Exome Sequencing and Epigenetic Analysis of Twins Who Are Discordant for Congenital Cataract

• Published in: Twin research and human genetics 2015-08, Vol.18 (4), p.393-398
• Main Authors: Wei, Tanwei, Sun, Hui, Hu, Bo, Yang, Jie, Qiao, Chen, Yan, Ming
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cataract - congenital; Cataract - genetics; Cataract - physiopathology; Cataracts; Child; Congenital diseases; Discordance; DNA methylation; DNA Methylation - genetics; DNA Mutational Analysis; Environmental factors; Enzymes; Epigenetics; Exome - genetics; Female; Genes; Genetic Association Studies; Genetic factors; Genomes; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Humans; Mutation; Pedigree; Phenotypes; Point mutation; Sequence analysis; Thermal cycling; Twins; Twins, Monozygotic - genetics
• ISSN: 1832-4274; 1839-2628
• DOI: 10.1017/thg.2015.34

Purpose: To further understand genetic factors that contribute to congenital cataracts, we sought to identify early post-twinning mutational and epigenetic events that may account for the discordant phenotypes of a twin pair. Methods: A patient with a congenital cataract and her twin sister were assessed for genetic factors that might contribute to their discordant phenotypes by mutation screening of 11 candidate genes (CRYGC, CRYGD, CRYAA, CRYAB, CRYBA1, CRYBB1, CRYBB2, MIP, HSF4, GJA3, and GJA8), exome analysis followed by Sanger sequencing of 10 additional candidate genes (PLEKHO2, FRYL, RBP3, P2RX2, GSR, TRAM1, VEGFA, NARS2, CADPS, and TEKT4), and promoter methylation analysis of five representative genes (TRAM1, CRYAA, HSF4, VEGFA, GJA3, DCT) plus one additional candidate gene (FTL). Results: Mutation screening revealed no gene mutation differences between the patient and her twin sister for the 11 candidate genes. Exome sequencing analysis revealed variations between the twins in 442 genes, 10 of which are expressed in the eye. However, these differential variants could not be confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Furthermore, epigenetic discordance was not detected in the twin pair. Conclusions: The genomic DNA mutational and epigenetic events assessed in this study could not explain the discordance in the development of phenotypic differences between the twin pair, suggesting the possible involvement of somatic mutations or environmental factors. Identification of possible causes requires further research.