Loading…

Understanding Overrepresentation of Indigenous Children in Child Welfare Data: An Application of the Drake Risk and Bias Models

Child welfare data collected for administrative purposes are often used as a source of information for understanding the population impact of child abuse and neglect (CA/N). This study used administrative data linked at the individual level for a cohort of Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) children to follo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Child maltreatment 2015-08, Vol.20 (3), p.170-182
Main Authors: Cram, Fiona, Gulliver, Pauline, Ota, Rissa, Wilson, Moira
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-7ffc5e33587de242658ba51162ca8ae7f55f2c625c284ea99e5fb1919e100a343
container_end_page 182
container_issue 3
container_start_page 170
container_title Child maltreatment
container_volume 20
creator Cram, Fiona
Gulliver, Pauline
Ota, Rissa
Wilson, Moira
description Child welfare data collected for administrative purposes are often used as a source of information for understanding the population impact of child abuse and neglect (CA/N). This study used administrative data linked at the individual level for a cohort of Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) children to follow and extend a model developed by Drake et al. In this investigation, we aimed to build an understanding of the high representation of indigenous NZ children in administratively sourced measures of CA/N. Variation in rate ratios (RRs) within infant mortality and birth outcomes considered as possible proxies for actual CA/N RRs leaves open a range of interpretations. Our findings indicate that a more nuanced interpretation of the overrepresentation of indigenous children in administratively recorded maltreatment statistics is required. Rather than considering risk and bias as competing explanations, we suggest an acknowledgment of the impact of colonization and the existence of systemic bias generating increased risk as key drivers. As linked administrative data are increasingly used for research and evaluation, and considered for use in supporting decision making, there is a need for a deeper understanding of the drivers of administratively recorded CA/N in order to effectively address the needs of indigenous populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1077559515580392
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1696683138</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1077559515580392</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1696683138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-7ffc5e33587de242658ba51162ca8ae7f55f2c625c284ea99e5fb1919e100a343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoflTvnmTBi5fVTNLZJEepXwWlF8Xjku5O6so2W5Ot4H9valWk4GkevN-8GR5jx8DPAZS6AK4UokFA1FwascX2kxR5AWC2k052vvL32EGMr5xzGBa4y_YEGq6l4Pvs4cnXFGJvfd34WTZ5pxBoESiS723fdD7rXDZO5ox8t4zZ6KVp60A-a_xaZ8_UOhsou7K9PWQ7zraRjr7ngD3dXD-O7vL7ye14dHmfVxJ0nyvnKiQpUauaxFAUqKcWAQpRWW1JOUQnqkJgJfSQrDGEbgoGDAHnVg7lgJ2tcxehe1tS7Mt5EytqW-spfVlCYYpCS5A6oacb6Gu3DD5990UprlBhoviaqkIXYyBXLkIzt-GjBF6uqi43q04rJ9_By-mc6t-Fn24TkK-BaGf05-p_gZ_R-oSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1696707575</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding Overrepresentation of Indigenous Children in Child Welfare Data: An Application of the Drake Risk and Bias Models</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Cram, Fiona ; Gulliver, Pauline ; Ota, Rissa ; Wilson, Moira</creator><creatorcontrib>Cram, Fiona ; Gulliver, Pauline ; Ota, Rissa ; Wilson, Moira</creatorcontrib><description>Child welfare data collected for administrative purposes are often used as a source of information for understanding the population impact of child abuse and neglect (CA/N). This study used administrative data linked at the individual level for a cohort of Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) children to follow and extend a model developed by Drake et al. In this investigation, we aimed to build an understanding of the high representation of indigenous NZ children in administratively sourced measures of CA/N. Variation in rate ratios (RRs) within infant mortality and birth outcomes considered as possible proxies for actual CA/N RRs leaves open a range of interpretations. Our findings indicate that a more nuanced interpretation of the overrepresentation of indigenous children in administratively recorded maltreatment statistics is required. Rather than considering risk and bias as competing explanations, we suggest an acknowledgment of the impact of colonization and the existence of systemic bias generating increased risk as key drivers. As linked administrative data are increasingly used for research and evaluation, and considered for use in supporting decision making, there is a need for a deeper understanding of the drivers of administratively recorded CA/N in order to effectively address the needs of indigenous populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1077-5595</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1552-6119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6119</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1077559515580392</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25908320</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Child ; Child Abuse ; Child abuse & neglect ; Child Abuse - prevention & control ; Child Abuse - statistics & numerical data ; Child Health Services - organization & administration ; Child Neglect ; Child welfare ; Child Welfare - statistics & numerical data ; Estimation bias ; Female ; Health Services, Indigenous - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Infant mortality ; Male ; Models, Statistical ; Native peoples ; New Zealand ; Performance evaluation ; Risk Factors ; Statistics]]></subject><ispartof>Child maltreatment, 2015-08, Vol.20 (3), p.170-182</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2015.</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Aug 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-7ffc5e33587de242658ba51162ca8ae7f55f2c625c284ea99e5fb1919e100a343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,33751</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25908320$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cram, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulliver, Pauline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ota, Rissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Moira</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding Overrepresentation of Indigenous Children in Child Welfare Data: An Application of the Drake Risk and Bias Models</title><title>Child maltreatment</title><addtitle>Child Maltreat</addtitle><description>Child welfare data collected for administrative purposes are often used as a source of information for understanding the population impact of child abuse and neglect (CA/N). This study used administrative data linked at the individual level for a cohort of Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) children to follow and extend a model developed by Drake et al. In this investigation, we aimed to build an understanding of the high representation of indigenous NZ children in administratively sourced measures of CA/N. Variation in rate ratios (RRs) within infant mortality and birth outcomes considered as possible proxies for actual CA/N RRs leaves open a range of interpretations. Our findings indicate that a more nuanced interpretation of the overrepresentation of indigenous children in administratively recorded maltreatment statistics is required. Rather than considering risk and bias as competing explanations, we suggest an acknowledgment of the impact of colonization and the existence of systemic bias generating increased risk as key drivers. As linked administrative data are increasingly used for research and evaluation, and considered for use in supporting decision making, there is a need for a deeper understanding of the drivers of administratively recorded CA/N in order to effectively address the needs of indigenous populations.</description><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Abuse</subject><subject>Child abuse &amp; neglect</subject><subject>Child Abuse - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Child Abuse - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Child Health Services - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Child Neglect</subject><subject>Child welfare</subject><subject>Child Welfare - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Estimation bias</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Services, Indigenous - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant mortality</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Native peoples</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><issn>1077-5595</issn><issn>1552-6119</issn><issn>1552-6119</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoflTvnmTBi5fVTNLZJEepXwWlF8Xjku5O6so2W5Ot4H9valWk4GkevN-8GR5jx8DPAZS6AK4UokFA1FwascX2kxR5AWC2k052vvL32EGMr5xzGBa4y_YEGq6l4Pvs4cnXFGJvfd34WTZ5pxBoESiS723fdD7rXDZO5ox8t4zZ6KVp60A-a_xaZ8_UOhsou7K9PWQ7zraRjr7ngD3dXD-O7vL7ye14dHmfVxJ0nyvnKiQpUauaxFAUqKcWAQpRWW1JOUQnqkJgJfSQrDGEbgoGDAHnVg7lgJ2tcxehe1tS7Mt5EytqW-spfVlCYYpCS5A6oacb6Gu3DD5990UprlBhoviaqkIXYyBXLkIzt-GjBF6uqi43q04rJ9_By-mc6t-Fn24TkK-BaGf05-p_gZ_R-oSg</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Cram, Fiona</creator><creator>Gulliver, Pauline</creator><creator>Ota, Rissa</creator><creator>Wilson, Moira</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>Understanding Overrepresentation of Indigenous Children in Child Welfare Data</title><author>Cram, Fiona ; Gulliver, Pauline ; Ota, Rissa ; Wilson, Moira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-7ffc5e33587de242658ba51162ca8ae7f55f2c625c284ea99e5fb1919e100a343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Abuse</topic><topic>Child abuse &amp; neglect</topic><topic>Child Abuse - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Child Abuse - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Child Health Services - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Child Neglect</topic><topic>Child welfare</topic><topic>Child Welfare - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Estimation bias</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Services, Indigenous - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant mortality</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Native peoples</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cram, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulliver, Pauline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ota, Rissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Moira</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Child maltreatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cram, Fiona</au><au>Gulliver, Pauline</au><au>Ota, Rissa</au><au>Wilson, Moira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding Overrepresentation of Indigenous Children in Child Welfare Data: An Application of the Drake Risk and Bias Models</atitle><jtitle>Child maltreatment</jtitle><addtitle>Child Maltreat</addtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>170</spage><epage>182</epage><pages>170-182</pages><issn>1077-5595</issn><issn>1552-6119</issn><eissn>1552-6119</eissn><abstract>Child welfare data collected for administrative purposes are often used as a source of information for understanding the population impact of child abuse and neglect (CA/N). This study used administrative data linked at the individual level for a cohort of Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) children to follow and extend a model developed by Drake et al. In this investigation, we aimed to build an understanding of the high representation of indigenous NZ children in administratively sourced measures of CA/N. Variation in rate ratios (RRs) within infant mortality and birth outcomes considered as possible proxies for actual CA/N RRs leaves open a range of interpretations. Our findings indicate that a more nuanced interpretation of the overrepresentation of indigenous children in administratively recorded maltreatment statistics is required. Rather than considering risk and bias as competing explanations, we suggest an acknowledgment of the impact of colonization and the existence of systemic bias generating increased risk as key drivers. As linked administrative data are increasingly used for research and evaluation, and considered for use in supporting decision making, there is a need for a deeper understanding of the drivers of administratively recorded CA/N in order to effectively address the needs of indigenous populations.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>25908320</pmid><doi>10.1177/1077559515580392</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1077-5595
ispartof Child maltreatment, 2015-08, Vol.20 (3), p.170-182
issn 1077-5595
1552-6119
1552-6119
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1696683138
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list); Sociological Abstracts
subjects Child
Child Abuse
Child abuse & neglect
Child Abuse - prevention & control
Child Abuse - statistics & numerical data
Child Health Services - organization & administration
Child Neglect
Child welfare
Child Welfare - statistics & numerical data
Estimation bias
Female
Health Services, Indigenous - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Infant mortality
Male
Models, Statistical
Native peoples
New Zealand
Performance evaluation
Risk Factors
Statistics
title Understanding Overrepresentation of Indigenous Children in Child Welfare Data: An Application of the Drake Risk and Bias Models
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T12%3A28%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20Overrepresentation%20of%20Indigenous%20Children%20in%20Child%20Welfare%20Data:%20An%20Application%20of%20the%20Drake%20Risk%20and%20Bias%20Models&rft.jtitle=Child%20maltreatment&rft.au=Cram,%20Fiona&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=170&rft.epage=182&rft.pages=170-182&rft.issn=1077-5595&rft.eissn=1552-6119&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1077559515580392&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1696683138%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-7ffc5e33587de242658ba51162ca8ae7f55f2c625c284ea99e5fb1919e100a343%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1696707575&rft_id=info:pmid/25908320&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1077559515580392&rfr_iscdi=true