Loading…
Modeling and Optimization of a Fermentation Process Integrated with Cell Recycling and Pervaporation for Multiple Objectives
Biofuels have potential to replace fossil fuels as a clean energy source. Bioethanol and biodiesel are the most commonly produced biofuels. Bioethanol is produced by fermenting sugar components of biomass (e.g., sugarcane, corn, cellulosic materials). Although ethanol production using sugar and star...
Saved in:
Published in: | Industrial & engineering chemistry research 2012-04, Vol.51 (15), p.5542-5551 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a392t-c5f1ca3f466ab4015f91c4ee98e9c51cb8d6202f09979421edb0c8b9772fe4ac3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a392t-c5f1ca3f466ab4015f91c4ee98e9c51cb8d6202f09979421edb0c8b9772fe4ac3 |
container_end_page | 5551 |
container_issue | 15 |
container_start_page | 5542 |
container_title | Industrial & engineering chemistry research |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Sharma, Shivom Rangaiah, G. P |
description | Biofuels have potential to replace fossil fuels as a clean energy source. Bioethanol and biodiesel are the most commonly produced biofuels. Bioethanol is produced by fermenting sugar components of biomass (e.g., sugarcane, corn, cellulosic materials). Although ethanol production using sugar and starch as feedstocks is well established, it can still be improved. Ethanol concentration in the fermentor inhibits conversion of fermentable sugars to ethanol, which results in low yield and productivity; these can be improved by better fermentation kinetics and/or process design. Ethanol can be removed from the fermentor by using extraction or a membrane process. Recently, bioethanol production process with interstage extraction has been optimized. The present work models and optimizes a three-stage bioethanol process integrated with cell recycling and pervaporation for multiple objectives using multiobjective differential evolution. The integrated process, with glucose and xylose as feedstocks, has been optimized for both ethanol productivity and xylose conversion simultaneously. The performance of the three-stage fermentation process integrated with pervaporation is compared with the three-stage fermentation process integrated with extraction, and the former is found to be better. The net flow method is used to rank the obtained nondominated solutions for the three-stage fermentation process integrated with cell recycling and pervaporation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/ie202205h |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692300671</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1692300671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a392t-c5f1ca3f466ab4015f91c4ee98e9c51cb8d6202f09979421edb0c8b9772fe4ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctKAzEUhoMoWKsL3yAbQRejSSaZSZZSvEGlIroeMpmTNmU6GZNUUXx4Ryp1I7g6cPj-j3NB6JiSc0oYvXDACGNELHbQiApGMkG42EUjIqXMhJRiHx3EuCSECMH5CH3e-wZa182x7ho865NbuQ-dnO-wt1jjawgr6NKm8xC8gRjxXZdgHnSCBr-5tMATaFv8CObdbE0PEF5178MmaH3A9-s2ub4FPKuXYJJ7hXiI9qxuIxz91DF6vr56mtxm09nN3eRymulcsZQZYanRueVFoWtOqLCKGg6gJCgjqKllUwxbW6JUqTij0NTEyFqVJbPAtcnH6HTj7YN_WUNM1cpFMwytO_DrWNFCsZyQoqT_o6IoJM9zXg7o2QY1wccYwFZ9cCsd3itKqu9nVNtnDOzJj1ZHo1sbdGdc3AaYkFTIPP_ltInV0q9DN9zlD98XO_qWuQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1566843347</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling and Optimization of a Fermentation Process Integrated with Cell Recycling and Pervaporation for Multiple Objectives</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Sharma, Shivom ; Rangaiah, G. P</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Shivom ; Rangaiah, G. P</creatorcontrib><description>Biofuels have potential to replace fossil fuels as a clean energy source. Bioethanol and biodiesel are the most commonly produced biofuels. Bioethanol is produced by fermenting sugar components of biomass (e.g., sugarcane, corn, cellulosic materials). Although ethanol production using sugar and starch as feedstocks is well established, it can still be improved. Ethanol concentration in the fermentor inhibits conversion of fermentable sugars to ethanol, which results in low yield and productivity; these can be improved by better fermentation kinetics and/or process design. Ethanol can be removed from the fermentor by using extraction or a membrane process. Recently, bioethanol production process with interstage extraction has been optimized. The present work models and optimizes a three-stage bioethanol process integrated with cell recycling and pervaporation for multiple objectives using multiobjective differential evolution. The integrated process, with glucose and xylose as feedstocks, has been optimized for both ethanol productivity and xylose conversion simultaneously. The performance of the three-stage fermentation process integrated with pervaporation is compared with the three-stage fermentation process integrated with extraction, and the former is found to be better. The net flow method is used to rank the obtained nondominated solutions for the three-stage fermentation process integrated with cell recycling and pervaporation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-5885</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5045</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/ie202205h</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IECRED</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biotechnology ; Chemical engineering ; Ethanol ; Ethyl alcohol ; Exact sciences and technology ; Extraction ; Fermentation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Membrane separation (reverse osmosis, dialysis...) ; Methods. Procedures. Technologies ; Others ; Pervaporation ; Productivity ; Recycling ; Sugars ; Various methods and equipments</subject><ispartof>Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 2012-04, Vol.51 (15), p.5542-5551</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a392t-c5f1ca3f466ab4015f91c4ee98e9c51cb8d6202f09979421edb0c8b9772fe4ac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a392t-c5f1ca3f466ab4015f91c4ee98e9c51cb8d6202f09979421edb0c8b9772fe4ac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25815833$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Shivom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rangaiah, G. P</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling and Optimization of a Fermentation Process Integrated with Cell Recycling and Pervaporation for Multiple Objectives</title><title>Industrial & engineering chemistry research</title><addtitle>Ind. Eng. Chem. Res</addtitle><description>Biofuels have potential to replace fossil fuels as a clean energy source. Bioethanol and biodiesel are the most commonly produced biofuels. Bioethanol is produced by fermenting sugar components of biomass (e.g., sugarcane, corn, cellulosic materials). Although ethanol production using sugar and starch as feedstocks is well established, it can still be improved. Ethanol concentration in the fermentor inhibits conversion of fermentable sugars to ethanol, which results in low yield and productivity; these can be improved by better fermentation kinetics and/or process design. Ethanol can be removed from the fermentor by using extraction or a membrane process. Recently, bioethanol production process with interstage extraction has been optimized. The present work models and optimizes a three-stage bioethanol process integrated with cell recycling and pervaporation for multiple objectives using multiobjective differential evolution. The integrated process, with glucose and xylose as feedstocks, has been optimized for both ethanol productivity and xylose conversion simultaneously. The performance of the three-stage fermentation process integrated with pervaporation is compared with the three-stage fermentation process integrated with extraction, and the former is found to be better. The net flow method is used to rank the obtained nondominated solutions for the three-stage fermentation process integrated with cell recycling and pervaporation.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Chemical engineering</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Ethyl alcohol</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Extraction</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Membrane separation (reverse osmosis, dialysis...)</subject><subject>Methods. Procedures. Technologies</subject><subject>Others</subject><subject>Pervaporation</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Recycling</subject><subject>Sugars</subject><subject>Various methods and equipments</subject><issn>0888-5885</issn><issn>1520-5045</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkctKAzEUhoMoWKsL3yAbQRejSSaZSZZSvEGlIroeMpmTNmU6GZNUUXx4Ryp1I7g6cPj-j3NB6JiSc0oYvXDACGNELHbQiApGMkG42EUjIqXMhJRiHx3EuCSECMH5CH3e-wZa182x7ho865NbuQ-dnO-wt1jjawgr6NKm8xC8gRjxXZdgHnSCBr-5tMATaFv8CObdbE0PEF5178MmaH3A9-s2ub4FPKuXYJJ7hXiI9qxuIxz91DF6vr56mtxm09nN3eRymulcsZQZYanRueVFoWtOqLCKGg6gJCgjqKllUwxbW6JUqTij0NTEyFqVJbPAtcnH6HTj7YN_WUNM1cpFMwytO_DrWNFCsZyQoqT_o6IoJM9zXg7o2QY1wccYwFZ9cCsd3itKqu9nVNtnDOzJj1ZHo1sbdGdc3AaYkFTIPP_ltInV0q9DN9zlD98XO_qWuQ</recordid><startdate>20120418</startdate><enddate>20120418</enddate><creator>Sharma, Shivom</creator><creator>Rangaiah, G. P</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120418</creationdate><title>Modeling and Optimization of a Fermentation Process Integrated with Cell Recycling and Pervaporation for Multiple Objectives</title><author>Sharma, Shivom ; Rangaiah, G. P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a392t-c5f1ca3f466ab4015f91c4ee98e9c51cb8d6202f09979421edb0c8b9772fe4ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Chemical engineering</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Ethyl alcohol</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Extraction</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Membrane separation (reverse osmosis, dialysis...)</topic><topic>Methods. Procedures. Technologies</topic><topic>Others</topic><topic>Pervaporation</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Recycling</topic><topic>Sugars</topic><topic>Various methods and equipments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Shivom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rangaiah, G. P</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Industrial & engineering chemistry research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharma, Shivom</au><au>Rangaiah, G. P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling and Optimization of a Fermentation Process Integrated with Cell Recycling and Pervaporation for Multiple Objectives</atitle><jtitle>Industrial & engineering chemistry research</jtitle><addtitle>Ind. Eng. Chem. Res</addtitle><date>2012-04-18</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>5542</spage><epage>5551</epage><pages>5542-5551</pages><issn>0888-5885</issn><eissn>1520-5045</eissn><coden>IECRED</coden><abstract>Biofuels have potential to replace fossil fuels as a clean energy source. Bioethanol and biodiesel are the most commonly produced biofuels. Bioethanol is produced by fermenting sugar components of biomass (e.g., sugarcane, corn, cellulosic materials). Although ethanol production using sugar and starch as feedstocks is well established, it can still be improved. Ethanol concentration in the fermentor inhibits conversion of fermentable sugars to ethanol, which results in low yield and productivity; these can be improved by better fermentation kinetics and/or process design. Ethanol can be removed from the fermentor by using extraction or a membrane process. Recently, bioethanol production process with interstage extraction has been optimized. The present work models and optimizes a three-stage bioethanol process integrated with cell recycling and pervaporation for multiple objectives using multiobjective differential evolution. The integrated process, with glucose and xylose as feedstocks, has been optimized for both ethanol productivity and xylose conversion simultaneously. The performance of the three-stage fermentation process integrated with pervaporation is compared with the three-stage fermentation process integrated with extraction, and the former is found to be better. The net flow method is used to rank the obtained nondominated solutions for the three-stage fermentation process integrated with cell recycling and pervaporation.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/ie202205h</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0888-5885 |
ispartof | Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 2012-04, Vol.51 (15), p.5542-5551 |
issn | 0888-5885 1520-5045 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692300671 |
source | American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list) |
subjects | Applied sciences Biological and medical sciences Biotechnology Chemical engineering Ethanol Ethyl alcohol Exact sciences and technology Extraction Fermentation Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Membrane separation (reverse osmosis, dialysis...) Methods. Procedures. Technologies Others Pervaporation Productivity Recycling Sugars Various methods and equipments |
title | Modeling and Optimization of a Fermentation Process Integrated with Cell Recycling and Pervaporation for Multiple Objectives |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T08%3A02%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20and%20Optimization%20of%20a%20Fermentation%20Process%20Integrated%20with%20Cell%20Recycling%20and%20Pervaporation%20for%20Multiple%20Objectives&rft.jtitle=Industrial%20&%20engineering%20chemistry%20research&rft.au=Sharma,%20Shivom&rft.date=2012-04-18&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=5542&rft.epage=5551&rft.pages=5542-5551&rft.issn=0888-5885&rft.eissn=1520-5045&rft.coden=IECRED&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/ie202205h&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1692300671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a392t-c5f1ca3f466ab4015f91c4ee98e9c51cb8d6202f09979421edb0c8b9772fe4ac3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1566843347&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |