Loading…
How past sea-level changes can inform future planning: A case study from the Macleay River estuary, New South Wales, Australia
Climate change poses many challenges for the future management and development of the coastal zone. Uncertainties in the rate of future sea-level rise reduce our ability to project potential future impacts. This study seeks to further develop the past–present–future methodology proposed in Baker and...
Saved in:
Published in: | Holocene (Sevenoaks) 2014-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1591-1601 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a431t-a8c56b71df4021db0d4c43f324c7ba61d9189f83114726157c150bd5587110b83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a431t-a8c56b71df4021db0d4c43f324c7ba61d9189f83114726157c150bd5587110b83 |
container_end_page | 1601 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1591 |
container_title | Holocene (Sevenoaks) |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | McGowan, Sarah A Baker, Robert GV |
description | Climate change poses many challenges for the future management and development of the coastal zone. Uncertainties in the rate of future sea-level rise reduce our ability to project potential future impacts. This study seeks to further develop the past–present–future methodology proposed in Baker and McGowan and apply it to an additional case study, the Macleay River estuary, New South Wales (NSW), Australia. The past–present–future methodology uses evidence from the past, the Holocene and Pleistocene, to formulate a response function that can be used to project future sea-level heights. Three scenarios for 2100 were developed to emphasise the uncertainties surrounding future sea levels and the need to consider multiple sea-level rise scenarios when planning for the future: a best case (90 cm rise), mid-case (2.6 m rise) and worst case (5 m rise). Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data were used to project each of the three scenarios onto the case study area of South West Rocks. The methodology was tested by using shell samples extracted from cores which were AMS dated to determine whether or not Holocene estuarine conditions correlated with the proposed future sea-level rise inundation scenarios. We also conducted an audit of potentially affected infrastructure and land uses, and proposed possible future adaptation strategies for the case study area. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0959683614544055 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1691293233</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0959683614544055</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3463197271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a431t-a8c56b71df4021db0d4c43f324c7ba61d9189f83114726157c150bd5587110b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1LxDAQxYMouK7ePQ548WA10yRN620Rv2BV8AOPJU2nu5Vuuyatshf_drOsBxE8zeH93uM9hrFD5KeIWp_xTGVJKhKUSkqu1BYbodQ64hniNhut5Wit77I97984xyRNcMS-brpPWBrfgycTNfRBDdi5aWfkwZoW6rbq3AKqoR8cwbIxbVu3s3OYBNUT-H4oV1C5bgH9nODO2IbMCh7rD3JAQTVudQL39AlP3dDP4dU05E9gMvjemaY2-2ynMo2ng587Zi9Xl88XN9H04fr2YjKNjBTYRya1Kik0lpXkMZYFL6WVohKxtLowCZYZplmVCgyT4wSVtqh4USqVakRepGLMjje5S9e9D6FYvqi9pSbsoW7wOSYZxpmIhQjo0R_0rRtcG9oFKkBScKEDxTeUdZ33jqp86epFWJsjz9cPyf8-JFiijcWbGf0K_Y__BngqiRE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1612943037</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How past sea-level changes can inform future planning: A case study from the Macleay River estuary, New South Wales, Australia</title><source>SAGE</source><creator>McGowan, Sarah A ; Baker, Robert GV</creator><creatorcontrib>McGowan, Sarah A ; Baker, Robert GV</creatorcontrib><description>Climate change poses many challenges for the future management and development of the coastal zone. Uncertainties in the rate of future sea-level rise reduce our ability to project potential future impacts. This study seeks to further develop the past–present–future methodology proposed in Baker and McGowan and apply it to an additional case study, the Macleay River estuary, New South Wales (NSW), Australia. The past–present–future methodology uses evidence from the past, the Holocene and Pleistocene, to formulate a response function that can be used to project future sea-level heights. Three scenarios for 2100 were developed to emphasise the uncertainties surrounding future sea levels and the need to consider multiple sea-level rise scenarios when planning for the future: a best case (90 cm rise), mid-case (2.6 m rise) and worst case (5 m rise). Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data were used to project each of the three scenarios onto the case study area of South West Rocks. The methodology was tested by using shell samples extracted from cores which were AMS dated to determine whether or not Holocene estuarine conditions correlated with the proposed future sea-level rise inundation scenarios. We also conducted an audit of potentially affected infrastructure and land uses, and proposed possible future adaptation strategies for the case study area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-6836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0911</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0959683614544055</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Climate change ; Estuaries ; Geological time ; Sea level</subject><ispartof>Holocene (Sevenoaks), 2014-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1591-1601</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2014</rights><rights>SAGE Publications © Nov 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a431t-a8c56b71df4021db0d4c43f324c7ba61d9189f83114726157c150bd5587110b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a431t-a8c56b71df4021db0d4c43f324c7ba61d9189f83114726157c150bd5587110b83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79236</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGowan, Sarah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Robert GV</creatorcontrib><title>How past sea-level changes can inform future planning: A case study from the Macleay River estuary, New South Wales, Australia</title><title>Holocene (Sevenoaks)</title><description>Climate change poses many challenges for the future management and development of the coastal zone. Uncertainties in the rate of future sea-level rise reduce our ability to project potential future impacts. This study seeks to further develop the past–present–future methodology proposed in Baker and McGowan and apply it to an additional case study, the Macleay River estuary, New South Wales (NSW), Australia. The past–present–future methodology uses evidence from the past, the Holocene and Pleistocene, to formulate a response function that can be used to project future sea-level heights. Three scenarios for 2100 were developed to emphasise the uncertainties surrounding future sea levels and the need to consider multiple sea-level rise scenarios when planning for the future: a best case (90 cm rise), mid-case (2.6 m rise) and worst case (5 m rise). Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data were used to project each of the three scenarios onto the case study area of South West Rocks. The methodology was tested by using shell samples extracted from cores which were AMS dated to determine whether or not Holocene estuarine conditions correlated with the proposed future sea-level rise inundation scenarios. We also conducted an audit of potentially affected infrastructure and land uses, and proposed possible future adaptation strategies for the case study area.</description><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Geological time</subject><subject>Sea level</subject><issn>0959-6836</issn><issn>1477-0911</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1LxDAQxYMouK7ePQ548WA10yRN620Rv2BV8AOPJU2nu5Vuuyatshf_drOsBxE8zeH93uM9hrFD5KeIWp_xTGVJKhKUSkqu1BYbodQ64hniNhut5Wit77I97984xyRNcMS-brpPWBrfgycTNfRBDdi5aWfkwZoW6rbq3AKqoR8cwbIxbVu3s3OYBNUT-H4oV1C5bgH9nODO2IbMCh7rD3JAQTVudQL39AlP3dDP4dU05E9gMvjemaY2-2ynMo2ng587Zi9Xl88XN9H04fr2YjKNjBTYRya1Kik0lpXkMZYFL6WVohKxtLowCZYZplmVCgyT4wSVtqh4USqVakRepGLMjje5S9e9D6FYvqi9pSbsoW7wOSYZxpmIhQjo0R_0rRtcG9oFKkBScKEDxTeUdZ33jqp86epFWJsjz9cPyf8-JFiijcWbGf0K_Y__BngqiRE</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>McGowan, Sarah A</creator><creator>Baker, Robert GV</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>How past sea-level changes can inform future planning: A case study from the Macleay River estuary, New South Wales, Australia</title><author>McGowan, Sarah A ; Baker, Robert GV</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a431t-a8c56b71df4021db0d4c43f324c7ba61d9189f83114726157c150bd5587110b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Geological time</topic><topic>Sea level</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGowan, Sarah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Robert GV</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Holocene (Sevenoaks)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGowan, Sarah A</au><au>Baker, Robert GV</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How past sea-level changes can inform future planning: A case study from the Macleay River estuary, New South Wales, Australia</atitle><jtitle>Holocene (Sevenoaks)</jtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1591</spage><epage>1601</epage><pages>1591-1601</pages><issn>0959-6836</issn><eissn>1477-0911</eissn><abstract>Climate change poses many challenges for the future management and development of the coastal zone. Uncertainties in the rate of future sea-level rise reduce our ability to project potential future impacts. This study seeks to further develop the past–present–future methodology proposed in Baker and McGowan and apply it to an additional case study, the Macleay River estuary, New South Wales (NSW), Australia. The past–present–future methodology uses evidence from the past, the Holocene and Pleistocene, to formulate a response function that can be used to project future sea-level heights. Three scenarios for 2100 were developed to emphasise the uncertainties surrounding future sea levels and the need to consider multiple sea-level rise scenarios when planning for the future: a best case (90 cm rise), mid-case (2.6 m rise) and worst case (5 m rise). Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data were used to project each of the three scenarios onto the case study area of South West Rocks. The methodology was tested by using shell samples extracted from cores which were AMS dated to determine whether or not Holocene estuarine conditions correlated with the proposed future sea-level rise inundation scenarios. We also conducted an audit of potentially affected infrastructure and land uses, and proposed possible future adaptation strategies for the case study area.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0959683614544055</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-6836 |
ispartof | Holocene (Sevenoaks), 2014-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1591-1601 |
issn | 0959-6836 1477-0911 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1691293233 |
source | SAGE |
subjects | Climate change Estuaries Geological time Sea level |
title | How past sea-level changes can inform future planning: A case study from the Macleay River estuary, New South Wales, Australia |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A57%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20past%20sea-level%20changes%20can%20inform%20future%20planning:%20A%20case%20study%20from%20the%20Macleay%20River%20estuary,%20New%20South%20Wales,%20Australia&rft.jtitle=Holocene%20(Sevenoaks)&rft.au=McGowan,%20Sarah%20A&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1591&rft.epage=1601&rft.pages=1591-1601&rft.issn=0959-6836&rft.eissn=1477-0911&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0959683614544055&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3463197271%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a431t-a8c56b71df4021db0d4c43f324c7ba61d9189f83114726157c150bd5587110b83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1612943037&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0959683614544055&rfr_iscdi=true |