Loading…

Data Richness Trade-Offs Between Face-to-Face, Online Audiovisual, and Online Text-Only Focus Groups

This study offers an examination of data richness (i.e., topic-related data, topic unrelated data, researcher ratings of data richness, word count, and linguistic characteristics of data richness) trade-offs between face-to-face (FTF), online text-only and online audiovisual focus group mediums. Two...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social science computer review 2015-02, Vol.33 (1), p.80-96
Main Authors: Abrams, Katie M., Wang, Zongyuan, Song, Yoo Jin, Galindo-Gonzalez, Sebastian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-671da346dd9c86970a0d88c5461b703266e44a294da7a4c11b1bc54a2a9b118c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-671da346dd9c86970a0d88c5461b703266e44a294da7a4c11b1bc54a2a9b118c3
container_end_page 96
container_issue 1
container_start_page 80
container_title Social science computer review
container_volume 33
creator Abrams, Katie M.
Wang, Zongyuan
Song, Yoo Jin
Galindo-Gonzalez, Sebastian
description This study offers an examination of data richness (i.e., topic-related data, topic unrelated data, researcher ratings of data richness, word count, and linguistic characteristics of data richness) trade-offs between face-to-face (FTF), online text-only and online audiovisual focus group mediums. Two focus group sessions were held for each type of medium. Data were analyzed using systematic content analysis and Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Findings showed that although online audiovisual focus groups show potential for producing data similar in richness to FTF focus groups, researchers should carefully consider the potential distractions that manifested in this study as a result of the medium itself, likely due to its novelty as a group communication medium. Online text-only groups did not facilitate rich data, as operationalized in this study, and also had a lower amount of data related to the topic of the groups due to more socializing and off-topic discussion. As the first study to empirically examine the potential of data from focus groups facilitated via webcam (online audiovisual), it concludes, the technology offers similar data richness to FTF focus groups.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0894439313519733
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680153735</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0894439313519733</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1669866008</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-671da346dd9c86970a0d88c5461b703266e44a294da7a4c11b1bc54a2a9b118c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFLwzAUxoMoOKd3jwEvHhbNa9IkPc7ppjAYyDyXtyTTjq6dTavuv7d1CjIQPL3H-37fB4-PkHPgVwBaX3OTSCkSASKGRAtxQHoQxxEzkVGHpNfJrNOPyUkIK84h0pz3iLvFGuljZl8KHwKdV-g8my2Xgd74-t37go7RelaXrJsDOivyrPB02LisfMtCg_mAYuF-7nP_UbN239JxaZtAJ1XZbMIpOVpiHvzZ9-yTp_HdfHTPprPJw2g4ZVZKqJnS4FBI5VxijUo0R-6MsbFUsNBcREp5KTFKpEON0gIsYNGqGGGyADBW9MnlLndTla-ND3W6zoL1eY6FL5uQgjIcYqFF_A9UJUYpzk2LXuyhq7KpivaRlpLKmK_IPuE7ylZlCJVfppsqW2O1TYGnXUPpfkOthe0sAZ_9r9C_-E8nFI0q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1646881537</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Data Richness Trade-Offs Between Face-to-Face, Online Audiovisual, and Online Text-Only Focus Groups</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Abrams, Katie M. ; Wang, Zongyuan ; Song, Yoo Jin ; Galindo-Gonzalez, Sebastian</creator><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Katie M. ; Wang, Zongyuan ; Song, Yoo Jin ; Galindo-Gonzalez, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><description>This study offers an examination of data richness (i.e., topic-related data, topic unrelated data, researcher ratings of data richness, word count, and linguistic characteristics of data richness) trade-offs between face-to-face (FTF), online text-only and online audiovisual focus group mediums. Two focus group sessions were held for each type of medium. Data were analyzed using systematic content analysis and Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Findings showed that although online audiovisual focus groups show potential for producing data similar in richness to FTF focus groups, researchers should carefully consider the potential distractions that manifested in this study as a result of the medium itself, likely due to its novelty as a group communication medium. Online text-only groups did not facilitate rich data, as operationalized in this study, and also had a lower amount of data related to the topic of the groups due to more socializing and off-topic discussion. As the first study to empirically examine the potential of data from focus groups facilitated via webcam (online audiovisual), it concludes, the technology offers similar data richness to FTF focus groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-4393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8286</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0894439313519733</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSCREH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Audiovisual ; Communication ; Content analysis ; Counting ; Focus groups ; Group communication ; Internet ; Interpersonal communication ; Linguistics ; Online ; Technology ; Tradeoffs ; Webcams</subject><ispartof>Social science computer review, 2015-02, Vol.33 (1), p.80-96</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2014</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Feb 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-671da346dd9c86970a0d88c5461b703266e44a294da7a4c11b1bc54a2a9b118c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-671da346dd9c86970a0d88c5461b703266e44a294da7a4c11b1bc54a2a9b118c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33774,33775,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Katie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zongyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Yoo Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galindo-Gonzalez, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><title>Data Richness Trade-Offs Between Face-to-Face, Online Audiovisual, and Online Text-Only Focus Groups</title><title>Social science computer review</title><description>This study offers an examination of data richness (i.e., topic-related data, topic unrelated data, researcher ratings of data richness, word count, and linguistic characteristics of data richness) trade-offs between face-to-face (FTF), online text-only and online audiovisual focus group mediums. Two focus group sessions were held for each type of medium. Data were analyzed using systematic content analysis and Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Findings showed that although online audiovisual focus groups show potential for producing data similar in richness to FTF focus groups, researchers should carefully consider the potential distractions that manifested in this study as a result of the medium itself, likely due to its novelty as a group communication medium. Online text-only groups did not facilitate rich data, as operationalized in this study, and also had a lower amount of data related to the topic of the groups due to more socializing and off-topic discussion. As the first study to empirically examine the potential of data from focus groups facilitated via webcam (online audiovisual), it concludes, the technology offers similar data richness to FTF focus groups.</description><subject>Audiovisual</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Counting</subject><subject>Focus groups</subject><subject>Group communication</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Interpersonal communication</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Online</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Tradeoffs</subject><subject>Webcams</subject><issn>0894-4393</issn><issn>1552-8286</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFLwzAUxoMoOKd3jwEvHhbNa9IkPc7ppjAYyDyXtyTTjq6dTavuv7d1CjIQPL3H-37fB4-PkHPgVwBaX3OTSCkSASKGRAtxQHoQxxEzkVGHpNfJrNOPyUkIK84h0pz3iLvFGuljZl8KHwKdV-g8my2Xgd74-t37go7RelaXrJsDOivyrPB02LisfMtCg_mAYuF-7nP_UbN239JxaZtAJ1XZbMIpOVpiHvzZ9-yTp_HdfHTPprPJw2g4ZVZKqJnS4FBI5VxijUo0R-6MsbFUsNBcREp5KTFKpEON0gIsYNGqGGGyADBW9MnlLndTla-ND3W6zoL1eY6FL5uQgjIcYqFF_A9UJUYpzk2LXuyhq7KpivaRlpLKmK_IPuE7ylZlCJVfppsqW2O1TYGnXUPpfkOthe0sAZ_9r9C_-E8nFI0q</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Abrams, Katie M.</creator><creator>Wang, Zongyuan</creator><creator>Song, Yoo Jin</creator><creator>Galindo-Gonzalez, Sebastian</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>Data Richness Trade-Offs Between Face-to-Face, Online Audiovisual, and Online Text-Only Focus Groups</title><author>Abrams, Katie M. ; Wang, Zongyuan ; Song, Yoo Jin ; Galindo-Gonzalez, Sebastian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-671da346dd9c86970a0d88c5461b703266e44a294da7a4c11b1bc54a2a9b118c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Audiovisual</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Counting</topic><topic>Focus groups</topic><topic>Group communication</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Interpersonal communication</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Online</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Tradeoffs</topic><topic>Webcams</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Katie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zongyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Yoo Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galindo-Gonzalez, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social science computer review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abrams, Katie M.</au><au>Wang, Zongyuan</au><au>Song, Yoo Jin</au><au>Galindo-Gonzalez, Sebastian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Data Richness Trade-Offs Between Face-to-Face, Online Audiovisual, and Online Text-Only Focus Groups</atitle><jtitle>Social science computer review</jtitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>80</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>80-96</pages><issn>0894-4393</issn><eissn>1552-8286</eissn><coden>SSCREH</coden><abstract>This study offers an examination of data richness (i.e., topic-related data, topic unrelated data, researcher ratings of data richness, word count, and linguistic characteristics of data richness) trade-offs between face-to-face (FTF), online text-only and online audiovisual focus group mediums. Two focus group sessions were held for each type of medium. Data were analyzed using systematic content analysis and Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Findings showed that although online audiovisual focus groups show potential for producing data similar in richness to FTF focus groups, researchers should carefully consider the potential distractions that manifested in this study as a result of the medium itself, likely due to its novelty as a group communication medium. Online text-only groups did not facilitate rich data, as operationalized in this study, and also had a lower amount of data related to the topic of the groups due to more socializing and off-topic discussion. As the first study to empirically examine the potential of data from focus groups facilitated via webcam (online audiovisual), it concludes, the technology offers similar data richness to FTF focus groups.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0894439313519733</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0894-4393
ispartof Social science computer review, 2015-02, Vol.33 (1), p.80-96
issn 0894-4393
1552-8286
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680153735
source Sage Journals Online; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Audiovisual
Communication
Content analysis
Counting
Focus groups
Group communication
Internet
Interpersonal communication
Linguistics
Online
Technology
Tradeoffs
Webcams
title Data Richness Trade-Offs Between Face-to-Face, Online Audiovisual, and Online Text-Only Focus Groups
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A50%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Data%20Richness%20Trade-Offs%20Between%20Face-to-Face,%20Online%20Audiovisual,%20and%20Online%20Text-Only%20Focus%20Groups&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20computer%20review&rft.au=Abrams,%20Katie%20M.&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=80&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=80-96&rft.issn=0894-4393&rft.eissn=1552-8286&rft.coden=SSCREH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0894439313519733&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1669866008%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-671da346dd9c86970a0d88c5461b703266e44a294da7a4c11b1bc54a2a9b118c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1646881537&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0894439313519733&rfr_iscdi=true