Challenges and opportunities in biodiversity conservation on private land: an institutional perspective from Central Europe and North America

• Published in: Biodiversity and conservation 2015-05, Vol.24 (5), p.1271-1292
• Main Authors: Kamal, Sristi, Grodzinska-Jurczak, Malgorzata, Kaszynska, Agata Pietrzyk
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; Biodiversity; Biodiversity loss; Biological diversity conservation; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Case studies; Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts; Conservation biology; Conservation Biology/Ecology; Ecology; Environmental policy; Land; Land conservation; Life Sciences; Original Paper; Private lands; Private property; Protected areas; Protection and preservation; Stakeholders
• ISSN: 0960-3115; 1572-9710
• DOI: 10.1007/s10531-014-0857-5

Private land is gradually emerging as a global biodiversity conservation strategy for its potential to complement the existing protected area model in its attempt to halt the global biodiversity loss. However, involving private lands in conserving a public good face continuous challenges. While examining landowners’ motivations for conserving their land is imperative to its success, it is equally important to assess how other stakeholder groups perceive private land conservation. In order to capture the diversity and contrasts in implementing private land conservation, this research focuses on investigating the managerial perspectives on the status of private land conservation in two countries: USA and Poland. The paper presents the results of twenty five in-depth interviews that were conducted in the two countries. The US context, with a longer history and experience, captured complex interactions and factors that influence private land conservation, including role of conservation policies, civic sector organizations, stakeholder collaboration, technical and financial support, and nonmonetary motivations of landowners. The Polish context however, was limited to the regulatory model and as such did not differentiate private land conservation from traditional protected areas. Additionally, the lack of voluntary initiatives along with adequate policies and lack of awareness on private land conservation at a national and local level contributed to limited scope and understanding on the subject. The two case studies highlight the context dependency of such a strategy and bring to focus some of the factors that should be addressed while adopting conservation on private land as a biodiversity conservation strategy.