Loading…
The United States and South Korea: Who Does What if the North Fails?
The uncertainties surrounding Kim Jong-un's leadership need sustained attention, as does their potential impact on the peninsula. For one thing, the Obama administration's pivot to Asia makes clear the more prominent posture intended for US forces there, including in Korea, where US milita...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Washington quarterly 2014-10, Vol.37 (3), p.183-197 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 197 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 183 |
container_title | The Washington quarterly |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Harrington, Kent Ramberg, Bennett |
description | The uncertainties surrounding Kim Jong-un's leadership need sustained attention, as does their potential impact on the peninsula. For one thing, the Obama administration's pivot to Asia makes clear the more prominent posture intended for US forces there, including in Korea, where US military capabilities still represent the tip of the deterrent spear. The responsibilities that will fall on US shoulders if the North collapses will add immeasurably to that position. Indeed, after a decade of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that have consumed thousands of lives and trillions of dollars, the need for Americans to understand their role, including its risks and potential costs, has never been greater. Here, Harrington and Ramberg examine whether the US should remain the centerpiece in dealing with North Korea's potential collapse. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/0163660X.2014.978443 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1698954299</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1667937659</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-75cc4ba47f5d4a3c35c8cc07e9e878eb092ed6527839f20666adeb99d9975dc13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkT9PwzAQxS0EEqXwDRgisbCk2PG_mKVCLQVEBQOtyma5jqOmSuNiO0L99jgKLAyI6U53v_ekuwfAJYIjBHN4AxHDjMH3UQYRGQmeE4KPwABRDFOBOD8Ggw5JO-YUnHm_hRAKkpMBmC42Jlk2VTBF8hZUMD5RTWxtGzbJs3VG3SarjU2mNm5WGxWSqkxC1LxYF4mZqmo_Pgcnpaq9ufiuQ7Cc3S8mj-n89eFpcjdPNaYwpJxqTdaK8JIWROE41LnWkBthcp6bNRSZKRjNeI5FmUHGmCrMWohCCE4LjfAQXPe-e2c_WuOD3FVem7pWjbGtl4iJXFCSCfEPlHGBOaMdevUL3drWNfEQ2f2VU0IZixTpKe2s986Ucu-qnXIHiaDsUpA_KcguBdmnEGXjXlY1pXU79WldXcigDrV1pVONrrzEfzp8AR2eizg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1636754566</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The United States and South Korea: Who Does What if the North Fails?</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor & Francis</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Harrington, Kent ; Ramberg, Bennett</creator><creatorcontrib>Harrington, Kent ; Ramberg, Bennett</creatorcontrib><description>The uncertainties surrounding Kim Jong-un's leadership need sustained attention, as does their potential impact on the peninsula. For one thing, the Obama administration's pivot to Asia makes clear the more prominent posture intended for US forces there, including in Korea, where US military capabilities still represent the tip of the deterrent spear. The responsibilities that will fall on US shoulders if the North collapses will add immeasurably to that position. Indeed, after a decade of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that have consumed thousands of lives and trillions of dollars, the need for Americans to understand their role, including its risks and potential costs, has never been greater. Here, Harrington and Ramberg examine whether the US should remain the centerpiece in dealing with North Korea's potential collapse.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-660X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-9177</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0163660X.2014.978443</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Routledge</publisher><subject>Administration ; Afghanistan ; Asia ; Foreign policy ; International relations-US ; Iraq ; Kim Jong Un ; Leadership ; Management ; Military ; National security ; North Korea ; Risk ; South Korea ; State failure ; U.S.A ; United States of America ; War</subject><ispartof>The Washington quarterly, 2014-10, Vol.37 (3), p.183-197</ispartof><rights>2014 The Elliott School of International Affairs 2014</rights><rights>Copyright Routledge Fall 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33222,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harrington, Kent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramberg, Bennett</creatorcontrib><title>The United States and South Korea: Who Does What if the North Fails?</title><title>The Washington quarterly</title><description>The uncertainties surrounding Kim Jong-un's leadership need sustained attention, as does their potential impact on the peninsula. For one thing, the Obama administration's pivot to Asia makes clear the more prominent posture intended for US forces there, including in Korea, where US military capabilities still represent the tip of the deterrent spear. The responsibilities that will fall on US shoulders if the North collapses will add immeasurably to that position. Indeed, after a decade of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that have consumed thousands of lives and trillions of dollars, the need for Americans to understand their role, including its risks and potential costs, has never been greater. Here, Harrington and Ramberg examine whether the US should remain the centerpiece in dealing with North Korea's potential collapse.</description><subject>Administration</subject><subject>Afghanistan</subject><subject>Asia</subject><subject>Foreign policy</subject><subject>International relations-US</subject><subject>Iraq</subject><subject>Kim Jong Un</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Military</subject><subject>National security</subject><subject>North Korea</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>South Korea</subject><subject>State failure</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>War</subject><issn>0163-660X</issn><issn>1530-9177</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkT9PwzAQxS0EEqXwDRgisbCk2PG_mKVCLQVEBQOtyma5jqOmSuNiO0L99jgKLAyI6U53v_ekuwfAJYIjBHN4AxHDjMH3UQYRGQmeE4KPwABRDFOBOD8Ggw5JO-YUnHm_hRAKkpMBmC42Jlk2VTBF8hZUMD5RTWxtGzbJs3VG3SarjU2mNm5WGxWSqkxC1LxYF4mZqmo_Pgcnpaq9ufiuQ7Cc3S8mj-n89eFpcjdPNaYwpJxqTdaK8JIWROE41LnWkBthcp6bNRSZKRjNeI5FmUHGmCrMWohCCE4LjfAQXPe-e2c_WuOD3FVem7pWjbGtl4iJXFCSCfEPlHGBOaMdevUL3drWNfEQ2f2VU0IZixTpKe2s986Ucu-qnXIHiaDsUpA_KcguBdmnEGXjXlY1pXU79WldXcigDrV1pVONrrzEfzp8AR2eizg</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Harrington, Kent</creator><creator>Ramberg, Bennett</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>The United States and South Korea: Who Does What if the North Fails?</title><author>Harrington, Kent ; Ramberg, Bennett</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-75cc4ba47f5d4a3c35c8cc07e9e878eb092ed6527839f20666adeb99d9975dc13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Administration</topic><topic>Afghanistan</topic><topic>Asia</topic><topic>Foreign policy</topic><topic>International relations-US</topic><topic>Iraq</topic><topic>Kim Jong Un</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Military</topic><topic>National security</topic><topic>North Korea</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>South Korea</topic><topic>State failure</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>War</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harrington, Kent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramberg, Bennett</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Washington quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harrington, Kent</au><au>Ramberg, Bennett</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The United States and South Korea: Who Does What if the North Fails?</atitle><jtitle>The Washington quarterly</jtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>183</spage><epage>197</epage><pages>183-197</pages><issn>0163-660X</issn><eissn>1530-9177</eissn><abstract>The uncertainties surrounding Kim Jong-un's leadership need sustained attention, as does their potential impact on the peninsula. For one thing, the Obama administration's pivot to Asia makes clear the more prominent posture intended for US forces there, including in Korea, where US military capabilities still represent the tip of the deterrent spear. The responsibilities that will fall on US shoulders if the North collapses will add immeasurably to that position. Indeed, after a decade of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that have consumed thousands of lives and trillions of dollars, the need for Americans to understand their role, including its risks and potential costs, has never been greater. Here, Harrington and Ramberg examine whether the US should remain the centerpiece in dealing with North Korea's potential collapse.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/0163660X.2014.978443</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0163-660X |
ispartof | The Washington quarterly, 2014-10, Vol.37 (3), p.183-197 |
issn | 0163-660X 1530-9177 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1698954299 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor & Francis; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Administration Afghanistan Asia Foreign policy International relations-US Iraq Kim Jong Un Leadership Management Military National security North Korea Risk South Korea State failure U.S.A United States of America War |
title | The United States and South Korea: Who Does What if the North Fails? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T12%3A46%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20United%20States%20and%20South%20Korea:%20Who%20Does%20What%20if%20the%20North%20Fails?&rft.jtitle=The%20Washington%20quarterly&rft.au=Harrington,%20Kent&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=183&rft.epage=197&rft.pages=183-197&rft.issn=0163-660X&rft.eissn=1530-9177&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0163660X.2014.978443&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1667937659%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-75cc4ba47f5d4a3c35c8cc07e9e878eb092ed6527839f20666adeb99d9975dc13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1636754566&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |