Loading…
Comparisons of the simulated emissions and fuel efficiencies of diesel and gasoline hybrid electric vehicles
This paper presents results from gasoline- and diesel-powered hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) that account for the interaction of drive cycle transients and engine start–stop events with after-treatment devices and their associated fuel penalties. These s...
Saved in:
Published in: | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering Journal of automobile engineering, 2011-07, Vol.225 (7), p.944-959 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-bf27d7078a85590e9b729672c76fdb1a1ebd13e012371ee47cab44355cbf7c833 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-bf27d7078a85590e9b729672c76fdb1a1ebd13e012371ee47cab44355cbf7c833 |
container_end_page | 959 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 944 |
container_title | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering |
container_volume | 225 |
creator | Gao, Z Chakravarthy, V K Daw, C S |
description | This paper presents results from gasoline- and diesel-powered hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) that account for the interaction of drive cycle transients and engine start–stop events with after-treatment devices and their associated fuel penalties. These simulations were conducted using the Powertrain Systems Analysis Toolkit software combined with after-treatment component models developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The present authors employed a three-way catalyst model for gasoline emissions control and a lean nitrogen oxide (NO
x
) trap model to simulate diesel exhaust NO
x
reduction. A previously reported methodology based on experimentally calibrated corrections to steady state maps was used to simulate engine-out emissions and thermal variations. As expected, the simulations indicate a higher baseline fuel efficiency for diesel-powered hybrid vehicles, but this advantage is reduced by about a third for both HEVs and PHEVs when the fuel penalty for the lean NO
x
trap is included. These preliminary studies demonstrate that existing engine and exhaust systems models can capture important features of the highly transient engine operation in hybrid vehicles and can provide useful comparisons between advanced hybrid vehicle engine options. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0954407011403231 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1686431516</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0954407011403231</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1323228522</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-bf27d7078a85590e9b729672c76fdb1a1ebd13e012371ee47cab44355cbf7c833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkdFr2zAQxsVoYWna9z4aRmEv7nSyZNmPI6xbIbCX7dnI8ilRUOxMZxfy309uwiiBUYE40Pf7Tnx3jN0DfwTQ-guvlZRccwDJC1HAB7YQXEIu6hqu2GKW81n_yG6IdjwdLdWChdWwP5joaegpG1w2bjEjv5-CGbHLcO-J_CyZvsvchCFD57z12Kf7auhSTc-zvjE0BN9jtj220Sd3QDtGb7MX3HobkG7ZtTOB8O5cl-z307dfqx_5-uf359XXdW4lV2PeOqE7zXVlKqVqjnWrRV1qYXXpuhYMYNtBgRxEoQFRamtaKQulbOu0rYpiyT6f-h7i8GdCGpuUw2IIpsdhogbKqpQFKCjfR9MshaiUEAn9dIHuhin2KUgDNVeVFpzLRPETZeNAFNE1h-j3Jh4b4M28qeZyU8nycG5syJrgoknTpX8-IcsUVM6x8hNHZoNvPv9f379Qlp8V</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1905872004</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparisons of the simulated emissions and fuel efficiencies of diesel and gasoline hybrid electric vehicles</title><source>SAGE IMechE Complete Collection</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Gao, Z ; Chakravarthy, V K ; Daw, C S</creator><creatorcontrib>Gao, Z ; Chakravarthy, V K ; Daw, C S</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents results from gasoline- and diesel-powered hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) that account for the interaction of drive cycle transients and engine start–stop events with after-treatment devices and their associated fuel penalties. These simulations were conducted using the Powertrain Systems Analysis Toolkit software combined with after-treatment component models developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The present authors employed a three-way catalyst model for gasoline emissions control and a lean nitrogen oxide (NO
x
) trap model to simulate diesel exhaust NO
x
reduction. A previously reported methodology based on experimentally calibrated corrections to steady state maps was used to simulate engine-out emissions and thermal variations. As expected, the simulations indicate a higher baseline fuel efficiency for diesel-powered hybrid vehicles, but this advantage is reduced by about a third for both HEVs and PHEVs when the fuel penalty for the lean NO
x
trap is included. These preliminary studies demonstrate that existing engine and exhaust systems models can capture important features of the highly transient engine operation in hybrid vehicles and can provide useful comparisons between advanced hybrid vehicle engine options.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-4070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-2991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0954407011403231</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Automobile industry ; Automotive components ; Automotive engineering ; Automotive engines ; Calibration ; Catalysts ; Computer simulation ; Devices ; Diesel ; Diesel fuels ; Drives ; Efficiency ; Electric vehicles ; Emissions control ; Exact sciences and technology ; Exhaust systems ; Fuel consumption ; Fuel economy ; Gasoline ; Hybrid electric vehicles ; Hybrid vehicles ; Mechanical engineering. Machine design ; Nitrogen ; Research facilities ; Shafts, couplings, clutches, brakes ; Steady state ; Systems analysis ; Trucks</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering, 2011-07, Vol.225 (7), p.944-959</ispartof><rights>IMechE 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-bf27d7078a85590e9b729672c76fdb1a1ebd13e012371ee47cab44355cbf7c833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-bf27d7078a85590e9b729672c76fdb1a1ebd13e012371ee47cab44355cbf7c833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0954407011403231$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0954407011403231$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21893,27903,27904,45038,45426,79110</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24623743$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gao, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakravarthy, V K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daw, C S</creatorcontrib><title>Comparisons of the simulated emissions and fuel efficiencies of diesel and gasoline hybrid electric vehicles</title><title>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering</title><description>This paper presents results from gasoline- and diesel-powered hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) that account for the interaction of drive cycle transients and engine start–stop events with after-treatment devices and their associated fuel penalties. These simulations were conducted using the Powertrain Systems Analysis Toolkit software combined with after-treatment component models developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The present authors employed a three-way catalyst model for gasoline emissions control and a lean nitrogen oxide (NO
x
) trap model to simulate diesel exhaust NO
x
reduction. A previously reported methodology based on experimentally calibrated corrections to steady state maps was used to simulate engine-out emissions and thermal variations. As expected, the simulations indicate a higher baseline fuel efficiency for diesel-powered hybrid vehicles, but this advantage is reduced by about a third for both HEVs and PHEVs when the fuel penalty for the lean NO
x
trap is included. These preliminary studies demonstrate that existing engine and exhaust systems models can capture important features of the highly transient engine operation in hybrid vehicles and can provide useful comparisons between advanced hybrid vehicle engine options.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Automobile industry</subject><subject>Automotive components</subject><subject>Automotive engineering</subject><subject>Automotive engines</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Catalysts</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Devices</subject><subject>Diesel</subject><subject>Diesel fuels</subject><subject>Drives</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Electric vehicles</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Exhaust systems</subject><subject>Fuel consumption</subject><subject>Fuel economy</subject><subject>Gasoline</subject><subject>Hybrid electric vehicles</subject><subject>Hybrid vehicles</subject><subject>Mechanical engineering. Machine design</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Research facilities</subject><subject>Shafts, couplings, clutches, brakes</subject><subject>Steady state</subject><subject>Systems analysis</subject><subject>Trucks</subject><issn>0954-4070</issn><issn>2041-2991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkdFr2zAQxsVoYWna9z4aRmEv7nSyZNmPI6xbIbCX7dnI8ilRUOxMZxfy309uwiiBUYE40Pf7Tnx3jN0DfwTQ-guvlZRccwDJC1HAB7YQXEIu6hqu2GKW81n_yG6IdjwdLdWChdWwP5joaegpG1w2bjEjv5-CGbHLcO-J_CyZvsvchCFD57z12Kf7auhSTc-zvjE0BN9jtj220Sd3QDtGb7MX3HobkG7ZtTOB8O5cl-z307dfqx_5-uf359XXdW4lV2PeOqE7zXVlKqVqjnWrRV1qYXXpuhYMYNtBgRxEoQFRamtaKQulbOu0rYpiyT6f-h7i8GdCGpuUw2IIpsdhogbKqpQFKCjfR9MshaiUEAn9dIHuhin2KUgDNVeVFpzLRPETZeNAFNE1h-j3Jh4b4M28qeZyU8nycG5syJrgoknTpX8-IcsUVM6x8hNHZoNvPv9f379Qlp8V</recordid><startdate>201107</startdate><enddate>201107</enddate><creator>Gao, Z</creator><creator>Chakravarthy, V K</creator><creator>Daw, C S</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201107</creationdate><title>Comparisons of the simulated emissions and fuel efficiencies of diesel and gasoline hybrid electric vehicles</title><author>Gao, Z ; Chakravarthy, V K ; Daw, C S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-bf27d7078a85590e9b729672c76fdb1a1ebd13e012371ee47cab44355cbf7c833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Automobile industry</topic><topic>Automotive components</topic><topic>Automotive engineering</topic><topic>Automotive engines</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Catalysts</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Devices</topic><topic>Diesel</topic><topic>Diesel fuels</topic><topic>Drives</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Electric vehicles</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Exhaust systems</topic><topic>Fuel consumption</topic><topic>Fuel economy</topic><topic>Gasoline</topic><topic>Hybrid electric vehicles</topic><topic>Hybrid vehicles</topic><topic>Mechanical engineering. Machine design</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Research facilities</topic><topic>Shafts, couplings, clutches, brakes</topic><topic>Steady state</topic><topic>Systems analysis</topic><topic>Trucks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gao, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakravarthy, V K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daw, C S</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gao, Z</au><au>Chakravarthy, V K</au><au>Daw, C S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparisons of the simulated emissions and fuel efficiencies of diesel and gasoline hybrid electric vehicles</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering</jtitle><date>2011-07</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>225</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>944</spage><epage>959</epage><pages>944-959</pages><issn>0954-4070</issn><eissn>2041-2991</eissn><abstract>This paper presents results from gasoline- and diesel-powered hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) that account for the interaction of drive cycle transients and engine start–stop events with after-treatment devices and their associated fuel penalties. These simulations were conducted using the Powertrain Systems Analysis Toolkit software combined with after-treatment component models developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The present authors employed a three-way catalyst model for gasoline emissions control and a lean nitrogen oxide (NO
x
) trap model to simulate diesel exhaust NO
x
reduction. A previously reported methodology based on experimentally calibrated corrections to steady state maps was used to simulate engine-out emissions and thermal variations. As expected, the simulations indicate a higher baseline fuel efficiency for diesel-powered hybrid vehicles, but this advantage is reduced by about a third for both HEVs and PHEVs when the fuel penalty for the lean NO
x
trap is included. These preliminary studies demonstrate that existing engine and exhaust systems models can capture important features of the highly transient engine operation in hybrid vehicles and can provide useful comparisons between advanced hybrid vehicle engine options.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0954407011403231</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0954-4070 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering, 2011-07, Vol.225 (7), p.944-959 |
issn | 0954-4070 2041-2991 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1686431516 |
source | SAGE IMechE Complete Collection; SAGE |
subjects | Applied sciences Automobile industry Automotive components Automotive engineering Automotive engines Calibration Catalysts Computer simulation Devices Diesel Diesel fuels Drives Efficiency Electric vehicles Emissions control Exact sciences and technology Exhaust systems Fuel consumption Fuel economy Gasoline Hybrid electric vehicles Hybrid vehicles Mechanical engineering. Machine design Nitrogen Research facilities Shafts, couplings, clutches, brakes Steady state Systems analysis Trucks |
title | Comparisons of the simulated emissions and fuel efficiencies of diesel and gasoline hybrid electric vehicles |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T21%3A22%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparisons%20of%20the%20simulated%20emissions%20and%20fuel%20efficiencies%20of%20diesel%20and%20gasoline%20hybrid%20electric%20vehicles&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Institution%20of%20Mechanical%20Engineers.%20Part%20D,%20Journal%20of%20automobile%20engineering&rft.au=Gao,%20Z&rft.date=2011-07&rft.volume=225&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=944&rft.epage=959&rft.pages=944-959&rft.issn=0954-4070&rft.eissn=2041-2991&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0954407011403231&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1323228522%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-bf27d7078a85590e9b729672c76fdb1a1ebd13e012371ee47cab44355cbf7c833%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1905872004&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0954407011403231&rfr_iscdi=true |