Loading…
Seasonal changes of leaf area index (LAI) in a tropical deciduous forest in west Mexico
Light canopy transmittance and the Beer-Lambert equation were utilized to assess monthly leaf area index (LAI) of a tropical deciduous forest ecosystem on the west coast of Mexico. The light transmittance coefficient ( k) was obtained by analyzing vertical leaf and light distribution in the forest c...
Saved in:
Published in: | Forest ecology and management 1995-06, Vol.74 (1), p.171-180 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Light canopy transmittance and the Beer-Lambert equation were utilized to assess monthly leaf area index (LAI) of a tropical deciduous forest ecosystem on the west coast of Mexico. The light transmittance coefficient (
k) was obtained by analyzing vertical leaf and light distribution in the forest canopy. An independent LAI estimate was obtained using litterfall data. The calculated
k value was 0.610 ± 0.035 (standard error). Average maximum LAI obtained with litterfall data was 4.2 ± 0.4 m
2m
−2. There was a significant correlation (
P < 0.001,
r = 0.98) between litter-LAI estimations and those obtained with the Beer-Lambert equation. The regression explained 95% of the variation; however, light-LAI overestimated litter-LAI by a constant of 0.87 ± 0.12 m
2 m
−2 (the slope was 1.03 and
Y intercept was 0.87). The discrepancy is partially attributed to leaf retention of the few evergreen species, and perhaps leaf retention of a few deciduous species beyond the end of the litterfall collection. Maximum annual LAI was similar in both study years (4.5 ± 0.3 m
2 m
−2 in 1990 and 4.9 ± 0.4 in 1991). Minimum LAI showed considerable variation between years with similar values in the dry seasons of 1990 and 1991 (1.0 ± 0.1 m
2 and 0.9 ± 0.1 m
2 m
−2, respectively), but much higher values in 1992 (2.7 ± 0.2 m
2 m
−2). The difference is probably attributed to an atypical rainfall event in January 1992 (644 mm), which retarded leaf abscission. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0378-1127 1872-7042 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0378-1127(94)03485-F |