Loading…
Efficacy of extracorporeal ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound: An evaluation based on controlled trials in China
Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of extracorporeal ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) based upon data in controlled clinical trials in China. Materials and methods: Data in 75 controlled trials involving in 833 cases of benign and 4559 cases of malignant diseases we...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of radiation biology 2015-06, Vol.91 (6), p.480-485 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-1eab10d3dab7e597d540ed3b06c2f91e7e74dd8a9dc57bd420a16a3fb6000f773 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-1eab10d3dab7e597d540ed3b06c2f91e7e74dd8a9dc57bd420a16a3fb6000f773 |
container_end_page | 485 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 480 |
container_title | International journal of radiation biology |
container_volume | 91 |
creator | Luo, Jun Ren, Xueyi Yu, Tinghe |
description | Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of extracorporeal ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) based upon data in controlled clinical trials in China.
Materials and methods: Data in 75 controlled trials involving in 833 cases of benign and 4559 cases of malignant diseases were re-evaluated.
Results: In uterine fibroid, ectopic pregnancy and chyluria, the efficacy of HIFU was similar to that of surgery or drugs. The survival rate of HIFU plus radiotherapy was less than that of radical surgery in operable liver cancer. In inoperable liver cancer, the survival benefit of HIFU was similar to that of radio frequency, transarterial chemoembolization or γ-knife. In pancreatic cancer, HIFU and chemotherapy produced similar survival rates, and HIFU did not improve the effect of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. HIFU did not enhance hormone therapy in prostate cancer. Preoperative HIFU increased rates of complete removal and of survival in retroperitoneal sarcoma, and increased the response rate in breast cancer. The response rate agreed with the survival benefit (κ = 0.71, p = 0.0002).
Conclusions: HIFU should be curtailed in resectable cases and be an alternative in inoperable cases; a combination regimen should not be recommended. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors can be applied to HIFU. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3109/09553002.2015.1021962 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685746249</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1685746249</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-1eab10d3dab7e597d540ed3b06c2f91e7e74dd8a9dc57bd420a16a3fb6000f773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMmOEzEQQC0EYsLAJ4B85NLBS7ud5oJG0bBII3GBs1XtZdqjjh28IHLkz3ErGThycpXrVZXqIfSaki2nZHxHRiE4IWzLCBVbShgdB_YEbSgfWMdb9SnarEy3QlfoRc4PpEWE756jKyak2HHON-j3rXNegz7h6LD9VRLomI4xWVhwXVqaYw2mu6_eWINnfz9jH4oN2ZcTdlHX3L7_ge_xTcD2JywVio8BT7DWW6BjKCkuS8tK8rDkNgbvZx_gJXrmWm5fXd5r9P3j7bf95-7u66cv-5u7TvNBlI5amCgx3MAkrRilET2xhk9k0MyN1Eore2N2MBot5GR6RoAOwN00tLOdlPwavT3PPab4o9pc1MFnbZcFgo01KzrshOwH1o8NFWdUp5hzsk4dkz9AOilK1GpfPdpXq311sd_63lxW1Olgzd-uR90N-HAGfHAxHWBumsusIVn1EGsK7f7_rPgD7raWnQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1685746249</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of extracorporeal ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound: An evaluation based on controlled trials in China</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Luo, Jun ; Ren, Xueyi ; Yu, Tinghe</creator><creatorcontrib>Luo, Jun ; Ren, Xueyi ; Yu, Tinghe</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of extracorporeal ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) based upon data in controlled clinical trials in China.
Materials and methods: Data in 75 controlled trials involving in 833 cases of benign and 4559 cases of malignant diseases were re-evaluated.
Results: In uterine fibroid, ectopic pregnancy and chyluria, the efficacy of HIFU was similar to that of surgery or drugs. The survival rate of HIFU plus radiotherapy was less than that of radical surgery in operable liver cancer. In inoperable liver cancer, the survival benefit of HIFU was similar to that of radio frequency, transarterial chemoembolization or γ-knife. In pancreatic cancer, HIFU and chemotherapy produced similar survival rates, and HIFU did not improve the effect of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. HIFU did not enhance hormone therapy in prostate cancer. Preoperative HIFU increased rates of complete removal and of survival in retroperitoneal sarcoma, and increased the response rate in breast cancer. The response rate agreed with the survival benefit (κ = 0.71, p = 0.0002).
Conclusions: HIFU should be curtailed in resectable cases and be an alternative in inoperable cases; a combination regimen should not be recommended. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors can be applied to HIFU.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0955-3002</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1362-3095</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/09553002.2015.1021962</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25758333</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa Healthcare</publisher><subject>Breast Neoplasms - therapy ; China ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms - therapy ; High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation - adverse effects ; High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation - methods ; Humans ; Kidney Neoplasms - therapy ; Liver Neoplasms - therapy ; Male ; Neoplasms - therapy ; Pancreatic Neoplasms - therapy ; Pregnancy ; Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy ; Retroperitoneal Neoplasms - therapy ; Space life sciences</subject><ispartof>International journal of radiation biology, 2015-06, Vol.91 (6), p.480-485</ispartof><rights>2015 Informa UK, Ltd. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-1eab10d3dab7e597d540ed3b06c2f91e7e74dd8a9dc57bd420a16a3fb6000f773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-1eab10d3dab7e597d540ed3b06c2f91e7e74dd8a9dc57bd420a16a3fb6000f773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25758333$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luo, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Xueyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Tinghe</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of extracorporeal ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound: An evaluation based on controlled trials in China</title><title>International journal of radiation biology</title><addtitle>Int J Radiat Biol</addtitle><description>Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of extracorporeal ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) based upon data in controlled clinical trials in China.
Materials and methods: Data in 75 controlled trials involving in 833 cases of benign and 4559 cases of malignant diseases were re-evaluated.
Results: In uterine fibroid, ectopic pregnancy and chyluria, the efficacy of HIFU was similar to that of surgery or drugs. The survival rate of HIFU plus radiotherapy was less than that of radical surgery in operable liver cancer. In inoperable liver cancer, the survival benefit of HIFU was similar to that of radio frequency, transarterial chemoembolization or γ-knife. In pancreatic cancer, HIFU and chemotherapy produced similar survival rates, and HIFU did not improve the effect of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. HIFU did not enhance hormone therapy in prostate cancer. Preoperative HIFU increased rates of complete removal and of survival in retroperitoneal sarcoma, and increased the response rate in breast cancer. The response rate agreed with the survival benefit (κ = 0.71, p = 0.0002).
Conclusions: HIFU should be curtailed in resectable cases and be an alternative in inoperable cases; a combination regimen should not be recommended. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors can be applied to HIFU.</description><subject>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation - adverse effects</subject><subject>High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Pancreatic Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Retroperitoneal Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><issn>0955-3002</issn><issn>1362-3095</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMmOEzEQQC0EYsLAJ4B85NLBS7ud5oJG0bBII3GBs1XtZdqjjh28IHLkz3ErGThycpXrVZXqIfSaki2nZHxHRiE4IWzLCBVbShgdB_YEbSgfWMdb9SnarEy3QlfoRc4PpEWE756jKyak2HHON-j3rXNegz7h6LD9VRLomI4xWVhwXVqaYw2mu6_eWINnfz9jH4oN2ZcTdlHX3L7_ge_xTcD2JywVio8BT7DWW6BjKCkuS8tK8rDkNgbvZx_gJXrmWm5fXd5r9P3j7bf95-7u66cv-5u7TvNBlI5amCgx3MAkrRilET2xhk9k0MyN1Eore2N2MBot5GR6RoAOwN00tLOdlPwavT3PPab4o9pc1MFnbZcFgo01KzrshOwH1o8NFWdUp5hzsk4dkz9AOilK1GpfPdpXq311sd_63lxW1Olgzd-uR90N-HAGfHAxHWBumsusIVn1EGsK7f7_rPgD7raWnQ</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Luo, Jun</creator><creator>Ren, Xueyi</creator><creator>Yu, Tinghe</creator><general>Informa Healthcare</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Efficacy of extracorporeal ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound: An evaluation based on controlled trials in China</title><author>Luo, Jun ; Ren, Xueyi ; Yu, Tinghe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-1eab10d3dab7e597d540ed3b06c2f91e7e74dd8a9dc57bd420a16a3fb6000f773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation - adverse effects</topic><topic>High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Pancreatic Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Retroperitoneal Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luo, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Xueyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Tinghe</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of radiation biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luo, Jun</au><au>Ren, Xueyi</au><au>Yu, Tinghe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of extracorporeal ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound: An evaluation based on controlled trials in China</atitle><jtitle>International journal of radiation biology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Radiat Biol</addtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>480</spage><epage>485</epage><pages>480-485</pages><issn>0955-3002</issn><eissn>1362-3095</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of extracorporeal ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) based upon data in controlled clinical trials in China.
Materials and methods: Data in 75 controlled trials involving in 833 cases of benign and 4559 cases of malignant diseases were re-evaluated.
Results: In uterine fibroid, ectopic pregnancy and chyluria, the efficacy of HIFU was similar to that of surgery or drugs. The survival rate of HIFU plus radiotherapy was less than that of radical surgery in operable liver cancer. In inoperable liver cancer, the survival benefit of HIFU was similar to that of radio frequency, transarterial chemoembolization or γ-knife. In pancreatic cancer, HIFU and chemotherapy produced similar survival rates, and HIFU did not improve the effect of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. HIFU did not enhance hormone therapy in prostate cancer. Preoperative HIFU increased rates of complete removal and of survival in retroperitoneal sarcoma, and increased the response rate in breast cancer. The response rate agreed with the survival benefit (κ = 0.71, p = 0.0002).
Conclusions: HIFU should be curtailed in resectable cases and be an alternative in inoperable cases; a combination regimen should not be recommended. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors can be applied to HIFU.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa Healthcare</pub><pmid>25758333</pmid><doi>10.3109/09553002.2015.1021962</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0955-3002 |
ispartof | International journal of radiation biology, 2015-06, Vol.91 (6), p.480-485 |
issn | 0955-3002 1362-3095 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685746249 |
source | Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | Breast Neoplasms - therapy China Combined Modality Therapy Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic Female Gastrointestinal Neoplasms - therapy High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation - adverse effects High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation - methods Humans Kidney Neoplasms - therapy Liver Neoplasms - therapy Male Neoplasms - therapy Pancreatic Neoplasms - therapy Pregnancy Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy Retroperitoneal Neoplasms - therapy Space life sciences |
title | Efficacy of extracorporeal ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound: An evaluation based on controlled trials in China |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A25%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20extracorporeal%20ultrasound-guided%20high%20intensity%20focused%20ultrasound:%20An%20evaluation%20based%20on%20controlled%20trials%20in%20China&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20radiation%20biology&rft.au=Luo,%20Jun&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=480&rft.epage=485&rft.pages=480-485&rft.issn=0955-3002&rft.eissn=1362-3095&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/09553002.2015.1021962&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1685746249%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-1eab10d3dab7e597d540ed3b06c2f91e7e74dd8a9dc57bd420a16a3fb6000f773%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1685746249&rft_id=info:pmid/25758333&rfr_iscdi=true |