Loading…

Comparisons of the simulated emissions and fuel efficiencies of diesel and gasoline hybrid electric vehicles

This paper presents results from gasoline- and diesel-powered hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) that account for the interaction of drive cycle transients and engine start–stop events with after-treatment devices and their associated fuel penalties. These s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering Journal of automobile engineering, 2011-07, Vol.225 (7), p.944-959
Main Authors: Gao, Z, Chakravarthy, V K, Daw, C S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-bf27d7078a85590e9b729672c76fdb1a1ebd13e012371ee47cab44355cbf7c833
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-bf27d7078a85590e9b729672c76fdb1a1ebd13e012371ee47cab44355cbf7c833
container_end_page 959
container_issue 7
container_start_page 944
container_title Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering
container_volume 225
creator Gao, Z
Chakravarthy, V K
Daw, C S
description This paper presents results from gasoline- and diesel-powered hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) that account for the interaction of drive cycle transients and engine start–stop events with after-treatment devices and their associated fuel penalties. These simulations were conducted using the Powertrain Systems Analysis Toolkit software combined with after-treatment component models developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The present authors employed a three-way catalyst model for gasoline emissions control and a lean nitrogen oxide (NO x ) trap model to simulate diesel exhaust NO x reduction. A previously reported methodology based on experimentally calibrated corrections to steady state maps was used to simulate engine-out emissions and thermal variations. As expected, the simulations indicate a higher baseline fuel efficiency for diesel-powered hybrid vehicles, but this advantage is reduced by about a third for both HEVs and PHEVs when the fuel penalty for the lean NO x trap is included. These preliminary studies demonstrate that existing engine and exhaust systems models can capture important features of the highly transient engine operation in hybrid vehicles and can provide useful comparisons between advanced hybrid vehicle engine options.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0954407011403231
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1686431516</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0954407011403231</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1323228522</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-bf27d7078a85590e9b729672c76fdb1a1ebd13e012371ee47cab44355cbf7c833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkdFr2zAQxsVoYWna9z4aRmEv7nSyZNmPI6xbIbCX7dnI8ilRUOxMZxfy309uwiiBUYE40Pf7Tnx3jN0DfwTQ-guvlZRccwDJC1HAB7YQXEIu6hqu2GKW81n_yG6IdjwdLdWChdWwP5joaegpG1w2bjEjv5-CGbHLcO-J_CyZvsvchCFD57z12Kf7auhSTc-zvjE0BN9jtj220Sd3QDtGb7MX3HobkG7ZtTOB8O5cl-z307dfqx_5-uf359XXdW4lV2PeOqE7zXVlKqVqjnWrRV1qYXXpuhYMYNtBgRxEoQFRamtaKQulbOu0rYpiyT6f-h7i8GdCGpuUw2IIpsdhogbKqpQFKCjfR9MshaiUEAn9dIHuhin2KUgDNVeVFpzLRPETZeNAFNE1h-j3Jh4b4M28qeZyU8nycG5syJrgoknTpX8-IcsUVM6x8hNHZoNvPv9f379Qlp8V</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1905872004</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparisons of the simulated emissions and fuel efficiencies of diesel and gasoline hybrid electric vehicles</title><source>SAGE IMechE Complete Collection</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Gao, Z ; Chakravarthy, V K ; Daw, C S</creator><creatorcontrib>Gao, Z ; Chakravarthy, V K ; Daw, C S</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents results from gasoline- and diesel-powered hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) that account for the interaction of drive cycle transients and engine start–stop events with after-treatment devices and their associated fuel penalties. These simulations were conducted using the Powertrain Systems Analysis Toolkit software combined with after-treatment component models developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The present authors employed a three-way catalyst model for gasoline emissions control and a lean nitrogen oxide (NO x ) trap model to simulate diesel exhaust NO x reduction. A previously reported methodology based on experimentally calibrated corrections to steady state maps was used to simulate engine-out emissions and thermal variations. As expected, the simulations indicate a higher baseline fuel efficiency for diesel-powered hybrid vehicles, but this advantage is reduced by about a third for both HEVs and PHEVs when the fuel penalty for the lean NO x trap is included. These preliminary studies demonstrate that existing engine and exhaust systems models can capture important features of the highly transient engine operation in hybrid vehicles and can provide useful comparisons between advanced hybrid vehicle engine options.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-4070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-2991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0954407011403231</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Automobile industry ; Automotive components ; Automotive engineering ; Automotive engines ; Calibration ; Catalysts ; Computer simulation ; Devices ; Diesel ; Diesel fuels ; Drives ; Efficiency ; Electric vehicles ; Emissions control ; Exact sciences and technology ; Exhaust systems ; Fuel consumption ; Fuel economy ; Gasoline ; Hybrid electric vehicles ; Hybrid vehicles ; Mechanical engineering. Machine design ; Nitrogen ; Research facilities ; Shafts, couplings, clutches, brakes ; Steady state ; Systems analysis ; Trucks</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering, 2011-07, Vol.225 (7), p.944-959</ispartof><rights>IMechE 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-bf27d7078a85590e9b729672c76fdb1a1ebd13e012371ee47cab44355cbf7c833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-bf27d7078a85590e9b729672c76fdb1a1ebd13e012371ee47cab44355cbf7c833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0954407011403231$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0954407011403231$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21893,27903,27904,45038,45426,79110</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24623743$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gao, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakravarthy, V K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daw, C S</creatorcontrib><title>Comparisons of the simulated emissions and fuel efficiencies of diesel and gasoline hybrid electric vehicles</title><title>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering</title><description>This paper presents results from gasoline- and diesel-powered hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) that account for the interaction of drive cycle transients and engine start–stop events with after-treatment devices and their associated fuel penalties. These simulations were conducted using the Powertrain Systems Analysis Toolkit software combined with after-treatment component models developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The present authors employed a three-way catalyst model for gasoline emissions control and a lean nitrogen oxide (NO x ) trap model to simulate diesel exhaust NO x reduction. A previously reported methodology based on experimentally calibrated corrections to steady state maps was used to simulate engine-out emissions and thermal variations. As expected, the simulations indicate a higher baseline fuel efficiency for diesel-powered hybrid vehicles, but this advantage is reduced by about a third for both HEVs and PHEVs when the fuel penalty for the lean NO x trap is included. These preliminary studies demonstrate that existing engine and exhaust systems models can capture important features of the highly transient engine operation in hybrid vehicles and can provide useful comparisons between advanced hybrid vehicle engine options.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Automobile industry</subject><subject>Automotive components</subject><subject>Automotive engineering</subject><subject>Automotive engines</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Catalysts</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Devices</subject><subject>Diesel</subject><subject>Diesel fuels</subject><subject>Drives</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Electric vehicles</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Exhaust systems</subject><subject>Fuel consumption</subject><subject>Fuel economy</subject><subject>Gasoline</subject><subject>Hybrid electric vehicles</subject><subject>Hybrid vehicles</subject><subject>Mechanical engineering. Machine design</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Research facilities</subject><subject>Shafts, couplings, clutches, brakes</subject><subject>Steady state</subject><subject>Systems analysis</subject><subject>Trucks</subject><issn>0954-4070</issn><issn>2041-2991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkdFr2zAQxsVoYWna9z4aRmEv7nSyZNmPI6xbIbCX7dnI8ilRUOxMZxfy309uwiiBUYE40Pf7Tnx3jN0DfwTQ-guvlZRccwDJC1HAB7YQXEIu6hqu2GKW81n_yG6IdjwdLdWChdWwP5joaegpG1w2bjEjv5-CGbHLcO-J_CyZvsvchCFD57z12Kf7auhSTc-zvjE0BN9jtj220Sd3QDtGb7MX3HobkG7ZtTOB8O5cl-z307dfqx_5-uf359XXdW4lV2PeOqE7zXVlKqVqjnWrRV1qYXXpuhYMYNtBgRxEoQFRamtaKQulbOu0rYpiyT6f-h7i8GdCGpuUw2IIpsdhogbKqpQFKCjfR9MshaiUEAn9dIHuhin2KUgDNVeVFpzLRPETZeNAFNE1h-j3Jh4b4M28qeZyU8nycG5syJrgoknTpX8-IcsUVM6x8hNHZoNvPv9f379Qlp8V</recordid><startdate>201107</startdate><enddate>201107</enddate><creator>Gao, Z</creator><creator>Chakravarthy, V K</creator><creator>Daw, C S</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201107</creationdate><title>Comparisons of the simulated emissions and fuel efficiencies of diesel and gasoline hybrid electric vehicles</title><author>Gao, Z ; Chakravarthy, V K ; Daw, C S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-bf27d7078a85590e9b729672c76fdb1a1ebd13e012371ee47cab44355cbf7c833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Automobile industry</topic><topic>Automotive components</topic><topic>Automotive engineering</topic><topic>Automotive engines</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Catalysts</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Devices</topic><topic>Diesel</topic><topic>Diesel fuels</topic><topic>Drives</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Electric vehicles</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Exhaust systems</topic><topic>Fuel consumption</topic><topic>Fuel economy</topic><topic>Gasoline</topic><topic>Hybrid electric vehicles</topic><topic>Hybrid vehicles</topic><topic>Mechanical engineering. Machine design</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Research facilities</topic><topic>Shafts, couplings, clutches, brakes</topic><topic>Steady state</topic><topic>Systems analysis</topic><topic>Trucks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gao, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakravarthy, V K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daw, C S</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gao, Z</au><au>Chakravarthy, V K</au><au>Daw, C S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparisons of the simulated emissions and fuel efficiencies of diesel and gasoline hybrid electric vehicles</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering</jtitle><date>2011-07</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>225</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>944</spage><epage>959</epage><pages>944-959</pages><issn>0954-4070</issn><eissn>2041-2991</eissn><abstract>This paper presents results from gasoline- and diesel-powered hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) that account for the interaction of drive cycle transients and engine start–stop events with after-treatment devices and their associated fuel penalties. These simulations were conducted using the Powertrain Systems Analysis Toolkit software combined with after-treatment component models developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The present authors employed a three-way catalyst model for gasoline emissions control and a lean nitrogen oxide (NO x ) trap model to simulate diesel exhaust NO x reduction. A previously reported methodology based on experimentally calibrated corrections to steady state maps was used to simulate engine-out emissions and thermal variations. As expected, the simulations indicate a higher baseline fuel efficiency for diesel-powered hybrid vehicles, but this advantage is reduced by about a third for both HEVs and PHEVs when the fuel penalty for the lean NO x trap is included. These preliminary studies demonstrate that existing engine and exhaust systems models can capture important features of the highly transient engine operation in hybrid vehicles and can provide useful comparisons between advanced hybrid vehicle engine options.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0954407011403231</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0954-4070
ispartof Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of automobile engineering, 2011-07, Vol.225 (7), p.944-959
issn 0954-4070
2041-2991
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1686431516
source SAGE IMechE Complete Collection; SAGE
subjects Applied sciences
Automobile industry
Automotive components
Automotive engineering
Automotive engines
Calibration
Catalysts
Computer simulation
Devices
Diesel
Diesel fuels
Drives
Efficiency
Electric vehicles
Emissions control
Exact sciences and technology
Exhaust systems
Fuel consumption
Fuel economy
Gasoline
Hybrid electric vehicles
Hybrid vehicles
Mechanical engineering. Machine design
Nitrogen
Research facilities
Shafts, couplings, clutches, brakes
Steady state
Systems analysis
Trucks
title Comparisons of the simulated emissions and fuel efficiencies of diesel and gasoline hybrid electric vehicles
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T21%3A22%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparisons%20of%20the%20simulated%20emissions%20and%20fuel%20efficiencies%20of%20diesel%20and%20gasoline%20hybrid%20electric%20vehicles&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Institution%20of%20Mechanical%20Engineers.%20Part%20D,%20Journal%20of%20automobile%20engineering&rft.au=Gao,%20Z&rft.date=2011-07&rft.volume=225&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=944&rft.epage=959&rft.pages=944-959&rft.issn=0954-4070&rft.eissn=2041-2991&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0954407011403231&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1323228522%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-bf27d7078a85590e9b729672c76fdb1a1ebd13e012371ee47cab44355cbf7c833%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1905872004&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0954407011403231&rfr_iscdi=true