Loading…

An Alternative to Multiple Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase Inhibitor Applications in No-Till Cotton

Glyphosate-resistant (GR) Palmer amaranth is a widespread problem in southeastern cotton production areas. Herbicide programs to control this weed in no-till cotton commonly include flumioxazin applied with preplant burndown herbicides approximately 3 wk before planting followed by fomesafen applied...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Weed technology 2014-01, Vol.28 (1), p.58-71
Main Authors: Cahoon, Charles W, York, Alan C, Jordan, David L, Everman, Wesley J, Seagroves, Richard W
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b386t-45dcc6e0e43a00b2b4ddaebc30b953a80e3170e819553de77961cb4eb7fc9ba53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b386t-45dcc6e0e43a00b2b4ddaebc30b953a80e3170e819553de77961cb4eb7fc9ba53
container_end_page 71
container_issue 1
container_start_page 58
container_title Weed technology
container_volume 28
creator Cahoon, Charles W
York, Alan C
Jordan, David L
Everman, Wesley J
Seagroves, Richard W
description Glyphosate-resistant (GR) Palmer amaranth is a widespread problem in southeastern cotton production areas. Herbicide programs to control this weed in no-till cotton commonly include flumioxazin applied with preplant burndown herbicides approximately 3 wk before planting followed by fomesafen applied PRE and then glufosinate or glyphosate applied POST. Flumioxazin and fomesafen are both protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO) inhibitors. Multiple yearly applications of PPO inhibitors in cotton, along with widespread use of PPO inhibitors in rotational crops, raise concerns over possible selection for PPO resistance in Palmer amaranth. An experiment was conducted to determine the potential to substitute diuron for one of the PPO inhibitors in no-till cotton. Palmer amaranth control by diuron and fomesafen applied PRE varied by location, but fomesafen was generally more effective. Control by both herbicides was inadequate when timely rainfall was not received for activation. Palmer amaranth control was more consistent when programs included a preplant residual herbicide. Applied preplant, flumioxazin was more effective than diuron. Programs with diuron preplant followed by fomesafen PRE were as effective as flumioxazin preplant followed by fomesafen only if fomesafen was activated in a timely manner. Programs with flumioxazin preplant followed by diuron PRE were as effective as flumioxazin preplant followed by fomesafen PRE at all locations, regardless of timely activation of the PRE herbicide. As opposed to flumioxazin preplant followed by fomesafen PRE, which exposes Palmer amaranth to two PPO-inhibiting herbicides, one could reduce selection pressure by using flumioxazin preplant followed by diuron PRE without sacrificing Palmer amaranth control or cotton yield. Nomenclature: Diuron; flumioxazin; fomesafen; glufosinate; glyphosate; Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. Amaranthus palmeri resistente a glyphosate (GR) es un problema ampliamente diseminado en las áreas de producción de algodón en el sureste de Estados Unidos. Los programas de herbicidas para el control de esta maleza en algodón bajo labranza cero incluyen flumioxazin aplicado con herbicidas para quema total en pre-siembra, aproximadamente 3 semanas antes de la siembra seguido de fomesafen aplicado PRE y después glufosinate o glyphosate aplicados POST. Flumioxazin y fomesafen son ambos inhibidores de protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO). Aplicaciones anuales múltiple
doi_str_mv 10.1614/WT-D-13-00078.1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1691282111</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43701948</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43701948</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b386t-45dcc6e0e43a00b2b4ddaebc30b953a80e3170e819553de77961cb4eb7fc9ba53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL1vFDEUxC0EEkegpkJYoqFx8t7a3o_ydOEjUiBIXBQqLHvXl_jk2Bvbh8h_j8MiChqqV8xvZvSGkJcIx9iiOLnaslOGnAFA1x_jI7JCKYE1nYDHZAX9AAx49-0peZbzHgDbpoEV-b4OdO2LTUEX98PSEumngy9u9pZ-SbHEOab55j65EK9toBc_3aSzpWfhxhlXYqLrefZurOYYMnWBfo5s67ynm1hKDM_Jk5322b74c4_I5ft3281Hdn7x4WyzPmeG921hQk7j2FqwgmsA0xgxTdqakYMZJNc9WI4d2B4HKflku25ocTTCmm43DkZLfkTeLrlzincHm4u6dXm03utg4yErbAds-gYRK_rmH3QfD_V9XykJoseuR1Gpk4UaU8w52Z2ak7vV6V4hqIe91dVWnSrk6vfe6iH31eLY57rLX1zwDnAQfdVfL_pOR6Wvk8vq8msDtROaRsgWKsEWwrgYg_1v4y-vcZTH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1504817814</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Alternative to Multiple Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase Inhibitor Applications in No-Till Cotton</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Cahoon, Charles W ; York, Alan C ; Jordan, David L ; Everman, Wesley J ; Seagroves, Richard W</creator><creatorcontrib>Cahoon, Charles W ; York, Alan C ; Jordan, David L ; Everman, Wesley J ; Seagroves, Richard W</creatorcontrib><description>Glyphosate-resistant (GR) Palmer amaranth is a widespread problem in southeastern cotton production areas. Herbicide programs to control this weed in no-till cotton commonly include flumioxazin applied with preplant burndown herbicides approximately 3 wk before planting followed by fomesafen applied PRE and then glufosinate or glyphosate applied POST. Flumioxazin and fomesafen are both protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO) inhibitors. Multiple yearly applications of PPO inhibitors in cotton, along with widespread use of PPO inhibitors in rotational crops, raise concerns over possible selection for PPO resistance in Palmer amaranth. An experiment was conducted to determine the potential to substitute diuron for one of the PPO inhibitors in no-till cotton. Palmer amaranth control by diuron and fomesafen applied PRE varied by location, but fomesafen was generally more effective. Control by both herbicides was inadequate when timely rainfall was not received for activation. Palmer amaranth control was more consistent when programs included a preplant residual herbicide. Applied preplant, flumioxazin was more effective than diuron. Programs with diuron preplant followed by fomesafen PRE were as effective as flumioxazin preplant followed by fomesafen only if fomesafen was activated in a timely manner. Programs with flumioxazin preplant followed by diuron PRE were as effective as flumioxazin preplant followed by fomesafen PRE at all locations, regardless of timely activation of the PRE herbicide. As opposed to flumioxazin preplant followed by fomesafen PRE, which exposes Palmer amaranth to two PPO-inhibiting herbicides, one could reduce selection pressure by using flumioxazin preplant followed by diuron PRE without sacrificing Palmer amaranth control or cotton yield. Nomenclature: Diuron; flumioxazin; fomesafen; glufosinate; glyphosate; Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. Amaranthus palmeri resistente a glyphosate (GR) es un problema ampliamente diseminado en las áreas de producción de algodón en el sureste de Estados Unidos. Los programas de herbicidas para el control de esta maleza en algodón bajo labranza cero incluyen flumioxazin aplicado con herbicidas para quema total en pre-siembra, aproximadamente 3 semanas antes de la siembra seguido de fomesafen aplicado PRE y después glufosinate o glyphosate aplicados POST. Flumioxazin y fomesafen son ambos inhibidores de protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO). Aplicaciones anuales múltiples de inhibidores PPO en algodón, además del amplio uso de inhibidores PPO en cultivos rotacionales, genera preocupación sobre la posible selección de resistencia a herbicidas inhibidores de PPO en A. palmeri. Se realizó un experimento para determinar el potencial de sustituir diuron por uno de los inhibidores PPO en algodón bajo labranza cero. El control de A. palmeri con diuron y fomesafen aplicados PRE varió según la localidad, pero fomesafen fue generalmente más efectivo. El control brindado por ambos herbicidas fue inadecuado cuando no se recibió lluvia en el momento necesario para su activación. El control de A. palmeri fue más consistente cuando los programas incluyeron un herbicida residual pre-siembra. Al aplicarse pre-siembra, flumioxazin fue más efectivo que diuron. Los programas con diuron pre-siembra seguidos de fomesafen PRE fueron tan efectivos como flumioxazin pre-siembra seguido de fomesafen solamente si fomesafen fue activado en el momento adecuado. Los programas con flumioxazin pre-siembra seguidos de diuron PRE fueron tan efectivos como flumioxazin pre-siembra seguido de fomesafen PRE en todas las localidades, sin importar el momento de activación del herbicida PRE. En contraste a programas con flumioxazin pre-siembra seguido de fomesafen PRE, los cuales exponen a A. palmeri a dos herbicidas inhibidores PPO, uno podría reducir la presión de selección al usar flumioxazin pre-siembra seguido de diuron PRE sin sacrificar el control de A. palmeri o el rendimiento del algodón.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1614/WT-D-13-00078.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence: The Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; Amaranth ; Amaranthus palmeri ; Cotton ; crop production ; Crop rotation ; Crops ; Diuron ; enzyme inhibitors ; flumioxazin ; fomesafen ; glufosinate ; glyphosate ; Gossypium hirsutum ; Herbicide resistance ; Herbicide resistance management ; herbicide-resistant weeds ; Herbicides ; Inhibitors ; No tillage ; Planting ; PPO-inhibiting herbicides ; protoporphyrinogen oxidase ; Rain ; Seeds ; Tillage ; Weed control ; WEED MANAGEMENT—MAJOR CROPS ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2014-01, Vol.28 (1), p.58-71</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2014 Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Jan-Mar 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b386t-45dcc6e0e43a00b2b4ddaebc30b953a80e3170e819553de77961cb4eb7fc9ba53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b386t-45dcc6e0e43a00b2b4ddaebc30b953a80e3170e819553de77961cb4eb7fc9ba53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43701948$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43701948$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cahoon, Charles W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>York, Alan C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, David L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Everman, Wesley J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seagroves, Richard W</creatorcontrib><title>An Alternative to Multiple Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase Inhibitor Applications in No-Till Cotton</title><title>Weed technology</title><description>Glyphosate-resistant (GR) Palmer amaranth is a widespread problem in southeastern cotton production areas. Herbicide programs to control this weed in no-till cotton commonly include flumioxazin applied with preplant burndown herbicides approximately 3 wk before planting followed by fomesafen applied PRE and then glufosinate or glyphosate applied POST. Flumioxazin and fomesafen are both protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO) inhibitors. Multiple yearly applications of PPO inhibitors in cotton, along with widespread use of PPO inhibitors in rotational crops, raise concerns over possible selection for PPO resistance in Palmer amaranth. An experiment was conducted to determine the potential to substitute diuron for one of the PPO inhibitors in no-till cotton. Palmer amaranth control by diuron and fomesafen applied PRE varied by location, but fomesafen was generally more effective. Control by both herbicides was inadequate when timely rainfall was not received for activation. Palmer amaranth control was more consistent when programs included a preplant residual herbicide. Applied preplant, flumioxazin was more effective than diuron. Programs with diuron preplant followed by fomesafen PRE were as effective as flumioxazin preplant followed by fomesafen only if fomesafen was activated in a timely manner. Programs with flumioxazin preplant followed by diuron PRE were as effective as flumioxazin preplant followed by fomesafen PRE at all locations, regardless of timely activation of the PRE herbicide. As opposed to flumioxazin preplant followed by fomesafen PRE, which exposes Palmer amaranth to two PPO-inhibiting herbicides, one could reduce selection pressure by using flumioxazin preplant followed by diuron PRE without sacrificing Palmer amaranth control or cotton yield. Nomenclature: Diuron; flumioxazin; fomesafen; glufosinate; glyphosate; Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. Amaranthus palmeri resistente a glyphosate (GR) es un problema ampliamente diseminado en las áreas de producción de algodón en el sureste de Estados Unidos. Los programas de herbicidas para el control de esta maleza en algodón bajo labranza cero incluyen flumioxazin aplicado con herbicidas para quema total en pre-siembra, aproximadamente 3 semanas antes de la siembra seguido de fomesafen aplicado PRE y después glufosinate o glyphosate aplicados POST. Flumioxazin y fomesafen son ambos inhibidores de protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO). Aplicaciones anuales múltiples de inhibidores PPO en algodón, además del amplio uso de inhibidores PPO en cultivos rotacionales, genera preocupación sobre la posible selección de resistencia a herbicidas inhibidores de PPO en A. palmeri. Se realizó un experimento para determinar el potencial de sustituir diuron por uno de los inhibidores PPO en algodón bajo labranza cero. El control de A. palmeri con diuron y fomesafen aplicados PRE varió según la localidad, pero fomesafen fue generalmente más efectivo. El control brindado por ambos herbicidas fue inadecuado cuando no se recibió lluvia en el momento necesario para su activación. El control de A. palmeri fue más consistente cuando los programas incluyeron un herbicida residual pre-siembra. Al aplicarse pre-siembra, flumioxazin fue más efectivo que diuron. Los programas con diuron pre-siembra seguidos de fomesafen PRE fueron tan efectivos como flumioxazin pre-siembra seguido de fomesafen solamente si fomesafen fue activado en el momento adecuado. Los programas con flumioxazin pre-siembra seguidos de diuron PRE fueron tan efectivos como flumioxazin pre-siembra seguido de fomesafen PRE en todas las localidades, sin importar el momento de activación del herbicida PRE. En contraste a programas con flumioxazin pre-siembra seguido de fomesafen PRE, los cuales exponen a A. palmeri a dos herbicidas inhibidores PPO, uno podría reducir la presión de selección al usar flumioxazin pre-siembra seguido de diuron PRE sin sacrificar el control de A. palmeri o el rendimiento del algodón.</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Amaranth</subject><subject>Amaranthus palmeri</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>crop production</subject><subject>Crop rotation</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Diuron</subject><subject>enzyme inhibitors</subject><subject>flumioxazin</subject><subject>fomesafen</subject><subject>glufosinate</subject><subject>glyphosate</subject><subject>Gossypium hirsutum</subject><subject>Herbicide resistance</subject><subject>Herbicide resistance management</subject><subject>herbicide-resistant weeds</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Inhibitors</subject><subject>No tillage</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>PPO-inhibiting herbicides</subject><subject>protoporphyrinogen oxidase</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>WEED MANAGEMENT—MAJOR CROPS</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkL1vFDEUxC0EEkegpkJYoqFx8t7a3o_ydOEjUiBIXBQqLHvXl_jk2Bvbh8h_j8MiChqqV8xvZvSGkJcIx9iiOLnaslOGnAFA1x_jI7JCKYE1nYDHZAX9AAx49-0peZbzHgDbpoEV-b4OdO2LTUEX98PSEumngy9u9pZ-SbHEOab55j65EK9toBc_3aSzpWfhxhlXYqLrefZurOYYMnWBfo5s67ynm1hKDM_Jk5322b74c4_I5ft3281Hdn7x4WyzPmeG921hQk7j2FqwgmsA0xgxTdqakYMZJNc9WI4d2B4HKflku25ocTTCmm43DkZLfkTeLrlzincHm4u6dXm03utg4yErbAds-gYRK_rmH3QfD_V9XykJoseuR1Gpk4UaU8w52Z2ak7vV6V4hqIe91dVWnSrk6vfe6iH31eLY57rLX1zwDnAQfdVfL_pOR6Wvk8vq8msDtROaRsgWKsEWwrgYg_1v4y-vcZTH</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Cahoon, Charles W</creator><creator>York, Alan C</creator><creator>Jordan, David L</creator><creator>Everman, Wesley J</creator><creator>Seagroves, Richard W</creator><general>The Weed Science Society of America</general><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>An Alternative to Multiple Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase Inhibitor Applications in No-Till Cotton</title><author>Cahoon, Charles W ; York, Alan C ; Jordan, David L ; Everman, Wesley J ; Seagroves, Richard W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b386t-45dcc6e0e43a00b2b4ddaebc30b953a80e3170e819553de77961cb4eb7fc9ba53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Amaranth</topic><topic>Amaranthus palmeri</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>crop production</topic><topic>Crop rotation</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Diuron</topic><topic>enzyme inhibitors</topic><topic>flumioxazin</topic><topic>fomesafen</topic><topic>glufosinate</topic><topic>glyphosate</topic><topic>Gossypium hirsutum</topic><topic>Herbicide resistance</topic><topic>Herbicide resistance management</topic><topic>herbicide-resistant weeds</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Inhibitors</topic><topic>No tillage</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>PPO-inhibiting herbicides</topic><topic>protoporphyrinogen oxidase</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>WEED MANAGEMENT—MAJOR CROPS</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cahoon, Charles W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>York, Alan C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, David L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Everman, Wesley J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seagroves, Richard W</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cahoon, Charles W</au><au>York, Alan C</au><au>Jordan, David L</au><au>Everman, Wesley J</au><au>Seagroves, Richard W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Alternative to Multiple Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase Inhibitor Applications in No-Till Cotton</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>58</spage><epage>71</epage><pages>58-71</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>Glyphosate-resistant (GR) Palmer amaranth is a widespread problem in southeastern cotton production areas. Herbicide programs to control this weed in no-till cotton commonly include flumioxazin applied with preplant burndown herbicides approximately 3 wk before planting followed by fomesafen applied PRE and then glufosinate or glyphosate applied POST. Flumioxazin and fomesafen are both protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO) inhibitors. Multiple yearly applications of PPO inhibitors in cotton, along with widespread use of PPO inhibitors in rotational crops, raise concerns over possible selection for PPO resistance in Palmer amaranth. An experiment was conducted to determine the potential to substitute diuron for one of the PPO inhibitors in no-till cotton. Palmer amaranth control by diuron and fomesafen applied PRE varied by location, but fomesafen was generally more effective. Control by both herbicides was inadequate when timely rainfall was not received for activation. Palmer amaranth control was more consistent when programs included a preplant residual herbicide. Applied preplant, flumioxazin was more effective than diuron. Programs with diuron preplant followed by fomesafen PRE were as effective as flumioxazin preplant followed by fomesafen only if fomesafen was activated in a timely manner. Programs with flumioxazin preplant followed by diuron PRE were as effective as flumioxazin preplant followed by fomesafen PRE at all locations, regardless of timely activation of the PRE herbicide. As opposed to flumioxazin preplant followed by fomesafen PRE, which exposes Palmer amaranth to two PPO-inhibiting herbicides, one could reduce selection pressure by using flumioxazin preplant followed by diuron PRE without sacrificing Palmer amaranth control or cotton yield. Nomenclature: Diuron; flumioxazin; fomesafen; glufosinate; glyphosate; Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. Amaranthus palmeri resistente a glyphosate (GR) es un problema ampliamente diseminado en las áreas de producción de algodón en el sureste de Estados Unidos. Los programas de herbicidas para el control de esta maleza en algodón bajo labranza cero incluyen flumioxazin aplicado con herbicidas para quema total en pre-siembra, aproximadamente 3 semanas antes de la siembra seguido de fomesafen aplicado PRE y después glufosinate o glyphosate aplicados POST. Flumioxazin y fomesafen son ambos inhibidores de protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO). Aplicaciones anuales múltiples de inhibidores PPO en algodón, además del amplio uso de inhibidores PPO en cultivos rotacionales, genera preocupación sobre la posible selección de resistencia a herbicidas inhibidores de PPO en A. palmeri. Se realizó un experimento para determinar el potencial de sustituir diuron por uno de los inhibidores PPO en algodón bajo labranza cero. El control de A. palmeri con diuron y fomesafen aplicados PRE varió según la localidad, pero fomesafen fue generalmente más efectivo. El control brindado por ambos herbicidas fue inadecuado cuando no se recibió lluvia en el momento necesario para su activación. El control de A. palmeri fue más consistente cuando los programas incluyeron un herbicida residual pre-siembra. Al aplicarse pre-siembra, flumioxazin fue más efectivo que diuron. Los programas con diuron pre-siembra seguidos de fomesafen PRE fueron tan efectivos como flumioxazin pre-siembra seguido de fomesafen solamente si fomesafen fue activado en el momento adecuado. Los programas con flumioxazin pre-siembra seguidos de diuron PRE fueron tan efectivos como flumioxazin pre-siembra seguido de fomesafen PRE en todas las localidades, sin importar el momento de activación del herbicida PRE. En contraste a programas con flumioxazin pre-siembra seguido de fomesafen PRE, los cuales exponen a A. palmeri a dos herbicidas inhibidores PPO, uno podría reducir la presión de selección al usar flumioxazin pre-siembra seguido de diuron PRE sin sacrificar el control de A. palmeri o el rendimiento del algodón.</abstract><cop>Lawrence</cop><pub>The Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1614/WT-D-13-00078.1</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-037X
ispartof Weed technology, 2014-01, Vol.28 (1), p.58-71
issn 0890-037X
1550-2740
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1691282111
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Cambridge University Press
subjects Agricultural practices
Amaranth
Amaranthus palmeri
Cotton
crop production
Crop rotation
Crops
Diuron
enzyme inhibitors
flumioxazin
fomesafen
glufosinate
glyphosate
Gossypium hirsutum
Herbicide resistance
Herbicide resistance management
herbicide-resistant weeds
Herbicides
Inhibitors
No tillage
Planting
PPO-inhibiting herbicides
protoporphyrinogen oxidase
Rain
Seeds
Tillage
Weed control
WEED MANAGEMENT—MAJOR CROPS
Weeds
title An Alternative to Multiple Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase Inhibitor Applications in No-Till Cotton
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A30%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Alternative%20to%20Multiple%20Protoporphyrinogen%20Oxidase%20Inhibitor%20Applications%20in%20No-Till%20Cotton&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Cahoon,%20Charles%20W&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=58&rft.epage=71&rft.pages=58-71&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1614/WT-D-13-00078.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43701948%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b386t-45dcc6e0e43a00b2b4ddaebc30b953a80e3170e819553de77961cb4eb7fc9ba53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1504817814&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43701948&rfr_iscdi=true