_start_page 317
container_title Key engineering materials
container_volume 548
creator Montojo, Cristina
Pozo, Santiago
López de Silanes, María Eugenia
Rivas, Teresa
López-Díaz, Ana Jesús
Fiorucci, Maria Paula
description This paper presents the evaluation of the efficacy of the removal of biological crust from ornamental granites. The removal was made applying different procedures and the efficiency was evaluated by means of optic and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier Transformed Infrared spectrometry (FTIR) and colour measures (CIE-L*a*b* colour spaces). Among the cleaning procedures, an abrasive cleaning method, several chemicals-based methods applied by brush in aqueous media (using acids, bleach, benzalkonium chloride, ethanol and others) and laser (Nd:YVO4 at 355 nm) were used. This last method was previously found very efficient in removing graffiti and biological crusts in other granites. The present study was conducted on a granite of great commercial value from Galicia (NW Spain) and traditionally used on construction of historical buildings in this region and abroad. Slabs of this granite with an intense biological crust were used. Before the cleaning procedures, the biological crust was characterized by the same techniques to establish the comparison between Pre and Post cleaning. The efficacy in the crust removal was evaluated with optic and electronic microscopy; the best cleaning methods were the acid-based methods and laser. In both cases, no biological remains were found on the cleaning surfaces. Hydrogommage (the abrasive cleaning method) obtained intermediate results, and benzalkonium chloride cleaning showed the worst effectiveness. FTIR technique helped to identify the presence of organic signals of biological crust; and also, it provided useful information on the contaminant remains on the stone after cleaning and on mineral damages. Colour differences after cleaning gave additional information about the efficiency of the cleaning.
doi_str_mv 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.548.317
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1678014522</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1678014522</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-908ea684b4226773eaf7ade3027e0edc3832c7e47b96d070de34624ea1acc4b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0E9LwzAYBvAiCs7pd-hJvLTLvzbpRZxjTnFDED2HLH3rMrpmJqnFb29kgted8ob3eZ_DL0muMcoZImIyDEPutYEumMbovIMweZ6v8oKJnGJ-koxwWZKs4lVxGmeEaVYJUp4nF95vEaJY4GKUTGd2t1fOeNulawgDQJeuIGxs7VPbpPfGtvbDaNWmM9f7kL7Czn7FX4wvnOpMgMvkrFGth6u_d5y8P8zfZo_Z8mXxNJsuM81oEbIKCVClYGtGSMk5BdVwVQNFhAOCWlNBiebA-Loqa8RRXLGSMFBYaR2v6Di5OfTunf3swQe5M15D26oObO8lLrlAmBWEHBElCPFCVChGbw9R7az3Dhq5d2an3LfESP4yy8gs_5llZJaRWUZmGZljwd2hIEQOH0Bv5Nb2rosUx1b8ACOOjmg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1620075890</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between Methods of Biological Crust Removal on Granite</title><source>Scientific.net Journals</source><creator>Montojo, Cristina ; Pozo, Santiago ; López de Silanes, María Eugenia ; Rivas, Teresa ; López-Díaz, Ana Jesús ; Fiorucci, Maria Paula</creator><creatorcontrib>Montojo, Cristina ; Pozo, Santiago ; López de Silanes, María Eugenia ; Rivas, Teresa ; López-Díaz, Ana Jesús ; Fiorucci, Maria Paula</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents the evaluation of the efficacy of the removal of biological crust from ornamental granites. The removal was made applying different procedures and the efficiency was evaluated by means of optic and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier Transformed Infrared spectrometry (FTIR) and colour measures (CIE-L*a*b* colour spaces). Among the cleaning procedures, an abrasive cleaning method, several chemicals-based methods applied by brush in aqueous media (using acids, bleach, benzalkonium chloride, ethanol and others) and laser (Nd:YVO4 at 355 nm) were used. This last method was previously found very efficient in removing graffiti and biological crusts in other granites. The present study was conducted on a granite of great commercial value from Galicia (NW Spain) and traditionally used on construction of historical buildings in this region and abroad. Slabs of this granite with an intense biological crust were used. Before the cleaning procedures, the biological crust was characterized by the same techniques to establish the comparison between Pre and Post cleaning. The efficacy in the crust removal was evaluated with optic and electronic microscopy; the best cleaning methods were the acid-based methods and laser. In both cases, no biological remains were found on the cleaning surfaces. Hydrogommage (the abrasive cleaning method) obtained intermediate results, and benzalkonium chloride cleaning showed the worst effectiveness. FTIR technique helped to identify the presence of organic signals of biological crust; and also, it provided useful information on the contaminant remains on the stone after cleaning and on mineral damages. Colour differences after cleaning gave additional information about the efficiency of the cleaning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1013-9826</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1662-9795</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1662-9795</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.548.317</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Trans Tech Publications Ltd</publisher><subject>Abrasive cleaning ; Biological ; Chlorides ; Cleaning ; Color ; Colour ; Crusts ; Granite</subject><ispartof>Key engineering materials, 2013-04, Vol.548, p.317-325</ispartof><rights>2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-908ea684b4226773eaf7ade3027e0edc3832c7e47b96d070de34624ea1acc4b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-908ea684b4226773eaf7ade3027e0edc3832c7e47b96d070de34624ea1acc4b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.scientific.net/Image/TitleCover/2309?width=600</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Montojo, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pozo, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López de Silanes, María Eugenia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivas, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Díaz, Ana Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiorucci, Maria Paula</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between Methods of Biological Crust Removal on Granite</title><title>Key engineering materials</title><description>This paper presents the evaluation of the efficacy of the removal of biological crust from ornamental granites. The removal was made applying different procedures and the efficiency was evaluated by means of optic and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier Transformed Infrared spectrometry (FTIR) and colour measures (CIE-L*a*b* colour spaces). Among the cleaning procedures, an abrasive cleaning method, several chemicals-based methods applied by brush in aqueous media (using acids, bleach, benzalkonium chloride, ethanol and others) and laser (Nd:YVO4 at 355 nm) were used. This last method was previously found very efficient in removing graffiti and biological crusts in other granites. The present study was conducted on a granite of great commercial value from Galicia (NW Spain) and traditionally used on construction of historical buildings in this region and abroad. Slabs of this granite with an intense biological crust were used. Before the cleaning procedures, the biological crust was characterized by the same techniques to establish the comparison between Pre and Post cleaning. The efficacy in the crust removal was evaluated with optic and electronic microscopy; the best cleaning methods were the acid-based methods and laser. In both cases, no biological remains were found on the cleaning surfaces. Hydrogommage (the abrasive cleaning method) obtained intermediate results, and benzalkonium chloride cleaning showed the worst effectiveness. FTIR technique helped to identify the presence of organic signals of biological crust; and also, it provided useful information on the contaminant remains on the stone after cleaning and on mineral damages. Colour differences after cleaning gave additional information about the efficiency of the cleaning.</description><subject>Abrasive cleaning</subject><subject>Biological</subject><subject>Chlorides</subject><subject>Cleaning</subject><subject>Color</subject><subject>Colour</subject><subject>Crusts</subject><subject>Granite</subject><issn>1013-9826</issn><issn>1662-9795</issn><issn>1662-9795</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0E9LwzAYBvAiCs7pd-hJvLTLvzbpRZxjTnFDED2HLH3rMrpmJqnFb29kgted8ob3eZ_DL0muMcoZImIyDEPutYEumMbovIMweZ6v8oKJnGJ-koxwWZKs4lVxGmeEaVYJUp4nF95vEaJY4GKUTGd2t1fOeNulawgDQJeuIGxs7VPbpPfGtvbDaNWmM9f7kL7Czn7FX4wvnOpMgMvkrFGth6u_d5y8P8zfZo_Z8mXxNJsuM81oEbIKCVClYGtGSMk5BdVwVQNFhAOCWlNBiebA-Loqa8RRXLGSMFBYaR2v6Di5OfTunf3swQe5M15D26oObO8lLrlAmBWEHBElCPFCVChGbw9R7az3Dhq5d2an3LfESP4yy8gs_5llZJaRWUZmGZljwd2hIEQOH0Bv5Nb2rosUx1b8ACOOjmg</recordid><startdate>20130401</startdate><enddate>20130401</enddate><creator>Montojo, Cristina</creator><creator>Pozo, Santiago</creator><creator>López de Silanes, María Eugenia</creator><creator>Rivas, Teresa</creator><creator>López-Díaz, Ana Jesús</creator><creator>Fiorucci, Maria Paula</creator><general>Trans Tech Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130401</creationdate><title>Comparison between Methods of Biological Crust Removal on Granite</title><author>Montojo, Cristina ; Pozo, Santiago ; López de Silanes, María Eugenia ; Rivas, Teresa ; López-Díaz, Ana Jesús ; Fiorucci, Maria Paula</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-908ea684b4226773eaf7ade3027e0edc3832c7e47b96d070de34624ea1acc4b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Abrasive cleaning</topic><topic>Biological</topic><topic>Chlorides</topic><topic>Cleaning</topic><topic>Color</topic><topic>Colour</topic><topic>Crusts</topic><topic>Granite</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Montojo, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pozo, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López de Silanes, María Eugenia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivas, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Díaz, Ana Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiorucci, Maria Paula</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Key engineering materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Montojo, Cristina</au><au>Pozo, Santiago</au><au>López de Silanes, María Eugenia</au><au>Rivas, Teresa</au><au>López-Díaz, Ana Jesús</au><au>Fiorucci, Maria Paula</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between Methods of Biological Crust Removal on Granite</atitle><jtitle>Key engineering materials</jtitle><date>2013-04-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>548</volume><spage>317</spage><epage>325</epage><pages>317-325</pages><issn>1013-9826</issn><issn>1662-9795</issn><eissn>1662-9795</eissn><abstract>This paper presents the evaluation of the efficacy of the removal of biological crust from ornamental granites. The removal was made applying different procedures and the efficiency was evaluated by means of optic and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier Transformed Infrared spectrometry (FTIR) and colour measures (CIE-L*a*b* colour spaces). Among the cleaning procedures, an abrasive cleaning method, several chemicals-based methods applied by brush in aqueous media (using acids, bleach, benzalkonium chloride, ethanol and others) and laser (Nd:YVO4 at 355 nm) were used. This last method was previously found very efficient in removing graffiti and biological crusts in other granites. The present study was conducted on a granite of great commercial value from Galicia (NW Spain) and traditionally used on construction of historical buildings in this region and abroad. Slabs of this granite with an intense biological crust were used. Before the cleaning procedures, the biological crust was characterized by the same techniques to establish the comparison between Pre and Post cleaning. The efficacy in the crust removal was evaluated with optic and electronic microscopy; the best cleaning methods were the acid-based methods and laser. In both cases, no biological remains were found on the cleaning surfaces. Hydrogommage (the abrasive cleaning method) obtained intermediate results, and benzalkonium chloride cleaning showed the worst effectiveness. FTIR technique helped to identify the presence of organic signals of biological crust; and also, it provided useful information on the contaminant remains on the stone after cleaning and on mineral damages. Colour differences after cleaning gave additional information about the efficiency of the cleaning.</abstract><pub>Trans Tech Publications Ltd</pub><doi>10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.548.317</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1013-9826
ispartof Key engineering materials, 2013-04, Vol.548, p.317-325
issn 1013-9826
1662-9795
1662-9795
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1678014522
source Scientific.net Journals
subjects Abrasive cleaning
Biological
Chlorides
Cleaning
Color
Colour
Crusts
Granite
title Comparison between Methods of Biological Crust Removal on Granite
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T10%3A36%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20Methods%20of%20Biological%20Crust%20Removal%20on%20Granite&rft.jtitle=Key%20engineering%20materials&rft.au=Montojo,%20Cristina&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.volume=548&rft.spage=317&rft.epage=325&rft.pages=317-325&rft.issn=1013-9826&rft.eissn=1662-9795&rft_id=info:doi/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.548.317&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1678014522%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-908ea684b4226773eaf7ade3027e0edc3832c7e47b96d070de34624ea1acc4b43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1620075890&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true