Recent progress in CFD modelling of wind field and pollutant transport in street canyons

• Published in: Atmospheric environment (1994) 2006-09, Vol.40 (29), p.5640-5658
• Main Authors: Li, Xian-Xiang, Liu, Chun-Ho, Leung, Dennis Y.C., Lam, K.M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: [formula omitted] turbulence model; Analysis methods; Applied sciences; Atmospheric pollution; Eulerian dispersion model; Exact sciences and technology; Lagrangian particle dispersion model (LPDM); Large-eddy simulation (LES); Photochemical reactions; Pollution; Thermal effects
• ISSN: 1352-2310; 1873-2844
• DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.055

With rapid development in computer hardware and numerical algorithms, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) techniques are widely utilized to study the wind field and pollutant transport in urban street canyons. The recent advancements and achievements in street-canyon pollution research using mathematical modelling approaches are reviewed in this paper. The standard, renormalized-group (RNG), and realizable k – ε turbulence closure schemes are the most commonly used Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) models in street-canyon flow research, including the studies on the effects of street-canyon aspect ratio, building configuration, ambient wind direction, inflow turbulence intensities, vehicle-induced turbulence, and thermal stratifications. Another approach to turbulence simulation inside street canyons is large-eddy simulation (LES) which can handle a broad range of turbulent motions in a transient manner. These two approaches have their merits and the choice between them will be a compromise between accuracy and cost. Several guidelines on this choice as well as some comments on the 2D and 3D CFD simulations are given. The outputs from wind field models can be used with pollutant transport models to calculate the pollutant distribution inside street canyons. The most commonly employed pollutant transport models include Lagrangian, Eulerian, and Lagrangian/Eulerian hybrid models. The advantages and shortcomings of these models are summarized. Several other modelling concerns, such as chemically reactive pollutant dispersion and boundary conditions treatment, are also discussed.