The Mental Disability Military Assessment Tool: A Reliable Tool for Determining Disability in Veterans with Post-traumatic Stress Disorder

Purpose An assessment tool was developed to assess disability in veterans who suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) due to a military mission. The objective of this study was to determine the reliability, intra-rater and inter-rater variation of the Mental Disability Military (MDM) asses...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of occupational rehabilitation 2015-09, Vol.25 (3), p.569-576
Main Authors: Fokkens, Andrea S., Groothoff, Johan W., van der Klink, Jac J. L., Popping, Roel, Stewart, Roy E., van de Ven, Lex, Brouwer, Sandra, Tuinstra, Jolanda
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Armed forces
Clinical Psychology
Compensation
Disability
Disability Evaluation
Disability management
Disabled Persons - psychology
Environmental Health
Female
Health Psychology
Humans
Interview, Psychological
Interviews
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Military
Military aspects
Military Medicine - methods
Military service
Netherlands
Observer Variation
Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine
Orthopedics
People with disabilities
Physical instruments
Post traumatic stress disorder
Rehabilitation
Reproducibility of Results
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis
Studies
Trauma
Veterans
Veterans - psychology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-3feeca8f86e890364b96bb0af50d848f4099b929cebf028909e68dd4c899dcd73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-3feeca8f86e890364b96bb0af50d848f4099b929cebf028909e68dd4c899dcd73
container_end_page 576
container_issue 3
container_start_page 569
container_title Journal of occupational rehabilitation
container_volume 25
creator Fokkens, Andrea S.
Groothoff, Johan W.
van der Klink, Jac J. L.
Popping, Roel
Stewart, Roy E.
van de Ven, Lex
Brouwer, Sandra
Tuinstra, Jolanda
description Purpose An assessment tool was developed to assess disability in veterans who suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) due to a military mission. The objective of this study was to determine the reliability, intra-rater and inter-rater variation of the Mental Disability Military (MDM) assessment tool. Methods Twenty-four assessment interviews of veterans with an insurance physician were videotaped. Each videotaped interview was assessed by a group of five independent raters on limitations of the veterans using the MDM assessment tool. After 2 months the raters repeated this procedure. Next the intra-rater and inter-rater variation was assessed with an adjusted version of AG09 computing weighted percentage agreement. Results The results of this study showed that both the intra-rater variation and inter-rater variation on the ten subcategories of the MDM assessment tool were small, with an agreement of 84–100 % within raters and 93–100 % between raters. Conclusions The MDM assessment tool proves to be a reliable instrument to measure PTSD limitations in functioning in Dutch military veterans who apply for disability compensation. Further research is needed to assess the validity of this instrument.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10926-014-9563-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1705730114</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A714971994</galeid><sourcerecordid>A714971994</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-3feeca8f86e890364b96bb0af50d848f4099b929cebf028909e68dd4c899dcd73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1TAQRSNERUvhA9ggS2zYpB0nTmKze2qhILUCwYOt5TjjV1eJ3dqOUH-Br67T15aCQF7Ymjn3asa3KF5ROKAA3WGkIKq2BMpK0bR1CU-KPdp0dVm3nD_Nb2hykfFut3ge4wUACN5Vz4rdqskU0G6v-LU-R3KGLqmRHNuoejvadE3OlkuFa7KKEWOcMkDW3o_vyIp8xdGqfsTbAjE-kGNMGCbrrNs8NrGO_Fg6ykXy06Zz8sXHVKag5kklq8m3FLL3ovBhwPCi2DFqjPjy7t4vvn94vz76WJ5-Pvl0tDotdcOqVNYGUStueItcQN2yXrR9D8o0MHDGDQMhelEJjb2BKiMCWz4MTHMhBj109X7xdut7GfzVjDHJyUaN46gc-jlK2sHt71CW0Td_oRd-Di5Pt1BM1G3Lmt_URo0orTM-76gXU7nqKBMdFWLxOvgHlc-Ak9XeobG5_oeAbgU6-BgDGnkZ7JRDkRTkkr_c5i9z_nLJX0LWvL4beO4nHB4U94FnoNoCMbfcBsOjjf7regPe2bq2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1704936645</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Mental Disability Military Assessment Tool: A Reliable Tool for Determining Disability in Veterans with Post-traumatic Stress Disorder</title><source>EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Fokkens, Andrea S. ; Groothoff, Johan W. ; van der Klink, Jac J. L. ; Popping, Roel ; Stewart, Roy E. ; van de Ven, Lex ; Brouwer, Sandra ; Tuinstra, Jolanda</creator><creatorcontrib>Fokkens, Andrea S. ; Groothoff, Johan W. ; van der Klink, Jac J. L. ; Popping, Roel ; Stewart, Roy E. ; van de Ven, Lex ; Brouwer, Sandra ; Tuinstra, Jolanda</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose An assessment tool was developed to assess disability in veterans who suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) due to a military mission. The objective of this study was to determine the reliability, intra-rater and inter-rater variation of the Mental Disability Military (MDM) assessment tool. Methods Twenty-four assessment interviews of veterans with an insurance physician were videotaped. Each videotaped interview was assessed by a group of five independent raters on limitations of the veterans using the MDM assessment tool. After 2 months the raters repeated this procedure. Next the intra-rater and inter-rater variation was assessed with an adjusted version of AG09 computing weighted percentage agreement. Results The results of this study showed that both the intra-rater variation and inter-rater variation on the ten subcategories of the MDM assessment tool were small, with an agreement of 84–100 % within raters and 93–100 % between raters. Conclusions The MDM assessment tool proves to be a reliable instrument to measure PTSD limitations in functioning in Dutch military veterans who apply for disability compensation. Further research is needed to assess the validity of this instrument.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-0487</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3688</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10926-014-9563-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25573017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Armed forces ; Clinical Psychology ; Compensation ; Disability ; Disability Evaluation ; Disability management ; Disabled Persons - psychology ; Environmental Health ; Female ; Health Psychology ; Humans ; Interview, Psychological ; Interviews ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Military ; Military aspects ; Military Medicine - methods ; Military service ; Netherlands ; Observer Variation ; Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine ; Orthopedics ; People with disabilities ; Physical instruments ; Post traumatic stress disorder ; Rehabilitation ; Reproducibility of Results ; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis ; Studies ; Trauma ; Veterans ; Veterans - psychology</subject><ispartof>Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2015-09, Vol.25 (3), p.569-576</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-3feeca8f86e890364b96bb0af50d848f4099b929cebf028909e68dd4c899dcd73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-3feeca8f86e890364b96bb0af50d848f4099b929cebf028909e68dd4c899dcd73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1704936645/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1704936645?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,21394,27924,27925,33611,33612,36060,36061,43733,44363,74221,74895</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25573017$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fokkens, Andrea S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groothoff, Johan W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Klink, Jac J. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popping, Roel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Roy E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Ven, Lex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brouwer, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuinstra, Jolanda</creatorcontrib><title>The Mental Disability Military Assessment Tool: A Reliable Tool for Determining Disability in Veterans with Post-traumatic Stress Disorder</title><title>Journal of occupational rehabilitation</title><addtitle>J Occup Rehabil</addtitle><addtitle>J Occup Rehabil</addtitle><description>Purpose An assessment tool was developed to assess disability in veterans who suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) due to a military mission. The objective of this study was to determine the reliability, intra-rater and inter-rater variation of the Mental Disability Military (MDM) assessment tool. Methods Twenty-four assessment interviews of veterans with an insurance physician were videotaped. Each videotaped interview was assessed by a group of five independent raters on limitations of the veterans using the MDM assessment tool. After 2 months the raters repeated this procedure. Next the intra-rater and inter-rater variation was assessed with an adjusted version of AG09 computing weighted percentage agreement. Results The results of this study showed that both the intra-rater variation and inter-rater variation on the ten subcategories of the MDM assessment tool were small, with an agreement of 84–100 % within raters and 93–100 % between raters. Conclusions The MDM assessment tool proves to be a reliable instrument to measure PTSD limitations in functioning in Dutch military veterans who apply for disability compensation. Further research is needed to assess the validity of this instrument.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Armed forces</subject><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>Compensation</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Disability management</subject><subject>Disabled Persons - psychology</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interview, Psychological</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Military</subject><subject>Military aspects</subject><subject>Military Medicine - methods</subject><subject>Military service</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>People with disabilities</subject><subject>Physical instruments</subject><subject>Post traumatic stress disorder</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Veterans</subject><subject>Veterans - psychology</subject><issn>1053-0487</issn><issn>1573-3688</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFu1TAQRSNERUvhA9ggS2zYpB0nTmKze2qhILUCwYOt5TjjV1eJ3dqOUH-Br67T15aCQF7Ymjn3asa3KF5ROKAA3WGkIKq2BMpK0bR1CU-KPdp0dVm3nD_Nb2hykfFut3ge4wUACN5Vz4rdqskU0G6v-LU-R3KGLqmRHNuoejvadE3OlkuFa7KKEWOcMkDW3o_vyIp8xdGqfsTbAjE-kGNMGCbrrNs8NrGO_Fg6ykXy06Zz8sXHVKag5kklq8m3FLL3ovBhwPCi2DFqjPjy7t4vvn94vz76WJ5-Pvl0tDotdcOqVNYGUStueItcQN2yXrR9D8o0MHDGDQMhelEJjb2BKiMCWz4MTHMhBj109X7xdut7GfzVjDHJyUaN46gc-jlK2sHt71CW0Td_oRd-Di5Pt1BM1G3Lmt_URo0orTM-76gXU7nqKBMdFWLxOvgHlc-Ak9XeobG5_oeAbgU6-BgDGnkZ7JRDkRTkkr_c5i9z_nLJX0LWvL4beO4nHB4U94FnoNoCMbfcBsOjjf7regPe2bq2</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Fokkens, Andrea S.</creator><creator>Groothoff, Johan W.</creator><creator>van der Klink, Jac J. L.</creator><creator>Popping, Roel</creator><creator>Stewart, Roy E.</creator><creator>van de Ven, Lex</creator><creator>Brouwer, Sandra</creator><creator>Tuinstra, Jolanda</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>The Mental Disability Military Assessment Tool: A Reliable Tool for Determining Disability in Veterans with Post-traumatic Stress Disorder</title><author>Fokkens, Andrea S. ; Groothoff, Johan W. ; van der Klink, Jac J. L. ; Popping, Roel ; Stewart, Roy E. ; van de Ven, Lex ; Brouwer, Sandra ; Tuinstra, Jolanda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-3feeca8f86e890364b96bb0af50d848f4099b929cebf028909e68dd4c899dcd73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Armed forces</topic><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>Compensation</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Disability management</topic><topic>Disabled Persons - psychology</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interview, Psychological</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Military</topic><topic>Military aspects</topic><topic>Military Medicine - methods</topic><topic>Military service</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>People with disabilities</topic><topic>Physical instruments</topic><topic>Post traumatic stress disorder</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Veterans</topic><topic>Veterans - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fokkens, Andrea S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groothoff, Johan W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Klink, Jac J. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popping, Roel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Roy E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Ven, Lex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brouwer, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuinstra, Jolanda</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of occupational rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fokkens, Andrea S.</au><au>Groothoff, Johan W.</au><au>van der Klink, Jac J. L.</au><au>Popping, Roel</au><au>Stewart, Roy E.</au><au>van de Ven, Lex</au><au>Brouwer, Sandra</au><au>Tuinstra, Jolanda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Mental Disability Military Assessment Tool: A Reliable Tool for Determining Disability in Veterans with Post-traumatic Stress Disorder</atitle><jtitle>Journal of occupational rehabilitation</jtitle><stitle>J Occup Rehabil</stitle><addtitle>J Occup Rehabil</addtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>569</spage><epage>576</epage><pages>569-576</pages><issn>1053-0487</issn><eissn>1573-3688</eissn><abstract>Purpose An assessment tool was developed to assess disability in veterans who suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) due to a military mission. The objective of this study was to determine the reliability, intra-rater and inter-rater variation of the Mental Disability Military (MDM) assessment tool. Methods Twenty-four assessment interviews of veterans with an insurance physician were videotaped. Each videotaped interview was assessed by a group of five independent raters on limitations of the veterans using the MDM assessment tool. After 2 months the raters repeated this procedure. Next the intra-rater and inter-rater variation was assessed with an adjusted version of AG09 computing weighted percentage agreement. Results The results of this study showed that both the intra-rater variation and inter-rater variation on the ten subcategories of the MDM assessment tool were small, with an agreement of 84–100 % within raters and 93–100 % between raters. Conclusions The MDM assessment tool proves to be a reliable instrument to measure PTSD limitations in functioning in Dutch military veterans who apply for disability compensation. Further research is needed to assess the validity of this instrument.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>25573017</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10926-014-9563-0</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-0487
ispartof Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2015-09, Vol.25 (3), p.569-576
issn 1053-0487
1573-3688
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1705730114
source EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text; ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Social Science Premium Collection; Springer Link
subjects Adult
Armed forces
Clinical Psychology
Compensation
Disability
Disability Evaluation
Disability management
Disabled Persons - psychology
Environmental Health
Female
Health Psychology
Humans
Interview, Psychological
Interviews
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Military
Military aspects
Military Medicine - methods
Military service
Netherlands
Observer Variation
Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine
Orthopedics
People with disabilities
Physical instruments
Post traumatic stress disorder
Rehabilitation
Reproducibility of Results
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis
Studies
Trauma
Veterans
Veterans - psychology
title The Mental Disability Military Assessment Tool: A Reliable Tool for Determining Disability in Veterans with Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T04%3A05%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Mental%20Disability%20Military%20Assessment%20Tool:%20A%20Reliable%20Tool%20for%20Determining%20Disability%20in%20Veterans%20with%20Post-traumatic%20Stress%20Disorder&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20occupational%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Fokkens,%20Andrea%20S.&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=569&rft.epage=576&rft.pages=569-576&rft.issn=1053-0487&rft.eissn=1573-3688&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10926-014-9563-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA714971994%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-3feeca8f86e890364b96bb0af50d848f4099b929cebf028909e68dd4c899dcd73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1704936645&rft_id=info:pmid/25573017&rft_galeid=A714971994&rfr_iscdi=true