Loading…

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI)

Abstract Study design Clinical measurement. Background The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is a patient reported outcome (PRO) measure with sound clinimetric properties and clinical viability for determination of upper limb function. Purpose-methods The aims of this study were to cross-culturally...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of hand therapy 2015-07, Vol.28 (3), p.279-285
Main Authors: Tonga, Eda, PT, PhD, Durutürk, Neslihan, PT, PhD, Gabel, Philip C., PT, PhD, Tekindal, Agah, MSc
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-62b6999cacc1d94e853326e60ffcf3f7fbc27f8b9d30fdeafecec09408e351633
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-62b6999cacc1d94e853326e60ffcf3f7fbc27f8b9d30fdeafecec09408e351633
container_end_page 285
container_issue 3
container_start_page 279
container_title Journal of hand therapy
container_volume 28
creator Tonga, Eda, PT, PhD
Durutürk, Neslihan, PT, PhD
Gabel, Philip C., PT, PhD
Tekindal, Agah, MSc
description Abstract Study design Clinical measurement. Background The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is a patient reported outcome (PRO) measure with sound clinimetric properties and clinical viability for determination of upper limb function. Purpose-methods The aims of this study were to cross-culturally adapt the ULFI for Turkish-speaking patients (ULFI-Tk) and investigate the reliability and validity in patients with upper limb problems. Patients (n=l02, age 49.1±16.6) with upper limb disorders were consecutively recruited. All participants completed the ULFI-Tk and the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Turkish-version (DASH-Tk) criterion at baseline and day-three. Results The ULFI-Tk demonstrated good internal consistency (α=0.87), moderate criterion validity (DASH-Tk:r=0.68;p
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jht.2014.11.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1701322308</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0894113014001677</els_id><sourcerecordid>3773030501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-62b6999cacc1d94e853326e60ffcf3f7fbc27f8b9d30fdeafecec09408e351633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kl-LEzEUxYMobnf1A_giA77sgjPeJPOXBUGK1ULBB7fgW8gkNzSz6UxNZor99mbsrsI--BQSfueQe84l5A2FjAItP3RZtxszBjTPKM0A6DOyoEVepAD5j-dkAXWTp5RyuCCXIXQRKBhUL8kFK5qmjuCCjEs_hJCqyY2Tly6RWh5GOdqhf594dFa21tnxlMheJ0fprJ4vg0nGHSZ3k7-3YZcc0YcoeHzeHg7ok43dt8lq6tXsFY3XvcZfyfV2s1rfvCIvjHQBXz-cV2S7-ny3_Jpuvn1ZLz9tUlXwYkxL1pZN0yipFNVNjnXBOSuxBGOU4aYyrWKVqdtGczAapUGFCpocauQFLTm_Itdn34Mffk4YRrG3QaFzssdhCoJWQDljHOqIvnuCdsPk48f_UKwCqClEip4pNafm0YiDt3vpT4KCmCsRnYiViLkSQamIiUfN2wfnqd2j_qt47CACt2cAYxRHi14EZbFXqK1HNQo92P_af3yiVs72Vkl3jycM_6YQgQkQ3-edmFeC5lFdVhX_DTatsTo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1702700810</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI)</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Tonga, Eda, PT, PhD ; Durutürk, Neslihan, PT, PhD ; Gabel, Philip C., PT, PhD ; Tekindal, Agah, MSc</creator><creatorcontrib>Tonga, Eda, PT, PhD ; Durutürk, Neslihan, PT, PhD ; Gabel, Philip C., PT, PhD ; Tekindal, Agah, MSc</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Study design Clinical measurement. Background The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is a patient reported outcome (PRO) measure with sound clinimetric properties and clinical viability for determination of upper limb function. Purpose-methods The aims of this study were to cross-culturally adapt the ULFI for Turkish-speaking patients (ULFI-Tk) and investigate the reliability and validity in patients with upper limb problems. Patients (n=l02, age 49.1±16.6) with upper limb disorders were consecutively recruited. All participants completed the ULFI-Tk and the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Turkish-version (DASH-Tk) criterion at baseline and day-three. Results The ULFI-Tk demonstrated good internal consistency (α=0.87), moderate criterion validity (DASH-Tk:r=0.68;p&lt;0.05), moderate reliability (ICC2:1=0.72,CI=0.58-0.80) and strong error measurement (SEM=2.94;MDC90=5.35). Exploratory factor analysis demonstrated a dual factor structure that explained 31.2% of total variance. Conclusions The ULFI-Tk is a reliable and valid PRO that could be used to assess upper limb musculoskeletal disorders in Turkish speaking patients Level of evidence Class 2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-1130</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-004X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2014.11.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25998545</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Activities of daily living ; Adult ; Aged ; Cross-Cultural Comparison ; Cultural Characteristics ; Ergonomics ; Factor analysis ; Female ; Health Status Indicators ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Musculoskeletal Diseases - physiopathology ; Musculoskeletal Diseases - rehabilitation ; Patient Outcome Assessment ; Patients ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Questionnaires ; Recovery of Function - physiology ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Self Report ; Translating ; Turkey ; Turkish ; Upper Extremity - physiology ; Upper limb outcome ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of hand therapy, 2015-07, Vol.28 (3), p.279-285</ispartof><rights>Hanley &amp; Belfus</rights><rights>2015 Hanley &amp; Belfus</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Hanley &amp; Belfus. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jul/Sep 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-62b6999cacc1d94e853326e60ffcf3f7fbc27f8b9d30fdeafecec09408e351633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-62b6999cacc1d94e853326e60ffcf3f7fbc27f8b9d30fdeafecec09408e351633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25998545$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tonga, Eda, PT, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durutürk, Neslihan, PT, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabel, Philip C., PT, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tekindal, Agah, MSc</creatorcontrib><title>Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI)</title><title>Journal of hand therapy</title><addtitle>J Hand Ther</addtitle><description>Abstract Study design Clinical measurement. Background The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is a patient reported outcome (PRO) measure with sound clinimetric properties and clinical viability for determination of upper limb function. Purpose-methods The aims of this study were to cross-culturally adapt the ULFI for Turkish-speaking patients (ULFI-Tk) and investigate the reliability and validity in patients with upper limb problems. Patients (n=l02, age 49.1±16.6) with upper limb disorders were consecutively recruited. All participants completed the ULFI-Tk and the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Turkish-version (DASH-Tk) criterion at baseline and day-three. Results The ULFI-Tk demonstrated good internal consistency (α=0.87), moderate criterion validity (DASH-Tk:r=0.68;p&lt;0.05), moderate reliability (ICC2:1=0.72,CI=0.58-0.80) and strong error measurement (SEM=2.94;MDC90=5.35). Exploratory factor analysis demonstrated a dual factor structure that explained 31.2% of total variance. Conclusions The ULFI-Tk is a reliable and valid PRO that could be used to assess upper limb musculoskeletal disorders in Turkish speaking patients Level of evidence Class 2.</description><subject>Activities of daily living</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cross-Cultural Comparison</subject><subject>Cultural Characteristics</subject><subject>Ergonomics</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Status Indicators</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Diseases - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Patient Outcome Assessment</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Recovery of Function - physiology</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Translating</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><subject>Turkish</subject><subject>Upper Extremity - physiology</subject><subject>Upper limb outcome</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0894-1130</issn><issn>1545-004X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kl-LEzEUxYMobnf1A_giA77sgjPeJPOXBUGK1ULBB7fgW8gkNzSz6UxNZor99mbsrsI--BQSfueQe84l5A2FjAItP3RZtxszBjTPKM0A6DOyoEVepAD5j-dkAXWTp5RyuCCXIXQRKBhUL8kFK5qmjuCCjEs_hJCqyY2Tly6RWh5GOdqhf594dFa21tnxlMheJ0fprJ4vg0nGHSZ3k7-3YZcc0YcoeHzeHg7ok43dt8lq6tXsFY3XvcZfyfV2s1rfvCIvjHQBXz-cV2S7-ny3_Jpuvn1ZLz9tUlXwYkxL1pZN0yipFNVNjnXBOSuxBGOU4aYyrWKVqdtGczAapUGFCpocauQFLTm_Itdn34Mffk4YRrG3QaFzssdhCoJWQDljHOqIvnuCdsPk48f_UKwCqClEip4pNafm0YiDt3vpT4KCmCsRnYiViLkSQamIiUfN2wfnqd2j_qt47CACt2cAYxRHi14EZbFXqK1HNQo92P_af3yiVs72Vkl3jycM_6YQgQkQ3-edmFeC5lFdVhX_DTatsTo</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Tonga, Eda, PT, PhD</creator><creator>Durutürk, Neslihan, PT, PhD</creator><creator>Gabel, Philip C., PT, PhD</creator><creator>Tekindal, Agah, MSc</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI)</title><author>Tonga, Eda, PT, PhD ; Durutürk, Neslihan, PT, PhD ; Gabel, Philip C., PT, PhD ; Tekindal, Agah, MSc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-62b6999cacc1d94e853326e60ffcf3f7fbc27f8b9d30fdeafecec09408e351633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Activities of daily living</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cross-Cultural Comparison</topic><topic>Cultural Characteristics</topic><topic>Ergonomics</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Status Indicators</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Diseases - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Patient Outcome Assessment</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Recovery of Function - physiology</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Translating</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><topic>Turkish</topic><topic>Upper Extremity - physiology</topic><topic>Upper limb outcome</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tonga, Eda, PT, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durutürk, Neslihan, PT, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabel, Philip C., PT, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tekindal, Agah, MSc</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of hand therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tonga, Eda, PT, PhD</au><au>Durutürk, Neslihan, PT, PhD</au><au>Gabel, Philip C., PT, PhD</au><au>Tekindal, Agah, MSc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hand therapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Hand Ther</addtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>285</epage><pages>279-285</pages><issn>0894-1130</issn><eissn>1545-004X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Study design Clinical measurement. Background The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is a patient reported outcome (PRO) measure with sound clinimetric properties and clinical viability for determination of upper limb function. Purpose-methods The aims of this study were to cross-culturally adapt the ULFI for Turkish-speaking patients (ULFI-Tk) and investigate the reliability and validity in patients with upper limb problems. Patients (n=l02, age 49.1±16.6) with upper limb disorders were consecutively recruited. All participants completed the ULFI-Tk and the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Turkish-version (DASH-Tk) criterion at baseline and day-three. Results The ULFI-Tk demonstrated good internal consistency (α=0.87), moderate criterion validity (DASH-Tk:r=0.68;p&lt;0.05), moderate reliability (ICC2:1=0.72,CI=0.58-0.80) and strong error measurement (SEM=2.94;MDC90=5.35). Exploratory factor analysis demonstrated a dual factor structure that explained 31.2% of total variance. Conclusions The ULFI-Tk is a reliable and valid PRO that could be used to assess upper limb musculoskeletal disorders in Turkish speaking patients Level of evidence Class 2.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25998545</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jht.2014.11.001</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0894-1130
ispartof Journal of hand therapy, 2015-07, Vol.28 (3), p.279-285
issn 0894-1130
1545-004X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1701322308
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Activities of daily living
Adult
Aged
Cross-Cultural Comparison
Cultural Characteristics
Ergonomics
Factor analysis
Female
Health Status Indicators
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Musculoskeletal Diseases - physiopathology
Musculoskeletal Diseases - rehabilitation
Patient Outcome Assessment
Patients
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Questionnaires
Recovery of Function - physiology
Reliability
Reproducibility of Results
Self Report
Translating
Turkey
Turkish
Upper Extremity - physiology
Upper limb outcome
Validity
title Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T23%3A30%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross-cultural%20adaptation,%20reliability%20and%20validity%20of%20the%20Turkish%20version%20of%20the%20Upper%20Limb%20Functional%20Index%20(ULFI)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hand%20therapy&rft.au=Tonga,%20Eda,%20PT,%20PhD&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=285&rft.pages=279-285&rft.issn=0894-1130&rft.eissn=1545-004X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jht.2014.11.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3773030501%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-62b6999cacc1d94e853326e60ffcf3f7fbc27f8b9d30fdeafecec09408e351633%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1702700810&rft_id=info:pmid/25998545&rfr_iscdi=true