Loading…
Evaluating sustainability of fisheries bycatch mortality for marine megafauna: a review of conservation reference points for data-limited populations
Fisheries bycatch threatens populations of marine megafauna such as marine mammals, turtles, seabirds, sharks and rays, but fisheries impacts on non-target populations are often difficult to assess due to factors such as data limitation, poorly defined management objectives and lack of quantitative...
Saved in:
Published in: | Environmental conservation 2013-12, Vol.40 (4), p.329-344 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-7d2f9554278dbc94242761163788e6a9de964d6a174d7c83896640d382cb75f43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-7d2f9554278dbc94242761163788e6a9de964d6a174d7c83896640d382cb75f43 |
container_end_page | 344 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 329 |
container_title | Environmental conservation |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | MOORE, J. E. CURTIS, K. A. LEWISON, R. L. DILLINGHAM, P. W. COPE, J. M. FORDHAM, S. V. HEPPELL, S. S. PARDO, S. A. SIMPFENDORFER, C. A. TUCK, G. N. ZHOU, S. |
description | Fisheries bycatch threatens populations of marine megafauna such as marine mammals, turtles, seabirds, sharks and rays, but fisheries impacts on non-target populations are often difficult to assess due to factors such as data limitation, poorly defined management objectives and lack of quantitative bycatch reduction targets. Limit reference points can be used to address these issues and thereby facilitate adoption and implementation of mitigation efforts. Reference points based on catch data and life history analysis can identify sustainability limits for bycatch with respect to defined population goals even when data are quite limited. This can expedite assessments for large numbers of species and enable prioritization of management actions based on mitigation urgency and efficacy. This paper reviews limit reference point estimators for marine megafauna bycatch, with the aim of highlighting their utility in fisheries management and promoting best practices for use. Different estimators share a common basic structure that can be flexibly applied to different contexts depending on species life history and available data types. Information on demographic vital rates and abundance is required; of these, abundance is the most data-dependent and thus most limiting factor for application. There are different approaches for handling management risk stemming from uncertainty in reference point and bycatch estimates. Risk tolerance can be incorporated explicitly into the reference point estimator itself, or probability distributions may be used to describe uncertainties in bycatch and reference point estimates, and risk tolerance may guide how those are factored into the management process. Either approach requires simulation-based performance testing such as management strategy evaluation to ensure that management objectives can be achieved. Factoring potential sources of bias into such evaluations is critical. This paper reviews the technical, operational, and political challenges to widespread application of reference points for management of marine megafauna bycatch, while emphasizing the importance of developing assessment frameworks that can facilitate sustainable fishing practices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S037689291300012X |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1701481632</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S037689291300012X</cupid><jstor_id>26319214</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26319214</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-7d2f9554278dbc94242761163788e6a9de964d6a174d7c83896640d382cb75f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc2KFDEUhQtRsB19ABdCwI2bGvNX-XEnw6gDAy5UcFfcSlI9aaqSNkn10A_i-5rqHkQUVwn3fOfcm9ymeUnwJcFEvv2CmRRKU00YxpjQ74-aDeFCt5wp-bjZrHK76k-bZznvKiM6qTbNz-sDTAsUH7YoL7mADzD4yZcjiiMafb5zybuMhqOBYu7QHFOBkzzGhGZIPjg0uy2MsAR4hwAld_DufnWbGLJLhxoeQy2PLrlgHNpHH0o--S0UaCc_--Jsre-X6QTn582TEabsXjycF823D9dfrz61t58_3ly9v20Np7i00tJRdx2nUtnBaE7rTRAimFTKCdDWacGtACK5lUYxpYXg2DJFzSC7kbOL5s05d5_ij8Xl0s8-GzdNEFxcck8kJlzVQFrR13-hu7ikUKfridCdZJILUilypkyKOdc39_vk6y8de4L7dVH9P4uqnldnzy6XmH4bqGBEU7IOyR4yYR6St1v3R-v_pv4CPtKhKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1695737461</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating sustainability of fisheries bycatch mortality for marine megafauna: a review of conservation reference points for data-limited populations</title><source>Cambridge University Press journals</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>MOORE, J. E. ; CURTIS, K. A. ; LEWISON, R. L. ; DILLINGHAM, P. W. ; COPE, J. M. ; FORDHAM, S. V. ; HEPPELL, S. S. ; PARDO, S. A. ; SIMPFENDORFER, C. A. ; TUCK, G. N. ; ZHOU, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>MOORE, J. E. ; CURTIS, K. A. ; LEWISON, R. L. ; DILLINGHAM, P. W. ; COPE, J. M. ; FORDHAM, S. V. ; HEPPELL, S. S. ; PARDO, S. A. ; SIMPFENDORFER, C. A. ; TUCK, G. N. ; ZHOU, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Fisheries bycatch threatens populations of marine megafauna such as marine mammals, turtles, seabirds, sharks and rays, but fisheries impacts on non-target populations are often difficult to assess due to factors such as data limitation, poorly defined management objectives and lack of quantitative bycatch reduction targets. Limit reference points can be used to address these issues and thereby facilitate adoption and implementation of mitigation efforts. Reference points based on catch data and life history analysis can identify sustainability limits for bycatch with respect to defined population goals even when data are quite limited. This can expedite assessments for large numbers of species and enable prioritization of management actions based on mitigation urgency and efficacy. This paper reviews limit reference point estimators for marine megafauna bycatch, with the aim of highlighting their utility in fisheries management and promoting best practices for use. Different estimators share a common basic structure that can be flexibly applied to different contexts depending on species life history and available data types. Information on demographic vital rates and abundance is required; of these, abundance is the most data-dependent and thus most limiting factor for application. There are different approaches for handling management risk stemming from uncertainty in reference point and bycatch estimates. Risk tolerance can be incorporated explicitly into the reference point estimator itself, or probability distributions may be used to describe uncertainties in bycatch and reference point estimates, and risk tolerance may guide how those are factored into the management process. Either approach requires simulation-based performance testing such as management strategy evaluation to ensure that management objectives can be achieved. Factoring potential sources of bias into such evaluations is critical. This paper reviews the technical, operational, and political challenges to widespread application of reference points for management of marine megafauna bycatch, while emphasizing the importance of developing assessment frameworks that can facilitate sustainable fishing practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-8929</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-4387</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S037689291300012X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EVCNA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Animal populations ; Aquatic birds ; Aquatic life ; Bycatch ; Conservation biology ; Fish populations ; Fisheries management ; Life history ; Marine mammals ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Sustainable fisheries ; Sustainable practices ; THEMATIC SECTION: Politics, Science and Policy of Reference Points for Resource Management ; Turtles</subject><ispartof>Environmental conservation, 2013-12, Vol.40 (4), p.329-344</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2013</rights><rights>Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2013</rights><rights>Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2013 This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-7d2f9554278dbc94242761163788e6a9de964d6a174d7c83896640d382cb75f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-7d2f9554278dbc94242761163788e6a9de964d6a174d7c83896640d382cb75f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26319214$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S037689291300012X/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,58213,58446,72703</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>MOORE, J. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CURTIS, K. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEWISON, R. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DILLINGHAM, P. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COPE, J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FORDHAM, S. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEPPELL, S. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARDO, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIMPFENDORFER, C. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TUCK, G. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHOU, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating sustainability of fisheries bycatch mortality for marine megafauna: a review of conservation reference points for data-limited populations</title><title>Environmental conservation</title><addtitle>Envir. Conserv</addtitle><description>Fisheries bycatch threatens populations of marine megafauna such as marine mammals, turtles, seabirds, sharks and rays, but fisheries impacts on non-target populations are often difficult to assess due to factors such as data limitation, poorly defined management objectives and lack of quantitative bycatch reduction targets. Limit reference points can be used to address these issues and thereby facilitate adoption and implementation of mitigation efforts. Reference points based on catch data and life history analysis can identify sustainability limits for bycatch with respect to defined population goals even when data are quite limited. This can expedite assessments for large numbers of species and enable prioritization of management actions based on mitigation urgency and efficacy. This paper reviews limit reference point estimators for marine megafauna bycatch, with the aim of highlighting their utility in fisheries management and promoting best practices for use. Different estimators share a common basic structure that can be flexibly applied to different contexts depending on species life history and available data types. Information on demographic vital rates and abundance is required; of these, abundance is the most data-dependent and thus most limiting factor for application. There are different approaches for handling management risk stemming from uncertainty in reference point and bycatch estimates. Risk tolerance can be incorporated explicitly into the reference point estimator itself, or probability distributions may be used to describe uncertainties in bycatch and reference point estimates, and risk tolerance may guide how those are factored into the management process. Either approach requires simulation-based performance testing such as management strategy evaluation to ensure that management objectives can be achieved. Factoring potential sources of bias into such evaluations is critical. This paper reviews the technical, operational, and political challenges to widespread application of reference points for management of marine megafauna bycatch, while emphasizing the importance of developing assessment frameworks that can facilitate sustainable fishing practices.</description><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>Aquatic life</subject><subject>Bycatch</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Fish populations</subject><subject>Fisheries management</subject><subject>Life history</subject><subject>Marine mammals</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Sustainable fisheries</subject><subject>Sustainable practices</subject><subject>THEMATIC SECTION: Politics, Science and Policy of Reference Points for Resource Management</subject><subject>Turtles</subject><issn>0376-8929</issn><issn>1469-4387</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc2KFDEUhQtRsB19ABdCwI2bGvNX-XEnw6gDAy5UcFfcSlI9aaqSNkn10A_i-5rqHkQUVwn3fOfcm9ymeUnwJcFEvv2CmRRKU00YxpjQ74-aDeFCt5wp-bjZrHK76k-bZznvKiM6qTbNz-sDTAsUH7YoL7mADzD4yZcjiiMafb5zybuMhqOBYu7QHFOBkzzGhGZIPjg0uy2MsAR4hwAld_DufnWbGLJLhxoeQy2PLrlgHNpHH0o--S0UaCc_--Jsre-X6QTn582TEabsXjycF823D9dfrz61t58_3ly9v20Np7i00tJRdx2nUtnBaE7rTRAimFTKCdDWacGtACK5lUYxpYXg2DJFzSC7kbOL5s05d5_ij8Xl0s8-GzdNEFxcck8kJlzVQFrR13-hu7ikUKfridCdZJILUilypkyKOdc39_vk6y8de4L7dVH9P4uqnldnzy6XmH4bqGBEU7IOyR4yYR6St1v3R-v_pv4CPtKhKg</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>MOORE, J. E.</creator><creator>CURTIS, K. A.</creator><creator>LEWISON, R. L.</creator><creator>DILLINGHAM, P. W.</creator><creator>COPE, J. M.</creator><creator>FORDHAM, S. V.</creator><creator>HEPPELL, S. S.</creator><creator>PARDO, S. A.</creator><creator>SIMPFENDORFER, C. A.</creator><creator>TUCK, G. N.</creator><creator>ZHOU, S.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>Evaluating sustainability of fisheries bycatch mortality for marine megafauna: a review of conservation reference points for data-limited populations</title><author>MOORE, J. E. ; CURTIS, K. A. ; LEWISON, R. L. ; DILLINGHAM, P. W. ; COPE, J. M. ; FORDHAM, S. V. ; HEPPELL, S. S. ; PARDO, S. A. ; SIMPFENDORFER, C. A. ; TUCK, G. N. ; ZHOU, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-7d2f9554278dbc94242761163788e6a9de964d6a174d7c83896640d382cb75f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>Aquatic life</topic><topic>Bycatch</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Fish populations</topic><topic>Fisheries management</topic><topic>Life history</topic><topic>Marine mammals</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Sustainable fisheries</topic><topic>Sustainable practices</topic><topic>THEMATIC SECTION: Politics, Science and Policy of Reference Points for Resource Management</topic><topic>Turtles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MOORE, J. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CURTIS, K. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEWISON, R. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DILLINGHAM, P. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COPE, J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FORDHAM, S. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEPPELL, S. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARDO, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIMPFENDORFER, C. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TUCK, G. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHOU, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Environmental conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MOORE, J. E.</au><au>CURTIS, K. A.</au><au>LEWISON, R. L.</au><au>DILLINGHAM, P. W.</au><au>COPE, J. M.</au><au>FORDHAM, S. V.</au><au>HEPPELL, S. S.</au><au>PARDO, S. A.</au><au>SIMPFENDORFER, C. A.</au><au>TUCK, G. N.</au><au>ZHOU, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating sustainability of fisheries bycatch mortality for marine megafauna: a review of conservation reference points for data-limited populations</atitle><jtitle>Environmental conservation</jtitle><addtitle>Envir. Conserv</addtitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>329</spage><epage>344</epage><pages>329-344</pages><issn>0376-8929</issn><eissn>1469-4387</eissn><coden>EVCNA4</coden><abstract>Fisheries bycatch threatens populations of marine megafauna such as marine mammals, turtles, seabirds, sharks and rays, but fisheries impacts on non-target populations are often difficult to assess due to factors such as data limitation, poorly defined management objectives and lack of quantitative bycatch reduction targets. Limit reference points can be used to address these issues and thereby facilitate adoption and implementation of mitigation efforts. Reference points based on catch data and life history analysis can identify sustainability limits for bycatch with respect to defined population goals even when data are quite limited. This can expedite assessments for large numbers of species and enable prioritization of management actions based on mitigation urgency and efficacy. This paper reviews limit reference point estimators for marine megafauna bycatch, with the aim of highlighting their utility in fisheries management and promoting best practices for use. Different estimators share a common basic structure that can be flexibly applied to different contexts depending on species life history and available data types. Information on demographic vital rates and abundance is required; of these, abundance is the most data-dependent and thus most limiting factor for application. There are different approaches for handling management risk stemming from uncertainty in reference point and bycatch estimates. Risk tolerance can be incorporated explicitly into the reference point estimator itself, or probability distributions may be used to describe uncertainties in bycatch and reference point estimates, and risk tolerance may guide how those are factored into the management process. Either approach requires simulation-based performance testing such as management strategy evaluation to ensure that management objectives can be achieved. Factoring potential sources of bias into such evaluations is critical. This paper reviews the technical, operational, and political challenges to widespread application of reference points for management of marine megafauna bycatch, while emphasizing the importance of developing assessment frameworks that can facilitate sustainable fishing practices.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S037689291300012X</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0376-8929 |
ispartof | Environmental conservation, 2013-12, Vol.40 (4), p.329-344 |
issn | 0376-8929 1469-4387 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1701481632 |
source | Cambridge University Press journals; JSTOR |
subjects | Animal populations Aquatic birds Aquatic life Bycatch Conservation biology Fish populations Fisheries management Life history Marine mammals Sustainability Sustainable development Sustainable fisheries Sustainable practices THEMATIC SECTION: Politics, Science and Policy of Reference Points for Resource Management Turtles |
title | Evaluating sustainability of fisheries bycatch mortality for marine megafauna: a review of conservation reference points for data-limited populations |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T13%3A51%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20sustainability%20of%20fisheries%20bycatch%20mortality%20for%20marine%20megafauna:%20a%20review%20of%20conservation%20reference%20points%20for%20data-limited%20populations&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20conservation&rft.au=MOORE,%20J.%20E.&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=329&rft.epage=344&rft.pages=329-344&rft.issn=0376-8929&rft.eissn=1469-4387&rft.coden=EVCNA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S037689291300012X&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26319214%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-7d2f9554278dbc94242761163788e6a9de964d6a174d7c83896640d382cb75f43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1695737461&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S037689291300012X&rft_jstor_id=26319214&rfr_iscdi=true |