Loading…

Predictive value of routine esophageal high‐resolution manometry for gastro‐esophageal reflux disease

Background Using conventional manometry, gastro‐esophageal reflux disease (GERD) was associated with a reduced lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and impaired peristalsis. However, with a large overlap between GERD patients and controls, these findings are of limited clinical relevance. It is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neurogastroenterology and motility 2015-07, Vol.27 (7), p.963-970
Main Authors: Hoeij, F. B., Smout, A. J., Bredenoord, A. J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-84399a88a03795d06b76666cba84829ffc25300d3108b1e6373a0d2e99ed296f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-84399a88a03795d06b76666cba84829ffc25300d3108b1e6373a0d2e99ed296f3
container_end_page 970
container_issue 7
container_start_page 963
container_title Neurogastroenterology and motility
container_volume 27
creator Hoeij, F. B.
Smout, A. J.
Bredenoord, A. J.
description Background Using conventional manometry, gastro‐esophageal reflux disease (GERD) was associated with a reduced lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and impaired peristalsis. However, with a large overlap between GERD patients and controls, these findings are of limited clinical relevance. It is uncertain whether the more detailed information of high‐resolution manometry (HRM) can discriminate GERD patients. Therefore, we aimed to determine to which extent HRM findings can predict GERD. Methods HRM measurements in 69 patients with GERD and 40 healthy subjects were compared and the predictive value of HRM for the diagnosis of GERD was explored. Key Results GERD patients had a significantly lower contraction amplitude (55 vs 64 mmHg; p = 0.045) and basal LES pressure (10 vs 13.2 mmHg; p = 0.034) than healthy controls. GERD patients more often had a hiatal hernia than healthy subjects (30% vs 7%; p = 0.005). Patients with reflux esophagitis had a lower DCI than patients without reflux esophagitis (558 vs 782 mmHg cm s; p = 0.045). No significant difference was seen in contractile front velocity, distal latency, number of peristaltic breaks, residual LES pressure and LES length. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, both esophagogastric junction type I (OR 4.971; 95% CI 1.33–18.59; p = 0.017) and mean wave amplitude (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.90–0.98; p = 0.013) were found to be independent predictors of GERD. However, the sensitivity and specificity of these findings were low. Conclusions & Inferences Hiatal hernia, low contraction amplitude and LES pressure are associated with GERD, but do not predict the disease with sufficient accuracy. Routine esophageal HRM can therefore not be used to distinguish GERD patients from healthy subjects. This paper discusses the relationship between manometric abnormalities and reflux disease (GERD). Hiatal hernia, low contraction amplitude and LES pressure are associated with GERD, but do not predict the disease with sufficient accuracy. Routine esophageal HRM can therefore not be used to distinguish GERD patients from healthy subjects.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/nmo.12570
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1691012391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3720787641</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-84399a88a03795d06b76666cba84829ffc25300d3108b1e6373a0d2e99ed296f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtOwzAQhi0EoqWw4ALIEhtYpPWjSewlqnhJhbKAdeQmk9ZVEhc7KXTHETgjJ8ElBSEkZjOjmW9-zfwIHVPSpz4GVWn6lIUx2UFdyqMwYFKw3U0dkoBKFnbQgXMLQkjEhtE-6rBQckKo7CL9YCHTaa1XgFeqaACbHFvT1LoCDM4s52oGqsBzPZt_vL1b3yr80FS4VJUpobZrnBuLZ8rV1nji146FvGhecaYdKAeHaC9XhYOjbe6hp6vLx9FNMJ5c344uxkE6ZJwEYsilVEIowmMZZiSaxpGPdKrEUDCZ5ykL_e0Zp0RMKUQ85opkDKSEjMko5z101uourXluwNVJqV0KRaEqMI1LaCQpoYxL6tHTP-jCNLby13lKSCmIiKWnzlsqtcY5_1SytLpUdp1Qkmz8T7z_yZf_nj3ZKjbTErIf8ttwDwxa4EUXsP5fKbm_m7SSnzXlkWU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1689980879</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predictive value of routine esophageal high‐resolution manometry for gastro‐esophageal reflux disease</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Hoeij, F. B. ; Smout, A. J. ; Bredenoord, A. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hoeij, F. B. ; Smout, A. J. ; Bredenoord, A. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Using conventional manometry, gastro‐esophageal reflux disease (GERD) was associated with a reduced lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and impaired peristalsis. However, with a large overlap between GERD patients and controls, these findings are of limited clinical relevance. It is uncertain whether the more detailed information of high‐resolution manometry (HRM) can discriminate GERD patients. Therefore, we aimed to determine to which extent HRM findings can predict GERD. Methods HRM measurements in 69 patients with GERD and 40 healthy subjects were compared and the predictive value of HRM for the diagnosis of GERD was explored. Key Results GERD patients had a significantly lower contraction amplitude (55 vs 64 mmHg; p = 0.045) and basal LES pressure (10 vs 13.2 mmHg; p = 0.034) than healthy controls. GERD patients more often had a hiatal hernia than healthy subjects (30% vs 7%; p = 0.005). Patients with reflux esophagitis had a lower DCI than patients without reflux esophagitis (558 vs 782 mmHg cm s; p = 0.045). No significant difference was seen in contractile front velocity, distal latency, number of peristaltic breaks, residual LES pressure and LES length. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, both esophagogastric junction type I (OR 4.971; 95% CI 1.33–18.59; p = 0.017) and mean wave amplitude (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.90–0.98; p = 0.013) were found to be independent predictors of GERD. However, the sensitivity and specificity of these findings were low. Conclusions &amp; Inferences Hiatal hernia, low contraction amplitude and LES pressure are associated with GERD, but do not predict the disease with sufficient accuracy. Routine esophageal HRM can therefore not be used to distinguish GERD patients from healthy subjects. This paper discusses the relationship between manometric abnormalities and reflux disease (GERD). Hiatal hernia, low contraction amplitude and LES pressure are associated with GERD, but do not predict the disease with sufficient accuracy. Routine esophageal HRM can therefore not be used to distinguish GERD patients from healthy subjects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-1925</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2982</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12570</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25930019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; esophageal motility ; Esophagogastric Junction - physiopathology ; Esophagus - physiopathology ; Female ; Gastroesophageal Reflux - diagnosis ; Gastroesophageal Reflux - physiopathology ; gastro‐esophageal reflux disease ; high‐resolution manometry ; Humans ; lower esophageal sphincter ; Male ; Manometry ; Middle Aged ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2015-07, Vol.27 (7), p.963-970</ispartof><rights>2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-84399a88a03795d06b76666cba84829ffc25300d3108b1e6373a0d2e99ed296f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-84399a88a03795d06b76666cba84829ffc25300d3108b1e6373a0d2e99ed296f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25930019$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hoeij, F. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smout, A. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bredenoord, A. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Predictive value of routine esophageal high‐resolution manometry for gastro‐esophageal reflux disease</title><title>Neurogastroenterology and motility</title><addtitle>Neurogastroenterol Motil</addtitle><description>Background Using conventional manometry, gastro‐esophageal reflux disease (GERD) was associated with a reduced lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and impaired peristalsis. However, with a large overlap between GERD patients and controls, these findings are of limited clinical relevance. It is uncertain whether the more detailed information of high‐resolution manometry (HRM) can discriminate GERD patients. Therefore, we aimed to determine to which extent HRM findings can predict GERD. Methods HRM measurements in 69 patients with GERD and 40 healthy subjects were compared and the predictive value of HRM for the diagnosis of GERD was explored. Key Results GERD patients had a significantly lower contraction amplitude (55 vs 64 mmHg; p = 0.045) and basal LES pressure (10 vs 13.2 mmHg; p = 0.034) than healthy controls. GERD patients more often had a hiatal hernia than healthy subjects (30% vs 7%; p = 0.005). Patients with reflux esophagitis had a lower DCI than patients without reflux esophagitis (558 vs 782 mmHg cm s; p = 0.045). No significant difference was seen in contractile front velocity, distal latency, number of peristaltic breaks, residual LES pressure and LES length. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, both esophagogastric junction type I (OR 4.971; 95% CI 1.33–18.59; p = 0.017) and mean wave amplitude (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.90–0.98; p = 0.013) were found to be independent predictors of GERD. However, the sensitivity and specificity of these findings were low. Conclusions &amp; Inferences Hiatal hernia, low contraction amplitude and LES pressure are associated with GERD, but do not predict the disease with sufficient accuracy. Routine esophageal HRM can therefore not be used to distinguish GERD patients from healthy subjects. This paper discusses the relationship between manometric abnormalities and reflux disease (GERD). Hiatal hernia, low contraction amplitude and LES pressure are associated with GERD, but do not predict the disease with sufficient accuracy. Routine esophageal HRM can therefore not be used to distinguish GERD patients from healthy subjects.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>esophageal motility</subject><subject>Esophagogastric Junction - physiopathology</subject><subject>Esophagus - physiopathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal Reflux - diagnosis</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal Reflux - physiopathology</subject><subject>gastro‐esophageal reflux disease</subject><subject>high‐resolution manometry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>lower esophageal sphincter</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Manometry</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1350-1925</issn><issn>1365-2982</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtOwzAQhi0EoqWw4ALIEhtYpPWjSewlqnhJhbKAdeQmk9ZVEhc7KXTHETgjJ8ElBSEkZjOjmW9-zfwIHVPSpz4GVWn6lIUx2UFdyqMwYFKw3U0dkoBKFnbQgXMLQkjEhtE-6rBQckKo7CL9YCHTaa1XgFeqaACbHFvT1LoCDM4s52oGqsBzPZt_vL1b3yr80FS4VJUpobZrnBuLZ8rV1nji146FvGhecaYdKAeHaC9XhYOjbe6hp6vLx9FNMJ5c344uxkE6ZJwEYsilVEIowmMZZiSaxpGPdKrEUDCZ5ykL_e0Zp0RMKUQ85opkDKSEjMko5z101uourXluwNVJqV0KRaEqMI1LaCQpoYxL6tHTP-jCNLby13lKSCmIiKWnzlsqtcY5_1SytLpUdp1Qkmz8T7z_yZf_nj3ZKjbTErIf8ttwDwxa4EUXsP5fKbm_m7SSnzXlkWU</recordid><startdate>201507</startdate><enddate>201507</enddate><creator>Hoeij, F. B.</creator><creator>Smout, A. J.</creator><creator>Bredenoord, A. J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201507</creationdate><title>Predictive value of routine esophageal high‐resolution manometry for gastro‐esophageal reflux disease</title><author>Hoeij, F. B. ; Smout, A. J. ; Bredenoord, A. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-84399a88a03795d06b76666cba84829ffc25300d3108b1e6373a0d2e99ed296f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>esophageal motility</topic><topic>Esophagogastric Junction - physiopathology</topic><topic>Esophagus - physiopathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal Reflux - diagnosis</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal Reflux - physiopathology</topic><topic>gastro‐esophageal reflux disease</topic><topic>high‐resolution manometry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>lower esophageal sphincter</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Manometry</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hoeij, F. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smout, A. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bredenoord, A. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurogastroenterology and motility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hoeij, F. B.</au><au>Smout, A. J.</au><au>Bredenoord, A. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predictive value of routine esophageal high‐resolution manometry for gastro‐esophageal reflux disease</atitle><jtitle>Neurogastroenterology and motility</jtitle><addtitle>Neurogastroenterol Motil</addtitle><date>2015-07</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>963</spage><epage>970</epage><pages>963-970</pages><issn>1350-1925</issn><eissn>1365-2982</eissn><abstract>Background Using conventional manometry, gastro‐esophageal reflux disease (GERD) was associated with a reduced lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and impaired peristalsis. However, with a large overlap between GERD patients and controls, these findings are of limited clinical relevance. It is uncertain whether the more detailed information of high‐resolution manometry (HRM) can discriminate GERD patients. Therefore, we aimed to determine to which extent HRM findings can predict GERD. Methods HRM measurements in 69 patients with GERD and 40 healthy subjects were compared and the predictive value of HRM for the diagnosis of GERD was explored. Key Results GERD patients had a significantly lower contraction amplitude (55 vs 64 mmHg; p = 0.045) and basal LES pressure (10 vs 13.2 mmHg; p = 0.034) than healthy controls. GERD patients more often had a hiatal hernia than healthy subjects (30% vs 7%; p = 0.005). Patients with reflux esophagitis had a lower DCI than patients without reflux esophagitis (558 vs 782 mmHg cm s; p = 0.045). No significant difference was seen in contractile front velocity, distal latency, number of peristaltic breaks, residual LES pressure and LES length. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, both esophagogastric junction type I (OR 4.971; 95% CI 1.33–18.59; p = 0.017) and mean wave amplitude (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.90–0.98; p = 0.013) were found to be independent predictors of GERD. However, the sensitivity and specificity of these findings were low. Conclusions &amp; Inferences Hiatal hernia, low contraction amplitude and LES pressure are associated with GERD, but do not predict the disease with sufficient accuracy. Routine esophageal HRM can therefore not be used to distinguish GERD patients from healthy subjects. This paper discusses the relationship between manometric abnormalities and reflux disease (GERD). Hiatal hernia, low contraction amplitude and LES pressure are associated with GERD, but do not predict the disease with sufficient accuracy. Routine esophageal HRM can therefore not be used to distinguish GERD patients from healthy subjects.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>25930019</pmid><doi>10.1111/nmo.12570</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1350-1925
ispartof Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2015-07, Vol.27 (7), p.963-970
issn 1350-1925
1365-2982
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1691012391
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
esophageal motility
Esophagogastric Junction - physiopathology
Esophagus - physiopathology
Female
Gastroesophageal Reflux - diagnosis
Gastroesophageal Reflux - physiopathology
gastro‐esophageal reflux disease
high‐resolution manometry
Humans
lower esophageal sphincter
Male
Manometry
Middle Aged
Young Adult
title Predictive value of routine esophageal high‐resolution manometry for gastro‐esophageal reflux disease
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A37%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictive%20value%20of%20routine%20esophageal%20high%E2%80%90resolution%20manometry%20for%20gastro%E2%80%90esophageal%20reflux%20disease&rft.jtitle=Neurogastroenterology%20and%20motility&rft.au=Hoeij,%20F.%20B.&rft.date=2015-07&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=963&rft.epage=970&rft.pages=963-970&rft.issn=1350-1925&rft.eissn=1365-2982&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/nmo.12570&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3720787641%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-84399a88a03795d06b76666cba84829ffc25300d3108b1e6373a0d2e99ed296f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1689980879&rft_id=info:pmid/25930019&rfr_iscdi=true