Supportive Breeding and Variance Effective Population Size

• Published in: Conservation biology 1995-12, Vol.9 (6), p.1619-1628
• Main Authors: Ryman, Nils, Jorde, Per Erik, Laikre, Linda
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Alleles; Biological and medical sciences; Breeding; Conservation biology; Depopulation; Evolutionary genetics; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Gene frequency; Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution; Inbreeding; Population genetics; Population genetics, reproduction patterns; Population size; Random mating; Theories and miscellaneous
• ISSN: 0888-8892; 1523-1739
• DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09061619.x

The practice of supporting weak, wild populations through release of individuals bred in captivity is becoming an increasingly important conservation measure. A frequently recommended form of such breeding-release activity refers to supportive breeding: a fraction of the target population is brought into captivity for reproduction, and the resulting progeny are released to mix with the wild segment of the population. We derived an expression for the variance effective size of a population managed through supportive breeding and discuss its relationship to previously published equations that are based on the assumption of random mating. We show that the effect of supportive breeding may be quite different on the inbreeding and the variance effective sizes. Whereas supportive breeding always results in a reduction of the inbreeding effective number, the variance effective number may either decrease, increase, or remain unchanged. We discuss these observations in relation to conservation management and suggest some general guidelines for supportive breeding situations. Our recommendations include making a distinction between inbreeding and variance effective numbers; taking particular care when dealing with organisms with high reproductive potential; assuring that the amount of drift be no larger than it would be without supportive breeding; and focusing primarily on the variance effective size of a population--that is, on the effective number directly related to the rate of loss of gene diversity.