Loading…
Dispersal Limitation Favors More Fecund Species in the Presence of Fitness-Equalizing Demographic Trade-Offs
Demographic equivalence is the central assumption of the neutral theory of species diversity and has attracted much criticism, since species clearly differ from each other in many traits. Two simple answers—that is, dispersal limitation and demographic trade-offs—have been suggested to resolve this...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American naturalist 2015-05, Vol.185 (5), p.620-630 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-a04dfa8083935fe1f87263bf14f6429f63cf39ca132f438e26fd57025f291ee03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-a04dfa8083935fe1f87263bf14f6429f63cf39ca132f438e26fd57025f291ee03 |
container_end_page | 630 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 620 |
container_title | The American naturalist |
container_volume | 185 |
creator | Zhou, Shurong Peng, Zechen Zhang, Da-Yong |
description | Demographic equivalence is the central assumption of the neutral theory of species diversity and has attracted much criticism, since species clearly differ from each other in many traits. Two simple answers—that is, dispersal limitation and demographic trade-offs—have been suggested to resolve this problem. Both processes are considered to be capable of making interspecific differences in fitness smaller on their own, thus potentially reconciling neutrality with reality. However, when the two mechanisms operate simultaneously, as they must do in natural communities, we are surprised to find that they interfere with each other in such a way that dispersal limitation favors more fecund species. Fitness equivalence is no longer guaranteed by a perfect trade-off, and contrary to popular belief, dispersal limitation is found to impede rather than facilitate the stochastic coexistence of species. Still, more species can coexist than allowed through demographic equivalence, providing a potentially alternative explanation for biodiversity maintenance in nature. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/680498 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1687672421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/680498</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/680498</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-a04dfa8083935fe1f87263bf14f6429f63cf39ca132f438e26fd57025f291ee03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV9rFDEUxYModq36ESSgiC-j-TtJHqXtWmGlgvV5SDM32ywzk2nujKCf3qlbuyAIfbpc-HHuuecQ8pKz95zZ-kNtmXL2EVlxLU2lpZCPyYoxJivGlTkizxB3y-qU00_JkdCOac30inSnCUco6Du6SX2a_JTyQNf-Ry5Iv-QCdA1hHlr6bYSQAGka6HQN9GsBhCEAzZGu0zQAYnV2M_su_UrDlp5Cn7fFj9cp0MviW6guYsTn5En0HcKLu3lMvq_PLk_Oq83Fp88nHzdVUJJNlWeqjd4yK53UEXi0RtTyKnIVayVcrGWI0gXPpYhKWhB1bLVhQkfhOACTx-TdXncs-WYGnJo-YYCu8wPkGRteW1MboQR_AGq0NdxZuaCv_0F3eS7D8sgtZa0z9o_g2z0VSkYsEJuxpN6Xnw1nzW1Vzb6qBXx1Jzdf9dDeY3-7OVibwxKj3-ZxyRwPR_c6zdjGBX3zAPTwwQ6nXP5n7Df_5rJT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1678897821</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dispersal Limitation Favors More Fecund Species in the Presence of Fitness-Equalizing Demographic Trade-Offs</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Zhou, Shurong ; Peng, Zechen ; Zhang, Da-Yong</creator><contributor>Susan Kalisz ; Mathew A. Leibold</contributor><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Shurong ; Peng, Zechen ; Zhang, Da-Yong ; Susan Kalisz ; Mathew A. Leibold</creatorcontrib><description>Demographic equivalence is the central assumption of the neutral theory of species diversity and has attracted much criticism, since species clearly differ from each other in many traits. Two simple answers—that is, dispersal limitation and demographic trade-offs—have been suggested to resolve this problem. Both processes are considered to be capable of making interspecific differences in fitness smaller on their own, thus potentially reconciling neutrality with reality. However, when the two mechanisms operate simultaneously, as they must do in natural communities, we are surprised to find that they interfere with each other in such a way that dispersal limitation favors more fecund species. Fitness equivalence is no longer guaranteed by a perfect trade-off, and contrary to popular belief, dispersal limitation is found to impede rather than facilitate the stochastic coexistence of species. Still, more species can coexist than allowed through demographic equivalence, providing a potentially alternative explanation for biodiversity maintenance in nature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/680498</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25905505</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMNTA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Animal Distribution ; Biodiversity ; Community ecology ; Competitive exclusion ; Demography ; Dispersal ; Ecological and Environmental Phenomena ; Ecological competition ; Ecological life histories ; Fecundity ; Fertility ; Genetic Fitness ; Models, Biological ; Mortality ; Seed dispersal ; Speciation ; Species ; Species extinction ; Tradeoff analysis</subject><ispartof>The American naturalist, 2015-05, Vol.185 (5), p.620-630</ispartof><rights>2015 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press May 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-a04dfa8083935fe1f87263bf14f6429f63cf39ca132f438e26fd57025f291ee03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-a04dfa8083935fe1f87263bf14f6429f63cf39ca132f438e26fd57025f291ee03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25905505$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Susan Kalisz</contributor><contributor>Mathew A. Leibold</contributor><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Shurong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Zechen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Da-Yong</creatorcontrib><title>Dispersal Limitation Favors More Fecund Species in the Presence of Fitness-Equalizing Demographic Trade-Offs</title><title>The American naturalist</title><addtitle>Am Nat</addtitle><description>Demographic equivalence is the central assumption of the neutral theory of species diversity and has attracted much criticism, since species clearly differ from each other in many traits. Two simple answers—that is, dispersal limitation and demographic trade-offs—have been suggested to resolve this problem. Both processes are considered to be capable of making interspecific differences in fitness smaller on their own, thus potentially reconciling neutrality with reality. However, when the two mechanisms operate simultaneously, as they must do in natural communities, we are surprised to find that they interfere with each other in such a way that dispersal limitation favors more fecund species. Fitness equivalence is no longer guaranteed by a perfect trade-off, and contrary to popular belief, dispersal limitation is found to impede rather than facilitate the stochastic coexistence of species. Still, more species can coexist than allowed through demographic equivalence, providing a potentially alternative explanation for biodiversity maintenance in nature.</description><subject>Animal Distribution</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Community ecology</subject><subject>Competitive exclusion</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Ecological and Environmental Phenomena</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>Ecological life histories</subject><subject>Fecundity</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Genetic Fitness</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Seed dispersal</subject><subject>Speciation</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Species extinction</subject><subject>Tradeoff analysis</subject><issn>0003-0147</issn><issn>1537-5323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkV9rFDEUxYModq36ESSgiC-j-TtJHqXtWmGlgvV5SDM32ywzk2nujKCf3qlbuyAIfbpc-HHuuecQ8pKz95zZ-kNtmXL2EVlxLU2lpZCPyYoxJivGlTkizxB3y-qU00_JkdCOac30inSnCUco6Du6SX2a_JTyQNf-Ry5Iv-QCdA1hHlr6bYSQAGka6HQN9GsBhCEAzZGu0zQAYnV2M_su_UrDlp5Cn7fFj9cp0MviW6guYsTn5En0HcKLu3lMvq_PLk_Oq83Fp88nHzdVUJJNlWeqjd4yK53UEXi0RtTyKnIVayVcrGWI0gXPpYhKWhB1bLVhQkfhOACTx-TdXncs-WYGnJo-YYCu8wPkGRteW1MboQR_AGq0NdxZuaCv_0F3eS7D8sgtZa0z9o_g2z0VSkYsEJuxpN6Xnw1nzW1Vzb6qBXx1Jzdf9dDeY3-7OVibwxKj3-ZxyRwPR_c6zdjGBX3zAPTwwQ6nXP5n7Df_5rJT</recordid><startdate>20150501</startdate><enddate>20150501</enddate><creator>Zhou, Shurong</creator><creator>Peng, Zechen</creator><creator>Zhang, Da-Yong</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150501</creationdate><title>Dispersal Limitation Favors More Fecund Species in the Presence of Fitness-Equalizing Demographic Trade-Offs</title><author>Zhou, Shurong ; Peng, Zechen ; Zhang, Da-Yong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-a04dfa8083935fe1f87263bf14f6429f63cf39ca132f438e26fd57025f291ee03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animal Distribution</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Community ecology</topic><topic>Competitive exclusion</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Ecological and Environmental Phenomena</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>Ecological life histories</topic><topic>Fecundity</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Genetic Fitness</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Seed dispersal</topic><topic>Speciation</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Species extinction</topic><topic>Tradeoff analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Shurong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Zechen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Da-Yong</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhou, Shurong</au><au>Peng, Zechen</au><au>Zhang, Da-Yong</au><au>Susan Kalisz</au><au>Mathew A. Leibold</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dispersal Limitation Favors More Fecund Species in the Presence of Fitness-Equalizing Demographic Trade-Offs</atitle><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle><addtitle>Am Nat</addtitle><date>2015-05-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>185</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>620</spage><epage>630</epage><pages>620-630</pages><issn>0003-0147</issn><eissn>1537-5323</eissn><coden>AMNTA4</coden><abstract>Demographic equivalence is the central assumption of the neutral theory of species diversity and has attracted much criticism, since species clearly differ from each other in many traits. Two simple answers—that is, dispersal limitation and demographic trade-offs—have been suggested to resolve this problem. Both processes are considered to be capable of making interspecific differences in fitness smaller on their own, thus potentially reconciling neutrality with reality. However, when the two mechanisms operate simultaneously, as they must do in natural communities, we are surprised to find that they interfere with each other in such a way that dispersal limitation favors more fecund species. Fitness equivalence is no longer guaranteed by a perfect trade-off, and contrary to popular belief, dispersal limitation is found to impede rather than facilitate the stochastic coexistence of species. Still, more species can coexist than allowed through demographic equivalence, providing a potentially alternative explanation for biodiversity maintenance in nature.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>25905505</pmid><doi>10.1086/680498</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-0147 |
ispartof | The American naturalist, 2015-05, Vol.185 (5), p.620-630 |
issn | 0003-0147 1537-5323 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1687672421 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Animal Distribution Biodiversity Community ecology Competitive exclusion Demography Dispersal Ecological and Environmental Phenomena Ecological competition Ecological life histories Fecundity Fertility Genetic Fitness Models, Biological Mortality Seed dispersal Speciation Species Species extinction Tradeoff analysis |
title | Dispersal Limitation Favors More Fecund Species in the Presence of Fitness-Equalizing Demographic Trade-Offs |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T13%3A04%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dispersal%20Limitation%20Favors%20More%20Fecund%20Species%20in%20the%20Presence%20of%20Fitness-Equalizing%20Demographic%20Trade-Offs&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20naturalist&rft.au=Zhou,%20Shurong&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.volume=185&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=620&rft.epage=630&rft.pages=620-630&rft.issn=0003-0147&rft.eissn=1537-5323&rft.coden=AMNTA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/680498&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/680498%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-a04dfa8083935fe1f87263bf14f6429f63cf39ca132f438e26fd57025f291ee03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1678897821&rft_id=info:pmid/25905505&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/680498&rfr_iscdi=true |