Taking the Blame for Someone Else's Wrongdoing: The Effects of Age and Reciprocity

False confessions are often involved in wrongful convictions and are sometimes made to protect someone else (i.e., the guilty), perhaps as a way of reciprocating past favors. Experimental research has neglected to investigate false confessions made to protect someone else, including among adolescent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Law and human behavior 2015-06, Vol.39 (3), p.219-231
Main Authors: Pimentel, Pamela S, Arndorfer, Andrea, Malloy, Lindsay C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adolescent
Age Differences
Age Factors
Blame
Criminal Law
Deception
False Confession
Female
Human
Humans
Intention
Interrogation
Interviews as Topic
Juvenile Justice
Legal Confession
Male
Reciprocity
Risk Factors
Scapegoating
Truth Disclosure
Young Adult
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:False confessions are often involved in wrongful convictions and are sometimes made to protect someone else (i.e., the guilty), perhaps as a way of reciprocating past favors. Experimental research has neglected to investigate false confessions made to protect someone else, including among adolescents who may be particularly vulnerable given their peer orientation and sensitivity to peer influence. The present study examined (a) how often individuals would falsely confess to take the blame for another's wrongdoing, and (b) whether the willingness to falsely confess would vary by age group and reciprocity. Adult (n = 99, M age = 20.29) and adolescent (n = 74, M age = 15.47) participants were randomly assigned to either receive or not receive a small favor from a confederate, witnessed the confederate cheat on a task, and then decided whether to sign a statement taking the blame for the confederate's cheating. Adolescents (59%) were more likely to falsely confess than adults (39%). No effect of reciprocity was found. Although a well-documented phenomenon in legal cases and field studies, the present study provides the first experimental evidence concerning voluntary false confessions to protect another, including developmental differences in this tendency. Results highlight the vulnerability of youth and the potential role of peers in legal decision making.
ISSN:0147-7307
1573-661X
DOI:10.1037/lhb0000132