Loading…

Regulating prostitution: A health risk approach

We build an equilibrium model of prostitution where clients and sex workers choose to demand and supply sex under three legal regimes: prohibition, regulation and laissez-faire. The key feature is the endogenous evolution of the risk as a consequence of policy changes. We calibrate the model to empi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of public economics 2015-01, Vol.121, p.14-31
Main Authors: Immordino, G., Russo, F.F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We build an equilibrium model of prostitution where clients and sex workers choose to demand and supply sex under three legal regimes: prohibition, regulation and laissez-faire. The key feature is the endogenous evolution of the risk as a consequence of policy changes. We calibrate the model to empirical evidence from Italy and then compare the effect of different policies on the equilibrium quantity of prostitution and on the harm associated with it. A prohibition regime that makes it illegal to buy sex but not to sell it is more effective than the opposite regime in reducing quantity. Taxes are one inducement to go illegal and prevent some of the less risky individuals from joining the market, leaving it smaller but riskier. A licensing system that prevents some infected individuals from joining the legal market reduces the risk and is therefore associated with an increase in quantity. Prohibition is preferable to minimize quantity only if a high expected fine is feasible. Regulation is best to minimize harm. •We build an equilibrium model of prostitution.•Key is the endogenous evolution of the risk as a consequence of policy changes.•We calibrate the model to empirical evidence from Italy.•We compare the effect of different policies on quantity and on the associated harm.•While prohibition is preferable to minimize quantity regulation is best to minimize harm.
ISSN:0047-2727
1879-2316
DOI:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.11.001