Novel hybrid drilling protocol: evaluation for the implant healing - thermal changes, crestal bone loss, and bone-to-implant contact

• Published in: Clinical oral implants research 2015-07, Vol.26 (7), p.753-760
• Main Authors: Calvo-Guirado, José Luis, Delgado-Peña, Jorge, Maté-Sánchez, Jose E., Mareque Bueno, Javier, Delgado-Ruiz, Rafael Arcesio, Romanos, Georgios E.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Alveolar Process - surgery; animal studies; Animals; Bicuspid; biologic drilling; Bone healing; Bone loss; bone-to-implant contact; crestal bone loss; Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods; Dental Implants; Dentistry; Dogs; Drilling; Healing; histomorphometry; Implants, Experimental; In vivo methods and tests; incremental drilling; Mandible - surgery; Osseointegration; Osseointegration - physiology; Osteotomy - methods; Premolars; Ribs - surgery; Swine; Temperature; Temperature requirements; Thermocouples; Transplants & implants; Wound Healing - physiology
• ISSN: 0905-7161; 1600-0501
• DOI: 10.1111/clr.12341

Objectives To evaluate a new hybrid drilling protocol, by the analysis of thermal changes in vitro, and their effects in the crestal bone loss and bone‐to‐implant contact in vivo. Materials and Methods Temperature changes during simulated osteotomies with a hybrid drilling technique (biologic plus simplified) (test) versus an incremental drilling technique (control) were investigated. One hundred and twenty random osteotomies were performed (60 by group) in pig ribs up to 3.75‐mm‐diameter drill to a depth of 10 mm. Thermal changes and time were recorded by paired thermocouples. In a parallel experiment, bilateral mandibular premolars P2, P3, P4, and first molar M1 were extracted from six dogs. After 2‐month healing, implant sites were randomly prepared using either of the drilling techniques. Forty eight implants of 3.75 mm diameter and 10 mm length were inserted. The dogs were euthanized at 30 and 90 days, and crestal bone loss (CBL) and bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) were evaluated. Results The control group showed maximum temperatures of 35.3°C ± 1.8°C, ΔT of 10.4°C, and a mean time of 100 s/procedure; meanwhile, the test group showed maximum temperatures of 36.7°C ± 1.2°C, ΔT of 8.1°C, and a mean time of 240 s/procedure. After 30 days, CBL values for both groups (test: 1.168 ± 0.194 mm; control: 1.181 ± 0.113 mm) and BIC values (test: 43 ± 2.8%; control: 45 ± 1.3%) were similar, without significant differences (P > 0.05). After 90 days, CBL (test: 1.173 ± 0.187 mm; control: 1.205 ± 0.122 mm) and BIC (test: 64 ± 3.3%; control: 64 ± 2.4%) values were similar, without significant differences (P > 0.05). The BIC values were increased at 90 days in both groups compared with the 30‐day period (P