Loading…

Modeling and Optimization of a Fermentation Process Integrated with Cell Recycling and Pervaporation for Multiple Objectives

Biofuels have potential to replace fossil fuels as a clean energy source. Bioethanol and biodiesel are the most commonly produced biofuels. Bioethanol is produced by fermenting sugar components of biomass (e.g., sugarcane, corn, cellulosic materials). Although ethanol production using sugar and star...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Industrial & engineering chemistry research 2012-04, Vol.51 (15), p.5542-5551
Main Authors: Sharma, Shivom, Rangaiah, G. P
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a392t-c5f1ca3f466ab4015f91c4ee98e9c51cb8d6202f09979421edb0c8b9772fe4ac3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a392t-c5f1ca3f466ab4015f91c4ee98e9c51cb8d6202f09979421edb0c8b9772fe4ac3
container_end_page 5551
container_issue 15
container_start_page 5542
container_title Industrial & engineering chemistry research
container_volume 51
creator Sharma, Shivom
Rangaiah, G. P
description Biofuels have potential to replace fossil fuels as a clean energy source. Bioethanol and biodiesel are the most commonly produced biofuels. Bioethanol is produced by fermenting sugar components of biomass (e.g., sugarcane, corn, cellulosic materials). Although ethanol production using sugar and starch as feedstocks is well established, it can still be improved. Ethanol concentration in the fermentor inhibits conversion of fermentable sugars to ethanol, which results in low yield and productivity; these can be improved by better fermentation kinetics and/or process design. Ethanol can be removed from the fermentor by using extraction or a membrane process. Recently, bioethanol production process with interstage extraction has been optimized. The present work models and optimizes a three-stage bioethanol process integrated with cell recycling and pervaporation for multiple objectives using multiobjective differential evolution. The integrated process, with glucose and xylose as feedstocks, has been optimized for both ethanol productivity and xylose conversion simultaneously. The performance of the three-stage fermentation process integrated with pervaporation is compared with the three-stage fermentation process integrated with extraction, and the former is found to be better. The net flow method is used to rank the obtained nondominated solutions for the three-stage fermentation process integrated with cell recycling and pervaporation.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/ie202205h
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692300671</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1692300671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a392t-c5f1ca3f466ab4015f91c4ee98e9c51cb8d6202f09979421edb0c8b9772fe4ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctKAzEUhoMoWKsL3yAbQRejSSaZSZZSvEGlIroeMpmTNmU6GZNUUXx4Ryp1I7g6cPj-j3NB6JiSc0oYvXDACGNELHbQiApGMkG42EUjIqXMhJRiHx3EuCSECMH5CH3e-wZa182x7ho865NbuQ-dnO-wt1jjawgr6NKm8xC8gRjxXZdgHnSCBr-5tMATaFv8CObdbE0PEF5178MmaH3A9-s2ub4FPKuXYJJ7hXiI9qxuIxz91DF6vr56mtxm09nN3eRymulcsZQZYanRueVFoWtOqLCKGg6gJCgjqKllUwxbW6JUqTij0NTEyFqVJbPAtcnH6HTj7YN_WUNM1cpFMwytO_DrWNFCsZyQoqT_o6IoJM9zXg7o2QY1wccYwFZ9cCsd3itKqu9nVNtnDOzJj1ZHo1sbdGdc3AaYkFTIPP_ltInV0q9DN9zlD98XO_qWuQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1566843347</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling and Optimization of a Fermentation Process Integrated with Cell Recycling and Pervaporation for Multiple Objectives</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read &amp; Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Sharma, Shivom ; Rangaiah, G. P</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Shivom ; Rangaiah, G. P</creatorcontrib><description>Biofuels have potential to replace fossil fuels as a clean energy source. Bioethanol and biodiesel are the most commonly produced biofuels. Bioethanol is produced by fermenting sugar components of biomass (e.g., sugarcane, corn, cellulosic materials). Although ethanol production using sugar and starch as feedstocks is well established, it can still be improved. Ethanol concentration in the fermentor inhibits conversion of fermentable sugars to ethanol, which results in low yield and productivity; these can be improved by better fermentation kinetics and/or process design. Ethanol can be removed from the fermentor by using extraction or a membrane process. Recently, bioethanol production process with interstage extraction has been optimized. The present work models and optimizes a three-stage bioethanol process integrated with cell recycling and pervaporation for multiple objectives using multiobjective differential evolution. The integrated process, with glucose and xylose as feedstocks, has been optimized for both ethanol productivity and xylose conversion simultaneously. The performance of the three-stage fermentation process integrated with pervaporation is compared with the three-stage fermentation process integrated with extraction, and the former is found to be better. The net flow method is used to rank the obtained nondominated solutions for the three-stage fermentation process integrated with cell recycling and pervaporation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-5885</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5045</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/ie202205h</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IECRED</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biotechnology ; Chemical engineering ; Ethanol ; Ethyl alcohol ; Exact sciences and technology ; Extraction ; Fermentation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Membrane separation (reverse osmosis, dialysis...) ; Methods. Procedures. Technologies ; Others ; Pervaporation ; Productivity ; Recycling ; Sugars ; Various methods and equipments</subject><ispartof>Industrial &amp; engineering chemistry research, 2012-04, Vol.51 (15), p.5542-5551</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a392t-c5f1ca3f466ab4015f91c4ee98e9c51cb8d6202f09979421edb0c8b9772fe4ac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a392t-c5f1ca3f466ab4015f91c4ee98e9c51cb8d6202f09979421edb0c8b9772fe4ac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25815833$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Shivom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rangaiah, G. P</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling and Optimization of a Fermentation Process Integrated with Cell Recycling and Pervaporation for Multiple Objectives</title><title>Industrial &amp; engineering chemistry research</title><addtitle>Ind. Eng. Chem. Res</addtitle><description>Biofuels have potential to replace fossil fuels as a clean energy source. Bioethanol and biodiesel are the most commonly produced biofuels. Bioethanol is produced by fermenting sugar components of biomass (e.g., sugarcane, corn, cellulosic materials). Although ethanol production using sugar and starch as feedstocks is well established, it can still be improved. Ethanol concentration in the fermentor inhibits conversion of fermentable sugars to ethanol, which results in low yield and productivity; these can be improved by better fermentation kinetics and/or process design. Ethanol can be removed from the fermentor by using extraction or a membrane process. Recently, bioethanol production process with interstage extraction has been optimized. The present work models and optimizes a three-stage bioethanol process integrated with cell recycling and pervaporation for multiple objectives using multiobjective differential evolution. The integrated process, with glucose and xylose as feedstocks, has been optimized for both ethanol productivity and xylose conversion simultaneously. The performance of the three-stage fermentation process integrated with pervaporation is compared with the three-stage fermentation process integrated with extraction, and the former is found to be better. The net flow method is used to rank the obtained nondominated solutions for the three-stage fermentation process integrated with cell recycling and pervaporation.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Chemical engineering</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Ethyl alcohol</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Extraction</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Membrane separation (reverse osmosis, dialysis...)</subject><subject>Methods. Procedures. Technologies</subject><subject>Others</subject><subject>Pervaporation</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Recycling</subject><subject>Sugars</subject><subject>Various methods and equipments</subject><issn>0888-5885</issn><issn>1520-5045</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkctKAzEUhoMoWKsL3yAbQRejSSaZSZZSvEGlIroeMpmTNmU6GZNUUXx4Ryp1I7g6cPj-j3NB6JiSc0oYvXDACGNELHbQiApGMkG42EUjIqXMhJRiHx3EuCSECMH5CH3e-wZa182x7ho865NbuQ-dnO-wt1jjawgr6NKm8xC8gRjxXZdgHnSCBr-5tMATaFv8CObdbE0PEF5178MmaH3A9-s2ub4FPKuXYJJ7hXiI9qxuIxz91DF6vr56mtxm09nN3eRymulcsZQZYanRueVFoWtOqLCKGg6gJCgjqKllUwxbW6JUqTij0NTEyFqVJbPAtcnH6HTj7YN_WUNM1cpFMwytO_DrWNFCsZyQoqT_o6IoJM9zXg7o2QY1wccYwFZ9cCsd3itKqu9nVNtnDOzJj1ZHo1sbdGdc3AaYkFTIPP_ltInV0q9DN9zlD98XO_qWuQ</recordid><startdate>20120418</startdate><enddate>20120418</enddate><creator>Sharma, Shivom</creator><creator>Rangaiah, G. P</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120418</creationdate><title>Modeling and Optimization of a Fermentation Process Integrated with Cell Recycling and Pervaporation for Multiple Objectives</title><author>Sharma, Shivom ; Rangaiah, G. P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a392t-c5f1ca3f466ab4015f91c4ee98e9c51cb8d6202f09979421edb0c8b9772fe4ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Chemical engineering</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Ethyl alcohol</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Extraction</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Membrane separation (reverse osmosis, dialysis...)</topic><topic>Methods. Procedures. Technologies</topic><topic>Others</topic><topic>Pervaporation</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Recycling</topic><topic>Sugars</topic><topic>Various methods and equipments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Shivom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rangaiah, G. P</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Industrial &amp; engineering chemistry research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharma, Shivom</au><au>Rangaiah, G. P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling and Optimization of a Fermentation Process Integrated with Cell Recycling and Pervaporation for Multiple Objectives</atitle><jtitle>Industrial &amp; engineering chemistry research</jtitle><addtitle>Ind. Eng. Chem. Res</addtitle><date>2012-04-18</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>5542</spage><epage>5551</epage><pages>5542-5551</pages><issn>0888-5885</issn><eissn>1520-5045</eissn><coden>IECRED</coden><abstract>Biofuels have potential to replace fossil fuels as a clean energy source. Bioethanol and biodiesel are the most commonly produced biofuels. Bioethanol is produced by fermenting sugar components of biomass (e.g., sugarcane, corn, cellulosic materials). Although ethanol production using sugar and starch as feedstocks is well established, it can still be improved. Ethanol concentration in the fermentor inhibits conversion of fermentable sugars to ethanol, which results in low yield and productivity; these can be improved by better fermentation kinetics and/or process design. Ethanol can be removed from the fermentor by using extraction or a membrane process. Recently, bioethanol production process with interstage extraction has been optimized. The present work models and optimizes a three-stage bioethanol process integrated with cell recycling and pervaporation for multiple objectives using multiobjective differential evolution. The integrated process, with glucose and xylose as feedstocks, has been optimized for both ethanol productivity and xylose conversion simultaneously. The performance of the three-stage fermentation process integrated with pervaporation is compared with the three-stage fermentation process integrated with extraction, and the former is found to be better. The net flow method is used to rank the obtained nondominated solutions for the three-stage fermentation process integrated with cell recycling and pervaporation.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/ie202205h</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0888-5885
ispartof Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 2012-04, Vol.51 (15), p.5542-5551
issn 0888-5885
1520-5045
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692300671
source American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)
subjects Applied sciences
Biological and medical sciences
Biotechnology
Chemical engineering
Ethanol
Ethyl alcohol
Exact sciences and technology
Extraction
Fermentation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Membrane separation (reverse osmosis, dialysis...)
Methods. Procedures. Technologies
Others
Pervaporation
Productivity
Recycling
Sugars
Various methods and equipments
title Modeling and Optimization of a Fermentation Process Integrated with Cell Recycling and Pervaporation for Multiple Objectives
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T08%3A02%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20and%20Optimization%20of%20a%20Fermentation%20Process%20Integrated%20with%20Cell%20Recycling%20and%20Pervaporation%20for%20Multiple%20Objectives&rft.jtitle=Industrial%20&%20engineering%20chemistry%20research&rft.au=Sharma,%20Shivom&rft.date=2012-04-18&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=5542&rft.epage=5551&rft.pages=5542-5551&rft.issn=0888-5885&rft.eissn=1520-5045&rft.coden=IECRED&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/ie202205h&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1692300671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a392t-c5f1ca3f466ab4015f91c4ee98e9c51cb8d6202f09979421edb0c8b9772fe4ac3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1566843347&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true