Loading…
Role of serum toll-like receptors 2 and 4 in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis
Background and Aim Non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease is a common cause of chronic liver disease, including non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Our aim was to investigate whether serum toll‐like receptors 2 and 4 (TLR2 and TLR4) levels are correlated with NASH and able to predict liver fibrosis, as...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2015-07, Vol.30 (7), p.1190-1196 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3634-6d939e1c7d01a08f82ab45a4f8fd25fca0c49131a35287714794ae0980a19be73 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3634-6d939e1c7d01a08f82ab45a4f8fd25fca0c49131a35287714794ae0980a19be73 |
container_end_page | 1196 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1190 |
container_title | Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Cengiz, Mustafa Ozenirler, Seren Elbeg, Sehri |
description | Background and Aim
Non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease is a common cause of chronic liver disease, including non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Our aim was to investigate whether serum toll‐like receptors 2 and 4 (TLR2 and TLR4) levels are correlated with NASH and able to predict liver fibrosis, as well as to compare these markers with other non‐invasive fibrosis scores (aspartate aminotransferase [AST] to alanine aminotransferase ratio, AST to platelet ratio index, fibrosis index, fibrosis 4, and fibrosis cirrhosis index).
Methods
Serum samples were obtained from consecutive biopsy proven NASH patients and healthy controls. Serum TLR2 and TLR4 were measured using ELISA. Stage of fibrosis was evaluated using the Brunt Criteria. The different non‐invasive fibrosis scores were compared using areas under the curve.
Results
Fifty‐seven patients with NASH and 57 healthy individuals were enrolled in the study. Serum TLR2 levels were not significantly different between the healthy controls and NASH patients. The medians were 3.88 ng/mL ± 0.29 versus 3.81 ng/mL ± 0.32, respectively (P = 0.587). In comparing the levels of TLR4 between groups, the medians were 1.05 ng/mL ± 0.13 versus 1.46 ng/mL ± 0.27, respectively (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jgh.12924 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1690649682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1690649682</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3634-6d939e1c7d01a08f82ab45a4f8fd25fca0c49131a35287714794ae0980a19be73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMlOwzAQQC0EgrIc-AHkIxwCduzY8ZG1ZUcIhISELNeZUIMbFztl-XsCBW7MZS5vnkYPoXVKtmk3O0-Po22aq5zPoR7lnGRUcjGPeqSkRaYYVUtoOaUnQggnslhES3khSl4I1kMP18EDDjVOEKdj3AbvM--eAUewMGlDTDjHpqkwx67BTWgy420YBe8sTi2YNoxgYlrXuvSNefcKEdduGENyaRUt1MYnWPvZK-j26PBmf5CdXfaP93fPMssE45moFFNArawINaSsy9wMeWF4XdZVXtTWEMsVZdSwIi-lpFwqboCokhiqhiDZCtqceScxvEwhtXrskgXvTQNhmjQVigiuRJl36NYMtd2HKUKtJ9GNTfzQlOivmrqrqb9rduzGj3Y6HEP1R_7m64CdGfDmPHz8b9In_cGvMptduK7e-9-Fic9aSCYLfXfR14O9q9OD8_sLzdgn0ZSM-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1690649682</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role of serum toll-like receptors 2 and 4 in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Cengiz, Mustafa ; Ozenirler, Seren ; Elbeg, Sehri</creator><creatorcontrib>Cengiz, Mustafa ; Ozenirler, Seren ; Elbeg, Sehri</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Aim
Non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease is a common cause of chronic liver disease, including non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Our aim was to investigate whether serum toll‐like receptors 2 and 4 (TLR2 and TLR4) levels are correlated with NASH and able to predict liver fibrosis, as well as to compare these markers with other non‐invasive fibrosis scores (aspartate aminotransferase [AST] to alanine aminotransferase ratio, AST to platelet ratio index, fibrosis index, fibrosis 4, and fibrosis cirrhosis index).
Methods
Serum samples were obtained from consecutive biopsy proven NASH patients and healthy controls. Serum TLR2 and TLR4 were measured using ELISA. Stage of fibrosis was evaluated using the Brunt Criteria. The different non‐invasive fibrosis scores were compared using areas under the curve.
Results
Fifty‐seven patients with NASH and 57 healthy individuals were enrolled in the study. Serum TLR2 levels were not significantly different between the healthy controls and NASH patients. The medians were 3.88 ng/mL ± 0.29 versus 3.81 ng/mL ± 0.32, respectively (P = 0.587). In comparing the levels of TLR4 between groups, the medians were 1.05 ng/mL ± 0.13 versus 1.46 ng/mL ± 0.27, respectively (P < 0.001). In NASH patients, the levels of serum TLR4 increased with the stage of fibrosis: TLR4 medians were F0:1.01, F1:1.46, F2:2.14, F3:3.74, F4:5.83 (P < 0.001). TLR4 produced AUCs for ≥ F1, ≥ F2, and ≥ F3 of 0.862, 0.810, and 0.905, respectively (P < 0.001). TLR4 levels were more predictive than other non‐invasive fibrosis scores in liver fibrosis.
Conclusion
Serum TLR4 levels but not TLR2 were elevated in NASH patients in comparison with healthy controls. And in NASH patients, serum TLR4 levels both correlated with and were able to predict liver fibrosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0815-9319</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1746</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jgh.12924</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25684563</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biomarkers - blood ; Dobutamine ; Forecasting ; Humans ; Liver Cirrhosis - blood ; Liver Cirrhosis - diagnosis ; Middle Aged ; Molecular Sequence Data ; NASH ; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease - blood ; non-invasive marker ; Toll-Like Receptor 2 - blood ; Toll-Like Receptor 4 - blood ; toll-like receptors</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2015-07, Vol.30 (7), p.1190-1196</ispartof><rights>2015 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</rights><rights>2015 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3634-6d939e1c7d01a08f82ab45a4f8fd25fca0c49131a35287714794ae0980a19be73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3634-6d939e1c7d01a08f82ab45a4f8fd25fca0c49131a35287714794ae0980a19be73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25684563$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cengiz, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozenirler, Seren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elbeg, Sehri</creatorcontrib><title>Role of serum toll-like receptors 2 and 4 in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis</title><title>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</title><addtitle>J Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><description>Background and Aim
Non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease is a common cause of chronic liver disease, including non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Our aim was to investigate whether serum toll‐like receptors 2 and 4 (TLR2 and TLR4) levels are correlated with NASH and able to predict liver fibrosis, as well as to compare these markers with other non‐invasive fibrosis scores (aspartate aminotransferase [AST] to alanine aminotransferase ratio, AST to platelet ratio index, fibrosis index, fibrosis 4, and fibrosis cirrhosis index).
Methods
Serum samples were obtained from consecutive biopsy proven NASH patients and healthy controls. Serum TLR2 and TLR4 were measured using ELISA. Stage of fibrosis was evaluated using the Brunt Criteria. The different non‐invasive fibrosis scores were compared using areas under the curve.
Results
Fifty‐seven patients with NASH and 57 healthy individuals were enrolled in the study. Serum TLR2 levels were not significantly different between the healthy controls and NASH patients. The medians were 3.88 ng/mL ± 0.29 versus 3.81 ng/mL ± 0.32, respectively (P = 0.587). In comparing the levels of TLR4 between groups, the medians were 1.05 ng/mL ± 0.13 versus 1.46 ng/mL ± 0.27, respectively (P < 0.001). In NASH patients, the levels of serum TLR4 increased with the stage of fibrosis: TLR4 medians were F0:1.01, F1:1.46, F2:2.14, F3:3.74, F4:5.83 (P < 0.001). TLR4 produced AUCs for ≥ F1, ≥ F2, and ≥ F3 of 0.862, 0.810, and 0.905, respectively (P < 0.001). TLR4 levels were more predictive than other non‐invasive fibrosis scores in liver fibrosis.
Conclusion
Serum TLR4 levels but not TLR2 were elevated in NASH patients in comparison with healthy controls. And in NASH patients, serum TLR4 levels both correlated with and were able to predict liver fibrosis.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biomarkers - blood</subject><subject>Dobutamine</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver Cirrhosis - blood</subject><subject>Liver Cirrhosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Molecular Sequence Data</subject><subject>NASH</subject><subject>Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease - blood</subject><subject>non-invasive marker</subject><subject>Toll-Like Receptor 2 - blood</subject><subject>Toll-Like Receptor 4 - blood</subject><subject>toll-like receptors</subject><issn>0815-9319</issn><issn>1440-1746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMlOwzAQQC0EgrIc-AHkIxwCduzY8ZG1ZUcIhISELNeZUIMbFztl-XsCBW7MZS5vnkYPoXVKtmk3O0-Po22aq5zPoR7lnGRUcjGPeqSkRaYYVUtoOaUnQggnslhES3khSl4I1kMP18EDDjVOEKdj3AbvM--eAUewMGlDTDjHpqkwx67BTWgy420YBe8sTi2YNoxgYlrXuvSNefcKEdduGENyaRUt1MYnWPvZK-j26PBmf5CdXfaP93fPMssE45moFFNArawINaSsy9wMeWF4XdZVXtTWEMsVZdSwIi-lpFwqboCokhiqhiDZCtqceScxvEwhtXrskgXvTQNhmjQVigiuRJl36NYMtd2HKUKtJ9GNTfzQlOivmrqrqb9rduzGj3Y6HEP1R_7m64CdGfDmPHz8b9In_cGvMptduK7e-9-Fic9aSCYLfXfR14O9q9OD8_sLzdgn0ZSM-A</recordid><startdate>201507</startdate><enddate>201507</enddate><creator>Cengiz, Mustafa</creator><creator>Ozenirler, Seren</creator><creator>Elbeg, Sehri</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201507</creationdate><title>Role of serum toll-like receptors 2 and 4 in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis</title><author>Cengiz, Mustafa ; Ozenirler, Seren ; Elbeg, Sehri</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3634-6d939e1c7d01a08f82ab45a4f8fd25fca0c49131a35287714794ae0980a19be73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biomarkers - blood</topic><topic>Dobutamine</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver Cirrhosis - blood</topic><topic>Liver Cirrhosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Molecular Sequence Data</topic><topic>NASH</topic><topic>Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease - blood</topic><topic>non-invasive marker</topic><topic>Toll-Like Receptor 2 - blood</topic><topic>Toll-Like Receptor 4 - blood</topic><topic>toll-like receptors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cengiz, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozenirler, Seren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elbeg, Sehri</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cengiz, Mustafa</au><au>Ozenirler, Seren</au><au>Elbeg, Sehri</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role of serum toll-like receptors 2 and 4 in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><date>2015-07</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1190</spage><epage>1196</epage><pages>1190-1196</pages><issn>0815-9319</issn><eissn>1440-1746</eissn><abstract>Background and Aim
Non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease is a common cause of chronic liver disease, including non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Our aim was to investigate whether serum toll‐like receptors 2 and 4 (TLR2 and TLR4) levels are correlated with NASH and able to predict liver fibrosis, as well as to compare these markers with other non‐invasive fibrosis scores (aspartate aminotransferase [AST] to alanine aminotransferase ratio, AST to platelet ratio index, fibrosis index, fibrosis 4, and fibrosis cirrhosis index).
Methods
Serum samples were obtained from consecutive biopsy proven NASH patients and healthy controls. Serum TLR2 and TLR4 were measured using ELISA. Stage of fibrosis was evaluated using the Brunt Criteria. The different non‐invasive fibrosis scores were compared using areas under the curve.
Results
Fifty‐seven patients with NASH and 57 healthy individuals were enrolled in the study. Serum TLR2 levels were not significantly different between the healthy controls and NASH patients. The medians were 3.88 ng/mL ± 0.29 versus 3.81 ng/mL ± 0.32, respectively (P = 0.587). In comparing the levels of TLR4 between groups, the medians were 1.05 ng/mL ± 0.13 versus 1.46 ng/mL ± 0.27, respectively (P < 0.001). In NASH patients, the levels of serum TLR4 increased with the stage of fibrosis: TLR4 medians were F0:1.01, F1:1.46, F2:2.14, F3:3.74, F4:5.83 (P < 0.001). TLR4 produced AUCs for ≥ F1, ≥ F2, and ≥ F3 of 0.862, 0.810, and 0.905, respectively (P < 0.001). TLR4 levels were more predictive than other non‐invasive fibrosis scores in liver fibrosis.
Conclusion
Serum TLR4 levels but not TLR2 were elevated in NASH patients in comparison with healthy controls. And in NASH patients, serum TLR4 levels both correlated with and were able to predict liver fibrosis.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25684563</pmid><doi>10.1111/jgh.12924</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0815-9319 |
ispartof | Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2015-07, Vol.30 (7), p.1190-1196 |
issn | 0815-9319 1440-1746 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1690649682 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Adult Aged Biomarkers - blood Dobutamine Forecasting Humans Liver Cirrhosis - blood Liver Cirrhosis - diagnosis Middle Aged Molecular Sequence Data NASH Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease - blood non-invasive marker Toll-Like Receptor 2 - blood Toll-Like Receptor 4 - blood toll-like receptors |
title | Role of serum toll-like receptors 2 and 4 in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T20%3A02%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20of%20serum%20toll-like%20receptors%202%20and%204%20in%20non-alcoholic%20steatohepatitis%20and%20liver%20fibrosis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastroenterology%20and%20hepatology&rft.au=Cengiz,%20Mustafa&rft.date=2015-07&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1190&rft.epage=1196&rft.pages=1190-1196&rft.issn=0815-9319&rft.eissn=1440-1746&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jgh.12924&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1690649682%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3634-6d939e1c7d01a08f82ab45a4f8fd25fca0c49131a35287714794ae0980a19be73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1690649682&rft_id=info:pmid/25684563&rfr_iscdi=true |