Newborn hearing screening: analysis and outcomes after 100,000 births in Upper-Normandy French region

• Published in: International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology 2015-06, Vol.79 (6), p.829-833
• Main Authors: Caluraud, Sophie, Marcolla-Bouchetemblé, Aurore, de Barros, Angélique, Moreau-Lenoir, Florence, de Sevin, Emmanuel, Rerolle, Stéphane, Charrière, Elisabeth, Lecler-Scarcella, Véronique, Billet, François, Obstoy, Marie-Françoise, Amstutz-Montadert, Isabelle, Marie, Jean-Paul, Lerosey, Yannick
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Audiometry, Evoked Response; Automatic auditory brainstem response; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem; France; Hearing impairment; Hearing Loss - diagnosis; Hearing Loss - rehabilitation; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal; Neonatal Screening - methods; Newborn hearing screening; Otoacoustic emissions; Otolaryngology; Pediatrics; Pilot Projects; Program Evaluation; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors
• ISSN: 0165-5876; 1872-8464
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.03.012

Abstract Objectives Neonatal hearing impairment is a common disorder with a prevalence of 1 to 2‰ worldwide, with significant consequences on overall development when rehabilitated too late. New-born hearing screening has been implemented in the 1990s in most European countries and the USA. The Upper-Normandy region of France has been conducting a pilot program since 1999. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate and critically analyse it. Methods The Upper-Normandy universal new-born hearing screening program is performed in two steps. Between 1999 and 2004, first, we administered a Transient Evoked Oto Acoustic Emission (TEOAE) test was administered a few days after birth for healthy newborns without risk factors. For newborns admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) or presenting risk factors, was administered an automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) test prior to discharge. Second, newborns who failed the initial hearing screening were retested as outpatients using TEOAE. Since 2004, infants who failed the initial screen were tested with AABR 3 to 4 weeks later as outpatients, providing an opportunity to compare the two protocols. Results Overall screening coverage in the Upper-Normandy region is 99.8%. First step coverage is 99.58% in well-infant nurseries and 97.09% in the NICU. The test–retest procedure during the first step and the use of AABR for the second resulted in higher follow-up rates and lower false positive rates. Conclusions The Upper-Normandy region universal newborn hearing screening program facilitated diagnosis and rehabilitation of infants before age of 9 months, most notably when severe to profound hearing impairment was found.