Loading…

Radar rainfall uncertainty modelling influenced by wind

Radar‐based estimates of rainfall are affected by many sources of uncertainties, which would propagate through the hydrological model when radar rainfall estimates are used as input or initial conditions. An elegant solution to quantify these uncertainties is to model the empirical relationship betw...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hydrological processes 2015-03, Vol.29 (7), p.1704-1716
Main Authors: Dai, Qiang, Han, Dawei, Rico-Ramirez, Miguel A., Zhuo, Lu, Nanding, Nergui, Islam, Tanvir
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5692-68b56c25ddf402ffb50007e74b7894ca8f9522ad5a078c6f857c8ea5c2ba4c8f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5692-68b56c25ddf402ffb50007e74b7894ca8f9522ad5a078c6f857c8ea5c2ba4c8f3
container_end_page 1716
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1704
container_title Hydrological processes
container_volume 29
creator Dai, Qiang
Han, Dawei
Rico-Ramirez, Miguel A.
Zhuo, Lu
Nanding, Nergui
Islam, Tanvir
description Radar‐based estimates of rainfall are affected by many sources of uncertainties, which would propagate through the hydrological model when radar rainfall estimates are used as input or initial conditions. An elegant solution to quantify these uncertainties is to model the empirical relationship between radar measurements and rain gauge observations (as the ‘ground reference’). However, most current studies only use a fixed and uniform model to represent the uncertainty of radar rainfall, without consideration of its variation under different synoptic regimes. Wind is such a typical weather factor, as it not only induces error in rain gauge measurements but also causes the raindrops observed by weather radar to drift when they reach the ground. For this reason, as a first attempt, this study introduces the wind field into the uncertainty model and designs the radar rainfall uncertainty model under different wind conditions. We separate the original dataset into three subsamples according to wind speed, which are named as WDI (0–2 m/s), WDII (2–4 m/s) and WDIII (>4 m/s). The multivariate distributed ensemble generator is introduced and established for each subsample. Thirty typical events (10 at each wind range) are selected to explore the behaviours of uncertainty under different wind ranges. In each time step, 500 ensemble members are generated, and the values of 5th to 95th percentile values are used to produce the uncertainty bands. Two basic features of uncertainty bands, namely dispersion and ensemble bias, increase significantly with the growth of wind speed, demonstrating that wind speed plays a considerable role in influencing the behaviour of the uncertainty band. On the basis of these pieces of evidence, we conclude that the radar rainfall uncertainty model established under different wind conditions should be more realistic in representing the radar rainfall uncertainty. This study is only a start in incorporating synoptic regimes into rainfall uncertainty analysis, and a great deal of more effort is still needed to build a realistic and comprehensive uncertainty model for radar rainfall data. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hyp.10292
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685820040</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1685820040</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5692-68b56c25ddf402ffb50007e74b7894ca8f9522ad5a078c6f857c8ea5c2ba4c8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctOwzAQRS0EEqWw4A8isYFFqOP4uUQFUqQWEBQBK8txHEhJk2InKvl7XAoskECsZkZz7jx0AdiP4HEEIRo8dwufIIE2QC-CQoQR5GQT9CDnJKSQs22w49wMQoghhz3AblSmbGBVUeWqLIO20sY2vmq6YF5npiyL6inwzbI1vpUFaRcsiyrbBVued2bvM_bB3fnZdDgKx1fJxfBkHGpCBQopTwnViGRZjiHK85T4zcwwnDIusFY8FwQhlREFGdc054RpbhTRKFVY8zzug8P13IWtX1vjGjkvnPZnqcrUrZMR5YSj1Tf_QSEmyPMePfiBzurWVv4RiVgsEMFCkL-oiDLMOGZitfZoTWlbO2dNLhe2mCvbyQjKlSfSeyI_PPHsYM0ui9J0v4Ny9Hj9pQjXisI15u1boeyLpCxmRN5fJjI5fZiOJ8lE3sbvL3KajQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1674784790</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radar rainfall uncertainty modelling influenced by wind</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Dai, Qiang ; Han, Dawei ; Rico-Ramirez, Miguel A. ; Zhuo, Lu ; Nanding, Nergui ; Islam, Tanvir</creator><creatorcontrib>Dai, Qiang ; Han, Dawei ; Rico-Ramirez, Miguel A. ; Zhuo, Lu ; Nanding, Nergui ; Islam, Tanvir</creatorcontrib><description>Radar‐based estimates of rainfall are affected by many sources of uncertainties, which would propagate through the hydrological model when radar rainfall estimates are used as input or initial conditions. An elegant solution to quantify these uncertainties is to model the empirical relationship between radar measurements and rain gauge observations (as the ‘ground reference’). However, most current studies only use a fixed and uniform model to represent the uncertainty of radar rainfall, without consideration of its variation under different synoptic regimes. Wind is such a typical weather factor, as it not only induces error in rain gauge measurements but also causes the raindrops observed by weather radar to drift when they reach the ground. For this reason, as a first attempt, this study introduces the wind field into the uncertainty model and designs the radar rainfall uncertainty model under different wind conditions. We separate the original dataset into three subsamples according to wind speed, which are named as WDI (0–2 m/s), WDII (2–4 m/s) and WDIII (&gt;4 m/s). The multivariate distributed ensemble generator is introduced and established for each subsample. Thirty typical events (10 at each wind range) are selected to explore the behaviours of uncertainty under different wind ranges. In each time step, 500 ensemble members are generated, and the values of 5th to 95th percentile values are used to produce the uncertainty bands. Two basic features of uncertainty bands, namely dispersion and ensemble bias, increase significantly with the growth of wind speed, demonstrating that wind speed plays a considerable role in influencing the behaviour of the uncertainty band. On the basis of these pieces of evidence, we conclude that the radar rainfall uncertainty model established under different wind conditions should be more realistic in representing the radar rainfall uncertainty. This study is only a start in incorporating synoptic regimes into rainfall uncertainty analysis, and a great deal of more effort is still needed to build a realistic and comprehensive uncertainty model for radar rainfall data. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-6087</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1085</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hyp.10292</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>copula ; Empirical analysis ; ensemble generator ; Error analysis ; Estimates ; Gages ; Gauges ; Hydrologic data ; Hydrologic models ; Hydrology ; Initial conditions ; Meteorological radar ; Modelling ; Precipitation ; Radar ; Radar data ; Radar measurement ; Radar rainfall ; Rain ; Rain gauges ; Raindrops ; Rainfall ; Rainfall data ; Uncertainty ; Uncertainty analysis ; Weather ; Weather radar ; Wind ; wind effects ; Wind speed ; wind-induced error</subject><ispartof>Hydrological processes, 2015-03, Vol.29 (7), p.1704-1716</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5692-68b56c25ddf402ffb50007e74b7894ca8f9522ad5a078c6f857c8ea5c2ba4c8f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5692-68b56c25ddf402ffb50007e74b7894ca8f9522ad5a078c6f857c8ea5c2ba4c8f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5719-5342</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dai, Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Dawei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rico-Ramirez, Miguel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhuo, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nanding, Nergui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Islam, Tanvir</creatorcontrib><title>Radar rainfall uncertainty modelling influenced by wind</title><title>Hydrological processes</title><addtitle>Hydrol. Process</addtitle><description>Radar‐based estimates of rainfall are affected by many sources of uncertainties, which would propagate through the hydrological model when radar rainfall estimates are used as input or initial conditions. An elegant solution to quantify these uncertainties is to model the empirical relationship between radar measurements and rain gauge observations (as the ‘ground reference’). However, most current studies only use a fixed and uniform model to represent the uncertainty of radar rainfall, without consideration of its variation under different synoptic regimes. Wind is such a typical weather factor, as it not only induces error in rain gauge measurements but also causes the raindrops observed by weather radar to drift when they reach the ground. For this reason, as a first attempt, this study introduces the wind field into the uncertainty model and designs the radar rainfall uncertainty model under different wind conditions. We separate the original dataset into three subsamples according to wind speed, which are named as WDI (0–2 m/s), WDII (2–4 m/s) and WDIII (&gt;4 m/s). The multivariate distributed ensemble generator is introduced and established for each subsample. Thirty typical events (10 at each wind range) are selected to explore the behaviours of uncertainty under different wind ranges. In each time step, 500 ensemble members are generated, and the values of 5th to 95th percentile values are used to produce the uncertainty bands. Two basic features of uncertainty bands, namely dispersion and ensemble bias, increase significantly with the growth of wind speed, demonstrating that wind speed plays a considerable role in influencing the behaviour of the uncertainty band. On the basis of these pieces of evidence, we conclude that the radar rainfall uncertainty model established under different wind conditions should be more realistic in representing the radar rainfall uncertainty. This study is only a start in incorporating synoptic regimes into rainfall uncertainty analysis, and a great deal of more effort is still needed to build a realistic and comprehensive uncertainty model for radar rainfall data. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>copula</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>ensemble generator</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Gages</subject><subject>Gauges</subject><subject>Hydrologic data</subject><subject>Hydrologic models</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Initial conditions</subject><subject>Meteorological radar</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Radar data</subject><subject>Radar measurement</subject><subject>Radar rainfall</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rain gauges</subject><subject>Raindrops</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Rainfall data</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Uncertainty analysis</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Weather radar</subject><subject>Wind</subject><subject>wind effects</subject><subject>Wind speed</subject><subject>wind-induced error</subject><issn>0885-6087</issn><issn>1099-1085</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkctOwzAQRS0EEqWw4A8isYFFqOP4uUQFUqQWEBQBK8txHEhJk2InKvl7XAoskECsZkZz7jx0AdiP4HEEIRo8dwufIIE2QC-CQoQR5GQT9CDnJKSQs22w49wMQoghhz3AblSmbGBVUeWqLIO20sY2vmq6YF5npiyL6inwzbI1vpUFaRcsiyrbBVued2bvM_bB3fnZdDgKx1fJxfBkHGpCBQopTwnViGRZjiHK85T4zcwwnDIusFY8FwQhlREFGdc054RpbhTRKFVY8zzug8P13IWtX1vjGjkvnPZnqcrUrZMR5YSj1Tf_QSEmyPMePfiBzurWVv4RiVgsEMFCkL-oiDLMOGZitfZoTWlbO2dNLhe2mCvbyQjKlSfSeyI_PPHsYM0ui9J0v4Ny9Hj9pQjXisI15u1boeyLpCxmRN5fJjI5fZiOJ8lE3sbvL3KajQ</recordid><startdate>20150330</startdate><enddate>20150330</enddate><creator>Dai, Qiang</creator><creator>Han, Dawei</creator><creator>Rico-Ramirez, Miguel A.</creator><creator>Zhuo, Lu</creator><creator>Nanding, Nergui</creator><creator>Islam, Tanvir</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5719-5342</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150330</creationdate><title>Radar rainfall uncertainty modelling influenced by wind</title><author>Dai, Qiang ; Han, Dawei ; Rico-Ramirez, Miguel A. ; Zhuo, Lu ; Nanding, Nergui ; Islam, Tanvir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5692-68b56c25ddf402ffb50007e74b7894ca8f9522ad5a078c6f857c8ea5c2ba4c8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>copula</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>ensemble generator</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Gages</topic><topic>Gauges</topic><topic>Hydrologic data</topic><topic>Hydrologic models</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Initial conditions</topic><topic>Meteorological radar</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Radar data</topic><topic>Radar measurement</topic><topic>Radar rainfall</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rain gauges</topic><topic>Raindrops</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Rainfall data</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Uncertainty analysis</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Weather radar</topic><topic>Wind</topic><topic>wind effects</topic><topic>Wind speed</topic><topic>wind-induced error</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dai, Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Dawei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rico-Ramirez, Miguel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhuo, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nanding, Nergui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Islam, Tanvir</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dai, Qiang</au><au>Han, Dawei</au><au>Rico-Ramirez, Miguel A.</au><au>Zhuo, Lu</au><au>Nanding, Nergui</au><au>Islam, Tanvir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radar rainfall uncertainty modelling influenced by wind</atitle><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle><addtitle>Hydrol. Process</addtitle><date>2015-03-30</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1704</spage><epage>1716</epage><pages>1704-1716</pages><issn>0885-6087</issn><eissn>1099-1085</eissn><abstract>Radar‐based estimates of rainfall are affected by many sources of uncertainties, which would propagate through the hydrological model when radar rainfall estimates are used as input or initial conditions. An elegant solution to quantify these uncertainties is to model the empirical relationship between radar measurements and rain gauge observations (as the ‘ground reference’). However, most current studies only use a fixed and uniform model to represent the uncertainty of radar rainfall, without consideration of its variation under different synoptic regimes. Wind is such a typical weather factor, as it not only induces error in rain gauge measurements but also causes the raindrops observed by weather radar to drift when they reach the ground. For this reason, as a first attempt, this study introduces the wind field into the uncertainty model and designs the radar rainfall uncertainty model under different wind conditions. We separate the original dataset into three subsamples according to wind speed, which are named as WDI (0–2 m/s), WDII (2–4 m/s) and WDIII (&gt;4 m/s). The multivariate distributed ensemble generator is introduced and established for each subsample. Thirty typical events (10 at each wind range) are selected to explore the behaviours of uncertainty under different wind ranges. In each time step, 500 ensemble members are generated, and the values of 5th to 95th percentile values are used to produce the uncertainty bands. Two basic features of uncertainty bands, namely dispersion and ensemble bias, increase significantly with the growth of wind speed, demonstrating that wind speed plays a considerable role in influencing the behaviour of the uncertainty band. On the basis of these pieces of evidence, we conclude that the radar rainfall uncertainty model established under different wind conditions should be more realistic in representing the radar rainfall uncertainty. This study is only a start in incorporating synoptic regimes into rainfall uncertainty analysis, and a great deal of more effort is still needed to build a realistic and comprehensive uncertainty model for radar rainfall data. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/hyp.10292</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5719-5342</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-6087
ispartof Hydrological processes, 2015-03, Vol.29 (7), p.1704-1716
issn 0885-6087
1099-1085
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1685820040
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects copula
Empirical analysis
ensemble generator
Error analysis
Estimates
Gages
Gauges
Hydrologic data
Hydrologic models
Hydrology
Initial conditions
Meteorological radar
Modelling
Precipitation
Radar
Radar data
Radar measurement
Radar rainfall
Rain
Rain gauges
Raindrops
Rainfall
Rainfall data
Uncertainty
Uncertainty analysis
Weather
Weather radar
Wind
wind effects
Wind speed
wind-induced error
title Radar rainfall uncertainty modelling influenced by wind
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T10%3A54%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radar%20rainfall%20uncertainty%20modelling%20influenced%20by%20wind&rft.jtitle=Hydrological%20processes&rft.au=Dai,%20Qiang&rft.date=2015-03-30&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1704&rft.epage=1716&rft.pages=1704-1716&rft.issn=0885-6087&rft.eissn=1099-1085&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hyp.10292&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1685820040%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5692-68b56c25ddf402ffb50007e74b7894ca8f9522ad5a078c6f857c8ea5c2ba4c8f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1674784790&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true