Loading…
Understanding Overrepresentation of Indigenous Children in Child Welfare Data: An Application of the Drake Risk and Bias Models
Child welfare data collected for administrative purposes are often used as a source of information for understanding the population impact of child abuse and neglect (CA/N). This study used administrative data linked at the individual level for a cohort of Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) children to follo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Child maltreatment 2015-08, Vol.20 (3), p.170-182 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-7ffc5e33587de242658ba51162ca8ae7f55f2c625c284ea99e5fb1919e100a343 |
container_end_page | 182 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 170 |
container_title | Child maltreatment |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Cram, Fiona Gulliver, Pauline Ota, Rissa Wilson, Moira |
description | Child welfare data collected for administrative purposes are often used as a source of information for understanding the population impact of child abuse and neglect (CA/N). This study used administrative data linked at the individual level for a cohort of Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) children to follow and extend a model developed by Drake et al. In this investigation, we aimed to build an understanding of the high representation of indigenous NZ children in administratively sourced measures of CA/N. Variation in rate ratios (RRs) within infant mortality and birth outcomes considered as possible proxies for actual CA/N RRs leaves open a range of interpretations. Our findings indicate that a more nuanced interpretation of the overrepresentation of indigenous children in administratively recorded maltreatment statistics is required. Rather than considering risk and bias as competing explanations, we suggest an acknowledgment of the impact of colonization and the existence of systemic bias generating increased risk as key drivers. As linked administrative data are increasingly used for research and evaluation, and considered for use in supporting decision making, there is a need for a deeper understanding of the drivers of administratively recorded CA/N in order to effectively address the needs of indigenous populations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1077559515580392 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1696683138</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1077559515580392</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1696683138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-7ffc5e33587de242658ba51162ca8ae7f55f2c625c284ea99e5fb1919e100a343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoflTvnmTBi5fVTNLZJEepXwWlF8Xjku5O6so2W5Ot4H9valWk4GkevN-8GR5jx8DPAZS6AK4UokFA1FwascX2kxR5AWC2k052vvL32EGMr5xzGBa4y_YEGq6l4Pvs4cnXFGJvfd34WTZ5pxBoESiS723fdD7rXDZO5ox8t4zZ6KVp60A-a_xaZ8_UOhsou7K9PWQ7zraRjr7ngD3dXD-O7vL7ye14dHmfVxJ0nyvnKiQpUauaxFAUqKcWAQpRWW1JOUQnqkJgJfSQrDGEbgoGDAHnVg7lgJ2tcxehe1tS7Mt5EytqW-spfVlCYYpCS5A6oacb6Gu3DD5990UprlBhoviaqkIXYyBXLkIzt-GjBF6uqi43q04rJ9_By-mc6t-Fn24TkK-BaGf05-p_gZ_R-oSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1696707575</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding Overrepresentation of Indigenous Children in Child Welfare Data: An Application of the Drake Risk and Bias Models</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Cram, Fiona ; Gulliver, Pauline ; Ota, Rissa ; Wilson, Moira</creator><creatorcontrib>Cram, Fiona ; Gulliver, Pauline ; Ota, Rissa ; Wilson, Moira</creatorcontrib><description>Child welfare data collected for administrative purposes are often used as a source of information for understanding the population impact of child abuse and neglect (CA/N). This study used administrative data linked at the individual level for a cohort of Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) children to follow and extend a model developed by Drake et al. In this investigation, we aimed to build an understanding of the high representation of indigenous NZ children in administratively sourced measures of CA/N. Variation in rate ratios (RRs) within infant mortality and birth outcomes considered as possible proxies for actual CA/N RRs leaves open a range of interpretations. Our findings indicate that a more nuanced interpretation of the overrepresentation of indigenous children in administratively recorded maltreatment statistics is required. Rather than considering risk and bias as competing explanations, we suggest an acknowledgment of the impact of colonization and the existence of systemic bias generating increased risk as key drivers. As linked administrative data are increasingly used for research and evaluation, and considered for use in supporting decision making, there is a need for a deeper understanding of the drivers of administratively recorded CA/N in order to effectively address the needs of indigenous populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1077-5595</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1552-6119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6119</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1077559515580392</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25908320</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Child ; Child Abuse ; Child abuse & neglect ; Child Abuse - prevention & control ; Child Abuse - statistics & numerical data ; Child Health Services - organization & administration ; Child Neglect ; Child welfare ; Child Welfare - statistics & numerical data ; Estimation bias ; Female ; Health Services, Indigenous - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Infant mortality ; Male ; Models, Statistical ; Native peoples ; New Zealand ; Performance evaluation ; Risk Factors ; Statistics]]></subject><ispartof>Child maltreatment, 2015-08, Vol.20 (3), p.170-182</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2015.</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Aug 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-7ffc5e33587de242658ba51162ca8ae7f55f2c625c284ea99e5fb1919e100a343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,33751</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25908320$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cram, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulliver, Pauline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ota, Rissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Moira</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding Overrepresentation of Indigenous Children in Child Welfare Data: An Application of the Drake Risk and Bias Models</title><title>Child maltreatment</title><addtitle>Child Maltreat</addtitle><description>Child welfare data collected for administrative purposes are often used as a source of information for understanding the population impact of child abuse and neglect (CA/N). This study used administrative data linked at the individual level for a cohort of Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) children to follow and extend a model developed by Drake et al. In this investigation, we aimed to build an understanding of the high representation of indigenous NZ children in administratively sourced measures of CA/N. Variation in rate ratios (RRs) within infant mortality and birth outcomes considered as possible proxies for actual CA/N RRs leaves open a range of interpretations. Our findings indicate that a more nuanced interpretation of the overrepresentation of indigenous children in administratively recorded maltreatment statistics is required. Rather than considering risk and bias as competing explanations, we suggest an acknowledgment of the impact of colonization and the existence of systemic bias generating increased risk as key drivers. As linked administrative data are increasingly used for research and evaluation, and considered for use in supporting decision making, there is a need for a deeper understanding of the drivers of administratively recorded CA/N in order to effectively address the needs of indigenous populations.</description><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Abuse</subject><subject>Child abuse & neglect</subject><subject>Child Abuse - prevention & control</subject><subject>Child Abuse - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Child Health Services - organization & administration</subject><subject>Child Neglect</subject><subject>Child welfare</subject><subject>Child Welfare - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Estimation bias</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Services, Indigenous - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant mortality</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Native peoples</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><issn>1077-5595</issn><issn>1552-6119</issn><issn>1552-6119</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoflTvnmTBi5fVTNLZJEepXwWlF8Xjku5O6so2W5Ot4H9valWk4GkevN-8GR5jx8DPAZS6AK4UokFA1FwascX2kxR5AWC2k052vvL32EGMr5xzGBa4y_YEGq6l4Pvs4cnXFGJvfd34WTZ5pxBoESiS723fdD7rXDZO5ox8t4zZ6KVp60A-a_xaZ8_UOhsou7K9PWQ7zraRjr7ngD3dXD-O7vL7ye14dHmfVxJ0nyvnKiQpUauaxFAUqKcWAQpRWW1JOUQnqkJgJfSQrDGEbgoGDAHnVg7lgJ2tcxehe1tS7Mt5EytqW-spfVlCYYpCS5A6oacb6Gu3DD5990UprlBhoviaqkIXYyBXLkIzt-GjBF6uqi43q04rJ9_By-mc6t-Fn24TkK-BaGf05-p_gZ_R-oSg</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Cram, Fiona</creator><creator>Gulliver, Pauline</creator><creator>Ota, Rissa</creator><creator>Wilson, Moira</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>Understanding Overrepresentation of Indigenous Children in Child Welfare Data</title><author>Cram, Fiona ; Gulliver, Pauline ; Ota, Rissa ; Wilson, Moira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-7ffc5e33587de242658ba51162ca8ae7f55f2c625c284ea99e5fb1919e100a343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Abuse</topic><topic>Child abuse & neglect</topic><topic>Child Abuse - prevention & control</topic><topic>Child Abuse - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Child Health Services - organization & administration</topic><topic>Child Neglect</topic><topic>Child welfare</topic><topic>Child Welfare - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Estimation bias</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Services, Indigenous - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant mortality</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Native peoples</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cram, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulliver, Pauline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ota, Rissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Moira</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Child maltreatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cram, Fiona</au><au>Gulliver, Pauline</au><au>Ota, Rissa</au><au>Wilson, Moira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding Overrepresentation of Indigenous Children in Child Welfare Data: An Application of the Drake Risk and Bias Models</atitle><jtitle>Child maltreatment</jtitle><addtitle>Child Maltreat</addtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>170</spage><epage>182</epage><pages>170-182</pages><issn>1077-5595</issn><issn>1552-6119</issn><eissn>1552-6119</eissn><abstract>Child welfare data collected for administrative purposes are often used as a source of information for understanding the population impact of child abuse and neglect (CA/N). This study used administrative data linked at the individual level for a cohort of Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) children to follow and extend a model developed by Drake et al. In this investigation, we aimed to build an understanding of the high representation of indigenous NZ children in administratively sourced measures of CA/N. Variation in rate ratios (RRs) within infant mortality and birth outcomes considered as possible proxies for actual CA/N RRs leaves open a range of interpretations. Our findings indicate that a more nuanced interpretation of the overrepresentation of indigenous children in administratively recorded maltreatment statistics is required. Rather than considering risk and bias as competing explanations, we suggest an acknowledgment of the impact of colonization and the existence of systemic bias generating increased risk as key drivers. As linked administrative data are increasingly used for research and evaluation, and considered for use in supporting decision making, there is a need for a deeper understanding of the drivers of administratively recorded CA/N in order to effectively address the needs of indigenous populations.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>25908320</pmid><doi>10.1177/1077559515580392</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1077-5595 |
ispartof | Child maltreatment, 2015-08, Vol.20 (3), p.170-182 |
issn | 1077-5595 1552-6119 1552-6119 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1696683138 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list); Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Child Child Abuse Child abuse & neglect Child Abuse - prevention & control Child Abuse - statistics & numerical data Child Health Services - organization & administration Child Neglect Child welfare Child Welfare - statistics & numerical data Estimation bias Female Health Services, Indigenous - statistics & numerical data Humans Infant mortality Male Models, Statistical Native peoples New Zealand Performance evaluation Risk Factors Statistics |
title | Understanding Overrepresentation of Indigenous Children in Child Welfare Data: An Application of the Drake Risk and Bias Models |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T12%3A28%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20Overrepresentation%20of%20Indigenous%20Children%20in%20Child%20Welfare%20Data:%20An%20Application%20of%20the%20Drake%20Risk%20and%20Bias%20Models&rft.jtitle=Child%20maltreatment&rft.au=Cram,%20Fiona&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=170&rft.epage=182&rft.pages=170-182&rft.issn=1077-5595&rft.eissn=1552-6119&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1077559515580392&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1696683138%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-7ffc5e33587de242658ba51162ca8ae7f55f2c625c284ea99e5fb1919e100a343%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1696707575&rft_id=info:pmid/25908320&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1077559515580392&rfr_iscdi=true |