Loading…

How past sea-level changes can inform future planning: A case study from the Macleay River estuary, New South Wales, Australia

Climate change poses many challenges for the future management and development of the coastal zone. Uncertainties in the rate of future sea-level rise reduce our ability to project potential future impacts. This study seeks to further develop the past–present–future methodology proposed in Baker and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Holocene (Sevenoaks) 2014-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1591-1601
Main Authors: McGowan, Sarah A, Baker, Robert GV
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a431t-a8c56b71df4021db0d4c43f324c7ba61d9189f83114726157c150bd5587110b83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a431t-a8c56b71df4021db0d4c43f324c7ba61d9189f83114726157c150bd5587110b83
container_end_page 1601
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1591
container_title Holocene (Sevenoaks)
container_volume 24
creator McGowan, Sarah A
Baker, Robert GV
description Climate change poses many challenges for the future management and development of the coastal zone. Uncertainties in the rate of future sea-level rise reduce our ability to project potential future impacts. This study seeks to further develop the past–present–future methodology proposed in Baker and McGowan and apply it to an additional case study, the Macleay River estuary, New South Wales (NSW), Australia. The past–present–future methodology uses evidence from the past, the Holocene and Pleistocene, to formulate a response function that can be used to project future sea-level heights. Three scenarios for 2100 were developed to emphasise the uncertainties surrounding future sea levels and the need to consider multiple sea-level rise scenarios when planning for the future: a best case (90 cm rise), mid-case (2.6 m rise) and worst case (5 m rise). Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data were used to project each of the three scenarios onto the case study area of South West Rocks. The methodology was tested by using shell samples extracted from cores which were AMS dated to determine whether or not Holocene estuarine conditions correlated with the proposed future sea-level rise inundation scenarios. We also conducted an audit of potentially affected infrastructure and land uses, and proposed possible future adaptation strategies for the case study area.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0959683614544055
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1691293233</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0959683614544055</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3463197271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a431t-a8c56b71df4021db0d4c43f324c7ba61d9189f83114726157c150bd5587110b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1LxDAQxYMouK7ePQ548WA10yRN620Rv2BV8AOPJU2nu5Vuuyatshf_drOsBxE8zeH93uM9hrFD5KeIWp_xTGVJKhKUSkqu1BYbodQ64hniNhut5Wit77I97984xyRNcMS-brpPWBrfgycTNfRBDdi5aWfkwZoW6rbq3AKqoR8cwbIxbVu3s3OYBNUT-H4oV1C5bgH9nODO2IbMCh7rD3JAQTVudQL39AlP3dDP4dU05E9gMvjemaY2-2ynMo2ng587Zi9Xl88XN9H04fr2YjKNjBTYRya1Kik0lpXkMZYFL6WVohKxtLowCZYZplmVCgyT4wSVtqh4USqVakRepGLMjje5S9e9D6FYvqi9pSbsoW7wOSYZxpmIhQjo0R_0rRtcG9oFKkBScKEDxTeUdZ33jqp86epFWJsjz9cPyf8-JFiijcWbGf0K_Y__BngqiRE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1612943037</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How past sea-level changes can inform future planning: A case study from the Macleay River estuary, New South Wales, Australia</title><source>SAGE</source><creator>McGowan, Sarah A ; Baker, Robert GV</creator><creatorcontrib>McGowan, Sarah A ; Baker, Robert GV</creatorcontrib><description>Climate change poses many challenges for the future management and development of the coastal zone. Uncertainties in the rate of future sea-level rise reduce our ability to project potential future impacts. This study seeks to further develop the past–present–future methodology proposed in Baker and McGowan and apply it to an additional case study, the Macleay River estuary, New South Wales (NSW), Australia. The past–present–future methodology uses evidence from the past, the Holocene and Pleistocene, to formulate a response function that can be used to project future sea-level heights. Three scenarios for 2100 were developed to emphasise the uncertainties surrounding future sea levels and the need to consider multiple sea-level rise scenarios when planning for the future: a best case (90 cm rise), mid-case (2.6 m rise) and worst case (5 m rise). Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data were used to project each of the three scenarios onto the case study area of South West Rocks. The methodology was tested by using shell samples extracted from cores which were AMS dated to determine whether or not Holocene estuarine conditions correlated with the proposed future sea-level rise inundation scenarios. We also conducted an audit of potentially affected infrastructure and land uses, and proposed possible future adaptation strategies for the case study area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-6836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0911</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0959683614544055</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Climate change ; Estuaries ; Geological time ; Sea level</subject><ispartof>Holocene (Sevenoaks), 2014-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1591-1601</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2014</rights><rights>SAGE Publications © Nov 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a431t-a8c56b71df4021db0d4c43f324c7ba61d9189f83114726157c150bd5587110b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a431t-a8c56b71df4021db0d4c43f324c7ba61d9189f83114726157c150bd5587110b83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79236</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGowan, Sarah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Robert GV</creatorcontrib><title>How past sea-level changes can inform future planning: A case study from the Macleay River estuary, New South Wales, Australia</title><title>Holocene (Sevenoaks)</title><description>Climate change poses many challenges for the future management and development of the coastal zone. Uncertainties in the rate of future sea-level rise reduce our ability to project potential future impacts. This study seeks to further develop the past–present–future methodology proposed in Baker and McGowan and apply it to an additional case study, the Macleay River estuary, New South Wales (NSW), Australia. The past–present–future methodology uses evidence from the past, the Holocene and Pleistocene, to formulate a response function that can be used to project future sea-level heights. Three scenarios for 2100 were developed to emphasise the uncertainties surrounding future sea levels and the need to consider multiple sea-level rise scenarios when planning for the future: a best case (90 cm rise), mid-case (2.6 m rise) and worst case (5 m rise). Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data were used to project each of the three scenarios onto the case study area of South West Rocks. The methodology was tested by using shell samples extracted from cores which were AMS dated to determine whether or not Holocene estuarine conditions correlated with the proposed future sea-level rise inundation scenarios. We also conducted an audit of potentially affected infrastructure and land uses, and proposed possible future adaptation strategies for the case study area.</description><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Geological time</subject><subject>Sea level</subject><issn>0959-6836</issn><issn>1477-0911</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1LxDAQxYMouK7ePQ548WA10yRN620Rv2BV8AOPJU2nu5Vuuyatshf_drOsBxE8zeH93uM9hrFD5KeIWp_xTGVJKhKUSkqu1BYbodQ64hniNhut5Wit77I97984xyRNcMS-brpPWBrfgycTNfRBDdi5aWfkwZoW6rbq3AKqoR8cwbIxbVu3s3OYBNUT-H4oV1C5bgH9nODO2IbMCh7rD3JAQTVudQL39AlP3dDP4dU05E9gMvjemaY2-2ynMo2ng587Zi9Xl88XN9H04fr2YjKNjBTYRya1Kik0lpXkMZYFL6WVohKxtLowCZYZplmVCgyT4wSVtqh4USqVakRepGLMjje5S9e9D6FYvqi9pSbsoW7wOSYZxpmIhQjo0R_0rRtcG9oFKkBScKEDxTeUdZ33jqp86epFWJsjz9cPyf8-JFiijcWbGf0K_Y__BngqiRE</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>McGowan, Sarah A</creator><creator>Baker, Robert GV</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>How past sea-level changes can inform future planning: A case study from the Macleay River estuary, New South Wales, Australia</title><author>McGowan, Sarah A ; Baker, Robert GV</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a431t-a8c56b71df4021db0d4c43f324c7ba61d9189f83114726157c150bd5587110b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Geological time</topic><topic>Sea level</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGowan, Sarah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Robert GV</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Holocene (Sevenoaks)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGowan, Sarah A</au><au>Baker, Robert GV</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How past sea-level changes can inform future planning: A case study from the Macleay River estuary, New South Wales, Australia</atitle><jtitle>Holocene (Sevenoaks)</jtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1591</spage><epage>1601</epage><pages>1591-1601</pages><issn>0959-6836</issn><eissn>1477-0911</eissn><abstract>Climate change poses many challenges for the future management and development of the coastal zone. Uncertainties in the rate of future sea-level rise reduce our ability to project potential future impacts. This study seeks to further develop the past–present–future methodology proposed in Baker and McGowan and apply it to an additional case study, the Macleay River estuary, New South Wales (NSW), Australia. The past–present–future methodology uses evidence from the past, the Holocene and Pleistocene, to formulate a response function that can be used to project future sea-level heights. Three scenarios for 2100 were developed to emphasise the uncertainties surrounding future sea levels and the need to consider multiple sea-level rise scenarios when planning for the future: a best case (90 cm rise), mid-case (2.6 m rise) and worst case (5 m rise). Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data were used to project each of the three scenarios onto the case study area of South West Rocks. The methodology was tested by using shell samples extracted from cores which were AMS dated to determine whether or not Holocene estuarine conditions correlated with the proposed future sea-level rise inundation scenarios. We also conducted an audit of potentially affected infrastructure and land uses, and proposed possible future adaptation strategies for the case study area.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0959683614544055</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-6836
ispartof Holocene (Sevenoaks), 2014-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1591-1601
issn 0959-6836
1477-0911
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1691293233
source SAGE
subjects Climate change
Estuaries
Geological time
Sea level
title How past sea-level changes can inform future planning: A case study from the Macleay River estuary, New South Wales, Australia
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A57%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20past%20sea-level%20changes%20can%20inform%20future%20planning:%20A%20case%20study%20from%20the%20Macleay%20River%20estuary,%20New%20South%20Wales,%20Australia&rft.jtitle=Holocene%20(Sevenoaks)&rft.au=McGowan,%20Sarah%20A&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1591&rft.epage=1601&rft.pages=1591-1601&rft.issn=0959-6836&rft.eissn=1477-0911&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0959683614544055&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3463197271%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a431t-a8c56b71df4021db0d4c43f324c7ba61d9189f83114726157c150bd5587110b83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1612943037&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0959683614544055&rfr_iscdi=true