Loading…

Fault domain-based testing in imperfect situations: a heuristic approach and case studies

Model-based testing (MBT) involves creating an abstraction, called a model, to represent the system and automatically deriving test cases from this model. MBT can be performed using various approaches that generally employ certain assumptions or requirements affecting the test performance in practic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Software quality journal 2015-09, Vol.23 (3), p.423-452
Main Authors: Belli, Fevzi, Beyazıt, Mutlu, Endo, Andre Takeshi, Mathur, Aditya, Simao, Adenilso
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-4b770c0dab1b95bfba1afed245185bf08716a965b2d7f40aafe887e04bdeb4293
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-4b770c0dab1b95bfba1afed245185bf08716a965b2d7f40aafe887e04bdeb4293
container_end_page 452
container_issue 3
container_start_page 423
container_title Software quality journal
container_volume 23
creator Belli, Fevzi
Beyazıt, Mutlu
Endo, Andre Takeshi
Mathur, Aditya
Simao, Adenilso
description Model-based testing (MBT) involves creating an abstraction, called a model, to represent the system and automatically deriving test cases from this model. MBT can be performed using various approaches that generally employ certain assumptions or requirements affecting the test performance in practice. Here, we consider the harmonized state identifiers (HSI) method, which is based on finite state machine (FSM) models and generates test sets that cover all faults in a given domain under certain conditions. We are interested in the application of the HSI method in practical scenarios where some conditions do not hold or are not straightforward to satisfy. Thus, we propose a heuristic extension to the HSI method, called heuristic HSI (HHSI), to consider imperfect situations as they often occur in practice. To analyze the characteristics of HHSI, we empirically compare it to random testing and coverage-based testing using non-trivial case studies. The experiments include model-based mutation analyses over several FSM models.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11219-014-9242-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685776129</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1685776129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-4b770c0dab1b95bfba1afed245185bf08716a965b2d7f40aafe887e04bdeb4293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKxDAQhoMouK4-gLeAFy_RTJsmrTdZXBUWvOjBU0jadDdLm9YkPfj2Zq0HETwNw3zf8PMjdAn0BigVtwEgg4pQYKTKWEb4EVpAIXICORfHaEErnpMqB3aKzkLYU3qw2AK9r9XURdwMvbKOaBVMg6MJ0bottg7bfjS-NXXEwcZJRTu4cIcV3pnJ20TVWI2jH1S9w8o1uE4-DnFqrAnn6KRVXTAXP3OJ3tYPr6snsnl5fF7db0jNeBYJ00LQmjZKg64K3WoFqjVNxgoo00pLAVxVvNBZI1pGVTqWpTCU6cZollX5El3Pf1OOjylFl70Ntek65cwwBQm8LITg8I1e_UH3w-RdSpcowWmZcw6Jgpmq_RCCN60cve2V_5RA5aE2OZctU9nyULbkyclmJyTWbY3_9flf6QvCJYJ1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1676083661</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fault domain-based testing in imperfect situations: a heuristic approach and case studies</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Belli, Fevzi ; Beyazıt, Mutlu ; Endo, Andre Takeshi ; Mathur, Aditya ; Simao, Adenilso</creator><creatorcontrib>Belli, Fevzi ; Beyazıt, Mutlu ; Endo, Andre Takeshi ; Mathur, Aditya ; Simao, Adenilso</creatorcontrib><description>Model-based testing (MBT) involves creating an abstraction, called a model, to represent the system and automatically deriving test cases from this model. MBT can be performed using various approaches that generally employ certain assumptions or requirements affecting the test performance in practice. Here, we consider the harmonized state identifiers (HSI) method, which is based on finite state machine (FSM) models and generates test sets that cover all faults in a given domain under certain conditions. We are interested in the application of the HSI method in practical scenarios where some conditions do not hold or are not straightforward to satisfy. Thus, we propose a heuristic extension to the HSI method, called heuristic HSI (HHSI), to consider imperfect situations as they often occur in practice. To analyze the characteristics of HHSI, we empirically compare it to random testing and coverage-based testing using non-trivial case studies. The experiments include model-based mutation analyses over several FSM models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-9314</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1367</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11219-014-9242-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Compilers ; Computer programs ; Computer Science ; Data Structures and Information Theory ; Empirical analysis ; Experiments ; Faults ; Finite state machines ; Heuristic ; Heuristic methods ; Interpreters ; Methods ; Mutations ; Operating Systems ; Programming Languages ; Quality control ; Software ; Software engineering ; Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems ; Studies ; Test sets ; Testing</subject><ispartof>Software quality journal, 2015-09, Vol.23 (3), p.423-452</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-4b770c0dab1b95bfba1afed245185bf08716a965b2d7f40aafe887e04bdeb4293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-4b770c0dab1b95bfba1afed245185bf08716a965b2d7f40aafe887e04bdeb4293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1676083661/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1676083661?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Belli, Fevzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beyazıt, Mutlu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Endo, Andre Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathur, Aditya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simao, Adenilso</creatorcontrib><title>Fault domain-based testing in imperfect situations: a heuristic approach and case studies</title><title>Software quality journal</title><addtitle>Software Qual J</addtitle><description>Model-based testing (MBT) involves creating an abstraction, called a model, to represent the system and automatically deriving test cases from this model. MBT can be performed using various approaches that generally employ certain assumptions or requirements affecting the test performance in practice. Here, we consider the harmonized state identifiers (HSI) method, which is based on finite state machine (FSM) models and generates test sets that cover all faults in a given domain under certain conditions. We are interested in the application of the HSI method in practical scenarios where some conditions do not hold or are not straightforward to satisfy. Thus, we propose a heuristic extension to the HSI method, called heuristic HSI (HHSI), to consider imperfect situations as they often occur in practice. To analyze the characteristics of HHSI, we empirically compare it to random testing and coverage-based testing using non-trivial case studies. The experiments include model-based mutation analyses over several FSM models.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Compilers</subject><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Data Structures and Information Theory</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Faults</subject><subject>Finite state machines</subject><subject>Heuristic</subject><subject>Heuristic methods</subject><subject>Interpreters</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Mutations</subject><subject>Operating Systems</subject><subject>Programming Languages</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Software engineering</subject><subject>Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Test sets</subject><subject>Testing</subject><issn>0963-9314</issn><issn>1573-1367</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFKxDAQhoMouK4-gLeAFy_RTJsmrTdZXBUWvOjBU0jadDdLm9YkPfj2Zq0HETwNw3zf8PMjdAn0BigVtwEgg4pQYKTKWEb4EVpAIXICORfHaEErnpMqB3aKzkLYU3qw2AK9r9XURdwMvbKOaBVMg6MJ0bottg7bfjS-NXXEwcZJRTu4cIcV3pnJ20TVWI2jH1S9w8o1uE4-DnFqrAnn6KRVXTAXP3OJ3tYPr6snsnl5fF7db0jNeBYJ00LQmjZKg64K3WoFqjVNxgoo00pLAVxVvNBZI1pGVTqWpTCU6cZollX5El3Pf1OOjylFl70Ntek65cwwBQm8LITg8I1e_UH3w-RdSpcowWmZcw6Jgpmq_RCCN60cve2V_5RA5aE2OZctU9nyULbkyclmJyTWbY3_9flf6QvCJYJ1</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Belli, Fevzi</creator><creator>Beyazıt, Mutlu</creator><creator>Endo, Andre Takeshi</creator><creator>Mathur, Aditya</creator><creator>Simao, Adenilso</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Fault domain-based testing in imperfect situations: a heuristic approach and case studies</title><author>Belli, Fevzi ; Beyazıt, Mutlu ; Endo, Andre Takeshi ; Mathur, Aditya ; Simao, Adenilso</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-4b770c0dab1b95bfba1afed245185bf08716a965b2d7f40aafe887e04bdeb4293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Compilers</topic><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Data Structures and Information Theory</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Faults</topic><topic>Finite state machines</topic><topic>Heuristic</topic><topic>Heuristic methods</topic><topic>Interpreters</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Mutations</topic><topic>Operating Systems</topic><topic>Programming Languages</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Software engineering</topic><topic>Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Test sets</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Belli, Fevzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beyazıt, Mutlu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Endo, Andre Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathur, Aditya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simao, Adenilso</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Software quality journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Belli, Fevzi</au><au>Beyazıt, Mutlu</au><au>Endo, Andre Takeshi</au><au>Mathur, Aditya</au><au>Simao, Adenilso</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fault domain-based testing in imperfect situations: a heuristic approach and case studies</atitle><jtitle>Software quality journal</jtitle><stitle>Software Qual J</stitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>423</spage><epage>452</epage><pages>423-452</pages><issn>0963-9314</issn><eissn>1573-1367</eissn><abstract>Model-based testing (MBT) involves creating an abstraction, called a model, to represent the system and automatically deriving test cases from this model. MBT can be performed using various approaches that generally employ certain assumptions or requirements affecting the test performance in practice. Here, we consider the harmonized state identifiers (HSI) method, which is based on finite state machine (FSM) models and generates test sets that cover all faults in a given domain under certain conditions. We are interested in the application of the HSI method in practical scenarios where some conditions do not hold or are not straightforward to satisfy. Thus, we propose a heuristic extension to the HSI method, called heuristic HSI (HHSI), to consider imperfect situations as they often occur in practice. To analyze the characteristics of HHSI, we empirically compare it to random testing and coverage-based testing using non-trivial case studies. The experiments include model-based mutation analyses over several FSM models.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11219-014-9242-6</doi><tpages>30</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0963-9314
ispartof Software quality journal, 2015-09, Vol.23 (3), p.423-452
issn 0963-9314
1573-1367
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685776129
source ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature
subjects Case studies
Compilers
Computer programs
Computer Science
Data Structures and Information Theory
Empirical analysis
Experiments
Faults
Finite state machines
Heuristic
Heuristic methods
Interpreters
Methods
Mutations
Operating Systems
Programming Languages
Quality control
Software
Software engineering
Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems
Studies
Test sets
Testing
title Fault domain-based testing in imperfect situations: a heuristic approach and case studies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A52%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fault%20domain-based%20testing%20in%20imperfect%20situations:%20a%20heuristic%20approach%20and%20case%20studies&rft.jtitle=Software%20quality%20journal&rft.au=Belli,%20Fevzi&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=423&rft.epage=452&rft.pages=423-452&rft.issn=0963-9314&rft.eissn=1573-1367&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11219-014-9242-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1685776129%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-4b770c0dab1b95bfba1afed245185bf08716a965b2d7f40aafe887e04bdeb4293%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1676083661&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true