Loading…
Data Richness Trade-Offs Between Face-to-Face, Online Audiovisual, and Online Text-Only Focus Groups
This study offers an examination of data richness (i.e., topic-related data, topic unrelated data, researcher ratings of data richness, word count, and linguistic characteristics of data richness) trade-offs between face-to-face (FTF), online text-only and online audiovisual focus group mediums. Two...
Saved in:
Published in: | Social science computer review 2015-02, Vol.33 (1), p.80-96 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-671da346dd9c86970a0d88c5461b703266e44a294da7a4c11b1bc54a2a9b118c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-671da346dd9c86970a0d88c5461b703266e44a294da7a4c11b1bc54a2a9b118c3 |
container_end_page | 96 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 80 |
container_title | Social science computer review |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Abrams, Katie M. Wang, Zongyuan Song, Yoo Jin Galindo-Gonzalez, Sebastian |
description | This study offers an examination of data richness (i.e., topic-related data, topic unrelated data, researcher ratings of data richness, word count, and linguistic characteristics of data richness) trade-offs between face-to-face (FTF), online text-only and online audiovisual focus group mediums. Two focus group sessions were held for each type of medium. Data were analyzed using systematic content analysis and Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Findings showed that although online audiovisual focus groups show potential for producing data similar in richness to FTF focus groups, researchers should carefully consider the potential distractions that manifested in this study as a result of the medium itself, likely due to its novelty as a group communication medium. Online text-only groups did not facilitate rich data, as operationalized in this study, and also had a lower amount of data related to the topic of the groups due to more socializing and off-topic discussion. As the first study to empirically examine the potential of data from focus groups facilitated via webcam (online audiovisual), it concludes, the technology offers similar data richness to FTF focus groups. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0894439313519733 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680153735</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0894439313519733</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1669866008</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-671da346dd9c86970a0d88c5461b703266e44a294da7a4c11b1bc54a2a9b118c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFLwzAUxoMoOKd3jwEvHhbNa9IkPc7ppjAYyDyXtyTTjq6dTavuv7d1CjIQPL3H-37fB4-PkHPgVwBaX3OTSCkSASKGRAtxQHoQxxEzkVGHpNfJrNOPyUkIK84h0pz3iLvFGuljZl8KHwKdV-g8my2Xgd74-t37go7RelaXrJsDOivyrPB02LisfMtCg_mAYuF-7nP_UbN239JxaZtAJ1XZbMIpOVpiHvzZ9-yTp_HdfHTPprPJw2g4ZVZKqJnS4FBI5VxijUo0R-6MsbFUsNBcREp5KTFKpEON0gIsYNGqGGGyADBW9MnlLndTla-ND3W6zoL1eY6FL5uQgjIcYqFF_A9UJUYpzk2LXuyhq7KpivaRlpLKmK_IPuE7ylZlCJVfppsqW2O1TYGnXUPpfkOthe0sAZ_9r9C_-E8nFI0q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1646881537</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Data Richness Trade-Offs Between Face-to-Face, Online Audiovisual, and Online Text-Only Focus Groups</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Abrams, Katie M. ; Wang, Zongyuan ; Song, Yoo Jin ; Galindo-Gonzalez, Sebastian</creator><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Katie M. ; Wang, Zongyuan ; Song, Yoo Jin ; Galindo-Gonzalez, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><description>This study offers an examination of data richness (i.e., topic-related data, topic unrelated data, researcher ratings of data richness, word count, and linguistic characteristics of data richness) trade-offs between face-to-face (FTF), online text-only and online audiovisual focus group mediums. Two focus group sessions were held for each type of medium. Data were analyzed using systematic content analysis and Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Findings showed that although online audiovisual focus groups show potential for producing data similar in richness to FTF focus groups, researchers should carefully consider the potential distractions that manifested in this study as a result of the medium itself, likely due to its novelty as a group communication medium. Online text-only groups did not facilitate rich data, as operationalized in this study, and also had a lower amount of data related to the topic of the groups due to more socializing and off-topic discussion. As the first study to empirically examine the potential of data from focus groups facilitated via webcam (online audiovisual), it concludes, the technology offers similar data richness to FTF focus groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-4393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8286</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0894439313519733</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSCREH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Audiovisual ; Communication ; Content analysis ; Counting ; Focus groups ; Group communication ; Internet ; Interpersonal communication ; Linguistics ; Online ; Technology ; Tradeoffs ; Webcams</subject><ispartof>Social science computer review, 2015-02, Vol.33 (1), p.80-96</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2014</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Feb 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-671da346dd9c86970a0d88c5461b703266e44a294da7a4c11b1bc54a2a9b118c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-671da346dd9c86970a0d88c5461b703266e44a294da7a4c11b1bc54a2a9b118c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33774,33775,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Katie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zongyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Yoo Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galindo-Gonzalez, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><title>Data Richness Trade-Offs Between Face-to-Face, Online Audiovisual, and Online Text-Only Focus Groups</title><title>Social science computer review</title><description>This study offers an examination of data richness (i.e., topic-related data, topic unrelated data, researcher ratings of data richness, word count, and linguistic characteristics of data richness) trade-offs between face-to-face (FTF), online text-only and online audiovisual focus group mediums. Two focus group sessions were held for each type of medium. Data were analyzed using systematic content analysis and Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Findings showed that although online audiovisual focus groups show potential for producing data similar in richness to FTF focus groups, researchers should carefully consider the potential distractions that manifested in this study as a result of the medium itself, likely due to its novelty as a group communication medium. Online text-only groups did not facilitate rich data, as operationalized in this study, and also had a lower amount of data related to the topic of the groups due to more socializing and off-topic discussion. As the first study to empirically examine the potential of data from focus groups facilitated via webcam (online audiovisual), it concludes, the technology offers similar data richness to FTF focus groups.</description><subject>Audiovisual</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Counting</subject><subject>Focus groups</subject><subject>Group communication</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Interpersonal communication</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Online</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Tradeoffs</subject><subject>Webcams</subject><issn>0894-4393</issn><issn>1552-8286</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFLwzAUxoMoOKd3jwEvHhbNa9IkPc7ppjAYyDyXtyTTjq6dTavuv7d1CjIQPL3H-37fB4-PkHPgVwBaX3OTSCkSASKGRAtxQHoQxxEzkVGHpNfJrNOPyUkIK84h0pz3iLvFGuljZl8KHwKdV-g8my2Xgd74-t37go7RelaXrJsDOivyrPB02LisfMtCg_mAYuF-7nP_UbN239JxaZtAJ1XZbMIpOVpiHvzZ9-yTp_HdfHTPprPJw2g4ZVZKqJnS4FBI5VxijUo0R-6MsbFUsNBcREp5KTFKpEON0gIsYNGqGGGyADBW9MnlLndTla-ND3W6zoL1eY6FL5uQgjIcYqFF_A9UJUYpzk2LXuyhq7KpivaRlpLKmK_IPuE7ylZlCJVfppsqW2O1TYGnXUPpfkOthe0sAZ_9r9C_-E8nFI0q</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Abrams, Katie M.</creator><creator>Wang, Zongyuan</creator><creator>Song, Yoo Jin</creator><creator>Galindo-Gonzalez, Sebastian</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>Data Richness Trade-Offs Between Face-to-Face, Online Audiovisual, and Online Text-Only Focus Groups</title><author>Abrams, Katie M. ; Wang, Zongyuan ; Song, Yoo Jin ; Galindo-Gonzalez, Sebastian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-671da346dd9c86970a0d88c5461b703266e44a294da7a4c11b1bc54a2a9b118c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Audiovisual</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Counting</topic><topic>Focus groups</topic><topic>Group communication</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Interpersonal communication</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Online</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Tradeoffs</topic><topic>Webcams</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Katie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zongyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Yoo Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galindo-Gonzalez, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social science computer review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abrams, Katie M.</au><au>Wang, Zongyuan</au><au>Song, Yoo Jin</au><au>Galindo-Gonzalez, Sebastian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Data Richness Trade-Offs Between Face-to-Face, Online Audiovisual, and Online Text-Only Focus Groups</atitle><jtitle>Social science computer review</jtitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>80</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>80-96</pages><issn>0894-4393</issn><eissn>1552-8286</eissn><coden>SSCREH</coden><abstract>This study offers an examination of data richness (i.e., topic-related data, topic unrelated data, researcher ratings of data richness, word count, and linguistic characteristics of data richness) trade-offs between face-to-face (FTF), online text-only and online audiovisual focus group mediums. Two focus group sessions were held for each type of medium. Data were analyzed using systematic content analysis and Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Findings showed that although online audiovisual focus groups show potential for producing data similar in richness to FTF focus groups, researchers should carefully consider the potential distractions that manifested in this study as a result of the medium itself, likely due to its novelty as a group communication medium. Online text-only groups did not facilitate rich data, as operationalized in this study, and also had a lower amount of data related to the topic of the groups due to more socializing and off-topic discussion. As the first study to empirically examine the potential of data from focus groups facilitated via webcam (online audiovisual), it concludes, the technology offers similar data richness to FTF focus groups.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0894439313519733</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0894-4393 |
ispartof | Social science computer review, 2015-02, Vol.33 (1), p.80-96 |
issn | 0894-4393 1552-8286 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1680153735 |
source | Sage Journals Online; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Audiovisual Communication Content analysis Counting Focus groups Group communication Internet Interpersonal communication Linguistics Online Technology Tradeoffs Webcams |
title | Data Richness Trade-Offs Between Face-to-Face, Online Audiovisual, and Online Text-Only Focus Groups |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A50%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Data%20Richness%20Trade-Offs%20Between%20Face-to-Face,%20Online%20Audiovisual,%20and%20Online%20Text-Only%20Focus%20Groups&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20computer%20review&rft.au=Abrams,%20Katie%20M.&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=80&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=80-96&rft.issn=0894-4393&rft.eissn=1552-8286&rft.coden=SSCREH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0894439313519733&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1669866008%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-671da346dd9c86970a0d88c5461b703266e44a294da7a4c11b1bc54a2a9b118c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1646881537&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0894439313519733&rfr_iscdi=true |