Solvent Effects on Kinetics of 2‑Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate Semibatch Radical Copolymerization

Radical copolymerizations of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) with n-butyl methacrylate (BMA) and n-butyl acrylate (BA) were carried out in xylene, DMF, and n-butanol solutions. Solvent effects on copolymerization propagation kinetics were investigated using pulsed laser polymerization (PLP) combi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Industrial & engineering chemistry research 2014-05, Vol.53 (18), p.7296-7304
Main Authors: Liang, Kun, Rooney, Thomas R., Hutchinson, Robin A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Copolymerization
Monomers
Polymerization
Propagation (polymerization)
Radicals
Reaction kinetics
Solvent effect
Solvents
Styrenes
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Radical copolymerizations of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) with n-butyl methacrylate (BMA) and n-butyl acrylate (BA) were carried out in xylene, DMF, and n-butanol solutions. Solvent effects on copolymerization propagation kinetics were investigated using pulsed laser polymerization (PLP) combined with size exclusion chromatography (SEC) as well as proton NMR, while starved-feed higher temperature semibatch reactions were carried out in different solutions to simulate industrial production. Solvent choice, through its influence on hydrogen bonding of HEMA monomer, has a significant impact on the copolymer composition and propagation rate coefficient and thus influences the semibatch polymerization behavior of BMA/HEMA, as previously found for the styrene/HEMA system. The presence of HEMA leads to increased polymer molecular weight, a result attributed to branching reactions involving dimethacrylate impurity. Although H-bonding (and solvent choice) influences BA/HEMA kinetics, its relative effect is negligible on semibatch operation under the conditions studied.
ISSN:0888-5885
1520-5045
DOI:10.1021/ie4027549