Loading…

The Circulating IGF System in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Impact of Liver Status and Treatment

Abstract Background Previous studies have demonstrated an elevated IGF-II mRNA expression and protein levels in tumors and blood from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), hereby suggesting a role of IGF-II as a pathogenic marker of HCC. We hypothesized that in HCC, an increased IGF-II secre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Growth hormone & IGF research 2015-08, Vol.25 (4), p.174-181
Main Authors: Espelund, Ulrick, Grønbæk, Henning, Villadsen, Gerda Elisabeth, Simonsen, Kira, Vestergaard, Poul Frølund, Jørgensen, Jens Otto Lunde, Flyvbjerg, Allan, Vilstrup, Hendrik, Frystyk, Jan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Previous studies have demonstrated an elevated IGF-II mRNA expression and protein levels in tumors and blood from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), hereby suggesting a role of IGF-II as a pathogenic marker of HCC. We hypothesized that in HCC, an increased IGF-II secretion would translate into an elevated circulating IGF bioactivity, which would normalize following treatment. Methods Patients with HCC (n = 39) were studied before and after radio-frequency ablation and/or transarterial chemo-embolization. Baseline data were compared to healthy subjects (n = 150) and patients with liver cirrhosis (n = 41). Serum levels of IGF ligands and IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs) were determined using gold standard methods as well as novel assays and compared to liver function tests and HCC treatment status. Results At baseline, HCC patients differed from cirrhosis patients and healthy controls regarding IGF-I (29 [23–37] vs. 12 [7–19] vs. 109 [103–116] μg/l), IGF-II (254 [224–288] vs. 118 [102–137] vs. 545 [525–566] μg/l) and IGF bioactivity (0.53 [0.41–0.68] vs. 0.29 [0.24–0.34] vs. 1.43 [1.33–1.53] μg/l) (mean [95% confidence interval], all age-adjusted P < 0.001). All variables but IGFBP-2 were strongly associated with liver status (MELD score), and accordingly, differences were either attenuated or disappeared when adjusted for MELD score. There was no effect of treatment on any IGF variables. Conclusions The marked differences in IGF and IGFBP levels between patients with HCC, liver cirrhosis and healthy subjects are mainly explained by variations in liver status. Therefore, this study questions the clinical utility of circulating IGF variables as markers of HCC.
ISSN:1096-6374
1532-2238
DOI:10.1016/j.ghir.2015.05.002