Loading…

Effects of Different Demineralization-Inhibiting Methods on the Shear Bond Strength of Glass-Ceramics

Purpose This in vitro study was undertaken to evaluate the effects of different demineralization‐inhibiting methods on the shear bond strength (SBS) of glass‐ceramics. Materials and Methods Ninety extracted intact human mandibular lateral insicors were randomly divided into six equal groups. Group C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of prosthodontics 2015-07, Vol.24 (5), p.407-413
Main Authors: Dilber, Erhan, Akın, Mehmet, Yavuz, Tevfik, Erdem, Ali
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3950-bf2b671d1310217108ac59fd24a81ba93ead658c667b26ae67f9f97f428dd01c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3950-bf2b671d1310217108ac59fd24a81ba93ead658c667b26ae67f9f97f428dd01c3
container_end_page 413
container_issue 5
container_start_page 407
container_title Journal of prosthodontics
container_volume 24
creator Dilber, Erhan
Akın, Mehmet
Yavuz, Tevfik
Erdem, Ali
description Purpose This in vitro study was undertaken to evaluate the effects of different demineralization‐inhibiting methods on the shear bond strength (SBS) of glass‐ceramics. Materials and Methods Ninety extracted intact human mandibular lateral insicors were randomly divided into six equal groups. Group C was left untreated, while enamel subsurface demineralization was induced in the other groups. In group D, porcelain discs (3 mm in diameter) were cemented to demineralized enamel by using total‐etch photopolymerizing luting composite resin without pretreatment. Demineralized specimens in groups F, CA, M, and I were pretreated with fluoride gel, CPP‐ACP paste, microabrasion, and resin infiltration, respectively, and then porcelain discs were cemented. SBS (MPa) was calculated from the failure load (N) per bonded area (mm2). Fracture types were examined by optical microscopy (40× magnification). Data were analyzed with ANOVA, Tukey's test, and G‐test. Results ANOVA revealed significant intergroup differences (p < 0.01). No significant differences in SBS (MPa) were found between groups C (19.48 ± 2.0) and I (20.02 ± 1.6). Lower SBS values were recorded in groups D (7.93 ± 0.8), F (12.51 ± 1.5), CA (17.08 ± 1.3), and M (14.84 ± 1.4). Mixed and cohesive failures were the most prevalent in groups M and I, respectively. Conclusion Resin infiltration enhanced the SBS of porcelain discs bonded to demineralized enamel when compared with the other demineralization‐inhibiting methods. Clinical Relevance: Resin infiltration could be useful to enhance adhesion of glass‐ceramics to teeth with white spot lesions.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jopr.12230
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1698962037</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1698962037</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3950-bf2b671d1310217108ac59fd24a81ba93ead658c667b26ae67f9f97f428dd01c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhiMEoh9w4QegSFwqpBSPnfjjSLft0tVCKwqiN8tJ7MZLYi-2V1B-PV627YEDc5k5PO-j0VsUrwAdQ553K78Ox4AxQU-KfWgIrngtbp7mGzWiEjXc7BUHMa4QAmg4PC_2cINZDQTtF_rMGN2lWHpTntp8B-1Seaon63RQo_2tkvWuunCDbW2y7rb8qNPg-xxwZRp0eT1oFcoT7_ryOuXwbRq2rvmoYqxm2THZLr4onhk1Rv3yfh8WX8_Pvsw-VMvL-cXs_bLqiGhQ1RrcUgY9EEAYGCCuukaYHteKQ6sE0aqnDe8oZS2mSlNmhBHM1Jj3PYKOHBZHO-86-B8bHZOcbOz0OCqn_SZKoIILihFhGX3zD7rym-Dyd1uKcUoR55l6u6O64GMM2sh1sJMKdxKQ3JYvt-XLv-Vn-PW9ctNOun9EH9rOAOyAn3bUd_9RycXl1ecHabXL2Jj0r8eMCt8lZYQ18tunuTxZzhlcLRaSkT9eWZ3H</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1697866088</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Different Demineralization-Inhibiting Methods on the Shear Bond Strength of Glass-Ceramics</title><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Dilber, Erhan ; Akın, Mehmet ; Yavuz, Tevfik ; Erdem, Ali</creator><creatorcontrib>Dilber, Erhan ; Akın, Mehmet ; Yavuz, Tevfik ; Erdem, Ali</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose This in vitro study was undertaken to evaluate the effects of different demineralization‐inhibiting methods on the shear bond strength (SBS) of glass‐ceramics. Materials and Methods Ninety extracted intact human mandibular lateral insicors were randomly divided into six equal groups. Group C was left untreated, while enamel subsurface demineralization was induced in the other groups. In group D, porcelain discs (3 mm in diameter) were cemented to demineralized enamel by using total‐etch photopolymerizing luting composite resin without pretreatment. Demineralized specimens in groups F, CA, M, and I were pretreated with fluoride gel, CPP‐ACP paste, microabrasion, and resin infiltration, respectively, and then porcelain discs were cemented. SBS (MPa) was calculated from the failure load (N) per bonded area (mm2). Fracture types were examined by optical microscopy (40× magnification). Data were analyzed with ANOVA, Tukey's test, and G‐test. Results ANOVA revealed significant intergroup differences (p &lt; 0.01). No significant differences in SBS (MPa) were found between groups C (19.48 ± 2.0) and I (20.02 ± 1.6). Lower SBS values were recorded in groups D (7.93 ± 0.8), F (12.51 ± 1.5), CA (17.08 ± 1.3), and M (14.84 ± 1.4). Mixed and cohesive failures were the most prevalent in groups M and I, respectively. Conclusion Resin infiltration enhanced the SBS of porcelain discs bonded to demineralized enamel when compared with the other demineralization‐inhibiting methods. Clinical Relevance: Resin infiltration could be useful to enhance adhesion of glass‐ceramics to teeth with white spot lesions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-941X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-849X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12230</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25274130</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate ; Ceramics ; demineralization ; Dental Bonding ; Dental Porcelain ; Dental Stress Analysis ; Dentistry ; glass-ceramic ; Humans ; infiltrant ; Materials Testing ; microabrasion ; Resin Cements ; shear bond strength ; Shear Strength ; Surface Properties</subject><ispartof>Journal of prosthodontics, 2015-07, Vol.24 (5), p.407-413</ispartof><rights>2014 by the American College of Prosthodontists</rights><rights>2014 by the American College of Prosthodontists.</rights><rights>2015 American College of Prosthodontists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3950-bf2b671d1310217108ac59fd24a81ba93ead658c667b26ae67f9f97f428dd01c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3950-bf2b671d1310217108ac59fd24a81ba93ead658c667b26ae67f9f97f428dd01c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25274130$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dilber, Erhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akın, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yavuz, Tevfik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdem, Ali</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Different Demineralization-Inhibiting Methods on the Shear Bond Strength of Glass-Ceramics</title><title>Journal of prosthodontics</title><addtitle>Journal of Prosthodontics</addtitle><description>Purpose This in vitro study was undertaken to evaluate the effects of different demineralization‐inhibiting methods on the shear bond strength (SBS) of glass‐ceramics. Materials and Methods Ninety extracted intact human mandibular lateral insicors were randomly divided into six equal groups. Group C was left untreated, while enamel subsurface demineralization was induced in the other groups. In group D, porcelain discs (3 mm in diameter) were cemented to demineralized enamel by using total‐etch photopolymerizing luting composite resin without pretreatment. Demineralized specimens in groups F, CA, M, and I were pretreated with fluoride gel, CPP‐ACP paste, microabrasion, and resin infiltration, respectively, and then porcelain discs were cemented. SBS (MPa) was calculated from the failure load (N) per bonded area (mm2). Fracture types were examined by optical microscopy (40× magnification). Data were analyzed with ANOVA, Tukey's test, and G‐test. Results ANOVA revealed significant intergroup differences (p &lt; 0.01). No significant differences in SBS (MPa) were found between groups C (19.48 ± 2.0) and I (20.02 ± 1.6). Lower SBS values were recorded in groups D (7.93 ± 0.8), F (12.51 ± 1.5), CA (17.08 ± 1.3), and M (14.84 ± 1.4). Mixed and cohesive failures were the most prevalent in groups M and I, respectively. Conclusion Resin infiltration enhanced the SBS of porcelain discs bonded to demineralized enamel when compared with the other demineralization‐inhibiting methods. Clinical Relevance: Resin infiltration could be useful to enhance adhesion of glass‐ceramics to teeth with white spot lesions.</description><subject>Casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate</subject><subject>Ceramics</subject><subject>demineralization</subject><subject>Dental Bonding</subject><subject>Dental Porcelain</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>glass-ceramic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>infiltrant</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>microabrasion</subject><subject>Resin Cements</subject><subject>shear bond strength</subject><subject>Shear Strength</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><issn>1059-941X</issn><issn>1532-849X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhiMEoh9w4QegSFwqpBSPnfjjSLft0tVCKwqiN8tJ7MZLYi-2V1B-PV627YEDc5k5PO-j0VsUrwAdQ553K78Ox4AxQU-KfWgIrngtbp7mGzWiEjXc7BUHMa4QAmg4PC_2cINZDQTtF_rMGN2lWHpTntp8B-1Seaon63RQo_2tkvWuunCDbW2y7rb8qNPg-xxwZRp0eT1oFcoT7_ryOuXwbRq2rvmoYqxm2THZLr4onhk1Rv3yfh8WX8_Pvsw-VMvL-cXs_bLqiGhQ1RrcUgY9EEAYGCCuukaYHteKQ6sE0aqnDe8oZS2mSlNmhBHM1Jj3PYKOHBZHO-86-B8bHZOcbOz0OCqn_SZKoIILihFhGX3zD7rym-Dyd1uKcUoR55l6u6O64GMM2sh1sJMKdxKQ3JYvt-XLv-Vn-PW9ctNOun9EH9rOAOyAn3bUd_9RycXl1ecHabXL2Jj0r8eMCt8lZYQ18tunuTxZzhlcLRaSkT9eWZ3H</recordid><startdate>201507</startdate><enddate>201507</enddate><creator>Dilber, Erhan</creator><creator>Akın, Mehmet</creator><creator>Yavuz, Tevfik</creator><creator>Erdem, Ali</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201507</creationdate><title>Effects of Different Demineralization-Inhibiting Methods on the Shear Bond Strength of Glass-Ceramics</title><author>Dilber, Erhan ; Akın, Mehmet ; Yavuz, Tevfik ; Erdem, Ali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3950-bf2b671d1310217108ac59fd24a81ba93ead658c667b26ae67f9f97f428dd01c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate</topic><topic>Ceramics</topic><topic>demineralization</topic><topic>Dental Bonding</topic><topic>Dental Porcelain</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>glass-ceramic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>infiltrant</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>microabrasion</topic><topic>Resin Cements</topic><topic>shear bond strength</topic><topic>Shear Strength</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dilber, Erhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akın, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yavuz, Tevfik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdem, Ali</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of prosthodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dilber, Erhan</au><au>Akın, Mehmet</au><au>Yavuz, Tevfik</au><au>Erdem, Ali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Different Demineralization-Inhibiting Methods on the Shear Bond Strength of Glass-Ceramics</atitle><jtitle>Journal of prosthodontics</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Prosthodontics</addtitle><date>2015-07</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>407</spage><epage>413</epage><pages>407-413</pages><issn>1059-941X</issn><eissn>1532-849X</eissn><abstract>Purpose This in vitro study was undertaken to evaluate the effects of different demineralization‐inhibiting methods on the shear bond strength (SBS) of glass‐ceramics. Materials and Methods Ninety extracted intact human mandibular lateral insicors were randomly divided into six equal groups. Group C was left untreated, while enamel subsurface demineralization was induced in the other groups. In group D, porcelain discs (3 mm in diameter) were cemented to demineralized enamel by using total‐etch photopolymerizing luting composite resin without pretreatment. Demineralized specimens in groups F, CA, M, and I were pretreated with fluoride gel, CPP‐ACP paste, microabrasion, and resin infiltration, respectively, and then porcelain discs were cemented. SBS (MPa) was calculated from the failure load (N) per bonded area (mm2). Fracture types were examined by optical microscopy (40× magnification). Data were analyzed with ANOVA, Tukey's test, and G‐test. Results ANOVA revealed significant intergroup differences (p &lt; 0.01). No significant differences in SBS (MPa) were found between groups C (19.48 ± 2.0) and I (20.02 ± 1.6). Lower SBS values were recorded in groups D (7.93 ± 0.8), F (12.51 ± 1.5), CA (17.08 ± 1.3), and M (14.84 ± 1.4). Mixed and cohesive failures were the most prevalent in groups M and I, respectively. Conclusion Resin infiltration enhanced the SBS of porcelain discs bonded to demineralized enamel when compared with the other demineralization‐inhibiting methods. Clinical Relevance: Resin infiltration could be useful to enhance adhesion of glass‐ceramics to teeth with white spot lesions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25274130</pmid><doi>10.1111/jopr.12230</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-941X
ispartof Journal of prosthodontics, 2015-07, Vol.24 (5), p.407-413
issn 1059-941X
1532-849X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1698962037
source Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)
subjects Casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate
Ceramics
demineralization
Dental Bonding
Dental Porcelain
Dental Stress Analysis
Dentistry
glass-ceramic
Humans
infiltrant
Materials Testing
microabrasion
Resin Cements
shear bond strength
Shear Strength
Surface Properties
title Effects of Different Demineralization-Inhibiting Methods on the Shear Bond Strength of Glass-Ceramics
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T05%3A33%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Different%20Demineralization-Inhibiting%20Methods%20on%20the%20Shear%20Bond%20Strength%20of%20Glass-Ceramics&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20prosthodontics&rft.au=Dilber,%20Erhan&rft.date=2015-07&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=407&rft.epage=413&rft.pages=407-413&rft.issn=1059-941X&rft.eissn=1532-849X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jopr.12230&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1698962037%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3950-bf2b671d1310217108ac59fd24a81ba93ead658c667b26ae67f9f97f428dd01c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1697866088&rft_id=info:pmid/25274130&rfr_iscdi=true