Loading…
Field Measurement of Beef Pen Manure Methane and Nitrous Oxide Reveals a Surprise for Inventory Calculations
Few data exist on direct greenhouse gas emissions from pen manure at beef feedlots. However, emission inventories attempt to account for these emissions. This study used a large chamber to isolate N2O and CH4 emissions from pen manure at two Australian commercial beef feedlots (stocking densities, 1...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of environmental quality 2015-05, Vol.44 (3), p.720-728 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3529-d72fb2d9c2b73fb5d4ce307c8e18b1022aeb121f2addaa2e44877f98317f7f013 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3529-d72fb2d9c2b73fb5d4ce307c8e18b1022aeb121f2addaa2e44877f98317f7f013 |
container_end_page | 728 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 720 |
container_title | Journal of environmental quality |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Redding, M. R. Devereux, J. Phillips, F. Lewis, R. Naylor, T. Kearton, T. Hill, C. J. Weidemann, S. |
description | Few data exist on direct greenhouse gas emissions from pen manure at beef feedlots. However, emission inventories attempt to account for these emissions. This study used a large chamber to isolate N2O and CH4 emissions from pen manure at two Australian commercial beef feedlots (stocking densities, 13–27 m2 head) and related these emissions to a range of potential emission control factors, including masses and concentrations of volatile solids, NO3−, total N, NH4+, and organic C (OC), and additional factors such as total manure mass, cattle numbers, manure pack depth and density, temperature, and moisture content. Mean measured pen N2O emissions were 0.428 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.252–0.691) and 0.00405 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% CI, 0.00114–0.0110) for the northern and southern feedlots, respectively. Mean measured CH4 emission was 0.236 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% CI, 0.163–0.332) for the northern feedlot and 3.93 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% CI, 2.58–5.81) for the southern feedlot. Nitrous oxide emission increased with density, pH, temperature, and manure mass, whereas negative relationships were evident with moisture and OC. Strong relationships were not evident between N2O emission and masses or concentrations of NO3− or total N in the manure. This is significant because many standard inventory calculation protocols predict N2O emissions using the mass of N excreted by the animal. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2134/jeq2014.04.0159 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685744656</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1685744656</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3529-d72fb2d9c2b73fb5d4ce307c8e18b1022aeb121f2addaa2e44877f98317f7f013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1PwjAYxhujEUTP3kyPXgZt163bxUQJKAbFz3PTrW_jyNig3VD-e4ugV5O3H3n669O-D0LnlPQZDflgDitGKO8TXzRKD1CXRqEImJ8OUZcQ7vecRR104tycEMqIiI9Rh8VkK4ddVI4LKDV-AOVaCwuoGlwbfANg8BNU-EFVXvbHzYeqAKtK48eisXXr8Oyr0IBfYA2qdFjh19YubeEAm9riSbX2VrXd4KEq87ZUTVFX7hQdGQ_D2X7toffx6G14F0xnt5Ph9TTIw4ilgRbMZEynOctEaLJI8xxCIvIEaJJRwpiCjDJqmNJaKQacJ0KYNAmpMMIQGvbQ5c53aetVC66Ri8LlUJa-B_91SeMkEpzHUezRwQ7Nbe2cBSN9EwtlN5ISuY1Y7iOWxJeP2N-42Ju32QL0H_-bqQeudsBnUcLmPz95P3pm2-E1wn9e-AYlgIoB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1685744656</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Field Measurement of Beef Pen Manure Methane and Nitrous Oxide Reveals a Surprise for Inventory Calculations</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Redding, M. R. ; Devereux, J. ; Phillips, F. ; Lewis, R. ; Naylor, T. ; Kearton, T. ; Hill, C. J. ; Weidemann, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Redding, M. R. ; Devereux, J. ; Phillips, F. ; Lewis, R. ; Naylor, T. ; Kearton, T. ; Hill, C. J. ; Weidemann, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Few data exist on direct greenhouse gas emissions from pen manure at beef feedlots. However, emission inventories attempt to account for these emissions. This study used a large chamber to isolate N2O and CH4 emissions from pen manure at two Australian commercial beef feedlots (stocking densities, 13–27 m2 head) and related these emissions to a range of potential emission control factors, including masses and concentrations of volatile solids, NO3−, total N, NH4+, and organic C (OC), and additional factors such as total manure mass, cattle numbers, manure pack depth and density, temperature, and moisture content. Mean measured pen N2O emissions were 0.428 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.252–0.691) and 0.00405 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% CI, 0.00114–0.0110) for the northern and southern feedlots, respectively. Mean measured CH4 emission was 0.236 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% CI, 0.163–0.332) for the northern feedlot and 3.93 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% CI, 2.58–5.81) for the southern feedlot. Nitrous oxide emission increased with density, pH, temperature, and manure mass, whereas negative relationships were evident with moisture and OC. Strong relationships were not evident between N2O emission and masses or concentrations of NO3− or total N in the manure. This is significant because many standard inventory calculation protocols predict N2O emissions using the mass of N excreted by the animal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2425</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/jeq2014.04.0159</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26024253</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc</publisher><ispartof>Journal of environmental quality, 2015-05, Vol.44 (3), p.720-728</ispartof><rights>Copyright © by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3529-d72fb2d9c2b73fb5d4ce307c8e18b1022aeb121f2addaa2e44877f98317f7f013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3529-d72fb2d9c2b73fb5d4ce307c8e18b1022aeb121f2addaa2e44877f98317f7f013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26024253$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Redding, M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devereux, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naylor, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kearton, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weidemann, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Field Measurement of Beef Pen Manure Methane and Nitrous Oxide Reveals a Surprise for Inventory Calculations</title><title>Journal of environmental quality</title><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><description>Few data exist on direct greenhouse gas emissions from pen manure at beef feedlots. However, emission inventories attempt to account for these emissions. This study used a large chamber to isolate N2O and CH4 emissions from pen manure at two Australian commercial beef feedlots (stocking densities, 13–27 m2 head) and related these emissions to a range of potential emission control factors, including masses and concentrations of volatile solids, NO3−, total N, NH4+, and organic C (OC), and additional factors such as total manure mass, cattle numbers, manure pack depth and density, temperature, and moisture content. Mean measured pen N2O emissions were 0.428 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.252–0.691) and 0.00405 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% CI, 0.00114–0.0110) for the northern and southern feedlots, respectively. Mean measured CH4 emission was 0.236 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% CI, 0.163–0.332) for the northern feedlot and 3.93 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% CI, 2.58–5.81) for the southern feedlot. Nitrous oxide emission increased with density, pH, temperature, and manure mass, whereas negative relationships were evident with moisture and OC. Strong relationships were not evident between N2O emission and masses or concentrations of NO3− or total N in the manure. This is significant because many standard inventory calculation protocols predict N2O emissions using the mass of N excreted by the animal.</description><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1PwjAYxhujEUTP3kyPXgZt163bxUQJKAbFz3PTrW_jyNig3VD-e4ugV5O3H3n669O-D0LnlPQZDflgDitGKO8TXzRKD1CXRqEImJ8OUZcQ7vecRR104tycEMqIiI9Rh8VkK4ddVI4LKDV-AOVaCwuoGlwbfANg8BNU-EFVXvbHzYeqAKtK48eisXXr8Oyr0IBfYA2qdFjh19YubeEAm9riSbX2VrXd4KEq87ZUTVFX7hQdGQ_D2X7toffx6G14F0xnt5Ph9TTIw4ilgRbMZEynOctEaLJI8xxCIvIEaJJRwpiCjDJqmNJaKQacJ0KYNAmpMMIQGvbQ5c53aetVC66Ri8LlUJa-B_91SeMkEpzHUezRwQ7Nbe2cBSN9EwtlN5ISuY1Y7iOWxJeP2N-42Ju32QL0H_-bqQeudsBnUcLmPz95P3pm2-E1wn9e-AYlgIoB</recordid><startdate>201505</startdate><enddate>201505</enddate><creator>Redding, M. R.</creator><creator>Devereux, J.</creator><creator>Phillips, F.</creator><creator>Lewis, R.</creator><creator>Naylor, T.</creator><creator>Kearton, T.</creator><creator>Hill, C. J.</creator><creator>Weidemann, S.</creator><general>The American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201505</creationdate><title>Field Measurement of Beef Pen Manure Methane and Nitrous Oxide Reveals a Surprise for Inventory Calculations</title><author>Redding, M. R. ; Devereux, J. ; Phillips, F. ; Lewis, R. ; Naylor, T. ; Kearton, T. ; Hill, C. J. ; Weidemann, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3529-d72fb2d9c2b73fb5d4ce307c8e18b1022aeb121f2addaa2e44877f98317f7f013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Redding, M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devereux, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naylor, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kearton, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weidemann, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Redding, M. R.</au><au>Devereux, J.</au><au>Phillips, F.</au><au>Lewis, R.</au><au>Naylor, T.</au><au>Kearton, T.</au><au>Hill, C. J.</au><au>Weidemann, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Field Measurement of Beef Pen Manure Methane and Nitrous Oxide Reveals a Surprise for Inventory Calculations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><date>2015-05</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>720</spage><epage>728</epage><pages>720-728</pages><issn>0047-2425</issn><eissn>1537-2537</eissn><abstract>Few data exist on direct greenhouse gas emissions from pen manure at beef feedlots. However, emission inventories attempt to account for these emissions. This study used a large chamber to isolate N2O and CH4 emissions from pen manure at two Australian commercial beef feedlots (stocking densities, 13–27 m2 head) and related these emissions to a range of potential emission control factors, including masses and concentrations of volatile solids, NO3−, total N, NH4+, and organic C (OC), and additional factors such as total manure mass, cattle numbers, manure pack depth and density, temperature, and moisture content. Mean measured pen N2O emissions were 0.428 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.252–0.691) and 0.00405 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% CI, 0.00114–0.0110) for the northern and southern feedlots, respectively. Mean measured CH4 emission was 0.236 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% CI, 0.163–0.332) for the northern feedlot and 3.93 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% CI, 2.58–5.81) for the southern feedlot. Nitrous oxide emission increased with density, pH, temperature, and manure mass, whereas negative relationships were evident with moisture and OC. Strong relationships were not evident between N2O emission and masses or concentrations of NO3− or total N in the manure. This is significant because many standard inventory calculation protocols predict N2O emissions using the mass of N excreted by the animal.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc</pub><pmid>26024253</pmid><doi>10.2134/jeq2014.04.0159</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0047-2425 |
ispartof | Journal of environmental quality, 2015-05, Vol.44 (3), p.720-728 |
issn | 0047-2425 1537-2537 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685744656 |
source | Wiley |
title | Field Measurement of Beef Pen Manure Methane and Nitrous Oxide Reveals a Surprise for Inventory Calculations |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T23%3A45%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Field%20Measurement%20of%20Beef%20Pen%20Manure%20Methane%20and%20Nitrous%20Oxide%20Reveals%20a%20Surprise%20for%20Inventory%20Calculations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20quality&rft.au=Redding,%20M.%20R.&rft.date=2015-05&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=720&rft.epage=728&rft.pages=720-728&rft.issn=0047-2425&rft.eissn=1537-2537&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/jeq2014.04.0159&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1685744656%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3529-d72fb2d9c2b73fb5d4ce307c8e18b1022aeb121f2addaa2e44877f98317f7f013%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1685744656&rft_id=info:pmid/26024253&rfr_iscdi=true |