Loading…

Field Measurement of Beef Pen Manure Methane and Nitrous Oxide Reveals a Surprise for Inventory Calculations

Few data exist on direct greenhouse gas emissions from pen manure at beef feedlots. However, emission inventories attempt to account for these emissions. This study used a large chamber to isolate N2O and CH4 emissions from pen manure at two Australian commercial beef feedlots (stocking densities, 1...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of environmental quality 2015-05, Vol.44 (3), p.720-728
Main Authors: Redding, M. R., Devereux, J., Phillips, F., Lewis, R., Naylor, T., Kearton, T., Hill, C. J., Weidemann, S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3529-d72fb2d9c2b73fb5d4ce307c8e18b1022aeb121f2addaa2e44877f98317f7f013
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3529-d72fb2d9c2b73fb5d4ce307c8e18b1022aeb121f2addaa2e44877f98317f7f013
container_end_page 728
container_issue 3
container_start_page 720
container_title Journal of environmental quality
container_volume 44
creator Redding, M. R.
Devereux, J.
Phillips, F.
Lewis, R.
Naylor, T.
Kearton, T.
Hill, C. J.
Weidemann, S.
description Few data exist on direct greenhouse gas emissions from pen manure at beef feedlots. However, emission inventories attempt to account for these emissions. This study used a large chamber to isolate N2O and CH4 emissions from pen manure at two Australian commercial beef feedlots (stocking densities, 13–27 m2 head) and related these emissions to a range of potential emission control factors, including masses and concentrations of volatile solids, NO3−, total N, NH4+, and organic C (OC), and additional factors such as total manure mass, cattle numbers, manure pack depth and density, temperature, and moisture content. Mean measured pen N2O emissions were 0.428 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.252–0.691) and 0.00405 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% CI, 0.00114–0.0110) for the northern and southern feedlots, respectively. Mean measured CH4 emission was 0.236 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% CI, 0.163–0.332) for the northern feedlot and 3.93 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% CI, 2.58–5.81) for the southern feedlot. Nitrous oxide emission increased with density, pH, temperature, and manure mass, whereas negative relationships were evident with moisture and OC. Strong relationships were not evident between N2O emission and masses or concentrations of NO3− or total N in the manure. This is significant because many standard inventory calculation protocols predict N2O emissions using the mass of N excreted by the animal.
doi_str_mv 10.2134/jeq2014.04.0159
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685744656</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1685744656</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3529-d72fb2d9c2b73fb5d4ce307c8e18b1022aeb121f2addaa2e44877f98317f7f013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1PwjAYxhujEUTP3kyPXgZt163bxUQJKAbFz3PTrW_jyNig3VD-e4ugV5O3H3n669O-D0LnlPQZDflgDitGKO8TXzRKD1CXRqEImJ8OUZcQ7vecRR104tycEMqIiI9Rh8VkK4ddVI4LKDV-AOVaCwuoGlwbfANg8BNU-EFVXvbHzYeqAKtK48eisXXr8Oyr0IBfYA2qdFjh19YubeEAm9riSbX2VrXd4KEq87ZUTVFX7hQdGQ_D2X7toffx6G14F0xnt5Ph9TTIw4ilgRbMZEynOctEaLJI8xxCIvIEaJJRwpiCjDJqmNJaKQacJ0KYNAmpMMIQGvbQ5c53aetVC66Ri8LlUJa-B_91SeMkEpzHUezRwQ7Nbe2cBSN9EwtlN5ISuY1Y7iOWxJeP2N-42Ju32QL0H_-bqQeudsBnUcLmPz95P3pm2-E1wn9e-AYlgIoB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1685744656</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Field Measurement of Beef Pen Manure Methane and Nitrous Oxide Reveals a Surprise for Inventory Calculations</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Redding, M. R. ; Devereux, J. ; Phillips, F. ; Lewis, R. ; Naylor, T. ; Kearton, T. ; Hill, C. J. ; Weidemann, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Redding, M. R. ; Devereux, J. ; Phillips, F. ; Lewis, R. ; Naylor, T. ; Kearton, T. ; Hill, C. J. ; Weidemann, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Few data exist on direct greenhouse gas emissions from pen manure at beef feedlots. However, emission inventories attempt to account for these emissions. This study used a large chamber to isolate N2O and CH4 emissions from pen manure at two Australian commercial beef feedlots (stocking densities, 13–27 m2 head) and related these emissions to a range of potential emission control factors, including masses and concentrations of volatile solids, NO3−, total N, NH4+, and organic C (OC), and additional factors such as total manure mass, cattle numbers, manure pack depth and density, temperature, and moisture content. Mean measured pen N2O emissions were 0.428 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.252–0.691) and 0.00405 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% CI, 0.00114–0.0110) for the northern and southern feedlots, respectively. Mean measured CH4 emission was 0.236 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% CI, 0.163–0.332) for the northern feedlot and 3.93 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% CI, 2.58–5.81) for the southern feedlot. Nitrous oxide emission increased with density, pH, temperature, and manure mass, whereas negative relationships were evident with moisture and OC. Strong relationships were not evident between N2O emission and masses or concentrations of NO3− or total N in the manure. This is significant because many standard inventory calculation protocols predict N2O emissions using the mass of N excreted by the animal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2425</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/jeq2014.04.0159</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26024253</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc</publisher><ispartof>Journal of environmental quality, 2015-05, Vol.44 (3), p.720-728</ispartof><rights>Copyright © by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3529-d72fb2d9c2b73fb5d4ce307c8e18b1022aeb121f2addaa2e44877f98317f7f013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3529-d72fb2d9c2b73fb5d4ce307c8e18b1022aeb121f2addaa2e44877f98317f7f013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26024253$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Redding, M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devereux, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naylor, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kearton, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weidemann, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Field Measurement of Beef Pen Manure Methane and Nitrous Oxide Reveals a Surprise for Inventory Calculations</title><title>Journal of environmental quality</title><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><description>Few data exist on direct greenhouse gas emissions from pen manure at beef feedlots. However, emission inventories attempt to account for these emissions. This study used a large chamber to isolate N2O and CH4 emissions from pen manure at two Australian commercial beef feedlots (stocking densities, 13–27 m2 head) and related these emissions to a range of potential emission control factors, including masses and concentrations of volatile solids, NO3−, total N, NH4+, and organic C (OC), and additional factors such as total manure mass, cattle numbers, manure pack depth and density, temperature, and moisture content. Mean measured pen N2O emissions were 0.428 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.252–0.691) and 0.00405 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% CI, 0.00114–0.0110) for the northern and southern feedlots, respectively. Mean measured CH4 emission was 0.236 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% CI, 0.163–0.332) for the northern feedlot and 3.93 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% CI, 2.58–5.81) for the southern feedlot. Nitrous oxide emission increased with density, pH, temperature, and manure mass, whereas negative relationships were evident with moisture and OC. Strong relationships were not evident between N2O emission and masses or concentrations of NO3− or total N in the manure. This is significant because many standard inventory calculation protocols predict N2O emissions using the mass of N excreted by the animal.</description><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1PwjAYxhujEUTP3kyPXgZt163bxUQJKAbFz3PTrW_jyNig3VD-e4ugV5O3H3n669O-D0LnlPQZDflgDitGKO8TXzRKD1CXRqEImJ8OUZcQ7vecRR104tycEMqIiI9Rh8VkK4ddVI4LKDV-AOVaCwuoGlwbfANg8BNU-EFVXvbHzYeqAKtK48eisXXr8Oyr0IBfYA2qdFjh19YubeEAm9riSbX2VrXd4KEq87ZUTVFX7hQdGQ_D2X7toffx6G14F0xnt5Ph9TTIw4ilgRbMZEynOctEaLJI8xxCIvIEaJJRwpiCjDJqmNJaKQacJ0KYNAmpMMIQGvbQ5c53aetVC66Ri8LlUJa-B_91SeMkEpzHUezRwQ7Nbe2cBSN9EwtlN5ISuY1Y7iOWxJeP2N-42Ju32QL0H_-bqQeudsBnUcLmPz95P3pm2-E1wn9e-AYlgIoB</recordid><startdate>201505</startdate><enddate>201505</enddate><creator>Redding, M. R.</creator><creator>Devereux, J.</creator><creator>Phillips, F.</creator><creator>Lewis, R.</creator><creator>Naylor, T.</creator><creator>Kearton, T.</creator><creator>Hill, C. J.</creator><creator>Weidemann, S.</creator><general>The American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201505</creationdate><title>Field Measurement of Beef Pen Manure Methane and Nitrous Oxide Reveals a Surprise for Inventory Calculations</title><author>Redding, M. R. ; Devereux, J. ; Phillips, F. ; Lewis, R. ; Naylor, T. ; Kearton, T. ; Hill, C. J. ; Weidemann, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3529-d72fb2d9c2b73fb5d4ce307c8e18b1022aeb121f2addaa2e44877f98317f7f013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Redding, M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devereux, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naylor, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kearton, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weidemann, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Redding, M. R.</au><au>Devereux, J.</au><au>Phillips, F.</au><au>Lewis, R.</au><au>Naylor, T.</au><au>Kearton, T.</au><au>Hill, C. J.</au><au>Weidemann, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Field Measurement of Beef Pen Manure Methane and Nitrous Oxide Reveals a Surprise for Inventory Calculations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><date>2015-05</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>720</spage><epage>728</epage><pages>720-728</pages><issn>0047-2425</issn><eissn>1537-2537</eissn><abstract>Few data exist on direct greenhouse gas emissions from pen manure at beef feedlots. However, emission inventories attempt to account for these emissions. This study used a large chamber to isolate N2O and CH4 emissions from pen manure at two Australian commercial beef feedlots (stocking densities, 13–27 m2 head) and related these emissions to a range of potential emission control factors, including masses and concentrations of volatile solids, NO3−, total N, NH4+, and organic C (OC), and additional factors such as total manure mass, cattle numbers, manure pack depth and density, temperature, and moisture content. Mean measured pen N2O emissions were 0.428 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.252–0.691) and 0.00405 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% CI, 0.00114–0.0110) for the northern and southern feedlots, respectively. Mean measured CH4 emission was 0.236 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% CI, 0.163–0.332) for the northern feedlot and 3.93 kg ha−1 d−1 (95% CI, 2.58–5.81) for the southern feedlot. Nitrous oxide emission increased with density, pH, temperature, and manure mass, whereas negative relationships were evident with moisture and OC. Strong relationships were not evident between N2O emission and masses or concentrations of NO3− or total N in the manure. This is significant because many standard inventory calculation protocols predict N2O emissions using the mass of N excreted by the animal.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc</pub><pmid>26024253</pmid><doi>10.2134/jeq2014.04.0159</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0047-2425
ispartof Journal of environmental quality, 2015-05, Vol.44 (3), p.720-728
issn 0047-2425
1537-2537
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685744656
source Wiley
title Field Measurement of Beef Pen Manure Methane and Nitrous Oxide Reveals a Surprise for Inventory Calculations
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T23%3A45%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Field%20Measurement%20of%20Beef%20Pen%20Manure%20Methane%20and%20Nitrous%20Oxide%20Reveals%20a%20Surprise%20for%20Inventory%20Calculations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20quality&rft.au=Redding,%20M.%20R.&rft.date=2015-05&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=720&rft.epage=728&rft.pages=720-728&rft.issn=0047-2425&rft.eissn=1537-2537&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/jeq2014.04.0159&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1685744656%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3529-d72fb2d9c2b73fb5d4ce307c8e18b1022aeb121f2addaa2e44877f98317f7f013%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1685744656&rft_id=info:pmid/26024253&rfr_iscdi=true