Loading…

Specific surface area of clay minerals: Comparison between atomic force microscopy measurements and bulk-gas (N 2) and -liquid (EGME) adsorption methods

The specific surface area of natural particles is an important parameter to quantify processes such as mineral dissolution and sorptive interactions in soils and sediments. In this study, the external specific surface area (SSA), specific edge surface area (ESA) and specific basal surface area (BSA)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied clay science 2011-07, Vol.53 (1), p.20-26
Main Authors: Macht, Felix, Eusterhues, Karin, Pronk, Geertje Johanna, Totsche, Kai Uwe
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The specific surface area of natural particles is an important parameter to quantify processes such as mineral dissolution and sorptive interactions in soils and sediments. In this study, the external specific surface area (SSA), specific edge surface area (ESA) and specific basal surface area (BSA) of an illite (Inter-ILI) and a montmorillonite (Ceratosil) were determined by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and compared with the SSA obtained by N 2 gas adsorption (BET) and by liquid adsorption using ethylene glycol monomethyl ether (EGME). For the illite we found an SSA of 41 ± 3 m 2 g − 1 by BET and of 83 ± 5 m 2 g − 1 by analysing 54 particles by AFM. For the montmorillonite BET we estimated a SSA of 61 ± 2 m 2 g − 1 , whereas the analysis of 62 particles by AFM images gave a much larger mean SSA of 346 ± 37 m 2 g − 1 . We assume that the sample treatment prior to AFM imaging (involving dispersion by NaOH in a dilute dispersion and sonication for 2 min) resulted in delamination of the clay mineral particles. The ESA was 5.6 ± 0.4 m 2 g − 1 for the illite, and 15 ± 2 m 2 g − 1 for the montmorillonite. This leads to an ESA/BSA ratio of 0.07 for the illite and 0.05 for the montmorillonite for the delaminated particles. For the untreated, non-delaminated particles we calculated an ESA/BSA ratio of 0.16 for the illite and of 0.27 for the montmorillonite. The specific surface area as estimated by EGME was 112 m 2 g − 1 for the illite and 475 m 2 g − 1 for the montmorillonite, i.e. about 30–40% larger than the respective AFM values. However, this difference in specific surface area was not in agreement with the expected interlayer surface area of both minerals. ► Specific surface area and edge surface area of an illite and a montmorillonite were determined by atomic force microscopy (AFM). ► The AFM specific surface area was found to be much larger than the respective gas adsorption (N 2-BET) specific surface area. ► Delamination of the particles during dispersion in 10-6 M NaOH during AFM sample preparation may explain this discrepancy.
ISSN:0169-1317
1872-9053
DOI:10.1016/j.clay.2011.04.006