How Are Indigenous and Local Communities' Rights Over Their Traditional Knowledge and Genetic Resources Protected in Current Free Trade Negotiations? Highlighting the Draft Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TTPA)

The article analyzes the relevant traditional knowledge provisions of two chapters of the TTPA: on intellectual property rights and on the environment. There is no agreement where these provisions shall be included. There is also wide disagreement over the content of the specific provisions. Some st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of world intellectual property 2014-07, Vol.17 (3-4), p.81-95
Main Author: Haugen, Hans Morten
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Communities
Consents
Decision-making
Free trade and protection
Genetics
human rights
Indigenous peoples
Intellectual property
Legal
Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing
Native peoples
Negotiation
Negotiations
Partnership
Partnerships
Property, Intellectual
Right of property
traditional knowledge
WIPO
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The article analyzes the relevant traditional knowledge provisions of two chapters of the TTPA: on intellectual property rights and on the environment. There is no agreement where these provisions shall be included. There is also wide disagreement over the content of the specific provisions. Some states want to have a widest possible scope of the public domain, and no provisions for sanctioning the taking of genetic resources and associated traditional intellectual property without the consent of indigenous peoples and local communities. The article investigates whether and in which form indigenous peoples are given stronger rights over their intellectual property in international legal instruments, compared to non‐indigenous traditional communities. It finds that in many legal instruments, there is no difference. The strongest provisions on traditional knowledge are, however, found in an instrument that applies only to indigenous peoples, the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). The article also investigates whether the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities are stronger in the realm of traditional knowledge than in the realm of genetic resources. It finds that this is generally the case. The provisions are analyzed from the perspective of collective decision‐making, defensive protection and positive protection.
ISSN:1422-2213
1747-1796
DOI:10.1002/jwip.12021