The Ethics of Meaningful Work: Types and Magnitude of Job-Related Harm and the Ethical Decision-Making Process

This research on the ethics of meaningful work examined how types of job-related harm (physical, economic, emotional, and cognitive) and their magnitude of consequences (MOC, low, high) influenced components of ethical decision-making (moral recognition, moral evaluations, and moral intentions). The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of business ethics 2014-06, Vol.121 (4), p.651-671
Main Authors: May, Douglas R., Li, Cuifang, Mencl, Jennifer, Huang, Ching-Chu
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analysis
Business
Business and Management
Business Ethics
Carpal tunnel syndrome
Cognition
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive psychology
Compensation (law)
Decision making
Education
Emotional expression
Emotions
Employees
Employment
Environmental ethics
Ethical behavior
Ethics
Evaluation
International maritime organization
Job design
Labor policy
Layoffs
Literature reviews
Management
Moral judgment
Morality
Morals
Motivation
Organization theory
Philosophy
Professional ethics
Quality of Life Research
Social ethics
Studies
Working conditions
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-1ddb33a4a946cf70e105c1bc8f97814d41fc5dd95524ebb8c9043c118f600b093
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-1ddb33a4a946cf70e105c1bc8f97814d41fc5dd95524ebb8c9043c118f600b093
container_end_page 671
container_issue 4
container_start_page 651
container_title Journal of business ethics
container_volume 121
creator May, Douglas R.
Li, Cuifang
Mencl, Jennifer
Huang, Ching-Chu
description This research on the ethics of meaningful work examined how types of job-related harm (physical, economic, emotional, and cognitive) and their magnitude of consequences (MOC, low, high) influenced components of ethical decision-making (moral recognition, moral evaluations, and moral intentions). The research also investigated the moderating effects of individual differences (experience with carpal tunnel syndrome, experience with layoffs, ability to read others' emotions, and intrinsic motivation orientation [IMO]) on the relation between the MOC and the ethical decision-making elements for each type of harm. Using a sample of 185 Chinese professionals, a between-subjects, fully crossed experimental scenario design revealed that physical and economic job-related harm were recognized as moral issues to a greater extent than cognitive or emotional harm. Second, physical job-related harm stimulated a higher level of moral evaluations than economic and cognitive harm. Third, individuals intended to act ethically when MOC was high versus low. Finally, experience with layoffs and IMO helped explain the relations between MOC and moral evaluations for economic and cognitive job-related harm, respectively. Implications for research and management are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10551-013-1736-9
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680144695</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42921409</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>42921409</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-1ddb33a4a946cf70e105c1bc8f97814d41fc5dd95524ebb8c9043c118f600b093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUGP1CAYhonRxHH1B3gwIfHiBf2-AqV4M-vqanaiMWM8EkrpbGc7MAvtYf-91KoxHpQLl-d94PteQp4ivEQA9SojSIkMkDNUvGb6HtmgVJxBrdV9sgGsFRNSiIfkUc4HKEei2JCwu_b0YroeXKaxp1tvwxD2_TzSbzHdvKa7u5PP1IaObu0-DNPc-YX7GFv2xY928h29tOn4g5h-qexI33o35CEGtrU3RUg_p-h8zo_Jg96O2T_5eZ-Rr-8udueX7OrT-w_nb66YE1xODLuu5dwKq0XtegW-TOewdU2vVYOiE9g72XVaykr4tm2cBsEdYtPXAC1ofkZerN5Tirezz5M5Dtn5cbTBxzkbrBtAIWot_49KwUXVQC0K-vwv9BDnFMogheLAEZRahLhSLsWck-_NKQ1Hm-4MglnKMmtZppRllrLM8t9qzeTChr1Pf5j_EXq2hg55iun3K6LSFYqyhO-5op51</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1530310775</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Ethics of Meaningful Work: Types and Magnitude of Job-Related Harm and the Ethical Decision-Making Process</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Archive</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>ProQuest ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>May, Douglas R. ; Li, Cuifang ; Mencl, Jennifer ; Huang, Ching-Chu</creator><creatorcontrib>May, Douglas R. ; Li, Cuifang ; Mencl, Jennifer ; Huang, Ching-Chu</creatorcontrib><description>This research on the ethics of meaningful work examined how types of job-related harm (physical, economic, emotional, and cognitive) and their magnitude of consequences (MOC, low, high) influenced components of ethical decision-making (moral recognition, moral evaluations, and moral intentions). The research also investigated the moderating effects of individual differences (experience with carpal tunnel syndrome, experience with layoffs, ability to read others' emotions, and intrinsic motivation orientation [IMO]) on the relation between the MOC and the ethical decision-making elements for each type of harm. Using a sample of 185 Chinese professionals, a between-subjects, fully crossed experimental scenario design revealed that physical and economic job-related harm were recognized as moral issues to a greater extent than cognitive or emotional harm. Second, physical job-related harm stimulated a higher level of moral evaluations than economic and cognitive harm. Third, individuals intended to act ethically when MOC was high versus low. Finally, experience with layoffs and IMO helped explain the relations between MOC and moral evaluations for economic and cognitive job-related harm, respectively. Implications for research and management are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4544</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-1736-9</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBUEDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Business ; Business and Management ; Business Ethics ; Carpal tunnel syndrome ; Cognition ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive psychology ; Compensation (law) ; Decision making ; Education ; Emotional expression ; Emotions ; Employees ; Employment ; Environmental ethics ; Ethical behavior ; Ethics ; Evaluation ; International maritime organization ; Job design ; Labor policy ; Layoffs ; Literature reviews ; Management ; Moral judgment ; Morality ; Morals ; Motivation ; Organization theory ; Philosophy ; Professional ethics ; Quality of Life Research ; Social ethics ; Studies ; Working conditions</subject><ispartof>Journal of business ethics, 2014-06, Vol.121 (4), p.651-671</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media 2014</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-1ddb33a4a946cf70e105c1bc8f97814d41fc5dd95524ebb8c9043c118f600b093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-1ddb33a4a946cf70e105c1bc8f97814d41fc5dd95524ebb8c9043c118f600b093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1530310775/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1530310775?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,11906,12847,12861,21387,21394,27865,27866,27924,27925,33223,33224,33611,33612,33985,33986,34775,34776,36050,36051,36060,36061,43733,43948,44200,44361,44363,58238,58471,74221,74468,74728,74893,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>May, Douglas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Cuifang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mencl, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ching-Chu</creatorcontrib><title>The Ethics of Meaningful Work: Types and Magnitude of Job-Related Harm and the Ethical Decision-Making Process</title><title>Journal of business ethics</title><addtitle>J Bus Ethics</addtitle><description>This research on the ethics of meaningful work examined how types of job-related harm (physical, economic, emotional, and cognitive) and their magnitude of consequences (MOC, low, high) influenced components of ethical decision-making (moral recognition, moral evaluations, and moral intentions). The research also investigated the moderating effects of individual differences (experience with carpal tunnel syndrome, experience with layoffs, ability to read others' emotions, and intrinsic motivation orientation [IMO]) on the relation between the MOC and the ethical decision-making elements for each type of harm. Using a sample of 185 Chinese professionals, a between-subjects, fully crossed experimental scenario design revealed that physical and economic job-related harm were recognized as moral issues to a greater extent than cognitive or emotional harm. Second, physical job-related harm stimulated a higher level of moral evaluations than economic and cognitive harm. Third, individuals intended to act ethically when MOC was high versus low. Finally, experience with layoffs and IMO helped explain the relations between MOC and moral evaluations for economic and cognitive job-related harm, respectively. Implications for research and management are discussed.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Business</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Business Ethics</subject><subject>Carpal tunnel syndrome</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive psychology</subject><subject>Compensation (law)</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Emotional expression</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Environmental ethics</subject><subject>Ethical behavior</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>International maritime organization</subject><subject>Job design</subject><subject>Labor policy</subject><subject>Layoffs</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Moral judgment</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Morals</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Social ethics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><issn>0167-4544</issn><issn>1573-0697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUGP1CAYhonRxHH1B3gwIfHiBf2-AqV4M-vqanaiMWM8EkrpbGc7MAvtYf-91KoxHpQLl-d94PteQp4ivEQA9SojSIkMkDNUvGb6HtmgVJxBrdV9sgGsFRNSiIfkUc4HKEei2JCwu_b0YroeXKaxp1tvwxD2_TzSbzHdvKa7u5PP1IaObu0-DNPc-YX7GFv2xY928h29tOn4g5h-qexI33o35CEGtrU3RUg_p-h8zo_Jg96O2T_5eZ-Rr-8udueX7OrT-w_nb66YE1xODLuu5dwKq0XtegW-TOewdU2vVYOiE9g72XVaykr4tm2cBsEdYtPXAC1ofkZerN5Tirezz5M5Dtn5cbTBxzkbrBtAIWot_49KwUXVQC0K-vwv9BDnFMogheLAEZRahLhSLsWck-_NKQ1Hm-4MglnKMmtZppRllrLM8t9qzeTChr1Pf5j_EXq2hg55iun3K6LSFYqyhO-5op51</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>May, Douglas R.</creator><creator>Li, Cuifang</creator><creator>Mencl, Jennifer</creator><creator>Huang, Ching-Chu</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>The Ethics of Meaningful Work: Types and Magnitude of Job-Related Harm and the Ethical Decision-Making Process</title><author>May, Douglas R. ; Li, Cuifang ; Mencl, Jennifer ; Huang, Ching-Chu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-1ddb33a4a946cf70e105c1bc8f97814d41fc5dd95524ebb8c9043c118f600b093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Business</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Business Ethics</topic><topic>Carpal tunnel syndrome</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive psychology</topic><topic>Compensation (law)</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Emotional expression</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Environmental ethics</topic><topic>Ethical behavior</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>International maritime organization</topic><topic>Job design</topic><topic>Labor policy</topic><topic>Layoffs</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Moral judgment</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Morals</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Social ethics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>May, Douglas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Cuifang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mencl, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ching-Chu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Health Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>May, Douglas R.</au><au>Li, Cuifang</au><au>Mencl, Jennifer</au><au>Huang, Ching-Chu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Ethics of Meaningful Work: Types and Magnitude of Job-Related Harm and the Ethical Decision-Making Process</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle><stitle>J Bus Ethics</stitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>651</spage><epage>671</epage><pages>651-671</pages><issn>0167-4544</issn><eissn>1573-0697</eissn><coden>JBUEDJ</coden><abstract>This research on the ethics of meaningful work examined how types of job-related harm (physical, economic, emotional, and cognitive) and their magnitude of consequences (MOC, low, high) influenced components of ethical decision-making (moral recognition, moral evaluations, and moral intentions). The research also investigated the moderating effects of individual differences (experience with carpal tunnel syndrome, experience with layoffs, ability to read others' emotions, and intrinsic motivation orientation [IMO]) on the relation between the MOC and the ethical decision-making elements for each type of harm. Using a sample of 185 Chinese professionals, a between-subjects, fully crossed experimental scenario design revealed that physical and economic job-related harm were recognized as moral issues to a greater extent than cognitive or emotional harm. Second, physical job-related harm stimulated a higher level of moral evaluations than economic and cognitive harm. Third, individuals intended to act ethically when MOC was high versus low. Finally, experience with layoffs and IMO helped explain the relations between MOC and moral evaluations for economic and cognitive job-related harm, respectively. Implications for research and management are discussed.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10551-013-1736-9</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-4544
ispartof Journal of business ethics, 2014-06, Vol.121 (4), p.651-671
issn 0167-4544
1573-0697
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680144695
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; Art, Design and Architecture Collection; ABI/INFORM Archive; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection; ProQuest ABI/INFORM Global; PAIS Index; Springer Link
subjects Analysis
Business
Business and Management
Business Ethics
Carpal tunnel syndrome
Cognition
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive psychology
Compensation (law)
Decision making
Education
Emotional expression
Emotions
Employees
Employment
Environmental ethics
Ethical behavior
Ethics
Evaluation
International maritime organization
Job design
Labor policy
Layoffs
Literature reviews
Management
Moral judgment
Morality
Morals
Motivation
Organization theory
Philosophy
Professional ethics
Quality of Life Research
Social ethics
Studies
Working conditions
title The Ethics of Meaningful Work: Types and Magnitude of Job-Related Harm and the Ethical Decision-Making Process
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T09%3A12%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Ethics%20of%20Meaningful%20Work:%20Types%20and%20Magnitude%20of%20Job-Related%20Harm%20and%20the%20Ethical%20Decision-Making%20Process&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20ethics&rft.au=May,%20Douglas%20R.&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=651&rft.epage=671&rft.pages=651-671&rft.issn=0167-4544&rft.eissn=1573-0697&rft.coden=JBUEDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10551-013-1736-9&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E42921409%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-1ddb33a4a946cf70e105c1bc8f97814d41fc5dd95524ebb8c9043c118f600b093%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1530310775&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42921409&rfr_iscdi=true