Public awareness of aesthetic and other forest values associated with sustainable forest management: A cross-cultural comparison among the public in four countries

• Published in: Journal of environmental management 2015-03, Vol.150, p.243-249
• Main Authors: Lim, Sang Seop, Innes, John L., Meitner, Michael
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aesthetics; Assessments; Canada; China; Climate change; College students; Confidence intervals; Conservation of Natural Resources; Cross cultural studies; Cross-Cultural Comparison; Economics; Female; Forest aesthetic indicator; Forest management; Forests; Humans; Indicators; Japan; Male; Multivariate analysis; Perceptions; Public awareness; Public Opinion; Republic of Korea; Social forest value; South Korea; Students; Surveys and Questionnaires; Sustainable development; Sustainable forest management; Values
• ISSN: 0301-4797; 1095-8630
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.11.026

Korea, China, Japan and Canada are all members of the Montreal Process (MP). However, there has been little comparative research on the public awareness of forest values within the framework of Sustainable Forest Management, not only between Asia and Canada, but also among these three Asian countries. This is true of aesthetic values, especially as the MP framework has no indicator for aesthetic values. We conducted surveys to identify similarities and differences in the perceptions of various forest values, including aesthetic values, between residents of the four countries: university student groups in Korea, China, Japan and Canada, as well as a more detailed assessment of the attitudes of Koreans by including two additional groups, Korean office workers, and Koreans living in Canada. A multivariate analysis of variance test across the four university student groups revealed significant differences in the rating of six forest functions out of 31. However the same test across the three Korean groups indicated no significant differences indicating higher confidence in the generalizability of our university student comparisons. For the forest aesthetic values, an analysis of variance test showed no significant differences across all groups. The forest aesthetic value was rated 6.95 to 7.98 (out of 10.0) depending on the group and rated relatively highly among ten social values across all the groups. Thurstone scale rankings and relative distances of six major forest values indicated that climate change control was ranked as the highest priority and scenic beauty was ranked the lowest by all the groups. Comparison tests of the frequencies of preferred major forest values revealed no significant differences across the groups with the exception of the Japanese group. These results suggest that public awareness of aesthetic and other forest values are not clearly correlated with the cultural backgrounds of the individuals, and the Korean university students' awareness could potentially be representative of the Koreans general public's opinion. We expect this research to contribute to the development of aesthetic and social indicators, and to the enhancement of balancing social with environmental and economic values within the SFM framework. •We conducted surveys of Koreans, Chinese, Japanese and Canadians.•We compared their opinions about the aesthetic and other forest values.•The forest aesthetic value was rated relatively highly among the ten social values.•