Loading…

The current strategy for urachal remnants

Background Optimal therapy for urachal remnant (UR) in children is controversial. Nonoperative management for symptomatic UR is an alternative. Many papers support the laparoscopic approach but the indication for this is unclear. We review our experience to determine the optimal management of UR. Ma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pediatric surgery international 2015-06, Vol.31 (6), p.581-587
Main Authors: Sato, Hideaki, Furuta, Shigeyuki, Tsuji, Shiho, Kawase, Hirokazu, Kitagawa, Hiroaki
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-1de02b582d50e3dfffdb19367db56015e8914cf952823ce49d9956df47a8ffac3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-1de02b582d50e3dfffdb19367db56015e8914cf952823ce49d9956df47a8ffac3
container_end_page 587
container_issue 6
container_start_page 581
container_title Pediatric surgery international
container_volume 31
creator Sato, Hideaki
Furuta, Shigeyuki
Tsuji, Shiho
Kawase, Hirokazu
Kitagawa, Hiroaki
description Background Optimal therapy for urachal remnant (UR) in children is controversial. Nonoperative management for symptomatic UR is an alternative. Many papers support the laparoscopic approach but the indication for this is unclear. We review our experience to determine the optimal management of UR. Materials and methods A retrospective chart review of patients from 1990 to 2013 with UR was performed. Patients were analyzed according to age, gender, initial symptoms, type of UR, treatment, and outcome. Results We identified 27 patients (M:F = 17:10). A urachal sinus was found in 16 cases (59 %), a urachal cyst in 5 (18 %) and a urachal duct in 6 (22 %). Eleven (A) were under 1 year, with 16 over 1 year (B). In Group A, the commonest symptom was umbilical granulation ( n  = 6, 54 %). Group B was dominated by abdominal pain ( n  = 12, 75 %). Six cases in Group A needed operation for repeated infections. In 5 cases, the UR disappeared. In Group B, 2 cases were followed conservatively. The others required surgery. From 2009, we utilized a laparoscopic approach (LA, n  = 7) rather than the classical umbilical approach (UA, n  = 13). The operation time was not significantly different (LA = 124 min: UA = 110 min, P  > 0.05). There was a tendency for shorter hospital stay following LA (LA = 7.5 days: UA = 10.9 days). Complete resection was always possible using UA in Group A but a more caudal incision (mean 3.6 cm) was required in group B. LA enabled confirmation of the complete resection with three 5 mm ports in Group B. There were no operative complications after LA against two wound infections, one of which suffered a disruption, after UA. Conclusion Conservative follow-up is recommended for UR under 1-year old except when there are repeated infections. The umbilical approach is enough for infants. Laparoscopic surgery is recommended in older children.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00383-015-3712-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1681262271</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3683360841</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-1de02b582d50e3dfffdb19367db56015e8914cf952823ce49d9956df47a8ffac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUhoMozjj6AG6k4EYX0ZykSZOlDN5gwM24Dmkuc6HTjkm78O1t6SgiuDqL853__HwIXQK5A0KK-0QIkwwT4JgVQDEcoSnkrMBKAjtGUwKFwoRxOUFnKW0JIZIJdYomlEslqMqn6Ha59pntYvR1m6U2mtavPrPQxKyLxq5NlUW_q03dpnN0EkyV_MVhztD70-Ny_oIXb8-v84cFtnlOWwzOE1pySR0nnrkQgitBMVG4kou-qZcKchsUp5Iy63PllOLChbwwMgRj2QzdjLn72Hx0PrV6t0nWV5WpfdMlDUICFZQW0KPXf9Bt08W6bzdQRHAlhOopGCkbm5SiD3ofNzsTPzUQPXjUo0fdt9ODRz0kXx2Su3Ln3c_Ft7geoCOQ-lW98vHX639TvwBrEHu-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1680659669</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The current strategy for urachal remnants</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Sato, Hideaki ; Furuta, Shigeyuki ; Tsuji, Shiho ; Kawase, Hirokazu ; Kitagawa, Hiroaki</creator><creatorcontrib>Sato, Hideaki ; Furuta, Shigeyuki ; Tsuji, Shiho ; Kawase, Hirokazu ; Kitagawa, Hiroaki</creatorcontrib><description>Background Optimal therapy for urachal remnant (UR) in children is controversial. Nonoperative management for symptomatic UR is an alternative. Many papers support the laparoscopic approach but the indication for this is unclear. We review our experience to determine the optimal management of UR. Materials and methods A retrospective chart review of patients from 1990 to 2013 with UR was performed. Patients were analyzed according to age, gender, initial symptoms, type of UR, treatment, and outcome. Results We identified 27 patients (M:F = 17:10). A urachal sinus was found in 16 cases (59 %), a urachal cyst in 5 (18 %) and a urachal duct in 6 (22 %). Eleven (A) were under 1 year, with 16 over 1 year (B). In Group A, the commonest symptom was umbilical granulation ( n  = 6, 54 %). Group B was dominated by abdominal pain ( n  = 12, 75 %). Six cases in Group A needed operation for repeated infections. In 5 cases, the UR disappeared. In Group B, 2 cases were followed conservatively. The others required surgery. From 2009, we utilized a laparoscopic approach (LA, n  = 7) rather than the classical umbilical approach (UA, n  = 13). The operation time was not significantly different (LA = 124 min: UA = 110 min, P  &gt; 0.05). There was a tendency for shorter hospital stay following LA (LA = 7.5 days: UA = 10.9 days). Complete resection was always possible using UA in Group A but a more caudal incision (mean 3.6 cm) was required in group B. LA enabled confirmation of the complete resection with three 5 mm ports in Group B. There were no operative complications after LA against two wound infections, one of which suffered a disruption, after UA. Conclusion Conservative follow-up is recommended for UR under 1-year old except when there are repeated infections. The umbilical approach is enough for infants. Laparoscopic surgery is recommended in older children.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0179-0358</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1437-9813</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00383-015-3712-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25896294</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Laparoscopy ; Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Original Article ; Pediatric Surgery ; Pediatrics ; Postoperative Complications - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Urachal Cyst - surgery ; Urachus - surgery</subject><ispartof>Pediatric surgery international, 2015-06, Vol.31 (6), p.581-587</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-1de02b582d50e3dfffdb19367db56015e8914cf952823ce49d9956df47a8ffac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-1de02b582d50e3dfffdb19367db56015e8914cf952823ce49d9956df47a8ffac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25896294$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sato, Hideaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furuta, Shigeyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuji, Shiho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawase, Hirokazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitagawa, Hiroaki</creatorcontrib><title>The current strategy for urachal remnants</title><title>Pediatric surgery international</title><addtitle>Pediatr Surg Int</addtitle><addtitle>Pediatr Surg Int</addtitle><description>Background Optimal therapy for urachal remnant (UR) in children is controversial. Nonoperative management for symptomatic UR is an alternative. Many papers support the laparoscopic approach but the indication for this is unclear. We review our experience to determine the optimal management of UR. Materials and methods A retrospective chart review of patients from 1990 to 2013 with UR was performed. Patients were analyzed according to age, gender, initial symptoms, type of UR, treatment, and outcome. Results We identified 27 patients (M:F = 17:10). A urachal sinus was found in 16 cases (59 %), a urachal cyst in 5 (18 %) and a urachal duct in 6 (22 %). Eleven (A) were under 1 year, with 16 over 1 year (B). In Group A, the commonest symptom was umbilical granulation ( n  = 6, 54 %). Group B was dominated by abdominal pain ( n  = 12, 75 %). Six cases in Group A needed operation for repeated infections. In 5 cases, the UR disappeared. In Group B, 2 cases were followed conservatively. The others required surgery. From 2009, we utilized a laparoscopic approach (LA, n  = 7) rather than the classical umbilical approach (UA, n  = 13). The operation time was not significantly different (LA = 124 min: UA = 110 min, P  &gt; 0.05). There was a tendency for shorter hospital stay following LA (LA = 7.5 days: UA = 10.9 days). Complete resection was always possible using UA in Group A but a more caudal incision (mean 3.6 cm) was required in group B. LA enabled confirmation of the complete resection with three 5 mm ports in Group B. There were no operative complications after LA against two wound infections, one of which suffered a disruption, after UA. Conclusion Conservative follow-up is recommended for UR under 1-year old except when there are repeated infections. The umbilical approach is enough for infants. Laparoscopic surgery is recommended in older children.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pediatric Surgery</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urachal Cyst - surgery</subject><subject>Urachus - surgery</subject><issn>0179-0358</issn><issn>1437-9813</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUhoMozjj6AG6k4EYX0ZykSZOlDN5gwM24Dmkuc6HTjkm78O1t6SgiuDqL853__HwIXQK5A0KK-0QIkwwT4JgVQDEcoSnkrMBKAjtGUwKFwoRxOUFnKW0JIZIJdYomlEslqMqn6Ha59pntYvR1m6U2mtavPrPQxKyLxq5NlUW_q03dpnN0EkyV_MVhztD70-Ny_oIXb8-v84cFtnlOWwzOE1pySR0nnrkQgitBMVG4kou-qZcKchsUp5Iy63PllOLChbwwMgRj2QzdjLn72Hx0PrV6t0nWV5WpfdMlDUICFZQW0KPXf9Bt08W6bzdQRHAlhOopGCkbm5SiD3ofNzsTPzUQPXjUo0fdt9ODRz0kXx2Su3Ln3c_Ft7geoCOQ-lW98vHX639TvwBrEHu-</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Sato, Hideaki</creator><creator>Furuta, Shigeyuki</creator><creator>Tsuji, Shiho</creator><creator>Kawase, Hirokazu</creator><creator>Kitagawa, Hiroaki</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>The current strategy for urachal remnants</title><author>Sato, Hideaki ; Furuta, Shigeyuki ; Tsuji, Shiho ; Kawase, Hirokazu ; Kitagawa, Hiroaki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-1de02b582d50e3dfffdb19367db56015e8914cf952823ce49d9956df47a8ffac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pediatric Surgery</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urachal Cyst - surgery</topic><topic>Urachus - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sato, Hideaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furuta, Shigeyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuji, Shiho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawase, Hirokazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitagawa, Hiroaki</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatric surgery international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sato, Hideaki</au><au>Furuta, Shigeyuki</au><au>Tsuji, Shiho</au><au>Kawase, Hirokazu</au><au>Kitagawa, Hiroaki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The current strategy for urachal remnants</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric surgery international</jtitle><stitle>Pediatr Surg Int</stitle><addtitle>Pediatr Surg Int</addtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>581</spage><epage>587</epage><pages>581-587</pages><issn>0179-0358</issn><eissn>1437-9813</eissn><abstract>Background Optimal therapy for urachal remnant (UR) in children is controversial. Nonoperative management for symptomatic UR is an alternative. Many papers support the laparoscopic approach but the indication for this is unclear. We review our experience to determine the optimal management of UR. Materials and methods A retrospective chart review of patients from 1990 to 2013 with UR was performed. Patients were analyzed according to age, gender, initial symptoms, type of UR, treatment, and outcome. Results We identified 27 patients (M:F = 17:10). A urachal sinus was found in 16 cases (59 %), a urachal cyst in 5 (18 %) and a urachal duct in 6 (22 %). Eleven (A) were under 1 year, with 16 over 1 year (B). In Group A, the commonest symptom was umbilical granulation ( n  = 6, 54 %). Group B was dominated by abdominal pain ( n  = 12, 75 %). Six cases in Group A needed operation for repeated infections. In 5 cases, the UR disappeared. In Group B, 2 cases were followed conservatively. The others required surgery. From 2009, we utilized a laparoscopic approach (LA, n  = 7) rather than the classical umbilical approach (UA, n  = 13). The operation time was not significantly different (LA = 124 min: UA = 110 min, P  &gt; 0.05). There was a tendency for shorter hospital stay following LA (LA = 7.5 days: UA = 10.9 days). Complete resection was always possible using UA in Group A but a more caudal incision (mean 3.6 cm) was required in group B. LA enabled confirmation of the complete resection with three 5 mm ports in Group B. There were no operative complications after LA against two wound infections, one of which suffered a disruption, after UA. Conclusion Conservative follow-up is recommended for UR under 1-year old except when there are repeated infections. The umbilical approach is enough for infants. Laparoscopic surgery is recommended in older children.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>25896294</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00383-015-3712-1</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0179-0358
ispartof Pediatric surgery international, 2015-06, Vol.31 (6), p.581-587
issn 0179-0358
1437-9813
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1681262271
source Springer Nature
subjects Adolescent
Child
Child, Preschool
Female
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Laparoscopy
Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Original Article
Pediatric Surgery
Pediatrics
Postoperative Complications - surgery
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
Urachal Cyst - surgery
Urachus - surgery
title The current strategy for urachal remnants
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A02%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20current%20strategy%20for%20urachal%20remnants&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20surgery%20international&rft.au=Sato,%20Hideaki&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=581&rft.epage=587&rft.pages=581-587&rft.issn=0179-0358&rft.eissn=1437-9813&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00383-015-3712-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3683360841%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-1de02b582d50e3dfffdb19367db56015e8914cf952823ce49d9956df47a8ffac3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1680659669&rft_id=info:pmid/25896294&rfr_iscdi=true