prevalence of metabolically healthy obesity: a systematic review and critical evaluation of the definitions used

We performed a systematic review of the prevalence of metabolically healthy obesity (MHO). Medline, Web of Science and EMBASE were searched for original articles from inception to November 2013. Only prospective and cross‐sectional studies were included. After screening 478 titles, we selected 55 pu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Obesity reviews 2014-10, Vol.15 (10), p.781-790
Main Authors: Rey‐López, J. P, Rezende, L. F, Pastor‐Valero, M, Tess, B. H
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biomarkers - blood
blood glucose
Blood Glucose - physiology
blood pressure
Blood Pressure - physiology
Body Composition
Body Mass Index
cholesterol
Cholesterol, HDL - blood
Cross-Sectional Studies
Epidemiology
Health Behavior
Humans
lipoproteins
obesity
Obesity - classification
Obesity - epidemiology
Obesity - metabolism
obesity phenotype
Prevalence
Prospective Studies
screening
systematic review
triacylglycerols
Triglycerides - blood
women
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We performed a systematic review of the prevalence of metabolically healthy obesity (MHO). Medline, Web of Science and EMBASE were searched for original articles from inception to November 2013. Only prospective and cross‐sectional studies were included. After screening 478 titles, we selected 55 publications, of which 27 were population‐based studies and were used in the narrative synthesis. From the 27 studies, we identified 30 definitions of metabolic health, mainly based on four criteria: blood pressure, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides and plasma glucose. Body mass index ≥30 kg m⁻² was the main indicator used to define obesity (74% of the studies). Overall, MHO prevalence ranged between 6% and 75%. In the studies that stratified the analysis by sex, prevalence was higher in women (seven out of nine studies) and in younger ages (all four studies). One‐third of the studies (n = 9) reported the response rate. Of these, four reported a response rate of ≥70% and they showed MHO prevalence estimates between 10% and 51%. The heterogeneity of MHO prevalence estimates described in this paper strengthens calls for the urgent need for a commonly established metabolic health definition.
ISSN:1467-7881
1467-789X
DOI:10.1111/obr.12198