Loading…
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI)
Abstract Study design Clinical measurement. Background The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is a patient reported outcome (PRO) measure with sound clinimetric properties and clinical viability for determination of upper limb function. Purpose-methods The aims of this study were to cross-culturally...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of hand therapy 2015-07, Vol.28 (3), p.279-285 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-62b6999cacc1d94e853326e60ffcf3f7fbc27f8b9d30fdeafecec09408e351633 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-62b6999cacc1d94e853326e60ffcf3f7fbc27f8b9d30fdeafecec09408e351633 |
container_end_page | 285 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 279 |
container_title | Journal of hand therapy |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Tonga, Eda, PT, PhD Durutürk, Neslihan, PT, PhD Gabel, Philip C., PT, PhD Tekindal, Agah, MSc |
description | Abstract Study design Clinical measurement. Background The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is a patient reported outcome (PRO) measure with sound clinimetric properties and clinical viability for determination of upper limb function. Purpose-methods The aims of this study were to cross-culturally adapt the ULFI for Turkish-speaking patients (ULFI-Tk) and investigate the reliability and validity in patients with upper limb problems. Patients (n=l02, age 49.1±16.6) with upper limb disorders were consecutively recruited. All participants completed the ULFI-Tk and the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Turkish-version (DASH-Tk) criterion at baseline and day-three. Results The ULFI-Tk demonstrated good internal consistency (α=0.87), moderate criterion validity (DASH-Tk:r=0.68;p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jht.2014.11.001 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1701322308</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0894113014001677</els_id><sourcerecordid>3773030501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-62b6999cacc1d94e853326e60ffcf3f7fbc27f8b9d30fdeafecec09408e351633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kl-LEzEUxYMobnf1A_giA77sgjPeJPOXBUGK1ULBB7fgW8gkNzSz6UxNZor99mbsrsI--BQSfueQe84l5A2FjAItP3RZtxszBjTPKM0A6DOyoEVepAD5j-dkAXWTp5RyuCCXIXQRKBhUL8kFK5qmjuCCjEs_hJCqyY2Tly6RWh5GOdqhf594dFa21tnxlMheJ0fprJ4vg0nGHSZ3k7-3YZcc0YcoeHzeHg7ok43dt8lq6tXsFY3XvcZfyfV2s1rfvCIvjHQBXz-cV2S7-ny3_Jpuvn1ZLz9tUlXwYkxL1pZN0yipFNVNjnXBOSuxBGOU4aYyrWKVqdtGczAapUGFCpocauQFLTm_Itdn34Mffk4YRrG3QaFzssdhCoJWQDljHOqIvnuCdsPk48f_UKwCqClEip4pNafm0YiDt3vpT4KCmCsRnYiViLkSQamIiUfN2wfnqd2j_qt47CACt2cAYxRHi14EZbFXqK1HNQo92P_af3yiVs72Vkl3jycM_6YQgQkQ3-edmFeC5lFdVhX_DTatsTo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1702700810</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI)</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Tonga, Eda, PT, PhD ; Durutürk, Neslihan, PT, PhD ; Gabel, Philip C., PT, PhD ; Tekindal, Agah, MSc</creator><creatorcontrib>Tonga, Eda, PT, PhD ; Durutürk, Neslihan, PT, PhD ; Gabel, Philip C., PT, PhD ; Tekindal, Agah, MSc</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Study design Clinical measurement. Background The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is a patient reported outcome (PRO) measure with sound clinimetric properties and clinical viability for determination of upper limb function. Purpose-methods The aims of this study were to cross-culturally adapt the ULFI for Turkish-speaking patients (ULFI-Tk) and investigate the reliability and validity in patients with upper limb problems. Patients (n=l02, age 49.1±16.6) with upper limb disorders were consecutively recruited. All participants completed the ULFI-Tk and the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Turkish-version (DASH-Tk) criterion at baseline and day-three. Results The ULFI-Tk demonstrated good internal consistency (α=0.87), moderate criterion validity (DASH-Tk:r=0.68;p<0.05), moderate reliability (ICC2:1=0.72,CI=0.58-0.80) and strong error measurement (SEM=2.94;MDC90=5.35). Exploratory factor analysis demonstrated a dual factor structure that explained 31.2% of total variance. Conclusions The ULFI-Tk is a reliable and valid PRO that could be used to assess upper limb musculoskeletal disorders in Turkish speaking patients Level of evidence Class 2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-1130</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-004X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2014.11.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25998545</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Activities of daily living ; Adult ; Aged ; Cross-Cultural Comparison ; Cultural Characteristics ; Ergonomics ; Factor analysis ; Female ; Health Status Indicators ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Musculoskeletal Diseases - physiopathology ; Musculoskeletal Diseases - rehabilitation ; Patient Outcome Assessment ; Patients ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Questionnaires ; Recovery of Function - physiology ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Self Report ; Translating ; Turkey ; Turkish ; Upper Extremity - physiology ; Upper limb outcome ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of hand therapy, 2015-07, Vol.28 (3), p.279-285</ispartof><rights>Hanley & Belfus</rights><rights>2015 Hanley & Belfus</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Hanley & Belfus. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jul/Sep 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-62b6999cacc1d94e853326e60ffcf3f7fbc27f8b9d30fdeafecec09408e351633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-62b6999cacc1d94e853326e60ffcf3f7fbc27f8b9d30fdeafecec09408e351633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25998545$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tonga, Eda, PT, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durutürk, Neslihan, PT, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabel, Philip C., PT, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tekindal, Agah, MSc</creatorcontrib><title>Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI)</title><title>Journal of hand therapy</title><addtitle>J Hand Ther</addtitle><description>Abstract Study design Clinical measurement. Background The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is a patient reported outcome (PRO) measure with sound clinimetric properties and clinical viability for determination of upper limb function. Purpose-methods The aims of this study were to cross-culturally adapt the ULFI for Turkish-speaking patients (ULFI-Tk) and investigate the reliability and validity in patients with upper limb problems. Patients (n=l02, age 49.1±16.6) with upper limb disorders were consecutively recruited. All participants completed the ULFI-Tk and the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Turkish-version (DASH-Tk) criterion at baseline and day-three. Results The ULFI-Tk demonstrated good internal consistency (α=0.87), moderate criterion validity (DASH-Tk:r=0.68;p<0.05), moderate reliability (ICC2:1=0.72,CI=0.58-0.80) and strong error measurement (SEM=2.94;MDC90=5.35). Exploratory factor analysis demonstrated a dual factor structure that explained 31.2% of total variance. Conclusions The ULFI-Tk is a reliable and valid PRO that could be used to assess upper limb musculoskeletal disorders in Turkish speaking patients Level of evidence Class 2.</description><subject>Activities of daily living</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cross-Cultural Comparison</subject><subject>Cultural Characteristics</subject><subject>Ergonomics</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Status Indicators</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Diseases - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Patient Outcome Assessment</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Recovery of Function - physiology</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Translating</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><subject>Turkish</subject><subject>Upper Extremity - physiology</subject><subject>Upper limb outcome</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0894-1130</issn><issn>1545-004X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kl-LEzEUxYMobnf1A_giA77sgjPeJPOXBUGK1ULBB7fgW8gkNzSz6UxNZor99mbsrsI--BQSfueQe84l5A2FjAItP3RZtxszBjTPKM0A6DOyoEVepAD5j-dkAXWTp5RyuCCXIXQRKBhUL8kFK5qmjuCCjEs_hJCqyY2Tly6RWh5GOdqhf594dFa21tnxlMheJ0fprJ4vg0nGHSZ3k7-3YZcc0YcoeHzeHg7ok43dt8lq6tXsFY3XvcZfyfV2s1rfvCIvjHQBXz-cV2S7-ny3_Jpuvn1ZLz9tUlXwYkxL1pZN0yipFNVNjnXBOSuxBGOU4aYyrWKVqdtGczAapUGFCpocauQFLTm_Itdn34Mffk4YRrG3QaFzssdhCoJWQDljHOqIvnuCdsPk48f_UKwCqClEip4pNafm0YiDt3vpT4KCmCsRnYiViLkSQamIiUfN2wfnqd2j_qt47CACt2cAYxRHi14EZbFXqK1HNQo92P_af3yiVs72Vkl3jycM_6YQgQkQ3-edmFeC5lFdVhX_DTatsTo</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Tonga, Eda, PT, PhD</creator><creator>Durutürk, Neslihan, PT, PhD</creator><creator>Gabel, Philip C., PT, PhD</creator><creator>Tekindal, Agah, MSc</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI)</title><author>Tonga, Eda, PT, PhD ; Durutürk, Neslihan, PT, PhD ; Gabel, Philip C., PT, PhD ; Tekindal, Agah, MSc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-62b6999cacc1d94e853326e60ffcf3f7fbc27f8b9d30fdeafecec09408e351633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Activities of daily living</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cross-Cultural Comparison</topic><topic>Cultural Characteristics</topic><topic>Ergonomics</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Status Indicators</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Diseases - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Patient Outcome Assessment</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Recovery of Function - physiology</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Translating</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><topic>Turkish</topic><topic>Upper Extremity - physiology</topic><topic>Upper limb outcome</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tonga, Eda, PT, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durutürk, Neslihan, PT, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabel, Philip C., PT, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tekindal, Agah, MSc</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of hand therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tonga, Eda, PT, PhD</au><au>Durutürk, Neslihan, PT, PhD</au><au>Gabel, Philip C., PT, PhD</au><au>Tekindal, Agah, MSc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hand therapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Hand Ther</addtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>285</epage><pages>279-285</pages><issn>0894-1130</issn><eissn>1545-004X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Study design Clinical measurement. Background The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is a patient reported outcome (PRO) measure with sound clinimetric properties and clinical viability for determination of upper limb function. Purpose-methods The aims of this study were to cross-culturally adapt the ULFI for Turkish-speaking patients (ULFI-Tk) and investigate the reliability and validity in patients with upper limb problems. Patients (n=l02, age 49.1±16.6) with upper limb disorders were consecutively recruited. All participants completed the ULFI-Tk and the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Turkish-version (DASH-Tk) criterion at baseline and day-three. Results The ULFI-Tk demonstrated good internal consistency (α=0.87), moderate criterion validity (DASH-Tk:r=0.68;p<0.05), moderate reliability (ICC2:1=0.72,CI=0.58-0.80) and strong error measurement (SEM=2.94;MDC90=5.35). Exploratory factor analysis demonstrated a dual factor structure that explained 31.2% of total variance. Conclusions The ULFI-Tk is a reliable and valid PRO that could be used to assess upper limb musculoskeletal disorders in Turkish speaking patients Level of evidence Class 2.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25998545</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jht.2014.11.001</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0894-1130 |
ispartof | Journal of hand therapy, 2015-07, Vol.28 (3), p.279-285 |
issn | 0894-1130 1545-004X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1701322308 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Activities of daily living Adult Aged Cross-Cultural Comparison Cultural Characteristics Ergonomics Factor analysis Female Health Status Indicators Humans Male Middle Aged Musculoskeletal Diseases - physiopathology Musculoskeletal Diseases - rehabilitation Patient Outcome Assessment Patients Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Questionnaires Recovery of Function - physiology Reliability Reproducibility of Results Self Report Translating Turkey Turkish Upper Extremity - physiology Upper limb outcome Validity |
title | Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T23%3A30%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross-cultural%20adaptation,%20reliability%20and%20validity%20of%20the%20Turkish%20version%20of%20the%20Upper%20Limb%20Functional%20Index%20(ULFI)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hand%20therapy&rft.au=Tonga,%20Eda,%20PT,%20PhD&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=285&rft.pages=279-285&rft.issn=0894-1130&rft.eissn=1545-004X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jht.2014.11.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3773030501%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-62b6999cacc1d94e853326e60ffcf3f7fbc27f8b9d30fdeafecec09408e351633%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1702700810&rft_id=info:pmid/25998545&rfr_iscdi=true |