Loading…
Effect of type (barley vs. maize) and processing (grinding vs. dry rolling) of cereal on ruminal fermentation and microbiota of beef calves during the early fattening period
•Acidosis is the most important nutritional disorder in intensively reared cattle.•Type of cereal in the concentrate and its processing can be key factors in acidosis.•In our experiment rumen fermentation and pH were not affected by cereal type.•Rumen fermentation was more buffered when dry-rolled c...
Saved in:
Published in: | Animal feed science and technology 2015-01, Vol.199, p.113-126 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-3102d8107fdcc689b58a4f25b30099e3a978ad6119b73ef2d59f3d14c7308093 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-3102d8107fdcc689b58a4f25b30099e3a978ad6119b73ef2d59f3d14c7308093 |
container_end_page | 126 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 113 |
container_title | Animal feed science and technology |
container_volume | 199 |
creator | Gimeno, A. Alami, A. Al Abecia, L. de Vega, A. Fondevila, M. Castrillo, C. |
description | •Acidosis is the most important nutritional disorder in intensively reared cattle.•Type of cereal in the concentrate and its processing can be key factors in acidosis.•In our experiment rumen fermentation and pH were not affected by cereal type.•Rumen fermentation was more buffered when dry-rolled cereals (vs. ground) were fed.•Cereal type and its processing had only a minor effect on rumen microbiota.
Ruminal acidosis is the most important nutritional disorder in intensively reared cattle and can be aggravated depending on the type of cereal in the concentrate and its processing, which affect the feed intake pattern and rumen fermentation and microbiota. Two compound feeds were formulated with a 0.60 mixture of maize and barley in proportions of 75:25 (M) and 25:75 (B), ground to 3.5mm (G) or dry-rolled (R). Eight 3-month old, rumen cannulated Holstein male calves were fed the experimental concentrates together with barley straw ad libitum, four of them receiving concentrate M and the other four receiving concentrate B throughout the experiment. Concentrates were offered to each animal in the two presentation forms in two 35-day periods, following a crossover arrangement. On days 33 and 35 of each period, rumen contents were sampled just before the morning feed distribution (8:30h) and 4 and 8h later to measure pH and determine volatile fatty acid (VFA), ammonia and lactic acid concentrations, as well as to characterise rumen bacterial community by qPCR. The pattern of feed intake was also monitored over the sampling days. The main cereal included in the concentrate scarcely affected ruminal fermentation. The higher fermentation rate of barley-based concentrates could be partly counterbalanced by a higher straw intake. Animals fed R cereals showed higher rumen pH (6.09 vs. 5.77, P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.11.008 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1687675204</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0377840114003939</els_id><sourcerecordid>1687675204</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-3102d8107fdcc689b58a4f25b30099e3a978ad6119b73ef2d59f3d14c7308093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv3CAQha2qlbpN-x84bg52GeM1-NhGaRopUi65IwxDysqGLbAruf-p_7GgrdRjTwyj9z7N02saArQDCuPnY6e8s4gmadf1FIYOoKNUvGl2IDhr-x7Gt82OMs5bMVB433xI6Ugp9IL1u-b3vbWoMwmW5O2EZD-ruOBGLqkjq3K_8JYob8gpBo0pOf9K9q_ReVOnqjFxIzEsS_nfVojGiGohwZN4Xp0vo8W4os8qu7KsrNXpGGYXsqqGGbG41HLBRMw5Vm7-gQTLGRuxKmf0dXfC6IL52Lyzakn46e9707x8u3-5-94-PT883n15ajUTQ24Z0N4IoNwarUcxzQehBtsfZkbpNCFTExfKjADTzBna3hwmywwMmjMq6MRumv0VW2L_PGPKcnVJ47Ioj-GcJIyCj_zQ06FIxVVaMqUU0cpTdKuKmwQqa0HyKP8VJGtBEkCWgor169WKJcnFYZRFgV6jcbFUIk1w_4f8AWstoO0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1687675204</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of type (barley vs. maize) and processing (grinding vs. dry rolling) of cereal on ruminal fermentation and microbiota of beef calves during the early fattening period</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Gimeno, A. ; Alami, A. Al ; Abecia, L. ; de Vega, A. ; Fondevila, M. ; Castrillo, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gimeno, A. ; Alami, A. Al ; Abecia, L. ; de Vega, A. ; Fondevila, M. ; Castrillo, C.</creatorcontrib><description>•Acidosis is the most important nutritional disorder in intensively reared cattle.•Type of cereal in the concentrate and its processing can be key factors in acidosis.•In our experiment rumen fermentation and pH were not affected by cereal type.•Rumen fermentation was more buffered when dry-rolled cereals (vs. ground) were fed.•Cereal type and its processing had only a minor effect on rumen microbiota.
Ruminal acidosis is the most important nutritional disorder in intensively reared cattle and can be aggravated depending on the type of cereal in the concentrate and its processing, which affect the feed intake pattern and rumen fermentation and microbiota. Two compound feeds were formulated with a 0.60 mixture of maize and barley in proportions of 75:25 (M) and 25:75 (B), ground to 3.5mm (G) or dry-rolled (R). Eight 3-month old, rumen cannulated Holstein male calves were fed the experimental concentrates together with barley straw ad libitum, four of them receiving concentrate M and the other four receiving concentrate B throughout the experiment. Concentrates were offered to each animal in the two presentation forms in two 35-day periods, following a crossover arrangement. On days 33 and 35 of each period, rumen contents were sampled just before the morning feed distribution (8:30h) and 4 and 8h later to measure pH and determine volatile fatty acid (VFA), ammonia and lactic acid concentrations, as well as to characterise rumen bacterial community by qPCR. The pattern of feed intake was also monitored over the sampling days. The main cereal included in the concentrate scarcely affected ruminal fermentation. The higher fermentation rate of barley-based concentrates could be partly counterbalanced by a higher straw intake. Animals fed R cereals showed higher rumen pH (6.09 vs. 5.77, P<0.01) and lower lactic acid (72.5 vs. 95.2mg/L, P=0.065) and total VFA (110 vs. 138mmol/L, P<0.05) concentrations than those receiving G. This effect was in general more evident when maize was the major cereal in the concentrate, although the interaction of cereal type by processing form was not significant. Scarce effects on rumen microbiota were promoted by dietary factors; however, the low ruminal proportion of Streptococcus bovis observed regardless of the diet fed and rumen pH suggests that other microorganisms could be involved in the appearance of acidosis in beef cattle on high-grain diets. The more buffered rumen fermentation associated with dry-rolling processing could be partly due to its higher particle size, which reduces microbial and enzymatic access to the starch and its fermentation rate, at the same time as it promotes a more homogeneous pattern of intake throughout the day. Therefore, this processing method could be useful for preventing acidosis in beef calves at the outset of the fattening stage, especially when feeding maize-based diets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0377-8401</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2216</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.11.008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acidosis ; Beef cattle ; Concentrate processing ; Hordeum vulgare ; Microbiota ; Rumen ; Rumen environment ; Streptococcus bovis ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Animal feed science and technology, 2015-01, Vol.199, p.113-126</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-3102d8107fdcc689b58a4f25b30099e3a978ad6119b73ef2d59f3d14c7308093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-3102d8107fdcc689b58a4f25b30099e3a978ad6119b73ef2d59f3d14c7308093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gimeno, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alami, A. Al</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abecia, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Vega, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fondevila, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castrillo, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of type (barley vs. maize) and processing (grinding vs. dry rolling) of cereal on ruminal fermentation and microbiota of beef calves during the early fattening period</title><title>Animal feed science and technology</title><description>•Acidosis is the most important nutritional disorder in intensively reared cattle.•Type of cereal in the concentrate and its processing can be key factors in acidosis.•In our experiment rumen fermentation and pH were not affected by cereal type.•Rumen fermentation was more buffered when dry-rolled cereals (vs. ground) were fed.•Cereal type and its processing had only a minor effect on rumen microbiota.
Ruminal acidosis is the most important nutritional disorder in intensively reared cattle and can be aggravated depending on the type of cereal in the concentrate and its processing, which affect the feed intake pattern and rumen fermentation and microbiota. Two compound feeds were formulated with a 0.60 mixture of maize and barley in proportions of 75:25 (M) and 25:75 (B), ground to 3.5mm (G) or dry-rolled (R). Eight 3-month old, rumen cannulated Holstein male calves were fed the experimental concentrates together with barley straw ad libitum, four of them receiving concentrate M and the other four receiving concentrate B throughout the experiment. Concentrates were offered to each animal in the two presentation forms in two 35-day periods, following a crossover arrangement. On days 33 and 35 of each period, rumen contents were sampled just before the morning feed distribution (8:30h) and 4 and 8h later to measure pH and determine volatile fatty acid (VFA), ammonia and lactic acid concentrations, as well as to characterise rumen bacterial community by qPCR. The pattern of feed intake was also monitored over the sampling days. The main cereal included in the concentrate scarcely affected ruminal fermentation. The higher fermentation rate of barley-based concentrates could be partly counterbalanced by a higher straw intake. Animals fed R cereals showed higher rumen pH (6.09 vs. 5.77, P<0.01) and lower lactic acid (72.5 vs. 95.2mg/L, P=0.065) and total VFA (110 vs. 138mmol/L, P<0.05) concentrations than those receiving G. This effect was in general more evident when maize was the major cereal in the concentrate, although the interaction of cereal type by processing form was not significant. Scarce effects on rumen microbiota were promoted by dietary factors; however, the low ruminal proportion of Streptococcus bovis observed regardless of the diet fed and rumen pH suggests that other microorganisms could be involved in the appearance of acidosis in beef cattle on high-grain diets. The more buffered rumen fermentation associated with dry-rolling processing could be partly due to its higher particle size, which reduces microbial and enzymatic access to the starch and its fermentation rate, at the same time as it promotes a more homogeneous pattern of intake throughout the day. Therefore, this processing method could be useful for preventing acidosis in beef calves at the outset of the fattening stage, especially when feeding maize-based diets.</description><subject>Acidosis</subject><subject>Beef cattle</subject><subject>Concentrate processing</subject><subject>Hordeum vulgare</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Rumen</subject><subject>Rumen environment</subject><subject>Streptococcus bovis</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0377-8401</issn><issn>1873-2216</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUFv3CAQha2qlbpN-x84bg52GeM1-NhGaRopUi65IwxDysqGLbAruf-p_7GgrdRjTwyj9z7N02saArQDCuPnY6e8s4gmadf1FIYOoKNUvGl2IDhr-x7Gt82OMs5bMVB433xI6Ugp9IL1u-b3vbWoMwmW5O2EZD-ruOBGLqkjq3K_8JYob8gpBo0pOf9K9q_ReVOnqjFxIzEsS_nfVojGiGohwZN4Xp0vo8W4os8qu7KsrNXpGGYXsqqGGbG41HLBRMw5Vm7-gQTLGRuxKmf0dXfC6IL52Lyzakn46e9707x8u3-5-94-PT883n15ajUTQ24Z0N4IoNwarUcxzQehBtsfZkbpNCFTExfKjADTzBna3hwmywwMmjMq6MRumv0VW2L_PGPKcnVJ47Ioj-GcJIyCj_zQ06FIxVVaMqUU0cpTdKuKmwQqa0HyKP8VJGtBEkCWgor169WKJcnFYZRFgV6jcbFUIk1w_4f8AWstoO0</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Gimeno, A.</creator><creator>Alami, A. Al</creator><creator>Abecia, L.</creator><creator>de Vega, A.</creator><creator>Fondevila, M.</creator><creator>Castrillo, C.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Effect of type (barley vs. maize) and processing (grinding vs. dry rolling) of cereal on ruminal fermentation and microbiota of beef calves during the early fattening period</title><author>Gimeno, A. ; Alami, A. Al ; Abecia, L. ; de Vega, A. ; Fondevila, M. ; Castrillo, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-3102d8107fdcc689b58a4f25b30099e3a978ad6119b73ef2d59f3d14c7308093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Acidosis</topic><topic>Beef cattle</topic><topic>Concentrate processing</topic><topic>Hordeum vulgare</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Rumen</topic><topic>Rumen environment</topic><topic>Streptococcus bovis</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gimeno, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alami, A. Al</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abecia, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Vega, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fondevila, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castrillo, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Animal feed science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gimeno, A.</au><au>Alami, A. Al</au><au>Abecia, L.</au><au>de Vega, A.</au><au>Fondevila, M.</au><au>Castrillo, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of type (barley vs. maize) and processing (grinding vs. dry rolling) of cereal on ruminal fermentation and microbiota of beef calves during the early fattening period</atitle><jtitle>Animal feed science and technology</jtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>199</volume><spage>113</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>113-126</pages><issn>0377-8401</issn><eissn>1873-2216</eissn><abstract>•Acidosis is the most important nutritional disorder in intensively reared cattle.•Type of cereal in the concentrate and its processing can be key factors in acidosis.•In our experiment rumen fermentation and pH were not affected by cereal type.•Rumen fermentation was more buffered when dry-rolled cereals (vs. ground) were fed.•Cereal type and its processing had only a minor effect on rumen microbiota.
Ruminal acidosis is the most important nutritional disorder in intensively reared cattle and can be aggravated depending on the type of cereal in the concentrate and its processing, which affect the feed intake pattern and rumen fermentation and microbiota. Two compound feeds were formulated with a 0.60 mixture of maize and barley in proportions of 75:25 (M) and 25:75 (B), ground to 3.5mm (G) or dry-rolled (R). Eight 3-month old, rumen cannulated Holstein male calves were fed the experimental concentrates together with barley straw ad libitum, four of them receiving concentrate M and the other four receiving concentrate B throughout the experiment. Concentrates were offered to each animal in the two presentation forms in two 35-day periods, following a crossover arrangement. On days 33 and 35 of each period, rumen contents were sampled just before the morning feed distribution (8:30h) and 4 and 8h later to measure pH and determine volatile fatty acid (VFA), ammonia and lactic acid concentrations, as well as to characterise rumen bacterial community by qPCR. The pattern of feed intake was also monitored over the sampling days. The main cereal included in the concentrate scarcely affected ruminal fermentation. The higher fermentation rate of barley-based concentrates could be partly counterbalanced by a higher straw intake. Animals fed R cereals showed higher rumen pH (6.09 vs. 5.77, P<0.01) and lower lactic acid (72.5 vs. 95.2mg/L, P=0.065) and total VFA (110 vs. 138mmol/L, P<0.05) concentrations than those receiving G. This effect was in general more evident when maize was the major cereal in the concentrate, although the interaction of cereal type by processing form was not significant. Scarce effects on rumen microbiota were promoted by dietary factors; however, the low ruminal proportion of Streptococcus bovis observed regardless of the diet fed and rumen pH suggests that other microorganisms could be involved in the appearance of acidosis in beef cattle on high-grain diets. The more buffered rumen fermentation associated with dry-rolling processing could be partly due to its higher particle size, which reduces microbial and enzymatic access to the starch and its fermentation rate, at the same time as it promotes a more homogeneous pattern of intake throughout the day. Therefore, this processing method could be useful for preventing acidosis in beef calves at the outset of the fattening stage, especially when feeding maize-based diets.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.11.008</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0377-8401 |
ispartof | Animal feed science and technology, 2015-01, Vol.199, p.113-126 |
issn | 0377-8401 1873-2216 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1687675204 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Acidosis Beef cattle Concentrate processing Hordeum vulgare Microbiota Rumen Rumen environment Streptococcus bovis Zea mays |
title | Effect of type (barley vs. maize) and processing (grinding vs. dry rolling) of cereal on ruminal fermentation and microbiota of beef calves during the early fattening period |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A16%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20type%20(barley%20vs.%20maize)%20and%20processing%20(grinding%20vs.%20dry%20rolling)%20of%20cereal%20on%20ruminal%20fermentation%20and%20microbiota%20of%20beef%20calves%20during%20the%20early%20fattening%20period&rft.jtitle=Animal%20feed%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Gimeno,%20A.&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=199&rft.spage=113&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=113-126&rft.issn=0377-8401&rft.eissn=1873-2216&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.11.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1687675204%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-3102d8107fdcc689b58a4f25b30099e3a978ad6119b73ef2d59f3d14c7308093%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1687675204&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |